Near Detector Tasks EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Paul Soler.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulation of Neutrino Factory beam and quasielastic scattering off electrons in the near detector Yordan Karadzhov University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Advertisements

Near detectors and systematics IDS-NF plenary meeting at TIFR, Mumbai October 13, 2009 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg TexPoint fonts used in EMF: AAAAA.
Neutrino Oscillation Physics at a Neutrino Factory Rob Edgecock RAL/CERN-AB.
ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE TEVATRON FIXED-TARGET PROGRAM Heidi Schellman Northwestern University 1 6/11/12.
Near Detector Working Group for ISS Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting 24 January 2006 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.
Near detectors for long baseline neutrino experiments T. Nakaya (Kyoto) 1T. Nakaya.
Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%) Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%)
Alain Blondel ISS3 RAL Why do we need to do to determine neutrino fluxes to at a Neutrino Factory or Beta-beam? source: M. Apollonio et al, OSCILLATION.
Alain Blondel NUFACT03 Why do we believe that the neutrino fluxes can be determined to at a Neutrino Factory? source: M. Apollonio et al, OSCILLATION.
Neutrino physics: experiments and infrastructure Anselmo Cervera Villanueva Université de Genève Orsay, 31/01/06.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Basic Measurements: What do we want to measure? Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction to Experimental.
Preliminary Ideas for a Near Detector at a Neutrino Factory Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting 23 September 2005 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
Alain Blondel ISS-1- CERN sept05 Why do we believe that the neutrino fluxes can be determined to at a Neutrino Factory? source: M. Apollonio.
2/21/2008 P5 neutrino session1 Conventional neutrino experiments Heidi Schellman P5 February 21, 2008.
P461 - particles VIII1 Neutrino Physics Three “active” neutrino flavors (from Z width measurements). Mass limit from beta decay Probably have non-zero.
Summary Near Detector at IDS Meeting in FNAL EuroNu Annual General Meeting, Strasbourg 3 June 2010 Paul Soler.
International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory The IDS-NF K. Long, 16 March, 2008.
Alain Blondel Neutrino Factory scenarios I will endeavour to address some principle design issues related to the physics use of high intensity muon beams.
Wolfgang Menges, Queen Mary Measuring |V ub | from Semileptonic B Decays Wolfgang Menges Queen Mary, University of London, UK Institute of Physics: Particle.
WP5: Detector Performance and Cost EuroNu Launch Meeting 5 February 2008 Coordinator: Paul Soler, University of Glasgow Deputy: Anselmo Cervera Villanueva,
Near Detector at a Neutrino Factory Chuzenji Lake, Nikko, Japan. 10 November 2005 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.
Measurement of CP violation with the LHCb experiment at CERN
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Summary Detector Working Group Neutrino Factory International Design Study Meeting 17 January 2008 Paul Soler.
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
UK involvement in Neutrino Factory Detector R&D UK Neutrino Factory Meeting 3 May 2006 Paul Soler University of Glasgow.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
WP5: Detector Performance and Cost EuroNu Meeting CERN, 26 March 2009 Paul Soler Coordinator: Paul Soler, University of Glasgow Deputy: Anselmo Cervera.
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
NEUTRINO PHYSICS 1. Historical milestones 2. Neutrinos at accelerators 3. Solar and atmospheric neutrinos 4. Neutrino oscillations 5. Neutrino astronomy.
Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #3 Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.How is neutrino beam produced? 2.Physics.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
R. Tsenov, 4 August, 2011 Slide 1/30 Beam monitoring and Near detector requirements for a Neutrino factory or long baseline beams R. Tsenov, 4 August,
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Extrapolation Neutrino Flux measured at Near Detector to the Far Detector Near Detector Workshop, CERN, 30 July 2011 Paul Soler, Andrew Laing.
Near Detector Report International Scoping Study Detector Meeting 4 July 2006 Paul Soler University of Glasgow.
1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 5. 2 Contents Top quark mass measurements at Tevatron Electroweak Measurements at low energy: –Neutral Currents at low momentum.
Near Detector Flux and R&D Near Detector Flux and R&D International Scoping Study Meeting 27 April 2005 Paul Soler University of Glasgow.
Steve Geer IDS Meeting CERN March Neutral Currents and Tests of 3-neutrino Unitarity in Long-Baseline Exeriments Steve Geer Barger, Geer, Whisnant,
How to extract Neutrino Factory flux from IMD and neutrino elastic scattering? Near Detector Workshop, CERN, 30 July 2011 Paul Soler.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory The IDS-NF K. Long, 8 th April 2008.
A Letter of Intent to Build a MiniBooNE Near Detector: BooNE W.C. Louis & G.B. Mills, FNAL PAC, November 13, 2009 Louis BooNE Physics Goals MiniBooNE Appearance.
General motivation S. Geer, K. Long Charge: (July collaboration meeting) Neutrinos and our lives (PR motivation) Neutrino oscillation and the role of NuFact.
Detector possibilities: scintillator based detectors EUCARD 1 st Annual Meeting, RAL, 13 April 2010 Paul Soler.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
Status and oscillation results of the OPERA experiment Florian Brunet LAPP - Annecy 24th Rencontres de Blois 29/05/2012.
Neutrino DIS measurements in CHORUS DIS2004 Strbske Pleso Alfredo G. Cocco INFN – Napoli.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
MIND Systematic Errors EuroNu Meeting, RAL 18 January 2010 Paul Soler.
Detector: Status and Plans 6 th IDS-NF Meeting, RAL, 22 September 2010 Paul Soler.
Neutrinos from Stored Muons STORM physics with a μ storage ring.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
Charm production and its impact on future neutrino experiments Francesco Di Capua – INFN Napoli NuFact - Valencia 3/07/08.
Systematics Sanghoon Jeon.
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
Detector Working Group: review of progress, issues to be addressed
Detector Baseline EuroNu Meeting, RAL 20 January 2010 Paul Soler.
to determine neutrino fluxes
Neutrino Oscillation Physics with a Neutrino Factory
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Based on material presented at various meetings
Presentation transcript:

Near Detector Tasks EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Paul Soler

2 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Near Detector and Beam Diagnostics aims o Beam diagnostics (needed for flux measurement) – Neutrino Factory –Number of muon decays –Measurement of divergence –Measurement of Muon polarization o Near detector measurements needed for neutrino oscillation systematics: –Flux control for the long baseline search. –Measurement of charm background – also search for taus from NSI? –Cross-section measurements: DIS, QES, RES scattering o Other near detector neutrino physics (electroweak and QCD): –sin 2  W -  sin 2  W ? –Unpolarised Parton Distribution Functions, nuclear effects –Polarised Parton Distribution Functions – polarised target –Lambda (  ) polarisation –  S from xF 3 -  S ? _ –Charm production: |V cd | and |V cs |, CP violation from D 0 / D 0 mixing? –Beyond SM searches – (taus?) –…

3 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Beam Diagnostics (ISS report) o Beam Current Transformer (BCT) to be included at entrance of straight section: large diameter, with accuracy ~ o Beam Cherenkov for divergence measurement? Could affect quality of beam. storage ring shielding? the leptonic detector the charm and DIS detector Polarimeter Cherenkov BCT Radiation simulations

4 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Beam Diagnostics (ISS report) o Muon polarization: Build prototype of polarimeter Fourier transform of muon energy spectrum amplitude=> polarization frequency => energy decay => energy spread.

5 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Flux Measurement at Near Detector  Best possibility: Inverse Muon Decay scattering off electrons in the near detector Well known cross sections in Standard Model (with 0.1% accuracy)

6 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Flux Measurement at Near Detector  Energy spectra for ν μ (green) and anti ν e (blue) for  decays/year, Mass ~1 ton, 400 m long section. E  = 40 GeV. E = 40GeV, P = x x x10 9 E = 40GeV, P = x x x10 9 E = 30GeV, P = x x x10 9 E = 30GeV, P = x x x10 9 E = 20GeV, P = x x x10 8 E = 20GeV, P = x x x10 9 Need to redo: E  =25GeV Baseline storage ring straight section (755 m) Perform proper event selection

7 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Flux Observed by Near Detector  Near Detector sees a line source (755 long decay straight)  Far Detector sees a point source 130 m 1 km 130 m 1 km2500 km ND FD

8 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Near Detector flux used to extract P e  o Original idea: use matrix method with Near Detector data (even if spectrum not identical in near and far detector!) to extract oscillation probability:  Where: M 1 =matrix relating event rate and flux of e at ND (x-section + det) M 2 =matrix relating event rate and flux of  at FD (x-section + det) M=matrix relating measured ND e rate and FD  rate (measured!) M nOsc =matrix relating expected e flux from ND to FD (extrapolation) o Method works well but two inversions affects fit convergence Probability of oscillation determined by matrix method under “simplistic” conditions. Need to give more realism to detector and matter effects. Two matrix inversions!

9 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Near Detector flux used to extract P e  P e  There is only one matrix inversion and fit to P e  seems to be more robust. Hardly any change in error contours by adding ND information. Still need to extract syst error from method Assume “true” flux Flux from ND  ND /E ~35%/ √ E  FD /E ~55%/ √ E No oscillations o Now we calculate in stages: ND simulated data to predict ND flux where: M 1 =matrix relating event rate and flux of e at ND  Extrapolate ND flux to FD: M nOsc =matrix relating e flux from ND to FD o Extract FD interaction rate: M 2 =matrix relating event rate and flux of  at FD, = prob oscillation

10 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Charm measurement o Motivation: measure charm cross-section to validate size of charm background in wrong-sign muon signature o Charm cross-section and branching fractions poorly known, especially close to threshold o Semiconductor vertex detector only viable option in high intensity environment (emulsion too slow!) CHORUS 2008

11 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Cross section measurements o Measure of cross sections in DIS, QE and RES.  Coherent  o Different nuclear targets: H 2, D 2 o Nuclear effects, nuclear shadowing, reinteractions At NUFACT, with modest size targets can obtain very large statistics, but is <1% error achievable? What is expected cross- section errors from MiniBoone, SciBoone, T2K, Minerva, before NUFACT?

12 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Other physics: Parton Distribution Functions o Unpolarised and Polarised Parton Distribution Functions o  S from xF 3 o Sum rules: e.g. Gross-Llewelyn Smith   polarization: spin transfer from quarks to  — NOMAD best data — Neutrino factory ~1000 times more data

13 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Near Detector Design Muon chambers EM calorimeter Hadronic Calorimeter o Overall design of near detector(s): more than one detector? –Near Detector could be a number of specialised detectors to perform different functions (ie. lepton and flux measurement, charm measurement, PDFs, etc.) or larger General Purpose Detector

14 EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Near Detector Design o Near Detector elements: –Vertex detector: Choice of Pixels (eg. Hybrid pixels, Monolithic Active Pixels …) or silicon strips –Tracker: scintillating fibres, gaseous trackers (TPC, Drift chambers, …) –Other sub-detectors: PID, muon ID, calorimeter, … o Tasks: –Simulation of near detector and optimisation of layout: benefit from common software framework for Far Detector –Flux determination with inverse muon decays, etc. –Analysis of charm using near detector –Determination of systematic error from near/far extrapolation –Expectation of cross-section measurements –Test beam activities to validate technology (eg. vertex detectors) –Construction of beam diagnostic prototypes –Other physics studies: PDFs, etc. (engage with theory community for interesting measurements)