Progress, plans and prospects Second Meeting, Nov. 12 to 14, 2007, Durham, NC NESCent Evolutionary Informatics Working Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AR – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will.
Advertisements

Strategic planning Click to add name Pacific Sexual Diversity Network Leadership Development Suva, 1-5 June 2009.
Template and information based on data provided by DERI 1 Mondeca ITM presentation & possible (?) collaboration Semantic Web Portal Project Michael Stollberg.
Open Library Environment Designing technology for the way libraries really work November 19, 2008 ~ ASERL, Atlanta Lynne O’Brien Director, Academic Technology.
Fungal Semantic Web Stephen Scott, Scott Henninger, Leen-Kiat Soh (CSE) Etsuko Moriyama, Ken Nickerson, Audrey Atkin (Biological Sciences) Steve Harris.
1 Digital Libraries and Evidence in the Developing World Context Dr. Jon Ferguson Senior Health Database Scientist IMMPACT Project University of Aberdeen.
W3C XML Query Language Working Group Mark Needleman Data Research Associates ZIG Current Awareness Session July 13, 2000.
Domain Modelling the upper levels of the eframework Yvonne Howard Hilary Dexter David Millard Learning Societies LabDistributed Learning, University of.
Annual SERC Research Review - Student Presentation, October 5-6, Extending Model Based System Engineering to Utilize 3D Virtual Environments Peter.
MDC Open Information Model West Virginia University CS486 Presentation Feb 18, 2000 Lijian Liu (OIM:
1 Open Library Environment Designing technology for the way libraries really work December 8, 2008 ~ CNI, Washington DC Lynne O’Brien Director, Academic.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Quality Information Framework (QIF) Design and Strategy Meeting June 12-14, 2012 Hilton Head Island Dimensional Metrology Standards Consortium (DMSC) 1.
Enriching the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) to Improve Its Suitability for Web Service Annotations Chaitanya Guttula, Alok Dhamanaskar,
Public Health Tiger Team we will start the meeting 3 min after the hour DRAFT Project Charter May 6, 2014.
Ontology Development Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University Harvard Medical School.
Ontology Development and Usage for Protozoan Parasite Research John A. Miller and Alok Dhamanaskar Collaborators: Michael E. Cotterell, Chaitanya Guttula,
TRANSITION PLAN STAKEHOLDER GROUP CENTER FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EDUCATION.
IMAT1906 Systems Development Lecture 1: Introduction.
Synthetic Biology Practices Working Group Meeting May
NeXML A future data exchange standard for phylogenetics Rutger Vos University of British Columbia.
Domain Modeling In FREMA David Millard Yvonne Howard Hugh Davis Gary Wills Lester Gilbert Learning Societies Lab University of Southampton, UK.
2003 Annual NSDL PI Survey A Collaborative Formative Evaluation.
1 Advanced Semantic Technologies Prof. Deborah McGuinness and Dr. Patrice Seyed CSCI CSCI ITWS ITWS TA: Justin.
The Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Library and Documentation Systems.
Topic Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Review Draft/Issued document 0.1.
Public Health Tiger Team we will start the meeting 3 min after the hour DRAFT Project Charter April 15, 2014.
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
As Class Convenes l Find your team’s table and have a seat l Pick up Team’s Modeling Folder l Remove Chapter 1 Assignment l Place your Chapter 2 Assignment.
Schema Interoperability Liam Magee Global Cities Institute RMIT University Melbourne, Australia.
CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd
From Objects to Assets: The Fungibility of Knowledge Christopher W. Higgins, Esq.
CH-Gesetzesdatenbank CHLexML Project FEDERAL DEPARTEMENT OF JUSTICE AND POLICE Federal Office of Justice Urs Paul Holenstein Ardita Driza Maurer Omar Abou.
10/24/09CK The Open Ontology Repository Initiative: Requirements and Research Challenges Ken Baclawski Todd Schneider.
CIPRES Software architecture/development Focus Leader: Mark Holder (FSU) Architecture:Wayne Maddison (UBC) Mark Holder (FSU) David Swofford (FSU) Implementation:
The Digital Library for Earth System Science: Contributing resources and collections GCCS Internship Orientation Holly Devaul 19 June 2003.
1 ECCF Training 2.0 Introduction ECCF Training Working Group January 2011.
Domain Modeling In FREMA Yvonne Howard David Millard Hugh Davis Gary Wills Lester Gilbert Learning Societies Lab University of Southampton, UK.
Develop Use Cases Evaluate Existing Models Develop/Extend Model Test ModelDocument 1. Commercial This use-case involves identifying the location and properties.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
Seeking SC Feedback on Draft Technology Strategy and Roadmap for EarthCube Draft of 3 November 2015 The Technology and Architecture Committee (TAC) Chairs:
1 Advanced Semantic Technologies Deborah McGuinness CSCI , 97543, CSCI , 97014, ITWS , 98113, ITWS , TA: Abigail.
The Use of Ontology Design Patterns for Metadata Semantics: Methods, Chances, and Limitations Gary Berg-Cross SOCoP Executive Secretary US RDA Advisory.
TDRp Implementation Challenges David Vance, Executive Director Peggy Parskey, Assistant Director October 23, 2014.
Query Health Distributed Population Queries Implementation Group Meeting March 6, 2012.
Aligning Digital Preservation Policies with Community Standards Nancy McGovern Digital Preservation Officer.
CaBIG Architecture Working Group Face-To-Face Meeting  Best Practices SIG  March 18th, 2005  David Kane and Jim Harrison.
February 2010 OBO Foundry Meeting Hilmar Lapp Nescent Comparative Data Analysis Ontology.
Welcome to CPSC 534B: Information Integration Laks V.S. Lakshmanan Rm. 315.
March 18th, 2005http://jhh.opi.upmc.edu/main/cabig/BestPracticesSig1 caBIG Architecture Working Group Face-To-Face Meeting Best Practices SIG March 18th,
LE:NOTRE Spring Workshop The Role of Ontologies for Mapping the Domain of Landscape Architecture An introduction.
The Agricultural Ontology Server (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Food and Agriculture Organization.
Progress, plans and prospects Third Meeting, May 19 to 22, 2008, Durham, NC NESCent Evolutionary Informatics Working Group.
Developing our Metadata: Technical Considerations & Approach Ray Plante NIST 4/14/16 NMI Registry Workshop BIPM, Paris 1 …don’t worry ;-) or How we concentrate.
Rutger Vos and Wayne Maddison University of British Columbia
Comparative Data Analysis Ontology (CDAO)
Evolutionary Informatics:
Strategies for NIS Development
Adult College and Career Education Leadership
Nexml A future data exchange standard for phylogenetics
DataNet Collaboration
DE3N 34 Communication: Analysing and Presenting Complex Communication.
OBI – Standard Semantic
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Using Wikis to Facilitate Teaching & Learning
2003 Annual NSDL PI Survey A Collaborative Formative Evaluation
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
Presentation transcript:

Progress, plans and prospects Second Meeting, Nov. 12 to 14, 2007, Durham, NC NESCent Evolutionary Informatics Working Group

History CDAT OO database (Mackey, Stoltzfus) Bio::NEXUS (Qiu, Stoltzfus) Bio::CDAT BioPerl Proposal (Stoltzfus, Vos, Qiu) “Evolutionary Informatics Group” meets in Philly (Stoltzfus, Qiu, Mackey, Vos, and 6 others) working group proposal (Stoltzfus, Vos) NIH proposal (Stoltzfus, Pontelli, Gupta) NESCent Phyloinformatics Hackathon (incl. Holder, Mackey, Qiu, Stoltzfus, Vos, Lewis, Kosakovsky Pond, Swofford, Zmasek) NESCent GSoC Projects First meeting Second meeting Third meeting Fourth meeting NESCent Evolutionary Informatics Working Group Jon Eisen (“phylogenomics”) Joe Felsenstein (PHYLIP) Mark Holder (GARLI) Sergei Kosakovsky Pond (HyPhy) Sudhir Kumar (MEGA) Paul Lewis (NCL) Aaron Mackey (BioPerl,GMOD) David Maddison (Mesquite) Wayne Maddison (Mesquite) Andrew Rambaut (BEAST) Arlin Stoltzfus (Bio::NEXUS) David Swofford (PAUP*) Rutger Vos (Bio::Phylo) Xuhua Xia (DAMBE) Christian Zmasek (ATV, RIO) You are here

Prioritization exercise In spring of 2007, participants ranked 11 proposed items leaders devised coherent plan with suggested tactics

First meeting  May 21-23, 2007, NESCent  Priorities and activities  Supporting current file formats  Substitution model language  Central unifying artefact  New data exchange format  Outreach (funding, community needs)  May 21-23, 2007, NESCent  Priorities and activities  Supporting current file formats  Substitution model language  Central unifying artefact  New data exchange format  Outreach (funding, community needs)

Central unifying artefact Implementation as File format DB schema Ontology Criteria to choose one Richness Ease of expression Tech support for transfer storage query validation Extensibility

Tangible Outcomes, period 1  New data exchange format (wiki)  Detailed proposal  Current formats (wiki)  Use assessment (incomplete)  Examples (incomplete)  Transition Model Language (wiki)  Assessment  Initial results on related technologies  Central Unifying Artefact (wiki, docs, online demos)  NeXML draft  Ontology development strategy (CDAO)  Concept glossary  Ontology-based semantic transformation demos  Project proposal (4-year, ~1.2 M$ NIH RO1)  International team of collaborators  Outreach: not much (broader awareness)  New data exchange format (wiki)  Detailed proposal  Current formats (wiki)  Use assessment (incomplete)  Examples (incomplete)  Transition Model Language (wiki)  Assessment  Initial results on related technologies  Central Unifying Artefact (wiki, docs, online demos)  NeXML draft  Ontology development strategy (CDAO)  Concept glossary  Ontology-based semantic transformation demos  Project proposal (4-year, ~1.2 M$ NIH RO1)  International team of collaborators  Outreach: not much (broader awareness)

Developing an ontology 1.Define domain by means of use cases 2.From use cases, identify core concepts and relations, and capture them in glossary 3.Study related artefacts, including ontologies to be integrated (MAO, PhyloXML, NEXUS) 4.Formally encode concepts and relations in an ontology language 5.Evaluate and revise the encoding 1.Define domain by means of use cases 2.From use cases, identify core concepts and relations, and capture them in glossary 3.Study related artefacts, including ontologies to be integrated (MAO, PhyloXML, NEXUS) 4.Formally encode concepts and relations in an ontology language 5.Evaluate and revise the encoding

Accomplishing our goals First meeting Second meeting Third meeting Fourth meeting NESCent Evolutionary Informatics Working Group Timespan of NIH project if funded Comparative Data Analysis Ontology Domain-specific language Workflow construction using reasoning Services infrastructure for execution Ongoing opportunities: Workshops Summer-of-code Funding proposals NESCent visiting scientist NESCent hack-a-thon NESCent working group NSF meeting proposals Research proposals Some milestones to complete: Glossary completion Transition model language Comparative Data Analysis Ontology Current stds: translation and validation Ontology session at Evolution 2008 Google Summer-of-Code projects NESCent Phyloinformatics course Woods’ Hole, Mol Evol Workshop

Activities for this week  Ontology-related  Use cases - clarify, document, add instances & references  Glossary - continue with concepts, start on instances  Related artefacts - identify, retrieve, start studying  Outreach  Identify 2008 opportunities, make plans for workshops and sessions on evoinfo, interoperability and ontologies  Current standards  library of annotated examples, with pathologies  Transition model language  Funding proposal for pilot projects  Ontology-related  Use cases - clarify, document, add instances & references  Glossary - continue with concepts, start on instances  Related artefacts - identify, retrieve, start studying  Outreach  Identify 2008 opportunities, make plans for workshops and sessions on evoinfo, interoperability and ontologies  Current standards  library of annotated examples, with pathologies  Transition model language  Funding proposal for pilot projects

What we will hear about today 9:20 SPAN project proposal (20 min each plus 20 min discussion)  9:20 Integrating Ontologies and Web services in Phylogenetic Workflow Development (Pontelli)  9:40 Problem Solving in Evolutionary Analysis with Web Services and DSLs (Gupta) 10:20 Break 10:40 Additional talks (20 min plus 20 min discussion each)  10:40 Extending MAO (Thompson)  11:20 NeXML (Vos)  12:00 Towards a description language for substitution models (Midford, Kosakovsky Pond) 12:40 Lunch 1:40 get back to work 9:20 SPAN project proposal (20 min each plus 20 min discussion)  9:20 Integrating Ontologies and Web services in Phylogenetic Workflow Development (Pontelli)  9:40 Problem Solving in Evolutionary Analysis with Web Services and DSLs (Gupta) 10:20 Break 10:40 Additional talks (20 min plus 20 min discussion each)  10:40 Extending MAO (Thompson)  11:20 NeXML (Vos)  12:00 Towards a description language for substitution models (Midford, Kosakovsky Pond) 12:40 Lunch 1:40 get back to work

What we won’t hear about  pPOD core data model  TreeBase II schema  FIGENIX expert system  pPOD core data model  TreeBase II schema  FIGENIX expert system

This Afternoon 1:40 Admonition (Stoltzfus, Vos) 2:00 Work session: organize into task-specific groups and begin work 3:20 Break (20 min) 3:40 Work session 4:40 Stand-ups and discussion (goals and planned activities) 5:40 Adjourn for the day 6:00 Group dinner (venue to be announced) 1:40 Admonition (Stoltzfus, Vos) 2:00 Work session: organize into task-specific groups and begin work 3:20 Break (20 min) 3:40 Work session 4:40 Stand-ups and discussion (goals and planned activities) 5:40 Adjourn for the day 6:00 Group dinner (venue to be announced)

Suggested activities  Ontology-related  Use cases - clarify, document, add instances & references  Glossary - continue with concepts, start on instances  Related artefacts - identify, retrieve, start studying  Outreach  Identify 2008 opportunities, make plans for workshops and sessions on evoinfo, interoperability and ontologies  Current standards  library of annotated examples, with pathologies  Transition model language  Funding proposal for pilot projects  Ontology-related  Use cases - clarify, document, add instances & references  Glossary - continue with concepts, start on instances  Related artefacts - identify, retrieve, start studying  Outreach  Identify 2008 opportunities, make plans for workshops and sessions on evoinfo, interoperability and ontologies  Current standards  library of annotated examples, with pathologies  Transition model language  Funding proposal for pilot projects What do I think is important? Where is my expertise? Where is my commitment?

Your charge 1.Note activities  Use cases - clarify, document, add instances & references  Glossary - continue with concepts, start on instances  Related artefacts - identify, retrieve, start studying  Outreach - identify 2008 opportunities, make plans  Current standards - document use and misuse  Transition model language - pilot projects, funding 2.Self-organize into groups  Ideally, 2 to 4 people per group  Your choice should reflect your expertise and priorities 3.Rapid assessment, then get to work  Summarize problem, set goals in terms of tangible outcomes  Consume caffeinated beverages  Work towards tangible outcomes  Discuss results and challenges with others  Put your work on the wiki 1.Note activities  Use cases - clarify, document, add instances & references  Glossary - continue with concepts, start on instances  Related artefacts - identify, retrieve, start studying  Outreach - identify 2008 opportunities, make plans  Current standards - document use and misuse  Transition model language - pilot projects, funding 2.Self-organize into groups  Ideally, 2 to 4 people per group  Your choice should reflect your expertise and priorities 3.Rapid assessment, then get to work  Summarize problem, set goals in terms of tangible outcomes  Consume caffeinated beverages  Work towards tangible outcomes  Discuss results and challenges with others  Put your work on the wiki

This Afternoon 1:40 Admonition (Stoltzfus, Vos) 2:00 Work session: organize into task-specific groups and begin work 3:20 Break (20 min) 3:40 Work session 4:40 Stand-ups and discussion (goals and planned activities) 5:40 Adjourn for the day 6:00 Group dinner (venue to be announced) 1:40 Admonition (Stoltzfus, Vos) 2:00 Work session: organize into task-specific groups and begin work 3:20 Break (20 min) 3:40 Work session 4:40 Stand-ups and discussion (goals and planned activities) 5:40 Adjourn for the day 6:00 Group dinner (venue to be announced)

Groups and targets 1.Group topic (wiki page)  Target 1  Target 2 2.Group topic (wiki page)  Target 1  Target 2 3.Group topic (wiki page)  Target 1  Target 2 4.Group topic (wiki page)  Target 1  Target 2 5.Group topic (wiki page)  Target 1  Target 2 1.Group topic (wiki page)  Target 1  Target 2 2.Group topic (wiki page)  Target 1  Target 2 3.Group topic (wiki page)  Target 1  Target 2 4.Group topic (wiki page)  Target 1  Target 2 5.Group topic (wiki page)  Target 1  Target 2