QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC 2003 -- Nicolas Simar QoS Experience on European Backbone TNC 2003, Zabgreb (Croatia),

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality of Service CCDA Quick Reference.
Advertisements

QoS Strategy in DiffServ aware MPLS environment Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn, D.Eng. Telecommunications Program, School of Advanced Technologies Asian Institute.
© R. Jayanthan, K. Gunasakera 1999 Quality of Service in Multiservice Networks for Digital Economy R. Jayanthan & Kithsiri Gunasakera National IT Conference.
Nicolas Simar – DANTE : Premium IP and LBE transparency on GEANT QoS on GÉANT Premium IP and Less than Best Effort.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.QoS v2.2—5-1 Congestion Management Configuring LAN Congestion Management.
Tiziana Ferrari Differentiated Services Test: Report1 Differentiated Service Test REPORT TF-TANT Tiziana Ferrari Frankfurt, 1 Oct.
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 20 – QoS.
CPSC Topics in Multimedia Networking A Mechanism for Equitable Bandwidth Allocation under QoS and Budget Constraints D. Sivakumar IBM Almaden Research.
Nicolas Simar – DANTE - TF-NGN Berlin: Premium IP update and LBE tranparency on GEANT Premium IP update and LBE tranparency on GÉANT TF-NGN meeting – BERLIN.
Differentiated Services. Service Differentiation in the Internet Different applications have varying bandwidth, delay, and reliability requirements How.
Color Aware Switch algorithm implementation The Computer Communication Lab (236340) Spring 2008.
Next Generation Networks Chapter 10. Knowledge Concepts QoS concepts Bandwidth needs for Internet traffic.
Quality of Service (QoS) Routing Eric M. Wagner St. Xavier University Spring 2005.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 8. CS Summer 2003 Populating LFIB with LDP Assigned/Learned Labels Changes in the LFIB may be triggered routing or.
CS 268: Differentiated Services Ion Stoica February 25, 2003.
In-Band Flow Establishment for End-to-End QoS in RDRN Saravanan Radhakrishnan.
Internet QoS Syed Faisal Hasan, PhD (Research Scholar Information Trust Institute) Visiting Lecturer ECE CS/ECE 438: Communication Networks.
CSc 461/561 CSc 461/561 Multimedia Systems Part C: 3. QoS.
CS 268: Lecture 11 (Differentiated Services) Ion Stoica March 6, 2001.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1 SEEREN2 Summer School Heraklion, Sept 25 th Routing Issues: QoS/CoS Jean-Marc Uzé Liaison Research.
Applications of MPLS in GEANT Agnès Pouélé Applications of MPLS in GÉANT MPLS WORLD CONGRESS 2002 Paris 7th February 2002 Agnes.
Integrated Services (RFC 1633) r Architecture for providing QoS guarantees to individual application sessions r Call setup: a session requiring QoS guarantees.
Nicolas Simar – DANTE - Sequin: Premium IP SEQUIN Premium IP.
GN2 Performance Monitoring & Management : AA Needs – Nicolas Simar - 2 nd AA Workshop Nov 2003 Malaga, Spain GN2 Performance Monitoring & Management.
TERENA Networking Conference 2002, Limerick, Ireland, June SEQUIN: Results on QoS Afrodite Sevasti Greek Research and Technology Network (GRNET)
Tiziana Ferrari Quality of Service Support in Packet Networks1 Quality of Service Support in Packet Networks Tiziana Ferrari Italian.
CSE QoS in IP. CSE Improving QOS in IP Networks Thus far: “making the best of best effort”
Quality of Service (QoS)
QOS مظفر بگ محمدی دانشگاه ایلام. 2 Why a New Service Model? Best effort clearly insufficient –Some applications need more assurances from the network.
LBE TF-NGN Budapest October Agenda GÉANT D9.9 deliverable summary Test reports for LBE on GÉANT (Nicolas) Tests for LBE at the edge Limerick.
Tiziana Ferrari Diffserv deployment in the wide area: network design and testing1 Diffserv deployment in the wide area: network design and testing Tiziana.
CSC 336 Data Communications and Networking Lecture 8d: Congestion Control : RSVP Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
Top-Down Network Design Chapter Thirteen Optimizing Your Network Design Oppenheimer.
Example Applications needing Advanced Services Campus Focused Workshop on Advanced Networks Atlanta, GA.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate VPNs in GÉANT2 Otto Kreiter, DANTE UKERNA Networkshop 34 4th - 6th April 2006.
Performance Monitoring - Internet2 Member Meeting -- Nicolas Simar Performance Monitoring Internet2 Member Meeting, Indianapolis.
GEANT Premium IP Overview Mauro Campanella INFN-GARR
Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 1 Discussion on Less-than Best-Effort Services T.Ferrari.
Beyond Best-Effort Service Advanced Multimedia University of Palestine University of Palestine Eng. Wisam Zaqoot Eng. Wisam Zaqoot November 2010 November.
QoS on GÉANT - Aristote Seminar -- Nicolas Simar QoS on GÉANT Aristote Seminar, Paris (France), Nicolas Simar,
Multimedia Wireless Networks: Technologies, Standards, and QoS Chapter 3. QoS Mechanisms TTM8100 Slides edited by Steinar Andresen.
Differentiated Services for the Internet Selma Yilmaz.
QoS monitoring -- Nicolas Simar Monitoring Infrastructure SEQUIN workshop, Amsterdam, 1 February 2002 Nicolas Simar DANTE.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
Scavenger performance Cern External Network Division - Caltech Datagrid WP January, 2002.
Packet switching network Data is divided into packets. Transfer of information as payload in data packets Packets undergo random delays & possible loss.
Nicolas Simar – DANTE - Sequin: Monitoring Infrastructure Monitoring Premium IP.
Less than Best Effort -- Nicolas Simar Less than Best Effort QoS IP 2003, Milan (Italy), Nicolas Simar, Network Engineer.
Analysis of QoS Arjuna Mithra Sreenivasan. Objectives Explain the different queuing techniques. Describe factors affecting network voice quality. Analyse.
Bjorn Landfeldt, The University of Sydney 1 NETS3303 Networked Systems.
Two-Tier Resource Management Designed after the Internet’s two-tier routing hierarchy Separate packet forwarding from admission and resource allocation.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
SLA/SLS Fundamental concepts SLAs/SLSs are the essential mechanisms for agreeing, configuring, delivering, guaranteeing and evaluating the obtained QoS.
Explicit Allocation of Best-Effort Service Goal: Allocate different rates to different users during congestion Can charge different prices to different.
EGEE-II INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE End-to-End Service Level Agreement Provisioning and Monitoring for End-to-End QoS.
Queue Scheduling Disciplines
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Institution of SLAs TNLC Meeting ― Athens, Afrodite Sevasti (SA2, GRNET)
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.2: Implementing QoS.
An End-to-End Service Architecture r Provide assured service, premium service, and best effort service (RFC 2638) Assured service: provide reliable service.
Quality of Service Frameworks Hamed Khanmirza Principles of Network University of Tehran.
1 Lecture 15 Internet resource allocation and QoS Resource Reservation Protocol Integrated Services Differentiated Services.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Routing algorithms provide support for performance goals – Distributed and dynamic React to congestion Load balance.
Chapter 30 Quality of Service Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Muhammad Mateen Yaqoob Department of Computer Science COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad 1.
Internet Quality of Service
Instructor Materials Chapter 6: Quality of Service
Congestion Control, Quality of Service, and Internetworking
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 6: Quality of Service Connecting Networks.
EE 122: Lecture 18 (Differentiated Services)
EE 122: Differentiated Services
Presentation transcript:

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar QoS Experience on European Backbone TNC 2003, Zabgreb (Croatia), Nicolas Simar, Network Engineer DANTE

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Agenda GÉANT Services on GÉANT Premium IP Less than Best Effort Queuing on GÉANT and status Next steps

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Multi-Gigabit pan-European Research Network Backbone Topology December 2002 Connecting 32 European Countries and 28 NRENs Backbone capacity in the range of: 34Mb/s-10Gb/s

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Backbone Access Speeds -August 2002

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar GÉANT Services Services available on GÉANT –Best Effort (IPv4) –Multicast (IPv4) –Premium IP (IPv4) –Less than Best Effort (Scavenger) (IPv4). –IPv6 (Best Effort)

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar IP QoS Services on GÉANT Premium IP –Upper-bounded one-way delay –Upper-bounded IPDV –Negligible packet loss –Guaranteed capacity. Less than Best Effort –Class of traffic using the unutilised Best Effort and higher classes of service bandwidth.

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Premium IP model End-to-end service across multiple management domains –Using diffserv, ATM CBR or over-provisioning(transition). –Packet tagged DSCP 46 (EF ). –Destination aware service. –Packet with other DSCP (from other service) are left untouched. –Premium IP bandwidth limited to 10% of the link capacity. Can cope with 20% in case of circuit failure.

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Shape ONLY here Classify (IP pair prefixes) Police - Strict, Capacity Mark Classify (DSCP) High priority queueing on all nodes Do not police on egress Do not shape Policing can be avoided at ingress when receiving from a trusted backbone Police by (AS source,dest) aggregate capacity on all border nodes

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Premium IP on GÉANT Protection of authorised Premium IP traffic –Under normal circumstances, the Premium IP traffic is limited at 10% of the circuit capacity. 20% in case of another circuit failure –Bullet-proofing of all GÉANT accesses against “un- authorised Premium IP” traffic (tagged DSCP 46) on all the ingress interfaces. If DSCP 46 packet arrives on GÉANT and is part of an un-authorised flow: the packet is not classify in the Premium IP queue and is re- tagged as Best Effort (DSCP 0). if DSCP 46 packet arrives on GÉANT and is part of an authorised flow: check against policer according capacity mentioned in the SLA (in-profile accepted, out-of-profile dropped).

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Premium IP on GÉANT Protection of authorised Premium IP traffic [cont] per next AS rate-limitation (implemented by Juniper for GÉANT) can also do source-destination IP addresses when NREN don’t do it. Trust the Premium IP traffic received from a GÉANT backbone interface. –Traffic checked at the GÉANT ingresses.

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Premium IP on GÉANT Queuing mechanism are configured on the backbone and access interfaces. –90% of the link capacity is allocated to the Premium IP queue (via WRR). Don’t forget that the amount of Premium IP traffic expected in the Premium IP queue is of 10% of the link capacity. –5% for the BE and 5% for the network control. Monitoring of the metric is very important to provide a proper service. When a end-to-end problem arise, it is very difficult to find out where the problem lies => PERT.

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Test result (end-to-end) - Traffic sent between NRENs end-sites and crossing GÉANT. - The packets were sent with a variable bit rate. - Premium IP provisioned in various way in the domains crossed. The Premium IP jitter is lower than the BE one and is indepen- dent of the packet size.

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Less than Best Effort LBE is a class of traffic using the un-utilised Best Effort and higher classes of service bandwidth. –In case of competition for resources, the LBE traffic will de discarded before any Best-Effort or higher classes of traffic. –Use the DSCP 8 (001000) - same as Internet2 scavenger service. Congestion on an interface due to LBE. –Should be transparent to the BE or higher classes of services. –No BE or higher classes of services packet loss.

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Less than Best Effort No end-to-end guarantees. –No metric needed to quantitatively describe the service. Can be supported on one interface. –Anywhere else, the LBE tagging should be passed transparently. Application scenarios: –mirroring, test traffic, protection of research traffic from student dormitory one.

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar LBE Queuing technique For algorithm with bandwidth shared assignment, as Weighted Round Robin and Weighted Fair Queuing, a very small bandwidth share is allocated to the LBE queue. –Typically 0% or 1% (depending of scheduling implementation).

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Measurement with congestion One-way delay –Increase of LBE maximum one-way delay of 1.5ms. –Increase of BE maximum one-way delay of 400µs. The traffic load (in %) express the amount of traffic generated by the SMB STM-16 interface.

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar ER2002 Demo - VLBI - dataGRID Normal Traffic Normal Traffic + Less Than Best Effort ( 2.0 Gbit/s) Normal Traffic + Radio Astronomy Data –500 Mbit/s Normal Traffic + Radio Astronomy Data + Less Than Best Effort ( 2.0 Gbit/s) Traffic aggregateLBE traffic UK-NL STM-16 link utilisation

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar QoS configuration on GÉANT The configuration has completed on most of the GÉANT routers, allowing Premium IP, BE and LBE to co-exist. –The routers where the three services have been enable are represented as green on the following map. –The routers coloured yellow are Juniper routers where “old” FPCs have been re-used from TEN-155. These old FPC’s that do not allow for the full functionality of QoS. As such BE is not ideally protected by LBE and the bandwidth is effectively shared. Premium IP only is supported. –The red routers are the Cisco 7k’s re-used from TEN-155. These routers don’t have VIP powerful enough to provide any QoS functionality. Premium IP and LBE not supported.

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar QoS configuration on GÉANT

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Useful tool Feature on the NANOG traceroute to allow the discovery of the DSCP changes along a path. –Very useful as it has allowed to discover most of the configuration problems on GÉANT and between GÉANT and NRENs.

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Next steps Premium IP reservation tool –Q4 2003, Premium IP requests will be done the NREN via a web-interface. Inter-domain monitoring –Performance monitoring activity –Aim at monitoring delay, IPDV, packet loss (to start with) across several domains. PERT –Performance Enhancement Response Team

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar QoS implementation Find the correct queuing parameters (for each service) “bullet proof” all ingresses for Premium IP Once configure, pretty stable (no need to change anything).

QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar Acknowledgements Spirent for a loan of SmartBits 600s (STM-16 interfaces) Juniper for the technical support