Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Longman PoliticalScienceInteractive Magleby & Light Government by the People Chapter 14 The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
Advertisements

The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16. The Nature of the Judicial System Introduction: – Two types of cases: Criminal Law: The government charges and individual.
The Federal Courts.
The Federal Courts. The Nature of the Judicial System Introduction: – Two types of cases: Criminal Law: The government charges and individual with violating.
American Government and Politics Today
THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Chapter 18. The Judicial System  Articles of Confederation did not set up a national judicial system  Major weakness of the Articles.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 14 Daily Dilemma: Should justices exercise judicial restraint or judicial activism?
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman.
The Judiciary Chapter 14. Learning Objectives Analyze the implications of the adversarial process Explain the structure of the federal court system Compare.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. The Federal Courts Chapter 16 Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry Government in America:
The Federal Courts Agenda Quiz Overview of the Judicial Court System
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. The Federal Courts Chapter 16 Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry Government in America:
The Judiciary Term of Office Life. Roots of the Federal Judiciary not much time spent on Article III Framers saw little threat of tyranny by judiciary.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 13. Founding of Judicial Branch Judicial Act of 1789 basically established the current Federal set-up of the Judicial Branch.
To Accompany Comprehensive, Alternate, and Texas Editions American Government: Roots and Reform, 10th edition Karen O’Connor and Larry J. Sabato  Pearson.
Types of Law Civil Law Criminal Law. Some Terms Litigants –Plaintiff –Defendant Standing Class Action Suits Interest Groups –ACLU, NAACP –Amicus Curiae.
The Judiciary. Constitutional Underpinnings and Evolution  Basis of Power is Found in Article III Supreme Court Congress given power to create lower.
The Federal Judiciary. A Dual Judicial System In the U.S., we have a dual judicial system consisting of a national court system, but also separate court.
Part B: Notes: Chapter 18 “The Federal Court System”
1 Federal Judiciary Lesson Role of the Courts What is the role of courts - resolve political issues? Presidential election Presidential election.
The Judicial Branch. Jurisdiction Federal Courts –Article III, Section 1 vests judicial power in the Supreme Court and other inferior courts created by.
Judicial Branch #1 The Federal Court System. Dual Court System State Courts: have jurisdiction over the majority of cases Federal Courts: have jurisdiction.
Chapter 12 The Judiciary. Common Law Tradition  Common law = judge-made law; originated in England; derived from prevailing customs  Precedent = court.
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS - Judiciary The Judiciary.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 16 The Role of the Courts.
The Judicial Branch. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Understanding the Federal Judiciary The Framers viewed the federal.
Ch. 18 – The Judicial Branch “The Final Say” The Role of the Judicial Branch To interpret and define law To interpret and define law This involves hearing.
The Supreme Court The Supreme Court’s term runs from the first Monday in October through the end of June.
 Is the authority of the courts to hear certain cases  Under Constitution, federal courts have jurisdiction in cases regarding › Federal law › Treaties.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16. Our System is Adversarial.
Federal Court System. Powers of Federal Courts U.S. has a dual court system (Federal & State) State courts have jurisdiction over state laws Federal courts.
UNIT 4: SECTION 1 JUDICIAL BRANCH: ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND POWERS Essential Questions: How are Supreme Court justices appointed and confirmed by the.
The U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Justices.
Chapter 16 The Federal Courts. Article III: The Judicial Branch Job under Separation of Powers: Job under Separation of Powers: Interpret the Law Marbury.
The United States Supreme Court. Constitutional Basis Supreme Court is established in Article III of the Constitution There is one Supreme Court. There.
Understanding the U.S. Supreme Court Processing Supreme Court Cases Supreme Court Decision Making The Role of Law and Legal Principles Supreme Court Decision.
Copyright 2006 Prentice Hall Prentice Hall PoliticalScienceInteractive Shea, Green, and Smith Living Democracy Chapter 4 The Judiciary.
1. 2 Legislative Judicial Executive Creates Law Enforces Law Branches of Government Interprets Law Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition.
Chapter 16. The Nature of the Judicial System Introduction: Two types of cases: Criminal Law: The government charges an individual with violating one.
Structure and Function of the American Judiciary.
Chapter 14 The Judiciary. Structure of the Federal Courts Supreme Court Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces 12 Courts of Appeals 94 US District Courts.
The Judicial Branch Unit V.
The Function of the Supreme Court
Understanding the U.S. Supreme Court
The Federal Courts The Judiciary.
The U.S. Supreme Court.
The Federal Courts Chapter 19.
Longman PoliticalScienceInteractive
Chapter 18 Judicial Branch.
Prentice Hall PoliticalScienceInteractive
REVIEW 1) What is jurisdiction? 2) Define concurrent jurisdiction.
The Court System.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 7.
 Chapter 9 The Judiciary
The Judiciary Chapter 14.
The Federal Courts.
The Judiciary: Blending Law and Politics
Prentice Hall PoliticalScienceInteractive
The Federal Court System
The Federal Courts.
Welcome! Today is Thursday, March 29, 2018
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
Federal Judiciary Lesson 12.
How should we handle conflict?
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
The Federal Courts Chapter 16.
Presentation transcript:

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Longman PoliticalScienceInteractive Magleby & Light Government by the People Chapter 14 The Judiciary: The Balancing Branch

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman The Supreme Court’s Shift to the Right When Sandra Day O’Connor retired from the Supreme Court, a pivotal swing vote disappeared George W. Bush’s appointments of Samuel Alito and John Roberts shifted the Court to the right Example: 2007 decision to strike down as unconstitutional the use of race in assigning pupils to individual public schools

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Understanding the Federal Judiciary The Framers viewed the federal judiciary as an important check against Congress and the president But the judiciary has no influence over the “sword” or the “purse” Judicial power is ensured via: –Insulation from public opinion –Insulation from the rest of government

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Judicial Review The power of a court to refuse to enforce a law or government regulation that, in the opinion of the judges, conflicts with the U.S. Constitution or, in a state court, the state constitution Only a constitutional amendment or a later Supreme Court can modify the Court’s decisions

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Adversary System The Adversarial System Judges serve as relatively passive and detached referees who do not argue with attorneys or challenge evidence The Inquisitorial System Judges take an active role in discovering and evaluating evidence, will question witnesses, and intervene as deemed necessary

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Adversary System Court of law is a neutral arena where two parties argue their differences The federal government brings criminal cases The federal judiciary decides the cases

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Types of Legal Disputes Criminal Law –Crimes against the public order –Liberty is at stake –Right to government- provided attorneys –Right to trial by jury Civil law –Relations between individuals, and their legal rights –Typically monetary punishment

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman The Scope of Judicial Power Judicial power is passive and reactive Power only to decide justiciable disputes –Harm must have been done –Case must be ripe –Case cannot be moot –Case cannot be political

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Prosecuting Cases U.S. Department of Justice –Led by attorney general –Assisted by solicitor general –Provides public defenders

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Types of Federal Courts Article III (Constitutional) Versus Article I (Legislative) Courts Original Jurisdiction The authority of a court to hear a case “in the first instance” Appellate Jurisdiction The authority of a court to review decisions made by lower courts

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Level One: District Courts District courts hear nearly 258,000 civil cases and more than 68,000 criminal cases annually Use both grand juries and petit juries District judges are appointed by the president, subject to confirmation by the Senate, and hold office for life

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Level Two: Circuit Courts of Appeals The 11 U.S. Judicial Circuits

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Level Three: The Supreme Court

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Judicial Federalism: State and Federal Courts Dual court system Two court systems, state and federal, exist and operate at the same time in the same geographic areas

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman The Politics of Appointing Federal Judges No Constitutional requirements

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Making the Initial Choices Article II: --President has power to appoint --Senate has power of advice and consent Senatorial courtesy Chief Justice John Roberts (far right) congratulates Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. at his swearing-in ceremony as a new member of the Supreme Court

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Senate Advice and Consent Senate Confirmation Hearings Except for Robert Bork, most judicial nominees have refused to answer questions that might reveal how they would decide a case

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman The Role of Party, Race, and Gender Since FDR, only 10 percent of judicial appointments have gone to candidates of the opposition party Jimmy Carter brought increased diversity to the lower courts Ronald Reagan appointed fewer minorities, but was the first to appoint a woman to the Supreme Court Nearly 50 percent of Bill Clinton’s appointees were women and minorities Roughly 32 percent of George W. Bush’s nominees have been women and minorities

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman The Role of Judicial Philosophy

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Reform of the Selection Process The lengthy and embattled confirmation hearings of Robert Bork (1987) and Clarence Thomas (1991) led many to ask if the confirmation process was in need of reform

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman How Do Cases Rise to the Supreme Court?

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman The Eight Steps to Judgment Reviewing appeals – Writ of certiorari – In forma pauperis –Docket Granting the appeal Briefing the case – Amicus curiae briefs Holding the oral argument Meeting in conference Explaining the decision –Opinions of the Court –Dissenting opinion –Concurring opinion Writing the opinion Releasing the opinion

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman The Supreme Court Docket

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Influences on Supreme Court Decisions: The Chief Justice Appointed by the president upon confirmation by the Senate Responsible for assigning judges to committees, responding to proposed legislation that affects the judiciary, and delivering the annual Report on the State of the Judiciary Former Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Influences on Supreme Court Decisions: Law Clerks Chosen by each justice Increased number over time, leading to longer and more elaborate opinions Debate over how much influence on Court decisions

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Influences on Supreme Court Decisions: The Solicitor General Represents the federal government before the Supreme Court Files amicus curiae briefs in cases in which the federal government is not a party

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Influences on Supreme Court Decisions: Citizens and Interested Parties Also may file amicus curiae briefs Increasingly used to counter the positions of the solicitor general and the government

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman After the Court Decides Sometimes remands the case Uncertain effect on individuals who are not immediate parties to the suit Decisions are sometimes ignored Difficult to implement decisions requiring the cooperation of large numbers of officials

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Limits on Judicial Action: Adherence to Precedent Stare Decisis The rule of precedent, whereby a rule or law contained in a judicial decision is commonly viewed as binding on judges whenever the same question is presented

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Limits on Judicial Action: Congress and the President Changing the numbers Changing the jurisdiction

Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Longman Debating the Proper Role of the Courts An independent judiciary is a hallmark of a constitutional democracy and a free society Yet, judicial independence is often criticized when judges make unpopular decisions