1 Lima, Peru, June 2010 Kenneth S. Casey, Tess Brandon NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center Nick Rayner Met Office Hadley Centre June 2010 GHRSST Reanalysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Oslo, Norway - Nov 2007 GHRSST/Medspiration and the SST Temperature Climate Data Record Kenneth S. Casey NOAA National Oceanographic.
Advertisements

Improvements to the NOAA Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Product Suite Eileen Maturi, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Andy Harris, Jonathan Mittaz, Prabhat Koner.
Pathfinder –> MODIS -> VIIRS Evolution of a CDR Robert Evans, Peter Minnett, Guillermo Podesta Kay Kilpatrick (retired), Sue Walsh, Vicki Halliwell, Liz.
GHRSST XI Science Team Meeting, ST-VAL, June 2010, Lima, Peru Recent developments to the SST Quality Monitor (SQUAM) and SST validation with In situ.
1 Building the SST Climate Data Record Kenneth S. Casey NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center Seattle, November 2010.
1 Overview LTSRF Status GHRSST Reanalysis Example L4 Analyses Future Activities GlobColour Connection Villefranche sur mer,
Medspiration user meeting, dec 4-6 Use of Medspiration and GHRSST data in the Northern Seas Jacob L. Høyer & Søren Andersen Center for Ocean and Ice, Danish.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder SST field, Versions 5 & 6 Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’ RSMAS Nov 8, 2010 with.
1 High Resolution Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analysis Errors Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University)
GOES-13 Science Team Report SST Images and Analyses Eileen Maturi, STAR/SOCD, Camp Springs, MD Andy Harris, CICS, University of Maryland, MD Chris Merchant,
1 A High Resolution Daily SST Analysis Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, CICS) Dudley B. Chelton (Oregon State University) Thomas M. Smith (NOAA, STAR)
NOAA Climate Obs 4th Annual Review Silver Spring, MD May 10-12, NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center 1.SSTs for Daily SST OI NOAA’s National.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 NOAA Operational Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Products from NOAA.
1 Improved Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analyses for Climate NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Thomas M. Smith Richard W. Reynolds Kenneth.
1 NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center April 2005 Climate Observation Program Blended SST Analysis Changes and Implications for the Buoy Network 1.Plans.
1 Sea Surface Temperature Analyses NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds.
1 Overview LTSRF Status GHRSST Reanalysis Example L4 Analyses Future Activities Beijing, October 2006 The GODAE High Resolution.
Arctic SST retrieval in the CCI project Owen Embury Chris Merchant University of Reading.
1 Comparisons of Daily SST Analyses for NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, NCDC) Dudley B. Chelton.
MISST FY1 team meeting April 5-6, Miami, FL NOAA: Gary Wick, Eric Bayler, Ken Casey, Andy Harris, Tim Mavor Navy: Bruce Mckenzie, Charlie Barron NASA:
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 POES-GOES Blended SST Analysis.
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Robert H. Evans & Peter J. Minnett Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
Reanalysis: When observations meet models
AN ENHANCED SST COMPOSITE FOR WEATHER FORECASTING AND REGIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES Gary Jedlovec 1, Jorge Vazquez 2, and Ed Armstrong 2 1NASA/MSFC Earth Science.
Page 1© Crown copyright HadISST2: progress and plans Nick Rayner, 14 th March 2007.
DMI-OI analysis in the Arctic DMI-OI processing scheme or Arctic Arctic bias correction method Arctic L4 Reanalysis Biases (AATSR – Pathfinder) Validation.
GCOS SST WG plans Nick Rayner OOPC-12, 2 nd May 2007.
1 Agenda Review Issues Melbourne, May 2007 Kenneth S. Casey NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center May 2007 Gary Wick, Rapporteur GHRSST-8 Session-8 Reanalysis.
Application of in situ Observations to Current Satellite-Derived Sea Surface Temperature Products Gary A. Wick NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory With.
1 Motivation Motivation SST analysis products at NCDC SST analysis products at NCDC  Extended Reconstruction SST (ERSST) v.3b  Daily Optimum Interpolation.
GHRSST XIV STM – AUS TAG. Woods Hole 18 June 2013, Cape Cod, MA 1 GHRSST 2013 Annual Meeting – AUS TAG breakout session 18 June, 2013, Woods Hole, MA SQUAM.
The HR-DDS for NCOF David J. S. Poulter, National Oceanography Centre, UK Ian S. Robinson, National Oceanography Centre, UK Craig Donlon, ESA/ESTEC, The.
AQUA AMSR-E MODIS POES AVHRR TRMM TMI ENVISAT AATSR GOES Imager Multi-sensor Improved SST (MISST) for GODAE Part I: Chelle Gentemann, Gary Wick Part II:
Ocean Dynamics Algorithm GOES-R AWG Eileen Maturi, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/SOCD, Igor Appel, STAR/IMSG, Andy Harris, CICS, Univ of Maryland AMS 92 nd Annual Meeting,
1 Daily OI Analysis for Sea Surface Temperature NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Richard W. Reynolds (NOAA, NCDC) Thomas M. Smith (NOAA,
Retrieval Algorithms The derivations for each satellite consist of two steps: 1) cloud detection using a Bayesian Probabilistic Cloud Mask; and 2) application.
Transfer of AVHRR SST Pathfinder to NODC to sustain long term production, distribution and archiving Sept 8, 2010 CICS PI Robert Evans, RSMAS/U Miami ,
1 Overview LTSRF Status GHRSST Reanalysis Example L4 Analyses Future Activities D.C., Nov 2006 Long Term Stewardship and Reanalysis.
Yi Chao Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
The GODAE High Resolution SST Project as an NDE Customer Presented By Ken Casey (NESDIS/NODC)
BLUElink> Regional High-Resolution SST Analysis System – Verification and Inter-Comparison Helen Beggs Ocean & Marine Forecasting Group, BMRC, Bureau of.
1 Edinburgh, Scotland Kenneth S. Casey Chair, GHRSST RAN-TAG NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center 27 June – 01 July, 2011 GHRSST Reanalysis Technical.
CLIMAR-III, Gdynia, Poland, May 2008 Advances in the AVHRR Pathfinder Sea Surface Temperature Climate Data Record and its Connections with GHRSST Reanalysis.
GHRSST Users Symposium 2009 Working with the GHRSST Data Format Experiences of the GCOS SST/SI Intercomparison Working Group Tess Brandon, NOAA National.
GHRSST HL_TAG meeting Copenhagen, March 2010 Validation of L2P products in the Arctic Motivation: Consistent inter-satellite validation of L2p SST observations.
AQUA AMSR-E MODIS POES AVHRR TRMM TMI ENVISAT AATSR GOES Imager Multi-sensor Improved SST (MISST) for GODAE Part I: Chelle Gentemann, Gary Wick Part II:
Report from the Australian Regional Data Assembly Centre Helen Beggs 1, Leon Majewski 2 and Justin Freeman 1 1 Centre for Australian Weather and Climate.
Status of SSES at the Bureau of Meteorology Leon Majewski, Justin Freeman, Helen Beggs Bureau of Meteorology Melbourne, Australia.
A comparison of AMSR-E and AATSR SST time-series A preliminary investigation into the effects of using cloud-cleared SST data as opposed to all-sky SST.
Use of high resolution global SST data in operational analysis and assimilation systems at the UK Met Office. Matt Martin, John Stark,
9th June 2008 GHRSST-9, Perros-Guirec SST framework at European level Medspiration, Marine Core Services & SAF O&SI Status and products Jean-François Piollé.
How to Access Data from the Group for High Resolution Sea Surface Temperature (GHRSST) at the Global Data Assembly Center (GDAC) and the Long Term Stewardship.
International GHRSST User Symposium Santa Rosa, California, USA 28-29th May 2009 MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures Peter J Minnett & Robert H. Evans With.
2 Jun 09 UNCLASSIFIED 10th GHRSST Science Team Meeting Santa Rosa, CA 1 – 5 June Presented by Bruce McKenzie Charlie N. Barron, A.B. Kara, C. Rowley.
Characterizing and comparison of uncertainty in the AVHRR Pathfinder Versions 5 & 6 SST field to various reference fields Robert Evans Guilllermo Podesta’
© Crown copyright Met Office Report of the GHRSST Inter-Comparison TAG (IC-TAG) Matt Martin GHRSST XI meeting, Lima, Peru, June 2010.
Uncertainty estimation from first principles: The future of SSES? Gary Corlett (University of Leicester) Chris Merchant (University of Edinburgh)
Edward Armstrong Jorge Vazquez Mike Chin Mike Davis James Pogue JPL PO.DAAC California Institute of Technology 28 May 2009 GHRSST Symposium, Santa Rosa,
1 Santa Rosa, CA, June 2009 Kenneth S. Casey, Tess Brandon NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center Nick Rayner Met Office Hadley Centre June 2010 GHRSST.
New Australian High Resolution AVHRR SST Products from the Integrated Marine Observing System Presented at the GHRSST Users Symposium, Santa Rosa, USA,
ST-VAL Breakout Summary Gary Corlett. ST-VAL Breakout 16:20 Introduction and objectives for session (G Corlett) 16:30 The Data Buoy Co-operation Panel.
Validation in Arctic conditions Steinar Eastwood (met.no) David Poulter (NOCS) GHRSST9, Perros-Guirec OSI SAF METOP SST, days mean.
ATSR Re-analysis for Climate (ARC) Chris Merchant The University of Edinburgh.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Systematic biases in satellite SST observations.
1 Perros-Guirec, June 2008 Kenneth S. Casey NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center June th Meeting Report for the Reanalysis Technical Advisory.
NOAA Report on Ocean Parameters - SST Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 9 Author: Sasha Ignatov.
MODIS SST Processing and Support for GHRSST at OBPG
Validation of Satellite-derived Lake Surface Temperatures
The SST CCI: Scientific Approaches
Presentation transcript:

1 Lima, Peru, June 2010 Kenneth S. Casey, Tess Brandon NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center Nick Rayner Met Office Hadley Centre June 2010 GHRSST Reanalysis Technical Advisory Group (RAN-TAG) 2010 Summary of Current Activities Kenneth S. Casey, Tess Brandon NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center Nick Rayner Met Office Hadley Centre June 2010

2 RAN Technical Advisory Group Ken Casey Ed Armstrong Jorge Vazquez Craig Donlon Hiroshi Kawamura Gilles Larnicol David Llewellyn-Jones Nick Rayner Gary Wick Dick Reynolds Bill Emery Helen Beggs Gary Corlett Tess Brandon Current RAN-TAG Membership

3 Historical and In situ Activities

4 LDEO [Kaplan et al., 1998, 2003] SST Project Goals To provide a statistically homogenous analysis of the full historical data set of in situ observations, accompanied by verified uncertainty estimates, using realistic covariances of the “true” field and data error, with the minimum of other assumptions. To support studies of climate variability and paleoreconstruction verification; serve as a benchmark for other century-scale analyses. Current Status The original 5 o x5 o analysis version of for in situ data only (1856--) extended to present using monthly NCEP OI v.2 is updated operationally by IRI Data Library; part of GCOS intercomparisons. Recent methodological developments: joint estimation of reduced space patterns and amplitude timeseries (w/ A.Ilin, HUT); ensemble representation of uncertainty (w/ A.Karspeck & S.Sain, NCAR). Looking Forward Using SST variability estimates from satellite data to model in situ data error and use it in a reduced space analysis of historical data; adding middle scales of SST variability to the global large scale solution at 1 o x1 o resolution; representing the uncertainty of by an ensemble of realizations; making this ensemble available on the web (collab w/A.Karspeck, NCAR). Alexey Kaplan, LDEO

5 Viva Banzon & Richard W. Reynolds - NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/Remote Sensing and Application Division ERSST Version 3b Project Goals 1.Provide historic SST monthly analyses from 1854 to present on a 2 o spatial grid 2.Merge SST and land surface temperatures to produce global surface temperatures 3.Improve documentation Current Status 1.Improved tuning procedures result in stronger anomalies prior to Version 3b available with in situ data only AVHRR data not used because Residual Pathfinder v5 AVHRR biases impact climate signal Looking Forward 1.Reprocess analyses with update COADS data 2.Improve satellite bias correction 3.Reprocessing using new releases: ICOADS 2.5 and Pathfinder v6 SST Annual Anomaly ( o C) Viva Banzon, NOAA NCDC

6 HadSST3 in situ SST product Project Goals 1.Bias corrected global in situ SST data set 1850-present 2.Quantify uncertainties comprehensively 3.Compare uncertainties arising from measurement error, bias correction and reconstruction methods. Global average HadSST3 anomaly Current Status 1.Bias corrected data set with uncertainties based on ICOADS2.0 completed to ICOADS2.5 data quality controlled and ready for bias correction 3.No callsign information after Looking Forward 1.Independent test of bias corrections possibly using subsurface data 2.Comparison with corrected marine air temperatures 3.Input to HadISST2 4.Regularly update product and feed into global temperature data set HadCRUT4. Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session

7 Level 1 Activities

8 Project Goals 1.To collect as much AVHRR HRPT data from receiving stations all over the world 2.To reformat and stitch together the collected Level 0 data, generate L1b data from that stitched data, and then produce L2 and L3 SSTs. 3.To serve as a fundamental input to high-resolution GHRSST CDRs Current Status 1.Kick-off meeting held at GHRSST-10 2.Agreement on roles of original data providers, a central HRPT Data Assembly Center, and a long term archive 3.Identified numerous committed partners and potential partners 4.Ad hoc group created draft plan Looking Forward 1.Begin collection of Level 0 data at URI 2.Continue evaluation of SeaDAS- based Pathfinder software for LAC/HRPT use 3.Seek commitments from other potential partners – LOTS OF INTEREST AVHRR HRPT/LAC Reprocessing

9 Level 2 and Level 3 Activities

10 AVHRR Pathfinder SST Project Goals 1.To provide the longest, most accurate, and highest resolution consistently- reprocessed SST climate data record (CDR) from the AVHRR sensor series 2.To serve as a fundamental input to GHRSST Reanalysis CDRs Current Status 1.Version 5 Available: Daily, 5-, 7-, 8- day, Monthly, Yearly SSTs for , and climatologies 2.Included in GCOS Intercomparisons 3.Available via FTP, HTTP, OPeNDAP, WCS, WMS, LAS and JPL POET 4.Basis for 25km Daily OI plus others… 5.Basic V6 code in place, establishing overall workflow at NODC now Looking Forward 1.SeaDAS-based processing at NODC expected within a year 2.Version 6 to be in GHRSST L2P, L3U, and L3C formats, with uncertainties 3.Higher-resolution reference field (25 km Daily OISST) improves coverage in coasts and near strong gradients 4.HRPT/LAC “Pathfinder” coordination Pathfinder SSTs available at Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session SST Anomaly (ºC) December , 1982

11 Correcting V5 Pathfinder Biases Project Goals To reduce bias in v5 AVHRR pathfinder SST Current Status Period from 1985 to 2008 processed AVHRR bias calculated from (A)ATSR-AVHRR differences and TOMS aerosol data Pre 1991 (ATSR-1): AVHRR node times matched with later (A)ATSR-AVHRR data to use later (A)ATSR-AVHRR data to calc bias Outside (A)ATSR swath: monthly (A)ATSR- AVHRR average data used to calc bias Looking Forward 1.Explain biases with AATSR post Modifications to bias calculations 3.Use alternative aerosol data since TOMS data not available whole period 4.Develop an error model 5.Reprocess whole dataset for consistency 6.Use in HadISST2 Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session HadSST3 = in-situ data Roger Saunders and Sarah Millington, UKMO

12 MODIS SST Improvements Project Goals 1.Add LATBAND SST retrievals to MODIS Aqua and Terra 2.Implement new MODIS Collection 6 calibration 3.Minimize seasonal, latitudinal differences with respect to reference observations Current Status 1.Update to MODIS Collection 6 calibration 2.Developed new matchup databases 3.New SST retrieval equation calculated 4.New Hypercube tables being computed (discrete values) Looking Forward 1.Proposal submitted to NSA to support implementation of Hypercube with continuous functions 2.LATBAND and Hypercube being implemented in Pathfinder for all 5- channel AVHRRs Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session Bob Evans, UMami/RSMAS

13 (A)ATSR SST Version 2.0 Project Goals 1.To provide the first consistently processed (A)ATSR data set 2.To compare time-series of global and regional (A)ATSR SST with those of other SST datasets. 3.Production of (A)ATSR only climatology Current Status 1.(A)ATSR data set (V2.0) complete. 2.Discussions underway to get into the LTSRF Looking Forward 1.See next slide…

14 ATSR Re-processing for Climate Project Goals Re-processing of ATSR series observations to derive: 1.Independent record of  15 years of SSTs 2.Radiometric (skin) and depth SSTs 3.Biases <0.1 K, regionally 4.Target stability  0.05 K decade -1, regionally 5.Comprehensive error characterization Current Status Time series will cover 1991 to New formalism for retrieval coefficients developed. ATSR-2 and AATSR work complete. Bias target substantially achieved (see graphic: bias map of D3 SST against drifting buoys for AATSR). Looking Forward ATSR-1 in progress, due end of summer Homogenization using overlaps. Quality and stability assessment by Rayner and Kent during autumn L4 production. Set up data distribution by end Project will end circa. January Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session Chris Merchant, Univ. of Edinburgh

15 IMOS HRPT AVHRR SST Reprocessing Project Goals 1.To reprocess HRPT AVHRR data back to 1996 from Australian and Antarctic ground stations to L2P and single day/single night L3C SSTskin 2.Aim to reduce errors by using: Regional drifting buoys to produce regression coefficients Improved BT to SST algorithms with day-time terms including latitude and higher order Improved CLAVR-based cloud clearing Nighttime NOAA-18 L3C Current Status 1.Producing RT and reprocessed HRPT AVHRR SSTskin L2P and single day/night L3C files from NOAA-17, 18 and 19 stitched raw data from Australian RX stations back to June For 1 Jun 2008 to 23 May 2010, IMOS HRPT AVHRR L2P SSTfnd cf drifting buoy SSTfnd exhibited standard deviations of: NOAA-17: 0.23  C (Night), 0.37  C (Day) NOAA-18: 0.25  C (Night), 0.36  C (Day) NOAA-19: 0.27  C (Night), 0.34  C (Day) Looking Forward 1.L2P and L3C files back to 1996 available from GHRSST GDAC by June Include Casey and Davis raw AVHRR data 3.Test using Chris Merchant’s Bayesian cloud clearing 4.Test NOAA’s MTSAT-1R physical retrieval method to produce skin SST from AVHRR 5.Implement Jon Mittaz’ AVHRR raw data to BT calibration method using semi-analytic retrieval models Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session Helen Beggs, ABOM

16 NEED SLIDE ON GOES Project Goals 1.? Current Status 1.? Looking Forward 1.? Pathfinder SSTs available at Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session Andy Harris and Eileen Maturi, NOAA

17 NEED SLIDE ON MT-SAT Project Goals 1.? Current Status 1.? Looking Forward 1.? Pathfinder SSTs available at Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session Andy Harris and Eileen Maturi, NOAA, others?

18 SEVIRI Project Goals 1.To reprocess SEVIRI data back to beginning of MSG, in 2002 Current Status 1.Will use new processing chain and algorithms making use of ECMWF outputs) 2.Reprocessing is scheduled for 2013/ SST files will be produced a hourly GDS v2.0 L3C, collating data from 15 minutes slots in 1 file Looking Forward 1.Data will be ready for delivery after 2014 Pathfinder SSTs available at Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session Pierre LeBorgne

19 IASI L2P SST Project Goals 1.Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) is a key payload element of the METOP series 2.IASI L2P SST 3.Core L2P produced from March 2010 experimentally. Current Status 1.No current re-processing plans Looking Forward 1.If the full IASI L2P products are produced in the OSI-SAF CDOP-2 phase, then these plans could include re-processing activities (CDOP-2 is post March 2012). 2.IASI L2 EUMETSAT products (which include surface temperature) are available from April Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session

20 Level 4 Activities

21 MGDSST reanalysis Project Goals 1.Provide consistent time series of global daily SST analysis during the satellite era 2.Used for ocean reanalysis with a regional ocean data assimilation system (MOVE/MRI.COM-WNP) real-time analysis vs. reanalysis Current Status 1.Use a system same as operational MGDSST 2.SSTs for was calculated using Pathfinder V5. Working on going back to In 2005, began operational recalculation (delayed about 5 months) using AQUA/AMSR-E and NOAA/AVHRR(GAC). Looking Forward 1.recalculate using Pathfinder V6 for compare with another of JMA`s SST analyses (COBE-SST), which has long term record (> 100yrs) and uses only in-situ observation. 3.Interested in providing to GDAC/LTSRF Shiro Ishizaki, JMA

22 Project Goals 1.Provide consistent long L4 SST daily timeseries for regional climate modelling, and climatologies to be used as background (first guess) field for operational real-time L4 processing. (MERSEA-IP, PRIMI, MyOCEAN) 2.Assess the system variability and trends via statistical analyses (SESAME-IP) 3.Build robust climatologies for comparison and validation of in-situ climatologies (SeaDataNet) =407 Current Status 1.Version 1 Available: Daily , and climatologies 2.Available via FTP, HTTP 3.Climatologies are used as first guess for the L4 operational production within MyOCEAN SST-Tematic Assembly Center Looking Forward 1.Working on ultra high resolution product now 2.Available late 2010 Mediterranean and Black Sea re-analyses Bruno Buongiorno Nardelli, GOS/CNR

23 OSI SAF Sea Ice Concentration ( )‏ Steinar Eastwood, met.no OSI SAF sea ice concentration reprocessing completed Jan 2010 Contains sea ice concentration from to using SMMR and SSM/I data on swath format Provided on polar stereographic 10km and lambert azimutal 12.5km grids, on NetCDF3 format Uses dynamical tiepoints (30days window) and includes error estimates for each data point Available at: –

24 OSTIA Reanalysis Project Goals 1.To produce a 20-year SST and sea- ice concentration reanalysis using the OSTIA system with input data from Pathfinder AVHRR v5, re-processed (A)ATSR, ICOADS in situ data and re- processed SMMR and SSMI sea-ice concentration from the EUMETSAT OSI-SAF. Current Status 1.A preliminary version of the reanalysis from has been completed. 2.Assessments of the impact of ATSR- series data (particularly ATSR-1) is being undertaken. 3.More general assessments of the accuracy and stability of the reanalysis are underway. Looking Forward 1.Decision on how to deal with the ATSR-1 data to be made. 2.Further detailed assessments of the first version. 3.Re-run the reanalysis before the end of Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session Monthly mean anomaly, Feb 1992 Matt Martin, UKMO

25 Richard W. Reynolds & Viva Banzon - NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/Remote Sensing and Application Division Daily OI Version 2 Project Goals 1.Produce Daily OI on 1/4 o spatial grid Include satellite bias correction with respect to in situ data 2.Compute analysis for entire period with satellite data 3.Make product useful for climate applications Current Status 1.Uses AVHRR + In Situ Data September present 2.Uses AMSR + AVHRR + In Situ Data June present 3.Interim (1 day of data) and final (3 days of data) versions 4.Ship SSTs corrected using buoy SSTs Looking Forward 1.Add higher resolution daily OI with ~ 1-10 km spatial resolution Use 1/4 o daily AMSR+AVHRR OI at current day and strongly damped high resolution analysis at previous day as first guess Use IR (AVHRR/MODIS) data only June present AVHRR-only AMSR+AVHRR Anomaly SST Impact from Hurricane Katrina

26 Richard W. Reynolds & Viva Banzon - NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/Remote Sensing and Application Division Daily High Resolution “Two-Stage” OI Project Goals 1.Two-Stage Analysis allows processing to take advantage of both microwave (MW) and infrared (IR) satellite data MW has better coverage than IR IR has higher resolution than MW 2.High resolution features are only present when high resolution IR data are available Current Status 1.Low resolution analysis (stage 1) uses AMSR, AVHRR (Pathfinder v5) and in situ data 25 km grid; daily analysis 2.High resolution (stage 2) uses AVHRR (Pathfinder v5) only 4.4 km grid; daily analysis June 2002 – December 2006 Looking Forward 1.Replace AVHRR Pathfinder v5 with v6 2.Make high resolution (stage 2) analysis operational 3.Create web site 4.Make analysis available to users

27 Global 1-km SST (G1SST) Goal: To produce a multi-year G1SST reanalysis data product Current Status: G1SST is a real-time, merged SST product (L4) using 16 satellite sensors and in situ measurements. Daily G1SST maps are produced in near real-time. The JPL G1SST web site provides basic visualizations and serves the data via OpenDAP. The G1SST data are also delivered to GHRSST for broader distributions. Future: The G1SST will be improved by applying corrections of bias and diurnal cycle and by implementing a multi-scale merging technique. We would like to produce a G1SST reanalysis before May 2009 using GHRSST L2 products.

28 DMI L4 Reanalysis, with Greenland Research Climate Centre Project Goals 1.A L4 SST reanalysis in 4 km to present, based upon Pathfinder and ARC data 3.Cover Arctic and focus upon Greenland waters around Nuuk. 4.Use the OSI SAF reanalysis ice mask. Area Current Status 1.Reanalysis planned to be carried out jan-march Released April Looking Forward 1.Trends and anomalies will be derived from the dataset during 2011 and compared to in situ time series in Greenland. Project Summary: GHRSST-11 Reanalysis Breakout Session

29 Multi-sensor Ultra-high Resolution (MUR) T. Mike Chin, Jorge Vazquez, Ed Armstrong (JPL); Arthur Mariano (U.Miami) MUR Relevance to NASA Goals Looking Forward Impacts on weather forecast studied through “Research To Operations” project Will incorporate feature detection for motion compensation. Plans to incorporate reprocessed AVHRR data (from P. Cornillon and R. Evans). A program set has been built for SST product validation using in situ data from fixed and moored buoys.. Project Goals NASA MEaSUREs Project for merged satellite SST product. Uses the MRVA approach to merge on the 1-2 km spatial scale. Initially focused on the post-2000 data. Contributes to improved understanding of ocean physics which will aid in improving climate models. Increases our understanding of the role of oceans and atmosphere in the climate system and improves our predictive capability Single vs multi- resolution analysis from the same data using the same finest-level analysis scale. Date: Jan 30, 2008 Current Status Two complete years of the MUR “Version 0” analysis available for in GHRSST L4 format. NCAMERICA regional domain (USA-centric parts of the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans), more regions planned. Product validated using validation program set for both drifting and fixed buoys. Preliminary results show biases close to zero with no seasonal dependence and RMS values less than 0.4 C°.

30 OTHER L4 WE SHOULD TRACK? Perros-Guirec, June 2008

31 GHRSST L4 In Situ Matchup Validation Project Goals 1.To provide in situ validation system for JPL PO.DAAC L4 product development efforts. Built on IDL. 2.Uses in situ data from drifting/moored buoys and ships etc. 3. Access methods to in situ and satellite data include HTTP/FTP clients wget and curl, and IDL OPeNDAP client Current Status 1.Being developed for in-house use only at present 2.Adapted to use AATSR L2P as validation sources Looking Forward 1.Could possibly be made public, perhaps using a web services approach Project Summary: GHRSST-X Reanalysis Breakout Session Ed Armstrong, JPL PO.DAAC

32 Data Tools/Intercomparison Activities

33 GCOS SST Intercomparison Framework Looking Forward 1.Pick up pilot study where it was left off 2.Update graphics for all products and standard diagnostics 3.Update products with new versions (e.g. ERSSTv3b) and new data (e.g. PFV ) 4.Summarize differences as a set of strengths and weaknesses for each product to provide guidance to users of SST analysis products Current Status 1.Eleven unique products in the framework, including historical and satellite-era products, as well as standard diagnostics and browse graphics for each 2.New linear trend maps as a standard diagnostic for all historical products 3.Pilot study to determine the origins of observed differences using a common set of input data – on hold Project Goals 1.To understand differences between global and near-global SST analyses with the aim of producing better, long-term SST climate data records 2.To use this understanding to link the modern satellite-based records with the historical, primarily in situ-based records Tess Brandon, NOAA NODC

GHRSST Data Availability Getting closer for both GAC and HRPT Still no progress

GHRSST Data Availability Complete, but not at LTSRF yet Getting closer for both GAC and HRPT Proposed to NASA ROSES (Vazquez) Plans now in place for reprocessing during