1 CBE 491 / 433 16 Oct 12 Deadtime in a Process. 2 Dead Time in a Process Show how dead time might show up How it affects block diagrams How it affects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Behavior of Ideal Systems
Advertisements

CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Controller Design Based on Transient Response Criteria
Model-based PID tuning methods Two degree of freedom controllers
Chapter 9 PID Tuning Methods.
13. Controller Tuning and Troubleshooting
10.1 Introduction Chapter 10 PID Controls
Optimization-based PI/PID control for SOPDT process
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
PID Controllers and PID tuning
Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013
1 ChE / MET Apr 12. Feedback Controller Tuning: (General Approaches) 1)Simple criteria; i.e QAD via ZN I, t r, etc easy, simple, do on existing.
Discrete Controller Design
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
Controller Design, Tuning. Must be stable. Provide good disturbance rejection---minimizing the effects of disturbance. Have good set-point tracking---Rapid,
Ratio Control Chapter 15.
Briefing on Process Control and Dynamics Laboratory 20 January 2010.
Process Control: Designing Process and Control Systems for Dynamic Performance Chapter 19. Single-Loop IMC Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013 The copyright.
Chapter 12. Direct Synthesis ( G includes G m, G v ) 1. Specify closed-loop response (transfer function) 2. Need process model, (= G P G M G V ) 3. Solve.
ChE / MET Mar Mar 07 2 Apr Mar 09.
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
280 SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION The System Identification Problem is to estimate a model of a system based on input-output data. Basic Configuration continuous.
Controllers With Two Degrees of Freedom
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
Process Control Instrumentation II
Lecture 9: Compensator Design in Frequency Domain.
What does Kc do?. What is Kc? Kc is the Controller Gain of a control system. It can be adjusted to obtain a variety of system responses.
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS CONTROL LOOP ANALYSIS.
Lecture 7: PID Tuning.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم PID Controllers
Chapter 8 Performance of P-only, PI and PID Controllers.
Introduction to Industrial Control Systems
Cascade, Ratio, and Feedforward Control
Proportional/Integral/Derivative Control
Automatic Control Theory-
Book Adaptive control -astrom and witten mark
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR AND STABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS
Controller Design (to determine controller settings for P, PI or PID controllers) Based on Transient Response Criteria Chapter 12.
Basic Concepts  Block diagram representation of control systems  Transfer functions  Analysis of block diagrams  P, PI and PID controllers ( Continuous.
Control Systems Design Part: Optimisation Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava 2007.
Model Reference Adaptive Control (MRAC). MRAS The Model-Reference Adaptive system (MRAS) was originally proposed to solve a problem in which the performance.
PID Controller Design and
Lecture 5: Basic Dynamical Systems CS 344R: Robotics Benjamin Kuipers.
Chapter 7 Adjusting Controller Parameters Professor Shi-Shang Jang Chemical Engineering Department National Tsing-Hua University Hsin Chu, Taiwan.
SELF TUNING OF CONTROLLERS What is a Controller Controller is an active element or device that receives the information from the measurements and takes.
Process Control: Designing Process and Control Systems for Dynamic Performance Chapter 10. Stability and Tuning Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013 The copyright.
ERT 210/4 Process Control Hairul Nazirah bt Abdul Halim Office: CHAPTER 8 Feedback.
Subsea Control and Communications Systems
Automatic Control System V. Performance of steady-state.
1 ChE / MET Apr 12 Cascade Control: Ch 09 Ratio Control: Ch 10 Advanced control schemes.
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
Dead Time Compensation (Smith Predictor)
ABE425 Engineering Measurement Systems ABE425 Engineering Measurement Systems PID Control Dr. Tony E. Grift Dept. of Agricultural & Biological Engineering.
Process Control. Feedback control y sp = set point (target value) y = measured value The process information (y) is fed back to the controller The objective.
EEN-E1040 Measurement and Control of Energy Systems Control I: Control, processes, PID controllers and PID tuning Nov 3rd 2016 If not marked otherwise,
ERT 321 – Process Control & Dynamics Feedforward & Ratio Control
Salman Bin Abdulaziz University
Transfer Functions Chapter 4
Tuning of PID controllers
Basic Design of PID Controller
Tuning of PID controllers
Dynamic Behavior of Ideal Systems
Process Control Engineering
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم PID Controllers
Nyquist Stability Criterion
Dynamical Systems Basics
PID Controller Design and
Controller Tuning Relations
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI SALERNO
Presentation transcript:

1 CBE 491 / Oct 12 Deadtime in a Process

2 Dead Time in a Process Show how dead time might show up How it affects block diagrams How it affects response LT LC

Closed loop response: (no setpoint change) Level Loop (melt tank) If: 0 t A

Closed loop response: (setpoint change) Level Loop (melt tank) If: 0 t A

5 Dead Time in a Process Suppose change manipulated variable LT LC FC FT

Level Loop (melt tank) D(s) not a polynomial; can’t do P.F. expansion, so different procedure needed. Dead time effect is to reduce the ultimate loop gain (will oscillate at lower Kc values)

Tuning: adjust controller parameters to obtain specified closed loop response. Feedback Controller Tuning Values of parameters depend upon: Desired response Dynamic characteristics of other elements in the control loop. We’ll come back to general tuning approaches, but lets first explore the solid feeder example that has some dead time…. 7

8 Tuning Introduction Feeder with some dead time (t o ) WC WY WT aT =aV =aP =aC =aT =aV =aP =aC =

9 Tuning Example (w/ P-only Controller)

¼ Decay Ratio or Quarter Amplitude Damping: QAD or ¼ Decay Ratio Convenient Relatively quick response Relatively high overshoot on setpoint changes Non-unique (theoretically infinite no. tuning parameters) If dead time in loop: Makes closed loop closer to unstable Reduce Kc … but then more sluggish response Instead of pure feed back control … could implement Dead- Time Compensation (Smith Predictor) 10

Ziegler Nichols Tuning Method (I) For our simple example with WC WY WT To achieve QAD we set Ziegler Nichols Tuning Method I P-only control Find Set We’ll see another Ziegler Nichols: ZN II related to FOPDT fit Empirical formula to get closed loop response close to QAD 11

Feedback Controller Tuning: (General Approaches) 1)Simple criteria; i.e QAD via ZN I, t r, etc easy, simple, do on existing process multiple solutions 2)Time integral performance criteria ISEintegral square error IAEintegral absolute value error ITAEintegral time weighted average error 3)Semi-empirical rules FOPDT (ZN II) Cohen-Coon 4)ATV, or Autotuning 5)Trial and error 6)Rules of thumb 12

13 Questions ??