Harlingen CISD Performance Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PBM The Staging Process. Check the dates August In late August, districts receive their PBMAS summary report.

Advertisements

1 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD PBMAS Program Effectiveness Review PBM November 11, 2008 DEIC Meeting Prepared by: Susan Kovacs Director of Federal & Special Programs.

System Safeguards and Campus Improvement

Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?

Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.

Part 2. Participate fully Hand in the air for getting attention Problem solve Limit side conversations Silence cell phone Norms.

Division of Instructional Support Office of School Improvement, Accountability & Compliance.

Accountability/Title I Advisory Wednesday, April 30, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (SIP). AYP INDICATORS, COMPONENTS AND STANDARDS  Reading/ELA  Performance: 87% Proficiency Rate  Participation: 95% Participating.

TUSCALOOSA COUNTY SCHOOLS Where Students Learn, Grow, and Achieve.

Performance-Based Monitoring and Interventions April 3, 2008.

RF Monitoring: RF Monitoring  RF Monitoring will still have its own guidance document for 

Data Validation Monitoring - Discipline Staging and Interventions March 5, 2015.

Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)

Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.

Rider 70 Changes to Staging for Special Education.

Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates March 07, 2014 Jana Schreiner, Accountability and State Assessment Consultant.

Adapted from Texas Education Agency PBM ProductDate of 2014 release Projected date of 2015 release PBMAS (Unmasked reports) LEA reports posted.

Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.

PEIMS and Accountability. Clear System of Data Quality Documentation (Enrollment, Special Program, etc.) PEIMS Data Entry Pearson Data File Answer Documents.

ESL Education Program Report Hudson ISD ESL/Content-Based An English program that serves students identified as students of limited English proficiency.

Department of Special Education Division of Special Programs in the Office of Academics 1111 W. 6 th Street Phone: (512) Austin, Texas

1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.

The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.

Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS) ESC3 – NET3 Session: Data Analysis/Problem Statements.

Go for the Touchdown with ESC-2

NOVEMBER 6, 2014 Harlingen CISD PBMAS Intervention Planning.

Texas Accountability Intervention System Part 2 September 23, 2013 Education Service Center, Region 2 Electronic handouts:

August 18, 2015 Net 3 Texas Accountability for State and Federal System Safeguards.

Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS) January 2005 Update.

1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.

 Leading, Learning, Serving.   District – Stage 2 AYP  District - Stage 3 AYP (possibility )  Campus – Stage 1 AYP (possibility.

SAISD Focus/Priority Training Samantha Gallegos, Coordinator III

Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.

New York State Education Department Informational Webinar October 8, Progress Reporting and Performance Management for Receivership Schools.

Program Update For Compliance PBMAS (Performance Based Monitoring) –Moved from Stage 4 w/on-site TEA visit to Stage 1B ( 3 indicators caused.

Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.

Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS). Data Process Reporting State Districts & Campuses IR or Met Standard Indexes & Safeguards Federal (ESEA.

An Overview 2015 PBMAS and Intervention Activities

Data Analysis Needs Assessment Improvement Plan Implement & Monitor ●Set annual goals ●Identify a strategy ●Set quarterly goals ●Determine interventions.

National DCST Induction and Orientation Programme Module 2: Workshop 1 Preparing for the Baseline Assessment.

Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.

Addressing Federal Program Stages in PBM OCTOBER 27, 2015.

School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.

Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.

June 2015 Good morning and welcome! 1.Open template and begin to review; and 2.Be sure you have your 2015 accountability data out, ready for easy.

By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.

Stage 4 Restructuring Stage 5 Alternative Governance.

Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.

Staging Training Region 4 ESC January 16, Data Validation Acronyms  DVM – Data Validation Monitoring  DA – Data Analysis (Intervention document)

Adequate Yearly Progress By Allyson, Brette, and Riley.

Raising standards, improving lives

Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council Social Services CSSIW Performance Evaluation Report 2014–15.

Stage 3 - Corrective Action. Corrective Action and the Corrective Action Team.

Data Validation Monitoring: Student Assessment Presents…

TAIS: Root Cause Analysis Keela McGraw, Billy Schewee ESC Region 11.

Effective Programs for Successful Students The Network Summer Summit Presenters: Rachel Harrington (Performance-Based Monitoring Division) Judy Struve.

April 29-30, Review information related to the RF monitoring system Ensure that the agency meets its ongoing obligation to have a monitoring system.

Edgewood ISD   School District Effectiveness  Statutory Requirements  Valid Indicators of Performance  Maximum Inclusion  Individual.

PBMAS Overview and TAIS Training

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)

Career Technology Education Performance-Based Monitoring Summer Overview Ed Garcia, CTE Specialist Region One Education Service Center (956)

Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H

Advancing ELL Progress

Instructional Coaches District BE/ESL Department

Accountability/DVM Update

The Answer Sheet—Where Assessment & Accountability Meet

Instructional Coaches District BE/ESL Department

2019 Accountability Updates

OGSM Framework Template

Presentation transcript:

Harlingen CISD Performance Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS)

A district-level, data-driven monitoring system developed and implemented annually since 2004 Established to shift from process to results-based monitoring—program effectiveness and student performance

Bilingual Education/English as a Second Language (BE/ESL) Career and Technical Education (CTE) No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Special Education (SPED)

Automated data system that reports on the performance of school districts and charter schools in the 4 Program Areas below: Bilingual Education/English as a Second Language (BE/ESL)-10 indicators Career Technology Education (CTE)-9 indicators No Child Left Behind (NCLB)-10 indicators Special Education (SPED)- 22 indicators

1.TEA utilizes the Performance-Based Monitoring (PBM) system to monitor school district performance. 2.The PBM system reflects the use of integrated interventions based on school district performance as evidenced by Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS) indicators. 3.Results on each PBMAS indicator and patterns across indicators determine a school district’s required levels of intervention, if at all.

4. Thus, a district staged for interventions in the PBM system must identify a District Leadership Team (DLT). 5. Then, the DLT is responsible for conducting “intervention activities” including the collection and analysis of data to identify areas for program improvement.

6. Districts that: have been rated as “improvement required” in the accountability system, and/or have missed one or more of the system safeguards targets, and/or have been staged for interventions in the Performance‐Based Monitoring (PBM) system will also need to engage in the Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS).

We are staged based on how many indicators receive a 3 or higher. Every student in the district counts and we all contribute to our staging.

Performance-Based Staging Monitoring (PBM) BE/ESL 3 NCLB 2 SPED 2 CTE No Staging Residential Facility (RF) Monitoring Residential Facilities (RF) 3 PBM On-Site Visit Scheduled for April

Indicators in which a 3 or higher were reported: #1 Passing Rate - Social Studies 33.9%(65% needed) Writing (70%needed). #3 EOC Passing Rate – Mathematics 29.9% (50.0) #20 Discretionary DAEP Placements Residential Facility (RF) Monitoring

Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS) Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS)

Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS) Continuous Improvement Process and Plan Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS) Continuous Improvement Process and Plan Objective findings Problem Statements Data Analysis Root Cause Identify Root Cause Needs Assessment Annual Goals, Strategies Quarterly Goals, Interventions Improvement Plan Review data by quarter, Implementation Impact, Reporting, Adjustment Implement and Monitor