© 2012 IBM Corporation How fit are we for Purpose? Beginning with the End in Mind. Oliver Wignall IBM UK PLM Capability Lead

© 2012 IBM Corporation Generic Project Lifecycle

© 2012 IBM Corporation Concept & Definition Engineering Procurement Construction Test Commission Hand Over Life (Maintain) Decommission Product Development and Delivery Asset Management Locked in knowledge Value left untapped Start from scratch with new product data required for asset management including maintenance and servicing Project Lifecycle A New Project cycle every time

© 2012 IBM Corporation Through Life Management – the handover challenge

© 2012 IBM Corporation Spend £ development and design costs over and over again Single domain databases that hold product / assets information leads to poor control & use of data Spend time developing the same over and over again Siloed working Lost opportunity: Data created and not exploited Valuable product information wasted No link between data created at design and data used during the operational life of the product Key themes recurring…

© 2012 IBM Corporation 1.Reduce New Product Development Time Time to market Encourage / allow innovation 2.Replication Capability Break the cycle shown in the example before Inherit benefits, eliminate inefficiencies and pain points of previous designs 3.Become mature at managing Engineering Data Common application sets (Globally) Design for Manufacture Design for Support Standardisation Cross use of common items between platforms (interchangeability) 4.Reduce the Total Cost of Ownership Control the engineering process and procedures used Through life data exploitation Example Industry Aspirations

© 2012 IBM Corporation What, if any, of the information has priority? The question we will be seeking to answer is that whilst an information ‘single point of truth’, or a ‘whole truth model’, remains the goal in making product information readily available through- life, just how close are we to achieving an information nirvana across a disparate set of disciplines and communities of interest – and just how realistic is the goal? Bill Of Materials - As Designed? - As Built? - As Maintained? Design Intent - Critical? - Significant? - Minor? Design Decisions Baslineing Requirements Product Configuration Change Test Results Customer Acceptance Programme Plans Supplier Information

© 2012 IBM Corporation Beginning with the End in Mind. Structured Product Information Requirements Validate Define System BoM Share Consume Major Area BoM MBOM As-Maint Func Area BoM Estimate Qty Compare Share Export Bill of Process BoM Routing Assign ERP As-Built & Maintained Commission Execution Test Results Boat # Verify Installation Safe to work System Operation ALM Share & Manage ALM = Asset Lifecycle Management ERP = Enterprise Resource Planning

© 2012 IBM Corporation Engineering What organizational structure is needed to support the project based nature of the creation of the asset? Operations Supply Chain Partners Other functions.. Major Area Team by co-ordinated, cross-functional working aligned to and structured by Build Area breakdown. Major Area Team it promotes increased ‘Design for x’ focus and common planning structure. Cross-functional working ‘Design for x’ = Generic method for a matrix organisational approach in large defence projects

© 2012 IBM Corporation OPERATIONS SUPPLY CHAIN FINANCE MAINTENANCE Uptime / Low production costs Higher productivity Minimise downtime Higher reliability Minimise number of breakdowns Use high quality materials Maximise Preventive Maintenance Minimise downtime Quick recovery Prompt supply materials Maximise Inventory Availability Minimise inventory Optimise investments Maximise shipment sizes Cheaper materials Lower purchasing costs AB: A requires B CD: C and D contradictory Cross functional objectives and boundaries ENGINEERING Design for Reliability Low modifications in the field Design for re-use

© 2012 IBM Corporation Interoperability and Model Integration Processes PLM / ALM Change management Governance Methodologies Multi-domain collaboration Users and Stakeholders System Engineers Marketing Domain experts CustomersSuppliers Tools and Services Modeling languages and tools Analysis Tools Maximo Requirements management Validation Common Data Hub Content Management

© 2012 IBM Corporation PLM solutions are getting very complex Implementation is to complex and a huge IT project Cost of implementing is to high Cost of change is accelerating Sustainability for some lifecycles is an issue

© 2012 IBM Corporation Summary – If you could achieve Nirvana.. Improve productivity Increase knowledge capture Reduce overtime cost Improve data quality and process efficiency Reduce schedule, cost and risk through improved access to information and streamlined supplier collaboration processes Eliminate duplication Reduce procurement cost (increase margin) Improve quality of information deliverable Reduce delays Reduce schedule, cost, and risk Improve revenue stream due to on-time or accelerated Start-up Improve operational readiness and reduce risk of disruption Improve Availability Reduce lost time due to spares availability Eliminate duplicates & obsolete inventory Improve warranty claims Improve compliance Reduce incidents Reduce reaction time to incidents Improve knowledge capture Reduce training cost D Disposal C Concept I In-Service M Manufacture D Demonstrate A Assessment 3 – 10 Years 25+ Years Example Benefits + Fully Integrated People, Processes and Technology

© 2012 IBM Corporation Key Contacts Oliver Wignall IBM UK PLM Capability Lead IBM Global Business Services Tel: +44 (0) Stacy Dyer Managing Consultant – PLM IBM Global Business Services Tel: +44 (0) Ravi Sibal Through Lifecycle Management Lead IBM Global Business Services Tel: +44 (0)