SUB-MODULE 4. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level
Advertisements

1 Mateja Bizilj PEMPAL BCOP KEY CONCEPTS AND APPROACHES TO PROGRAMS AND PERFORMANCE Tbilisi, June 28, 2007.
Poverty Monitoring - Good Practice in Selecting Indicators Presentation by Dirk U. Hahn, Consultant at the Workshop on Prioritization, Operationalization.
JOINT EVALUATION UNIT – April Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Cross-cutting M&E functions in MENARID MENARID Knowledge Exchange workshop 24th to 28th of March, Hammamet, Tunisia 1.
Gender sensitive indicators Turin 12 February 2014.
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
Indicator Baseline Target Milestones PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS.
Participants should expect to understand: Concept of M&E Importance of gender in M&E Different steps in the M&E process Integrating gender into program/project.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
Indicators Dr Murali Krishna Public Health Foundation of India.
1-6 December 2003ASIACOVER Training Workshop Bangkok, Thailand Socio-economic Aspects of ASIACOVER Variables and indicators Selected for inclusion.
May 8, 2012 MWP-K Learning Event Monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) framework for the Millennium Water Program, Kenya.
Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Infrastructure Projects: Latin America and Caribbean Regional Workshop Lima, Peru – November 2009 Shireen Lateef Measuring.
Developing Indicators
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 2o th November Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Module 6: Properties of Indicators Tools for Civil Society to Understand and Use Development Data: Improving MDG Policymaking and Monitoring.
Lesson 8: Effectiveness Macerata, 11 December Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
The National Development Plan, Iraq 6 July 2010 “Developing Objectives & Indicators for Strategic Planning” Khaled Ehsan and Helen Olafsdottir UNDP Iraq.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
Primer on Monitoring and Evaluation. The 3 Pillars of Monitoring and Evaluation  Identifying the Performance Indicators  Collecting information using.
Module 9 Mainstreaming in country monitoring systems Country-led environmental and climate change mainstreaming (specialist course) Training materials.
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH. UNAIDS M&E Senior Adviser 12 th May 2009.
Goals and Indicators. Sustainable Measures Goals, Principles, Criteria, and Indicators  Goal – a description of future condition community members wish.
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
1 Gender Statistics: What is all about? Angela Me UNECE Statistics Division.
1 Second Regional Workshop on gender and Poverty Reduction Strategies, September 2003, Siem Reap Gender responsive costing and budgeting Nalini Burn.
Roadmap for a monitoring framework for the post-2015 development agenda OWG on Sustainable Development Goals Informal meeting on measuring progress (17.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
SUB-MODULE 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK RESULTS BASED LOG-FRAME TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2 )
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
Monitoring and Evaluation Orientation 17 th May 2011 MCA Namibia.
Midterm Review of Agriculture and Food Security Sector June 2009, Baghdad.
Task NumberHarmonise, develop & implement capacity building Performance Indicators CB-07-01c Harmonise efforts by Tasks, in particular those related with.
SUB-MODULE. 3 RESULTS CHAIN RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
The P Process Strategic Design
Advanced Engineering Projects Management Dr. Nabil I El Sawalhi Associate Professor of Construction Management 1AEPM 4.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
Deeping Skill in Working with Logical Frameworks Examples.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND HUMAN SETTLEMENTS Presentation by Delegation of the European Union Consultative Group Meeting Technical Session La Palm, Accra, 23/09/2010.
Key Components of a successful Proposal OAS / IACML Workshop on Technical Assistance. San José, Costa Rica May 8, 2007 By: José Luis Alvarez R. Consultant.
Kaushal Joshi Senior Statistician Development Indicators and Policy Research Division, Economics and Research Department, Asian Development Bank, Manila.
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
Demystifying Project Level MIS: Practical Implementation Dr Eric Weiss Experience Sharing Workshop on MIS for IFAD Projects, Bangkok, 9-10 October 2006.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Marelize Gorgens The World Bank An M&E strategy Monitoring & Evaluation strategy Master & Execute Money and Energy is a waste of M&E that we do not M&E.
Performance Indicators
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Country Level Programs
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH
MAINSTREAMING OF WOMEN, CHILDREN AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES’ CONSIDERATIONS IN RELATION TO THE ENERGY SECTOR Presentation to the Joint Meeting of the.
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Promoting Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women
Tracking development results at the EIB
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Assessing Trust Fund Performance
Gender mainstreaming in environmental
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Presentation transcript:

SUB-MODULE 4. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)

 Introduction to the RLF  Participatory Approach for RLF development  The results chain  Performance indicators  Means of verification  Risks and mitigation measures 6 Sub-Modules TRAINING CONTENT 2 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Evaluation  Test at end of training  Multiple choice, open questions and case studies

3 CONTENT: SUB-MODULE 4 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

4 OBJECTIVE: SUB-MODULE 4 At the end of this sub-module, Bank staff are able to:  Understand the importance of measuring results through the establishment of objective performance indicators;  Understand the linkage between baseline, targets and performance indicators;  Develop objectively verifiable indicators across sectors RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

I. Definition 5  Performance indicators are quantitative or qualitative factors or variables  They provide a simple and reliable means to measure and inform the achievement to reflect the changes connected to an intervention  They also help to assess the performance of a development entity. RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

6 Indicators are used for:  Providing the basis for monitoring and evaluation. Progress toward the achievement of expected results can be measured at the level of Outputs and Outcomes  Demonstrate, through the use of Core Sector Indicators, the Bank's contribution to development.  Link the project to the CSP and possibly the Millenium Development Goals.  Provide a basis for informed decision-making when changes are required during implementation. RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

 Output indicators: measure the quantity of products and services needed to meet an objective of the results chain – for example: kilometers of road constructed, female staff trained on a specific subject; number of wells constructed  Outcome Indicators: The likely or achieved short-term and medium-term effects of an intervention’s outputs – for example – percentage of enrolment of female in secondary schools, increase in head households revenues ($/annum) 7 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

 Impact indicators: Long-term results that measure the impact or the achievement of the project or programme goal. It indicates the quality and quantity of long-term results generated by the programme.  For example - Reduced under five child mortality in country X, Increased school enrollment rates of girls in country X, Proportion of households living below the poverty line reduced in country X. 8 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

9 Performance Indicators Indicators Baseline (2010) Target (2015) Outcome: Female headed households with access to safe drinking water in the project area (%) 3050 Outcome: Girls enrolled in college (%)3040 Output: New classrooms built (#)0150 Output: Latrines built for girls (#)025 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

10  Quantitative indicators measure changes in numerical terms such as numbers, percentage, frequency, ratio, proportion, etc. Examples :  Percentage of girls/boys attending primary schools  Unemployment rates of women/men in the rural areas RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

11  Reflect´s people judgements, opinions, perceptions or attitudes. They can be expressed in terms of satisfaction and perception of change, etc. Examples:  More than 80% of residents in the project area are satisfied (average of 3 out of 4) with the new water services (taste, colour, smell). RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

 These ‘indirect’ indicators are used when it is difficult to directly measure a result or change.  They are largely symbolic, or approximate of the change to be measured. 12 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

13  The sex-disaggregated indicators measure changes related to gender equity. Results Chain IndicatorBaselineTarget Means of verification Risks and mitigation measures People trained in improved hygiene practices. Women trained in improved hygiene practices (#) 0 (2013) 2000 (2015) Quarterly Project Progress Reports Risk: Participants did not participate because of language barriers MM: Provide training in local languages ​. Men trained in improved hygiene practices (#) 0 (2013) 2000 (2015) RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

 An indicator that helps to measure gender-related changes. IndicatorBaselineTarget Water management committees chaired by women (%) 0 (2014)20 (2019) Female headed households that that have access to potable water in the project area (%) 30 (2014)70 (2019) Male headed households that that have access to potable water in the project area (%) 40 (2014)70 (2019) Time spent by women per week fetching water (hours) 10 (2014)0 (2019) 14 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

15  Core Sector Indicators (CSI) are used by the Bank to report to its shareholders and the general public of its contribution to development.  CSI measure the direct results of the Bank's interventions, often tangible, quantifiable, and made ​​ during the life cycle of the operation. RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

16 55 sectoral indicators defined in 8 sectors: 1)Water & sanitation. 2)Transport, power and ITC. 3)Agriculture and Agro-industries. 4)Regional integration. 5)Climate change and clean energy. 6)Education, health and social protection. 7)Economic and financial gouvernance. 8)Private sector. RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

17 TRANSPORT  Roads constructed or rehabilitated (km).  National citizens employed in the construction, operation and maintenance of the infrastructure project (number per month), of which are female (percentage per month). WATER AND SANTITATION  Additional potable water production capacity (m3/day).  People educated through hygiene programs that are part of the project intervention (number), of which are female (percentage). RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

18 AGRICULTURE  Land irrigated as a result of the project intervention (hectares)  People trained in sustainable agricultural practices resulting from the project intervention (number), of which are female (percentage) REGIONAL INTEGRATION  Cross-border roads constructed or rehabilitated (km)  New telecommunication networks that serve more than one country as a result of the project intervention (number) RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

The properties of good indicators can be described in two main ways:  SMART – Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time-bound  CREAM – Clear, Relevant, Economic, Adequate and Monitorable 19 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

 Specific: The target referred by the indicator must be precise and unambiguous. The target must identify a single result to be achieved and must relate to one indicator.  Measurable: As the indicator, the target must be measurable.  Attainable: This criterion refers to the internal capacity of the organization. Does the organization have the human, material, financial and institutional resources to achieve the target? 20 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

 Realistic: The target must be realistic about the policy objectives pursued.  Time-bound: The target must be achieved within a defined period. It is necessary to set a fixed period to achieve the goal: a semester, a year, etc. 21 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

 Clear: The indicator must be precise, direct and unambiguous concerning what it should measure.  Relevant: The indicator should measure something pertinent to monitor the achievement of the objective.  Economic: The indicator must be measurable at a reasonable cost. 22 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

 Adequate: The indicator must adequately represent what needs to be measured.  Monitorable: The indicator should be subject to regular and reliable data monitoring: data required to assess progress need to be produced and timely available. The data and methodology used to calculate the indicator can be verified independently. 23 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

 Baseline data establishes a foundation from which to measure change.  Without baseline data, it is very difficult to measure change over time or to monitor and evaluate  Baselines and targets are established after identification of the indicators to set the desired level of change.  Baseline established through research (Economic and Sector Work) or Feasibility studies (sometimes established retrospectively in the course of project implementation). 24 RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

25  Targets are set after the baseline is established.  Targets normally depend on the programme period and the duration of the interventions and activities.  Targets also depend on the budget allocated  Both baseline and targets should be clearly aligned with the indicator, using the same unit of measurement. RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

26  An indicator should focus on measuring what you need to know – not what would be good to know  The measure of an indicator should be understandable and clear even if there is a change in personnel/staff  Indicators should rely on data that is available at the time when needed and/or can be collected at a cost that is affordable and budgeted  The measurability of indicators is as important as the means of their verification RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

27  Before you select an indicator you need to know : who will use it, when and for what specific purpose  An indicator should be directly related to the objective being measured.  It is advisable to limit the number of indicators to be monitored and when possible use internationally accepted indicators.  Apply the use of proxy indicators in cases when it is difficult to directly measure a result or change. RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING

28 Your one-stop shop to quality assurance and results reporting tools used throughout the project cycle RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING ACCESSIBLE THROUGH THE INTRANET Quality Assurance Assistant