Framing Effects and Focusing Illusion Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 6/2/2016: Lecture 10-4 Note: This Powerpoint presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Judgment & Decision Making Based on High Consumer Effort
Advertisements

Test Taking Strategies
Reason, Passion, & Social Cognition Week 13, Part 1 Announcements for April Papers due at start of class on Thursday. 2. Class will meet in 223D.
Scaling Session Measurement implies “assigning numbers to objects or events…” Distinguish two levels: we can assign numbers to the response levels for.
Samantha Nicholas & Khrys Nugent Hanover College
1 Intuitive Irrationality: Reasons for Unreason. 2 Epistemology Branch of philosophy focused on how people acquire knowledge about the world Descriptive.
Behavioral Finance Ahmed Elshahat October 27 th 2006 CPE.
Prospect Theory, Framing and Behavioral Traps Yuval Shahar M.D., Ph.D. Judgment and Decision Making in Information Systems.
Decision making and economics. Economic theories Economic theories provide normative standards Expected value Expected utility Specialized branches like.
Judgment and Decision Making How Rational Are We?.
Reasoning What is the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning? What are heuristics, and how do we use them? How do we reason about categories?
Organizational Behaviour Individual and Social Behaviour
Do we always make the best possible decisions?
Choice. There’s never just one reinforcer Hmm…what to do?
©2003 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman Publishers. Study Skills Topic 13 Preparing & Taking Exams PowerPoint by JoAnn Yaworski.
Study Guide for Final Exam What Smart Students Know.
Decision making Making decisions Optimal decisions Violations of rationality.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects
Framing Effects From Chapter 34 ‘Frame and Reality’ of Thinking Fast and Slow, by D. Kahneman.
Attitude You learn to behave in a particular way to a particular object in a particular situation. A learned predisposition to behave in a consistently.
Exam Taking Kinds of Tests and Test Taking Strategies.
Decision making behavior Why do people make the choices they do? Reason-based choice Regret theory Effort-accuracy Choice and judgment heuristics.
Michigan Merit Curriculum Standard 6: Decision Making – 4.7 Apply decision-making and problem-solving steps to generate alternative solutions regarding.
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects.
Gathering Useful Data. 2 Principle Idea: The knowledge of how the data were generated is one of the key ingredients for translating data intelligently.
“Social Influence” Chapter 7 How do group members influence one another’s opinions?
Introduction to Problem Solving
Judgement Judgement We change our opinion of the likelihood of something in light of new information. Example:  Do you think.
Psychology 485 March 23,  Intro & Definitions Why learn about probabilities and risk?  What is learned? Expected Utility Prospect Theory Scalar.
Slide 10-1 © 1999 South-Western Publishing McDaniel Gates Contemporary Marketing Research, 4e Using Measurement Scales to Build Marketing Effectiveness.
1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 22.
Psychology of Judgment & Decision Making: Future Directions Psychology 466: Judgment & Decision Making Instructor: John Miyamoto 12/10/2015: Lecture 11-2.
Introduction to Prospect Theory Psychology 466: Judgment & Decision Making Instructor: John Miyamoto 11/17/2015: Lecture 08-2 Note: This Powerpoint presentation.
Loss Aversion, Endowment Effect & Sunk Costs
Chapter 8 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Linear Judgment Models: What Do They Suggest About Human Judgment?
1 DECISION MAKING Suppose your patient (from the Brazilian rainforest) has tested positive for a rare but serious disease. Treatment exists but is risky.
Expected Value, Expected Utility & the Allais and Ellsberg Paradoxes
Introduction to Preference and Decision Making
Allais Paradox, Ellsberg Paradox, and the Common Consequence Principle Then: Introduction to Prospect Theory Psychology 466: Judgment & Decision Making.
MODULE 9 MANAGERS AS DECISION MAKERS “Decide first, then act” How do managers use information to make decisions and solve problems? What are the steps.
Autobiographical Memories & Flashbulb Memories Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 5/11 /2015: Lecture 07-1 This Powerpoint.
ORBChapter 51 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR Chapter 5 Perception & Individual Decision Making.
Discussing numerical data with patients. Framing Framing manipulations: describing equivalent choice situations in different ways Information on relative.
Test Taking Skills Make sure you prove what you know!
Phonological Loop, Visuospatial Sketchpad & Articulatory Suppression Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 04/25/2016: Lecture.
Finish: Course Organization Then: History of Cognitive Psychology (in 30 minutes) Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 03/29/2016:
The Psychology of Inductive Inference Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 5/26/2016: Lecture 09-4 Note: This Powerpoint presentation.
Cognitive Neuroscience (Psychology 460) Summer Quarter Mondays & Wednesdays 12:00 – 2:10pm This course will focus on answering the question, “How are cognitive.
The Representativeness Heuristic then: Risk Attitude and Framing Effects Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 6/1/2016: Lecture.
Psychology and Personal Finance
COGNITIVE LIMITATIONS AND CONSUMER BEHAVIOR
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
Preference Assessment 1 Measuring Utilities Directly
Cognitive Limitations and Consumer Behavior
1st: Representativeness Heuristic and Conjunction Errors 2nd: Risk Attitude and Framing Effects Psychology 355:
These slides are preview slides
Unilateral Neglect, Spatial Attention, Object-Based Attention
Framing Effects and Affective Forecasting
Loss Aversion, Endowment Effect & Sunk Costs
Judgment & Decision Making A Few Final Comments
Sensory Memory, Short-Term Memory & Working Memory
How to Improve the Chance of Future Retrieval
Brief History of Cognitive Psychology
Framing Effects and Affective Forecasting
DIS 280 Social Science Research Methodology: Problem Framing
What is Social Psychology?
CREATED BY T.ALAA AL AMOUDI
Choices, Values and Frames
Presentation transcript:

Framing Effects and Focusing Illusion Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 6/2/2016: Lecture 10-4 Note: This Powerpoint presentation may contain macros that I wrote to help me create the slides. The macros aren’t needed to view the slides. You can disable or delete the macros without any change to the presentation.

Outline Framing effects ♦ Example: The Asian Disease Problem Affective forecasting The focusing illusion Reminder: Course evaluations Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr ‘16 2 Reminder: Risk Attitude

Risk Attitude Risk Aversion Mr. A's attitude toward monetary risks is risk averse if Mr. A prefers a sure-thing of $y over a gamble G whose expected value is slightly greater than $y. ♦ E.g., prefers $5,000 to a gamble for $10,100 and $0. Risk Seeking Ms. B's attitude toward monetary risks is risk seeking if Ms. B prefers a gamble G* over a sure-thing $z when the expected value of G* is slightly less than $z. ♦ E.g., prefers a gamble for $12,000 over a sure-thing of $6,500. Psych 355,, Miyamoto, Spr '16 3 Reminder: Risk Averse for Gains; Risk Seeking for Losses; Reflection Effect

Example: Choice 1: Which would you prefer? Option A: 1.0 chance to win $3,000. Option B:.80 chance to win $4,000. Example: Choice 2: Which would you prefer? Option C: 1.0 chance to lose $3,000. Option D:.80 chance to lose $4,000. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 4 Risk Averse for Gains/Risk Seeking for Losses Framing Effect - Definition Choose between: * A Sure-GAIN, X. * A gamble G, where the expected value of G is somewhat greater than X. Choose between: * A Sure-LOSS, X. * A gamble G, where the expected value of G < X. Choice Among Gains Choice Among Losses The pattern, risk averse for gains and risk seeking for losses, is called the reflection effect.

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 5 Framing Effects Definition: A framing effect has occurred if people’s preferences change when: a)the description of the choice problem is changed, and... b)the content of the choice problem is not changed  By “content” I mean the logical structure of the problem. If two problems are logically equivalent, they have the same content.  The content is the same if different versions of a problem have the same probabilities and the same outcomes – only the wording or "framing" of the problem changes. Basic Principle of Rational Choice: The framing of a problem should not affect the decisions of a rational agent ( preference should not change as a function of problem description ). Distinction Between Reflection Effect & Framing Effect

Reflection Effects and Framing Effects By itself, a reflection effect is not a framing effect, but.... reflection effects can be part of what causes a framing effect. How to create a framing effect: Change the wording of the choices to emphasize gains or to emphasize losses. Emphasize gains in the options Become more risk averse Emphasize losses in the options Become more risk seeking Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 6 Asian Disease Problem - Gain Frame

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 7 Asian Disease Problem: Gain Frame Problem 1: Imagine that the US is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternative programs to combat the disease have been proposed. If Program A is adopted, 200 people will be saved. If Program B is adopted, there is 1/3 probability that 600 people will be saved, and 2/3 probability that no people will be saved. Which program would you favor? Asian Disease Problem – Loss Frame

Asian Disease Problem: Loss Frame Problem 2: Imagine that the US is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternative programs to combat the disease have been proposed. If Program C is adopted, 400 people will die. If Program D is adopted there is 1/3 probability that nobody will die, and 2/3 probability that 600 people will die. Which program would you favor? Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 8 Results – Asian Disease Problem

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 9 Asian Disease Problem: Results Problem 1 [N = 152]: (Gain Frame  Risk Averse Choice) If Program A is adopted, 200 people will be saved. [72 %] If Program B is adopted, [28 %] there is 1/3 probability that 600 people will be saved, and a 2/3 probability that no people will be saved. Problem 2 [N = 155]: (Loss Frame  Risk Seeking Choice) If Program C is adopted 400 people will die. [22 %] If Program D is adopted[78 %] there is 1/3 probability that nobody will die, and a 2/3 probability that 600 people will die. Asian Disease Problem Satisfies the Definition of a Framing Effect

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 10 The Asian Disease Problem Is an Example of a Framing Effect A framing effects is a change in preference that is due only to the way that the options are described. ♦ The logical structure of the choice remains the same in the different frames. In the Asian disease problem: ♦ The gain frame and loss frame versions of the problem are logically identical but... ♦ People have different preferences depending on whether the outcomes are described as potential gains or potential losses. ○ An emphasis on gains elicits risk averse behavior. An emphasis on losses elicits risk seeking behavior. (Remember: People tend to risk averse for gains and risk seeking for losses.) This shows that the Asian Disease Problem is an example of a framing effect. Comment on the Name - "Asian Disease Problem"

Comment on the Name: "The Asian Disease Problem" Goldstein discusses the Asian Disease Problem, but the textbook does not refer to this problem by this name. Goldstein discusses a health policy decision on p Experimental results are presented in Figure 13.7 (p. 385). ♦ This decision is actually a description of the Asian Disease Problem, but it is not referred to by that name. The most common name for this problem in the cog psych literature is the "Asian Disease Problem." Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 11 Summary re Framing Effects

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 12 Summary re Framing Effects Reflection effect (not a framing effect): People are generally risk averse for gains and risk seeking for losses. Framing effects are produced when we change the emphasis from gains to losses without changing the “bottom lines” for the options. (Asian Disease Problem) There are other examples of framing effects that do not involve manipulating the framing of gains and losses (see examples of mental accounting). Basic Psychological Principle: Judgments are Relative

Humans Respond to Relative Values of Outcomes, Not Absolute Values of Outcomes Humans do not judge the absolute magnitude of dimensions. Human judgment is comparative: We judge how much better or worse one state is than another. Examples When we evaluate risks we encode the outcomes as gains or losses relative to a standard of comparison like my personal current status. ( We don't consider outcomes as absolute amounts without respect to our status quo. ) Next example: Focusing illusion Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 13 Affective Forecasting

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 14 Affective Forecasting Affective forecasting – predicting how we will feel if different outcomes were to occur. ♦ Brickman et al. – Small differences in life satisfaction between paraplegics and lottery winners. ♦ Sackett & Torrance report that the general public rated life on chronic dialysis as 39 whereas patients who were treated with chronic dialysis rated it as 56 (100 point scale). ♦ Mellers & McGraw – Women who did not want to be pregnant, awaiting pregnancy test results at a Planned Parenthood clinic, anticipated more negative affect if they found out they were pregnant than they actually did feel if they turned out to be pregnant. Why Do People Have Difficulty with Affective Forecasting?

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 15 Why Do People Have Difficulty With Affective Forecasting? People have incomplete or inaccurate self-theories. Response to novel experiences is hard to anticipate. Affective set point – overall happiness/unhappiness is determined by internal personal factors. People sometimes fail to take this into account. Possible biases: Focusing illusion Impact bias Duration neglect Focusing Illusion

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 16 Focusing Illusion Focusing illusion – if attention is focused on some but not all of attributes a of an option, these attributes will have greater influence over the predicted affective outcome than they will if the outcome is actually experienced. a An "attribute" is a discernable quality of the option; other words for the same idea would be "aspects of an option" or "issues regarding an option." Study of Working Women – Ratings of Self and Predictions for Others

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 17 How Would You Feel If You Were ______ ? Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, 312, Participants were working women. Participants were asked.... (a) to state the percentage of time they were in a bad mood on the preceding day, and.... (b) to predict the percentage of time a woman similar to themselves would be in a bad mood if she were in specific social categories Contrasting social categories: income $100, yrs & living alone40 yrs & married no health insurancehas health insurance Since some women were in each of these categories, we can compare predicted differences to actual differences. How Would You Feel If You Were ____? - Results

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 18 Would You Feel If You Were ______? - Results In general, ACTUAL difference < PREDICTED difference The effects of good or bad circumstances were exaggerated. ♦ Good or bad circumstances do have an effect, but not as much as predicted. Same Slide Without Emphasis Rectangles

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 19 Would You Feel If You Were ______? - Results Focalism (a.k.a. the focusing illusion) – people tend to overestimate the impact of variables that that they focus on. Focusing Illusion - Thinking About a Possibility Makes It Seem More Influencial

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 20 Focusing Illusion - Summary Focusing on any one aspect of a larger situation exaggerates its perceived impact on quality of life. Schkade and Kahneman (1998), "Nothing in life is quite as important as you think it is while you are thinking about it." Psych 466: Judgment and Decision Making - What Is It?

Psych 466: Judgment and Decision Making Psych 466: Judgment and Decision Making Autumn 2016 Human judgments of likelihood and uncertainty Preference - what looks more or less desirable Heuristics and biases Decisions where risk is relevant Influence of framing and context on decisions Affective forecasting Psych 355,, Miyamoto, Spr '16 21 Comments Regarding the Final Exam

Bring a scantron form; bring a pencil for the scantron form. One essay question ♦ You do not need to bring a blue book to the exam. ♦ Obviously bring a pen if you prefer to write with a pen. All other questions will be multiple choice, or true/false, or short answer (fill in a few words) Approximate distribution of questions: ♦ 50% Chapters 1 – 8 ♦ 50% Chapters 9, 10, 12, 13 ♦ +1 essay question Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 22 What Are Available Materials for Studying for the Final Exam

Materials for Studying for the Final Exam Obviously, look at the lecture slides, your section notes, and the textbook. Available on the Psych 355 webpage: ♦ What will be covered on the Final Exam? will be covered on the Final Exam? ♦ Study questions for all chapters ( ♦ See the Spring 2015 Psych 355 exams. Use the version without answer key as well as with the answer key. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 23 Suggestions for Studying for the Final Exam

Spaced practice is better than massed practice. Generate your own ideas with respect to the course material – they will serve as retrieval cues. ♦ Create good associative links to information that you want to remember. E.g., does the study material remind you of anything else that you know? E.g., does the study material help to explain something about your own experience? Test yourself without an answer key in front of you. Memory tricks: ♦ Memorization (maintenance rehearsal) is an ineffective memory aid. ♦ Create interactive images that capture ideas that you want to remember. ♦ Try to relate facts or ideas to yourself. ♦ Study in an environment that is similar to the test environment. Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 24 Good Luck!

Psych 355, Miyamoto, Spr '16 25 Best of Luck END Don’t overstress for the exam. Focusing illusion – your exam performance seems more important than it really is (for your future happiness). Have a good break