International Energy Workshop 2009- Venise Policy Scenarios and Stochastic Analysis with the Gemini-E3 Model F. Babonneau¹ – A. Haurie¹ – M. Vielle² (¹Ordecsys.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model Comparison: Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Models
Advertisements

What does REMI say? sm Tools for Evaluating Climate Change Policies with REMI PI+
Integrated Resource Planning: An overview Mark Howells & Bruno Merven Energy Research Centre Energy Research Centre University of Cape Town.
Transparent, Repeatable, Defendable, and Published Generation, Transmission & Nat Gas Network Co-Optimizations
Estimating the Levelized Cost to Sequester Carbon ($/ton CO 2 e) in Four Different Types of Forest Carbon Sequestration Projects Adam Diamant Electric.
1 Coupling bottom-up and top-down energy models: challenges and results with TIAM and GEMINI-E3 Maryse Labriet 1, Marc Vielle 2, Laurent Drouet 3, Alain.
CO 2 Emission per Primary Energy Consumption Unit : 1,000 Tons-CO 2 /KTOE (FEB) Year
Effects of Structural Change and Climate Policy on Long-Term Shifts in Lifecycle Energy Efficiency and Carbon Footprint Gouri Shankar Mishra Sonia Yeh,
Economy-Energy-Environment (E3)Model: Energy Technology and Climate Change Youngho Chang Division of Economics and Nanyang Technological University.
MultiMOD – An equilibrium model for energy market & infrastructure analysis Ruud Egging 24 th Oct 2013 CREE meets CenSES.
1 John J. Conti Acting Director Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting Prepared for the Energy Technology System Analysis Program (ETSAP) Florence,
Integrated Gas and Electricity Modelling Paul Deane Gas - Electricity Interactions Workshop June 2014 *
The impact of the rebound effect of first generation biofuel use in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions 17 th ICABR Conference, 19 June 2013 Edward Smeets,
Experience with GHG emission projections for energy sector in LATVIA Workshop on emissions projection 6-8 September 2004, UNFCCC Secretariat, Bonn Janis.
Conference on the International Dimensions of Climate Policies; 21 – 23 January 2009, Bern, Switzerland TOCSIN-EU FP6 Project 1 A dynamic.
Modeling Choices & Approaches Key Model Outputs: Carbon emissions Other emissions Electricity prices Total electricity system costs Fuel use and diversity.
Brief Overview of the Second Generation Model Presentation to U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board SAB Second Generation Model (SGM) Advisory Panel Dr. Michael.
SEDS - Industrial Sector Joseph M. Roop Olga V. Livingston Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Ort, Datum Autor Economic and Environmental Effects of the EU Directive on Energy Tax Harmonization Katja Schumacher Presented at: International Energy.
IMPACT OF HIGH ENERGY COSTS: RESULTS FROM A GENERAL AND A PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL Francesco Gracceva Umberto Ciorba International Energy Workshop Kyoto,
June GTAP Conference Purdue University Welfare Cost for Europe of Non Participation in the Market for Tradable Permits and Comparative Efficiency.
SGM P.R. Shukla. Second Generation Model Top-Down Economic Models  Project baseline carbon emissions over time for a country or group of countries 
M. Amann, W. Schöpp, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen The RAINS-GHG Model Approach Work in progress.
Carbon Capture and Storage: What Does Integrated Assessment Modelling Analysis Tell Us? Dr Vaibhav Chaturvedi Research Fellow Council on Energy, Environment.
Sergey Paltsev Massachusetts Institute of Technology Low-Carbon Russia: Myth or Reality? Moscow, Russia January 15, 2015.
1 Designing Climate Change Scenarios in a Global Economic Model Warwick J McKibbin ANU, Lowy Institute and Brookings Prepared for the OECD conference on.
Global Climate Change and its Distributional Impacts Maurizio Bussolo, Rafael de Hoyos, Denis Medvedev and Dominique van der Mensbrugghe The World Bank.
EMPIRE- modelling the future European power system under different climate policies Asgeir Tomasgard, Christian Skar, Gerard Doorman, Bjørn H. Bakken,
WORKSHOP ON TECHNOLOGY PATHWAYS FORWARD FOR CARBON CAPTURE & STORAGE ON NATURAL GAS POWER SYSTEMS April 22, 2014 Revis W. James Director, Generation R&D.
The Economics of Marine Renewable Energy Peter McGregor Fraser of Allander Institute, Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde Second Forum on.
1 E-Modeling By: Energy Group Advisors: Mark Gehlhar Thomas Hertel and Robert McDouglas.
Can CCS Help Protect the Climate?. Key Points Climate Protection requires a budget limit on cumulative GHG emissions. Efficiency, Renewable Electric,
1 On the Effect of Greenhouse Gas Abatement in Japanese Economy: an Overlapping Generations Approach Shimasawa Manabu Akita University March 2006.
The Effects of a Carbon Charge on Electricity Generation – Comparing Two Models Presentation to Motu Climate Economics Research Workshop 21 March 2012.
With the financial support of the European Commission Impact on employment in the EU-25 of climate change and climate change policies by 2030 power generation.
Masaru Aoki (Japan Research Institute) Long-term, Multi-sectoral Model for Interaction on Economy and Environment of Japan International Workshop for Interactive.
TA Project: “Improving Emissions Control” Session 2 Scenarios for Emissions Management Dr Russell C Frost Project Team Leader.
1 Macroeconomic Impacts of EU Climate Policy in AIECE November 5, 2008 Olavi Rantala - Paavo Suni The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
Regional Modeling and Linking Sector Models with CGE Models Presented by Martin T. Ross Environmental and Natural Resource Economics Program RTI International.
MAPS Chile Macroeconomic Modelling Results: MEMO II Model November 5th, 2014 EconLab III, Cape Town.
Low carbon scenarios for the UK Energy White Paper Peter G Taylor Presented at “Energy, greenhouse gas emissions and climate change scenarios” June.
Baseline developments for NEC Directie revision Projections Expert Panel 25 October 2007 Dublin, Ireland Eduard Dame DG Environment C5, Energy & Environment.
Generation Portfolio Options Study Philip O’Donnell Manager, Generation Analysis 14 October 2009.
Analyzing the Oil Price-GDP Relationship and its Historical Changes.
The economic and competitiveness dimensions of the draft Chilean INDC Andrea Rudnick Our Common Future Conference. Paris. July 8 th, 2015.
Combining options for commitments AIXG, OECD, 22 March Combining options for commitments: results from modelling exercises Patrick Criqui, LEPII-EPE,
Sustainable Energy Systems The EU “WETO” World Energy, Technology and climate policy Outlook 2030 Domenico Rossetti di Valdalbero European Commission,
Interaction of a GHG Emissions Cap With Energy Technologies and Markets USAEE Annual Conference – Washington DC October 11, 2011 Donald Hanson and David.
The Canadian Approach To Compiling Emission Projections Marc Deslauriers Environment Canada Pollution Data Division Science and Technology Branch Projections.
Long-term Greenhouse Gas Stabilization and the Risks of Dangerous Impacts M. Webster, C.E. Forest, H. Jacoby, S. Paltsev, J. Parsons, R. Prinn, J. Reilly,
Climate Policies and Induced Technological Change: The Impacts of Timing of Technology Subsidies Presentation at Samstemt workshop November Knut.
Workshop on Energy-related National and EU-Wide Projections of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 27 to 28 februari 2002 Emissions of CO 2 from the energy sector.
On/Off Operation of Carbon Capture Systems in the Dynamic Electric Grid On/Off Operation of Carbon Capture Systems in the Dynamic Electric Grid Rochelle.
Dutch Reference Outlook Energy and Greenhouse Gases Remko Ybema, ECN Policy Studies Workshop on Energy-related National and EU-Wide Projections.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHALE GAS PRODUCTION AND CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE UNDER CO2 TAXES: MARKAL MODELING Nadja Victor and Chris Nichols Pittsburgh,
PORTFOLIO RISK ANALYSIS BASED GENERATION EXPANSION PLANNING Presenter: Nguyen Xuan Phuc Asian Institute of Technology School of Environment, Resources.
CAFE Baseline dissemination workshop 27/09/2004 Dr. Leonidas Mantzos E3M-LAB/ICCS NTUA contact: Energy projections as input to the.
Center for Global Trade Analysis Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University 403 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN USA
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Technology: Stationary Sources and Demand-Side Management Session Two Air Pollution as Climate Forcing: A Workshop Honolulu,
ENERGY & CLIMATE ASSESSMENT TEAM National Risk Management Research Laboratory U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research.
Optimal R&D Investments and the Cost of GHG Stabilization when Knowledge Spills across Sectors FEEM Venice, 21 May 2009 Carlo Carraro Emanuele Massetti.
1 Perspectives of CCS power plants in Europe under different climate policy regimes Tom Kober, Markus Blesl Institute of Energy Economics and the Rational.
1 Coupling bottom-up and top-down energy models: challenges and results with TIAM and GEMINI-E3 Marc Vielle 1, Maryse Labriet 2, Laurent Drouet 3, Alain.
Optimal climate policy
The Opportunity Cost of Climate Mitigation Policy
Fairtax Conference: “Options for an EU Tax as an EU Own Resource”
Costs and Benefits of a Carbon Policy for China
Regional Modeling and Linking Sector Models with CGE Models
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis: a User’s Guide – Economic tools
National electricity mixes
Presentation transcript:

International Energy Workshop Venise Policy Scenarios and Stochastic Analysis with the Gemini-E3 Model F. Babonneau¹ – A. Haurie¹ – M. Vielle² (¹Ordecsys – ²EPFL) Switzerlandwww.ordecsys.com

International Energy Workshop Venise Aim of the work Perform stochastic analysis in the framework of the Planets Project Analyzing the robustness of the scenario results in particular concerning energy mix and technological choice Preliminary runs

International Energy Workshop Venise Main Characterictics of GEMINI-E3 World General Equilibrium Model Total Price Flexibility Detailed Representation of Indirect Taxation Measure of Welfare Cost of Policies and Components

International Energy Workshop Venise GEMINI-E3 Production Function

International Energy Workshop Venise Electricity Generation CCS

International Energy Workshop Venise Cost of CCS Information coming from Chalmers University of Technology - (Euro/ton CO2) CaptureTransportStorage K. Andersson, F. Johnsson « Process evaluation of an 865 MWe lignite fired O2/CO2 power plant » Energy Conversion and Management, 2006

International Energy Workshop Venise The climate constraint The objective is to limit the radiative forcing to 3.5 W/m 2, the emission profile is given by TIAM

International Energy Workshop Venise Methodology 1/2 We retain the BAU scenario and the FP-3.5 scenario defined by the planets project We use an aggregated version of Gemini-E3 model Run Monte Carlo simulations on six parameters We run 500 scenarios with Latin Hyper Cube sampling

International Energy Workshop Venise Regions EUR : European Union (25) OEC : Other industrialized countries ASI : Asia EEC : Energy exporting countries (FSU-MID) ROW : Rest of the World

International Energy Workshop Venise Methodology 2/2 Uncertain parameters : Productivity factor (technical progress on labor) : ASI ROW Correlation Autonomous Energy Efficiency Improvements (AEEI) Elasticities Energy nest Aggregated inputs Oil prices Price of carbon capture and sequestration (only for coal)

International Energy Workshop Venise Infeasible runs 19% of runs are infeasible (i.e. Gemini-E3 does not converge) We estimate a probit model: 0 if convergence 1 otherwise Endogenous variables : uncertain parameters

International Energy Workshop Venise Carbon tax in 2050 in US $ per ton

International Energy Workshop Venise Energy consumption (G toe) in 2050 Coal Gas Oil Elec In red: Standard deviation divided by mean

International Energy Workshop Venise Macroeconomic Cost (GDP change wrt Baseline ) 1/2 OECEUR ROW ASI

International Energy Workshop Venise Macroeconomic Cost (GDP change wrt Baseline) – /2 EEC

International Energy Workshop Venise We propose to combine Monte Carlo and Optimal hedging strategy to «model» the dynamic process of the uncertainty. 1. We use the stochastic version of TIAM to generate emission profiles for different values of CS and assuming that the uncertainty is revealed in Gemini-E3 : Monte-Carlo sampling on CS Generation of the emission profile by interpolation on the profiles given by TIAM. Next Step : Uncertainty on climate sensitivity (1/2)

International Energy Workshop Venise 3. Try to link results and stochastic parameters (econometric) Next Step : Uncertainty on climate sensitivity (2/2)