Active and Passive Reflectance Sensor Comparison in Cotton Kevin F. Bronson Texas A & M Univ. – Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Sensor-Based Approaches for Cotton Nitrogen Management.

Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.

Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.

EVALUATION OF GREENSEEKER FOR NITROGEN FETILIZATION IN COTTON ALABAMA REPORT 1 Evaluation of Green Seeker for Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton – Preliminary.

2003 Sap Flow CWSI Vine Sap Flow Stress Measurement Objectives: Transpiration measurement method – Collect data to measure Crop Water Stress Index using.

SKYE INSTRUMENTS LTD Llandrindod Wells, United Kingdom.

Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.

1 CANOPY REFLECTANCE (HRWW AND HRSW) IN SOUTH DAKOTA ECONOMIC OPTIMUM NITROGEN RATE FOR HRSW IN SOUTH DAKOTA Nitrogen Use Efficiency Meeting Cheryl Reese*,

Impressions of China and More Dr. Chuanguo Xu. Dr. Fang Chen Regional Director IPNI Mr. Maury Keonig Vice-President Ag Services.

Outline Introduction – Importance for SE Mississippi State – Sensor Comparison – Wavelength/Index Analysis University of Arkansas – Active detection of.

Receding water levels in Ogallala aquifer are threatening the sustainability of irrigated agriculture in the High Plains of Eastern New Mexico and West.

Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.

NUE Workshop: Improving NUE using Crop Sensing, Waseca, MN

METHODS (cont.) Field nadir and field off-nadir (approximately 60° from nadir) pictures were taken of the canopy with an inexpensive digital camera (Canon.

Cotton. Leading Countries 1.China 1.China 2.USA 2.USA 3.India 3.India 4.Pakistan 4.Pakistan 5.Uzbekistan 5.Uzbekistan.

New Technology and Strategies for Nitrogen Management.

West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future Precision Agriculture – Lesson 5 What is Precision Agriculture?? Managing.

Cotton Research Oklahoma State University. Exp. 439, Altus OK

Abstract: Dryland river basins frequently support both irrigated agriculture and riparian vegetation and remote sensing methods are needed to monitor.

Field-Scale Sensor Evaluation Ken Sudduth, Newell Kitchen, Scott Drummond USDA-ARS Columbia MO.

GreenSeeker® Handheld Crop Sensor

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.

Presented by: Keri D.Brixey

NDVI: What It Is and What It Measures Danielle Williams.

Remote sensing of canopy reflectance on a field scale has been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosing nitrogen (N) deficiency of corn plants. Differences.

The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.

Center Pivot Training Flow Requirements. The easy way QT = DA (not a true equation if Q is in cfs) Q (flow rate) is in cfs (or acre-in/hr) T (time) is.

Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.

UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION

Active-Crop Sensor Calibration Using the Virtual-Reference Concept K. H. Holland (Holland Scientific) J. S. Schepers (USDA-ARS, retired) 8 th ECPA Conference.

Missouri algorithm: Design & objectives Peter Scharf University of Missouri Peter Scharf Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, Glenn Davis, John Lory, Vicky Hubbard,

Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,

Optical-Sensors. Wavelength nm Visible Light Near Infrared % Reflectance.

NITROGEN FERTIGATION OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATED BERMUDAGRASS M.A. Maurer* 1, J.A. Moken 2 and J.L. Young 1 1 Department of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin.

Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.

Spectral Reflectance-based Nitrogen Management for Subsurface Drip Irrigated Cotton Raj Yabaji, Kevin Bronson, Cary Green, Eduardo Segarra, and Adi Malapati.

State of Engineering in Precision Agriculture, Boundaries and Limits for Agronomy.

Moving Beyond NDVI for Active Sensing in Cotton

N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.

Estimating Cotton Defoliation with Remote Sensing Glen Ritchie 1 and Craig Bednarz 2 1 UGA Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, GA 2 Texas Tech, Lubbock,

Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies for Corn Production John Sawyer John Lundvall Jennifer Hawkins Department of Agronomy Iowa State.

On-farm Evaluation of Optical Sensor Technology for Variable Rate N Application to Corn in Ontario and Quebec Bao-Luo Ma, and Nicolas Tremblay Eastern.

West Texas Mesonet – Texas Tech University TTU Wind Science & Engineering Atmospheric Science Group

Weekly NDVI Relationships to Height, Nodes and Productivity Index for Low, Medium, and High Cotton Productivity Zones T. Sharp, G. Evans and A. Salvador.

Irrigation Water Requirements for Planning Irrigation Water Management Training.

Efficacy of EMD Crop Bioscience products on cotton stand and yield M. S. Reddy, R. Bowman and R. Osburn Dept. of Entomology & Plant Pathology, Auburn University,

Source: Becton Trial - Lubbock, Texas Stoller SUGAR MOVER TM Lint Yield (lb/ac) From 16 acre plots Treatement Field A2005 Field B Control

Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Regional Project Objectives  To evaluate the performance of sensor-based N recommendation algorithms across a wide range of soil and climate conditions.

Texas Alliance for Water Conservation

Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA

NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.

EVALUATION OF PLANT GROWTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS ON LOW DESERT COTTON

Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator

Brenda V. Ortiz1, Mariana Del Corso1, Gregory Pate2

Cotton Sensor Research Update

OWC/OWRF Use of Sensors and Spectral Reflectance Water Indices to Select for Grain Yield in Wheat Dr. Arthur Klatt Dr. Ali Babar Dr. B. Prasad Mr. Mario.

Crop-based Approach for In-season N Application

Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting

Fig 1: Nitrogen fertilizer application at V7.

2017 NUE Conference Baton Rouge, LA – August 7 - 9, 2017

E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,

Sensor Readings in Corn as Affected by Time of Day

Development of Cotton N Fertilization Algorithms, Southern USA

Addressing Soil Variability using air seeders

REGIONAL NUE WINTER WHEAT TRIAL

Gyles Randall and Jeff Vetsch University of Minnesota

What is Early Maturity and Determinacy?

Fertilizer Calculations

Presentation transcript:

Active and Passive Reflectance Sensor Comparison in Cotton Kevin F. Bronson Texas A & M Univ. – Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX

Introduction Previous work has shown that using spectral reflectance with well-fertilized plots/sufficiency index approach can improve agronomic N use efficiency in LEPA and subsurface drip irrigated cotton We hypothesized that reflectance based management can be used on long plots/stations with near daily N injection We built a 16-station SDI system that we can inject N daily as farmers do (not 30 lb N/ac doses)

Study objectives To assess lint yields and N fertilizer use efficiency of UAN (32-0-0) and S injected between 1 st square and mid bloom and 1 st square and peak bloom To test the GreenSeeker and Cropscan spectroradiometers as in-season N status monitoring tools

Treat NSource Termination Other Mid bloom a 90lb N/ac Peak bloom a 90lb N/ac Mid bloom a 90lb N/ac a 90lb N/ac Peak bloom 45 lb N/ac & reflect 6 Zero-N 1 rep/stn only a Treatments 1-4 based on 150 lb N/ac– lb NO 3 -N/ac in 0-24 in. soil - NO 3 -Nin 12 inches of irrigation water) Peak bloom Treatments

Plot/station layout (plots are 8, 40-in. rows X 600 ft)

Reflectance methods Measured zero-N, reflectance-based (includes 30 ft over-fertilized plots), and to mid bloom weekly between 23 June and 9 August Cropscan MSR 16 is a passive spectroradiometer. Has 16 upwards and downwards facing radiation tranducers/filters. Height of measurement was 48 inches (24–in. fov). Four spot measures (100 per) per GPS point (4 per 600 foot plot). GreenSeeker (Green) is an active spectroradiometer and calculated GNDVI and 1/GVI. Wavebands are 530 and 780 nm). Took 6 m of measurements (~100) per GPS point at in above canopy.

Green vegetative index (r780/r530) from Cropscan MSR16, 48 inches above canopy, Lubbock, TX, 2005

Green vegetative index (r780/r530) from GreenSeeker, 36 inches above canopy, Lubbock, TX, 2005

Correlations of GVI from cropscan, GreenSeeker and SPAD meter readings at early bloom, and peak bloom, Lubbock, 2005

Summary/What next Reflectance-based had 65 lb N/ac injected, we hope for same lint yield as soil-test based of 90 lb N/ac. N Source or timing did not affect GVI. Will repeat study next year. May abandon small well-fertilized plots. Keep the same height above the ground for the GreenSeeker for all plots? Or maintain the same height above the canopy for GreenSeeker?