Defining Ourselves: I-O Psychology’s Identity Quest By: Dr. Ann Marie Ryan Discussion by: Matt Brown
Symptoms of Our Identity Problem Concerns about the visibility of the field. “When CNN reports on issues they should go to SIOP to ask for an expert to provide fact-based commentary on the subject.” How well we are differentiated from other like disciplines. “We need to define and advertise what really distinguishes our society and service from the throng of MBAs.” Not perceived as positively as competitors in the marketplace. “I see other professionals making inroads into service areas that I believe I-O psychologists are better trained to deliver.” How we fit within the broader field of psychology. Quit consciously distancing ourselves from the APA, even if others in psychology ignore our existence. How well our name conveys who we are. “Industrial-Organizational psychology is almost unintelligible to anyone outside our discipline!” Concerns for future generations of I-O psychologists. New PhDs may seek an academic career path that does not include teaching.
What Actions Can We Take in This Quest for Identity? Create solidarity around a set of distinctive, core attributes to clearly state what our identity is. Application of psychological principles to the workplace. Scientific approach makes us different from others. Maintain our goal of enhancing the effectiveness of the organization AND the well-being of individuals. Operate with an implicit multilevel model. Individual behavior and attitudes are influenced by not only individuals but by teams and organizations. Know how to define ourselves. Keep in mind that identity comes from knowledge, not practice. Educate the fundamental that knowledge base and research are the core components of training. Continue to develop our own unique knowledge base.
What Actions Can We Take in This Quest for Identity? Match our external image to our identity, not what “they” are looking for. We choose what to focus on, not the business world. Consider who we want to be known to. Educate everyone because anyone who works can and will be affected by I-O psychology. Choose our comparators and dimensions of comparison thoughtfully. Interaction with SHRM and the Academy of Management is good, but SIOP should not substitute their identity for our own. Change the name to something that better conveys who we are. Could be helpful but not a priority to address the challenges. Manage multiple identities within the organization. Recognize and work with multiple synergies rather than compartmentalizing them. E.g. scientist, practitioner, HR generalist, management consultant
What is SIOP Doing to Meet These Challenges? Name change discussions Press releases PR person Media referrals Brochures Workplace toolkits Website enhancement Respond whenever other psychologists ignore our existence.
What Can You Do? Be willing to identify yourself as an I-O psychologist. Don’t assume people know what you do. Talk to others about our profession. Ex. Media, local HR, businesses, students Stay active. Ex. Publish in journals with audiences in other areas of psychology. Ensure new entrants to the field are socialized to the values with which we identify ourselves by. Do research that shows value added by our perspective. Show that our field deserves attention by doing your job well.