MSC #26 Ready or Not: Next Generation Assessments Susan Gendron Senior Fellow Policy Coordinator, SMARTER July 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modesto Common Core Reading October 11, Todays agenda Focus for the day – Reading AM Session 1. Understanding Rigor/Relevance Framework 2. Exploring.
Advertisements

Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Understanding PARCC. Diagnostic Assessment PARCC Overview Mid-Year Assessment (MYA) Speaking and Listening Assessment Performance-Based Assessment (PBA)
Madison School District Governing Board Meeting March 19, 2013.
PARCC Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask.
SBA Usability, Accessibility, & Accommodations
Accessibility and Accommodations. Introduction Positive and productive assessment experience Results that are fair and accurate.
Accessibility and Accommodations. Introduction Positive and productive assessment experience Results that are fair and accurate.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Structure of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Research-based learning progressions Internationally.
Smarter Balanced Accessibility and Accommodations Policies and Guidelines Chief Instructional Officers Update March 12, 2013.
Website: Dr. Dea Conrad-Curry Partner in Education PARCC FRAMEWORKS & ASSESSMENT BLUEPRINT TOOLS FOR TEACHING.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Kristy Green Debbie Wilson Joan Mattson. Higher Expectations 3 ELA/Literacy Read sufficiently complex texts independently Write effectively to sources.
Accommodations SBAC Assessment Beth Schiltz Fall 2014.
Accessibility and Accommodations. Introduction Positive and productive assessment experience Results that are fair and accurate.
Understanding PARCC. Diagnostic Assessment PARCC Overview Mid-Year Assessment (MYA) Speaking and Listening Assessment Performance-Based Assessment (PBA)
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers PARCC 1.
SMARTER BALANCED QUESTION TYPES OVERVIEW TEXT TXT EXT Assess a broad range of content. Scoring is objective, fast, and inexpensive to score. Difficult.
What you never wanted to know about accommodations. Getting testy about testing.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision of Assessment: Texts Worth Reading, Problems Worth Solving, Tests Worth Taking Overview Presented by:
Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5 Whitney Shook, Assistant Principal/Testing Coordinator Lori Dunagan, Curriculum Support.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
March16, To keep up with the current and future standards of high school graduates. To align with college and career readiness standards. To ensure.
GED 2014 Changes, Challenges, and Choices October 14, 2014.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Parent Information Session Colchester Public Schools 1.
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
Overview Dr. Karen Russo 1 As of October 1, 2014.
Computerized Adaptive Testing for Students with Disabilities in K-12: Promises and Challenges Marty McCall Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium CCSSO.
Assessment Literacy Module
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Assessment Update Testing Students with Disabilities District Test Coordinator Meeting Douglas Alexander Anne Mruz Suzanne Swaffield June 11,
{ Allegan AAESA March 17, 18, 2014 Linda Jordan. Agenda WelcomeClosingShare What’s Working? Questions Updates Work Time 2.
A New Reality The world is no longer the safe, stable and predictable place that it once was and, as a result, there are ever increasing and incredible.
Riverside County Assessment Network CCSS SBAC Update.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
THINK / PUZZLE / EXPLORE Think about what you may have read as part of the pre-reading activity for this workshop as well as what you already know about.
Online Assessment Supports State Assessment Beth Schiltz, SD DOE – Sped Office September, 2015.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
New Mexico PARCC Tests: What do families need to know? November 2015.
Advances in the PARCC ELA/Literacy Assessment August
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
A Vocabulary Study THE LANGUAGE OF THE CCSS AND PARCC From Bruce D. Taylor "Most Significant Common Core Key Terms," Chicago 2014.
Accessibility and Accommodations. Introduction Positive and productive assessment experience Results that are fair and accurate.
Performance Task Overview Introduction This training module answers the following questions: –What is a performance task? –What is a Classroom Activity?
S MARTER B ALANCED (R EQUIRED FOR DTC S, STC S, AND S MARTER B ALANCED TA S )
Rhode Island Department of Education Diane Girard & Colleen O’Brien.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
The Constructed Response Assessment The Journey Continues.
Smarter Balanced 103: Item Types and Instructional Implementation Rachel Aazzerah Science & Social Science Assessment Specialist
Reflecting on the Shifts in Assessment. English Language Arts.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Smarter Balanced Scores & Reports. The new assessment, Smarter Balanced, replaces our previous statewide assessment, the New England Common Assessment.
A Peak into PARCC: Analysis of Test Items and Tools on the ELA PBA Content courtesy of Dr. Eric Hibbs, Superintendent Marlboro School District
CCSS & Smarter Balanced Mathematics: Key Shifts to Claims tinyurl.com/UPK5math University of Portland Brian Graham Camas School District TOSA M.Ed.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Questions
Welcome to SBAC Claims: ELA
CCSS: Common Core State Standards and SBAC: Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Parent Information Night.
Georgia Milestones Online Testing Program
Presentation transcript:

MSC #26 Ready or Not: Next Generation Assessments Susan Gendron Senior Fellow Policy Coordinator, SMARTER July 2013

Agenda Next Generation of Assessments Welcome Closing RR Framework Assessment: Overview & Information Item Types Applications

Resources

Backward Design “To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means you know where you’re going…so the steps you take are always in the right direction.”

Evidence Based Design

1. Define the domain 2. Define claims to be made 3. Define assessment targets 4. Define evidence required 5. Develop Task Models 6. Performance Tasks

Matrix of Accessibility Features Available to AllAvailable with ISAAP Available with Documentation EmbeddedEnglish Glossaries Highlighter Mark for Review Masking Writing Tools Zoom Expandable Passages Calculator Digital Notepad Tab-enter Navigation Embedded Math Tools Color Overlays Color Contrast Guided Line Reader Magnification Reverse Contrast Text-to-Speech ASL Audio Captions Braille Translation Option Auditory Calming Non-EmbeddedBreaks Scratch Paper Color OverlaysAbacus Hand-held Calculator Print on Demand Quiet Environment

Figure 1: Conceptual Model of the Smarter Balanced Accessibility and Accommodations Framework A very small percentage of students participate in alternate assessments aligned to the Common Core State Standards

Three Item Types Evidence-Based Selected Response (EBSR) Selected-response question with a second selected-response question that asks students to show evidence from the text Examples include: Multiple-choice +; true-false + Technology- Enhanced Constructed Response (TECR) Uses technology to capture student comprehension of texts Examples include: drag and drop, cut and paste, shade text, move items to show relationships Range of Prose Constructed Responses (PCR) Read and can communicate understanding both in terms of written expression and knowledge of language and conventions Examples include: Multipage Essay

Six Item Types Selected Response Students select one response from a provided list Examples include: Multiple-choice, true- false, matching Constructed Response Student organizes and uses knowledge and skills to answer a question or complete a task Examples include: short answer, open response, extended response, essay, performance assessment Extended Response Students prepare a written answer, often a short phrase, a list, or a more substantial composition Examples include: Multipage Essay

Six Item Types Performance Task/Assessment Activity that requires students to construct a response, create a product or perform a demonstration. Open- ended-may not have one right answer, rubric used to grade. Technology- Enhanced Items (TEI) are computer-delivered items that include specialized interactions for collecting response data. Examples include: Select a single piece of text and type in a replacement for that text, select options from drop down menu Technology Enabled Allow for non-traditional layout of items that use constructed-response and/or selected- responses. Examples include: sound, computer read aloud, video, interactive widget

Claims and Targets Broad statements of the assessment system’s learning outcomes, each of which requires evidence. For each Claim, a set of “Assessment Targets” are provided. Claims Ways in which students may be expected to learn and demonstrate their knowledge A target represents the prioritized content for summative assessment Targets

Overall Claim (3-8 or 9-12) Informational Texts Literacy Texts Relationship Between Claims and Targets Claim # 2 (WRITING) Claim # 1 (LITERACY) Target 2 Target 3 Target 4 -7 Target 1 Target 8 Target 9 Target 10-14

How do Targets relate to Standards? Overall Claim (3-8 or 9-12) Informational Texts Literacy Texts Claim # 2 (WRITING) Claim # 1 (LITERACY) Target 2 Target 3 Target 4-7 Target 1 Target 8 Target 9 Target CCSS RL-1 CCSS RL-2 CCSS RL-4 CCSS RL-5 CCSS L-5 CCSS L-5c CCSS L-4

No longer are we looking at standards in isolation. Instead, how do these groups of standards work together to accomplish a task or target? Overall Claim (3-8 or 9-12) Informational Texts Literacy Texts Claim # 2 (WRITING) Claim # 1 (LITERACY) Target 2 Target 3 Target 4-7 Target 1 Target 8 Target 9 Target CCSS RL-1 CCSS RL-2 CCSS RL-4 CCSS RL-5 CCSS L-5 CCSS L-5c CCSS L-4

Rigor/Relevance Framework

Cognitive Rigor and Depth of Knowledge The level of complexity of the cognitive demand – Level 1/ Quad A: Recall and Reproduction Requires eliciting information such as a fact, definition, term, or a simple procedure, as well as performing a simple algorithm or applying a formula. – Level 2/ Quad B: Basic Skills and Concepts Requires the engagement of some mental processing beyond a recall of information. – Level 3/Quad C: Strategic Thinking and Reasoning Requires reasoning, planning, using evidence, and explanations of thinking. – Level 4: Extended Thinking Requires complex reasoning, planning, developing, and thinking most likely over an extended period of time.

Defining Relevance

Compare Learning to: Student’s life Family’s life Student’s community and friends Our world, nation, state World of work World of service World of business and commerce Use the Real World Moral, ethical, political, cultural points of view and dilemmas Real world materials Internet resources Video and other media Scenarios, real life stories News—periodicals, visual media Adding Relevance to Any Lesson

Rigor/Relevance Framework

Bloom’s Taxonomy— Technology Version educationaltechnologyguy.blogspot.com

The “two-second rule” is used by a driver who wants to maintain a safe following distance at any speed. A driver must count two seconds from when the car in front of him or her passes a fixed point, such as a tree, until the driver passes the same fixed point. Drivers use this rule to determine the minimum distance to follow a car traveling at the same speed. A diagram representing this distance is shown. As the speed of the cars increases, the minimum following distance also increases. Explain how the “two-second rule” leads to a greater minimum following distance as the speed of the cars increases. As part of your explanation, include the minimum following distances, in feet, for cars traveling at 30 miles per hour and 60 miles per hour. 2 Second Rule

Answer: ¾ of a sandwich is Left for Oscar