Task # 3 Task #3 - 100kW Target Station Layout proposal Presented by L.Bruno CERN AB Experimental Areas, Targets and Secondary Beams Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SNS Experimental FacilitiesOak Ridge Target Systems for the Spallation Neutron Source Presented by John R. Haines at the High-Power Targetry for Future.
Advertisements

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC , the State of Michigan.
Mercury Chamber Update V. Graves NF-IDS Meeting October 4, 2011.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Neutrino Factory Mercury Containment Concepts V.B. Graves 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High- Powered Target.
Technical studies for the HIE- ISOLDE Frontend upgrade Jacobo Montaño Marie Curie Fellow; CATHI Project * The research project has been supported by a.
MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.
K. McDonald Muon Collaboration Meeting 19 Mar 2008 Future Target System R&D Analysis (and simulation) of MERIT data is ongoing, but the success of the.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
1 Final Conference, 19th – 23rd January 2015 Geneva, Switzerland RP 7 Remote Handling Concept Study for the Super-FRS Plug System Luis M. Orona D. Helmut.
IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.
Construction and Installation of the CLIC Experimental Area
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz September 10, 2007.
2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Powered Target Workshop, Y. KadiNovember 6, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET DESIGN Y. Kadi On behalf of the.
EURISOL Town Meeting October 2012 – Lisbon High-Power Targets High-Power Targets Developments and Testing of Spallation Neutron Sources Yacine Kadi,
EURISOL DS Target Meeting, CERN, CHY.KADIMarch 10-11, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET 1st year planning Y. Kadi (AB/ATB) European Organization.
1 Overview of the NPDGamma Experiment at the Fundamental Neutron Physics Beamline Geoff Greene UT/ORNL.
Next generation of ν beams Challenges Ahead I. Efthymiopoulos - CERN LAGUNA Workshp Aussois, France, September 8,2010 what it takes to design and construct.
ISOLDE: Status report building th ISCC meeting CERN, 31 March 2014 Erwin Siesling, Magda Kowalska.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
MoEDAL MoU EDMS No Issues from LHCb & CERN  MoEDAL at IP8  Infrastructure  TimePix Deployment  Access & Safety  General Conditions MoEDAL.
PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT CERN / Oct / P.A.Schmelzbach.
High Power Dumps – RDR 10 atm. Cylinder water vessel with copper plate back end, 1.5m diameter x 6.5m long, in a 15 x 3 x 4 m^3 shielded enclosure, with.
ISOLDE: Status report building th ISCC meeting CERN, 22 October 2013 Maria Borge, Erwin Siesling.
General RP guidelines for CENF CENF secondary beam study group H. Vincke07/05/
1 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction K. Nishikawa IPNS, KEK 2006 . 12 . 4.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
Run 12: STAR Status and Schedule Update RHIC Coordination Meeting October 18, 2011 Bill Christie BNL Outline Status update Schedule update and issues Summary.
Injectors & LHC report K. Foraz on behalf of OSS members 14/06/2013LSC - K. Foraz1.
1Page # Machine Assembly WBS 700 By: James H. Chrzanowski January 24, 2001.
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
Progress on Remote Handling Systems TAC 12 Magnus Göhran – WPM 15 th October 2015.
Secondary beam production facility layout discussions SBLNF meeting 5 th Dec M. Calviani, A. Ferrari, R. Losito (EN/STI) H. Vincke (DGS/RP)
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
3/20/11 ALCPG11 Global Design Effort 1 CFS Detector Hall Considerations Tom Lackowski.
ISOLDE: Status report building th ISCC meeting CERN, 24 June 2014 Erwin Siesling, Magda Kowalska.
1 Cryogenic Design and the 4 He Evaporative Purifier David G. Haase, et al., North Carolina State University.
October 9th, 2007 Daresbury – Positron Kick-Off Meeting Slide 1 Remote Handling Vinod K. Bharadwaj SLAC October 9th, 2007.
ARIEL Building Pierre Bricault. Proton Beam specification The proton beam energy must be between 450 to 500 MeV. 200 µA with proton beam intensity losses.
Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration CERN Project Structure Edda Gschwendtner, CERN Lisbon Meeting, 22 June 2012Edda Gschwendtner, CERN2.
T2K Remote Handling T. Sekiguchi (KEK) on behalf of Tada (KEK) 2012/11/10.
BENE/EURISOL-DS Joint Meeting, CERN, SwitzerlandFebruary 22, Progress in the Liquid Mercury Multi-MW Target Design Studies Y. Kadi On behalf of.
Mu2e Mu2e Remote Handling Review Comparisons: Costs, Risks & Maintainability Ryan Schultz Deputy L3 Manager Target Station 3/3/2015.
Accelerator Tunnel Layout (G01) Nick Gazis Senior Mechanical Engineer Review of ESS Accelerator Conventional Facility Design.
SECONDARY BEAM HANDLING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN STATUS BRUNO FERAL (CERN/EN) DIAMANTO SMARGIANAKI (CERN/EN) Project Leader: I.Efthymiopoulos (Cern/EN)
August 2007Andrea Gaddi, CERN Physics Dept. Detectors Infrastructures & Services Baseline to design detectors infrastructures. Tentative arrangement of.
Update on the ESS monolith design Rikard Linander Monolith and Handling Group ESS Target Division TAC 10, Lund, Nov 5,
1 Building Design Progress Dan Wilcox March 2012.
LIEBE project Safety aspects of the Pb/Bi loop target LIEBE meeting report – WP5AP.Bernardes Thanks to : Richard Catherall/EN-STI, M.Delonca/EN/STI,
C. Kharoua, Y. Kadi, Thierry Stora, J. Lettry, M. Lindroos (CERN) K. Samec(PSI & CERN) J-C. David, D. Ene(CEA Saclay) L. Tecchioet al. (INFN Legnaro),
The target handling concept of the pbar- separator at FAIR M. Helmecke, V. Gostishchev, R. Hettinger, K. Knie 6th High Power Targetry Workshop Oxford.
Status of the FAIR pbar target: Target handling study (M. Helmecke)
LBNE Remote Handling Layout Options Adam Carroll Van Graves Tom Burgess FNAL/ORNL Videoconference March 11, 2010.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz August 16, 2007.
DTU A VISION OF SUPPORTING NEUTRON CHOPPER ESS PT 1 - BUNKER SYSTEMS Discussion Document.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months Vaia Papadimitriou Beamline Technical Board Meeting.
HIE-ISOLDE Workshop: The Technical Aspects Target Area Infrastructure Ventilation 29 November 2013 Andrea Polato* - CERN EN-CV-PJ * The research project.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox February 2012.
Beam Dump Hall Volume Beam Dump Meeting at SLAC May S.Ban
Analyses to Support Waste Disposition of SNS Inner Reflector Plug
INSTALLATION SEQUENCE
Concepts and Requirements for GIMM Structures
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
Sébastien Bousson (CNRS-IN2P3-IPN Orsay)
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
Change Request Panel report
The HIE-ISOLDE Design Study and the CATHI Fellow Participation
Operation of Target Safety System (TSS)
IFMIF/DONES Project: opportunities for the industry
Presentation transcript:

Task # 3 Task # kW Target Station Layout proposal Presented by L.Bruno CERN AB Experimental Areas, Targets and Secondary Beams Group

Task # 3 The 100kW Target Proposal of a target station layout OUTLINE 1. Assumptions & requirements 2. Eng.approach & station layout 3. Main sub-assemblies kW liquid metal target 5. Summary of Task#3 on-going activities

Task # 3 Assumptions & Requirements The 100kW target will be of proven conventional design, such as the TRIUMPH or CERN ISOLDE type ; The design activity shall be a site-independent, „green- field“ study; Radiation safety issues are the main concern to be addressed by the engineering choices; The target station shall allow remote handling of any sub- assembly during routine and exceptional maintenance; Downtime periods shall be limited to increase the target availability. The assumtpions, constrains and requirements of the 100kW target station are described in a functional specification (CERN EDMS doc.#752679).

Task # 3  Modular target station “block”  To be replicated in an array of independent stations;  supported by a target service building (labs, workshops, offices);  Three-level containment system  1 st level: target RIB module;  2 nd level: target station vessel;  3 rd level: target hot cell.  Vertical concept  Vertical extraction of the RIB beam;  Vertical handling of sub-assemblies by crane;  Vertical slender support structures;  Underground construction  Target located at -11m (“irradiation level”);  Remote handling at -5m (“handling level”);  Separator’s at 0m (“experimental level”); The details of the engineering proposal are described in a draft engineering conceptual design note (CERN EDMS doc.#889218). Engineering approach

Task # 3 Schematic EURISOL Layout Only a schematic layout of the EURISOL facility was available in the final report of the EURISOL Feasibility Study. That has been the starting point of to develop the present proposal. Primary Beam Complex ISOL Complex

Task # 3 Basic Engineering choice Station vertical cut – Beam view Target pit Ancyllary Area A (Cooling) Ancyllary Area B (Electric) Sliding shield Hot cell enclosure (3 rd cont. ) Roof plug p. beam Leak-tight penetrations Irradiation Level Handling Level Surface Level The basic engineering choice for the 100kW EURISOL target is to locate the target station within an  -  hot cell in a target pit. The hot cell enclosure defines the 3 rd level of the containment system.

Task # 3 Target Handling Station vertical cut – Proton beam plane Surface level p.beam RIB beam Shielded door Remote handling corridor (Served by a power manipulator) Hot cell enclosure Hot cell Operators Service corridor (Always accessible) Downstream Area (No access required) Primary beam corridor Target pit Target lifting system The irradiated target is first lifted within the hot cell and then brought away by a power manipulator to a storage area. Routine and exceptional maintenance is performed remotely in the hot cell. No shielded transport cask is required.

Task # 3 Target station building Target irradiation level – Plan view sketch p.beam Ancyllary Area A (Cooling) Ancyllary Area B (Electric) Access corridor to the ancillary areas Target pit Leak-tight penetrations HV Station Transformer P.Beam corridor The modular target bulding has a footprint of 16x20 m 2 (width x depth). The irradiation level hosts the ancillary services of the target station. Two separated areas are envisaged for fluids and power supply/electronics. The ancillary areas shall be accessible for maintenance while neighboring stations close to the one being serviced are in operation Downstream Area

Task # 3 Target station building Target handling level – Plan view sketch Remote handling corridor (Served by a power manipulator) Service corridor (Always accessible) other stations/ service building Hot cell Operators Hot cell enclosure Sliding shield Shielded door Remote handling is performed in a  -  hot cell by telescopic manipulators. Human access to the hot cell operators room is requested only during target station shut-down and with closed sliding shield. The cell is accessible via a shielded door from a corridor served by a power manipulator The remote handling corridor is a potentially contaminated area. Exceptional access to the hot cell enclosure is possible through a roof plug during installation and decommissioning

Task # 3 Target station assembly Schematic cross-sections Beam view Side view Iron shielding (under vacuum) Dump module The target station is enclosed in a He-filled cylindrical vessel embedded in a massive cast-iron shielding kept under vacuum. Helium filling is envisaged to monitor the leak- tightness of the safety barriers. He-filled vessel (2 nd containment) Leak-tight penetrations

Task # 3 Target station core Main sub-assemblies Inside the target station vessel all sub-assemblies are suspended within a barrel. The vessel dome is remotely opened and lifted up together with the target during routine exchange. All sub-assemblies are provided with automatic couplings and can be remotely extracted for maintenance.

Task # 3 Target module Vertical cut – Beam view The 100kW target is suspended at the bottom of a module where the RIB beam steering and focussing optics is located. Should a rad hard pump be not feasible, cryopumping should be envisaged. During routine target exchange, the module is lifted into the hot cell handling bay, the spent target is de-coupled, evacuated by the power manipulator and a new one installed. +60kV 0kV

Task # 3 100kW liquid metal target Overview by E.Noah

Task # 3 Liquid metal loop prototype Overview by E.Noah

Task # 3 Task #3 Milestones Summary by T.Stora M1.2 (SiC): Pending M1.4 (SiC test ):TN published on website M2.3 ( TARPIPE ):Irradiation finished due to Injector 1 failure at PSI. 2 nd target level could not be irradiated. M2.4 Sample extraction and analysis under preparation M3.3 ( ) : planned Sept 2008 M4.4 (“Bivalve” test): TN (?) published on web site and in addition… - Target station tentative layout circulating for feedback/comments; - Molten metal loop prototype in collaboration with IPUL (E. Noah); - 6 He production tests planned at ISOLDE for  -beam (1 st week July); - Considerations on beam steering on refractory metal foils published.