Eric Weber (1/14)1 Configuration and Structural Design Eric Weber Tasks –Preliminary hardware research –Preliminary transmission research –Materials Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Israeli Universal Spacecraft Bus Characteristics and Design Trade-Offs
Advertisements

LightSail.
Standard Frame w/ ¼” offset In this configuration, the side jambs and the head jamb are bolted. The jambs are formed at a 90° angle. The face of the head.
Payload Design Criteria for the Space Test Program Standard Interface Vehicle (STP-SIV) Mr. Mike Marlow STP-SIV Program Manager Payload Design Criteria.
Low Energy, Low Cost Swift A design experiment June 2010.
System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure Craig L. Stevens, Jana L. Schwartz, and Christopher D. Hall Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Virginia.
Attitude Determination and Control
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
Commercial Confidential 1 LIM Yoram Yaniv, October 2010 LIM Yoram Yaniv, October 2010.
Karla Vega University of California, Berkeley Attitude Determination and Control 6/9/2015.
University of Kansas EPS of KUTEsat Pathfinder Leon S. Searl April 5, 2006 AE256 Satellite Electrical Power Systems.
Tutorial: Hatch Assembly
MAXIM Power Subsystem Diane Yun Vickie Moran NASA/GSFC Code (IMDC) 8/19/99.
Welcome Students!. What is a Satellite? An object, natural or human made, that orbits a larger object.
Space Engineering Institute (SEI) Space Based Solar Power Space Engineering Research Center Texas Engineering Experiment Station, Texas A&M University.
1 Electrical Power System By Aziatun Burhan. 2 Overview Design goal requirements throughout mission operation: Energy source generates enough electrical.
April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Satellite Structure Subsystem Structural and Vibrational Stress Analysis Presented By: Chris Matthews.
Cansat 2011 PDR (UYARI) 1 UYARI TEAM PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT.
FASTRAC Thermal Model Analysis By Millan Diaz-Aguado.
Final Version Wes Ousley Dan Nguyen May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Thermal.
0 衛星結構設計 (II) 祝飛鴻 6/17/  What you should learn from this course?  低軌道小衛星發展趨勢  Why spacecraft structure fails?
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
HokieSat Introduction
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
Attitude Determination and Control System
1 Formation Flying Project Proposal 2/5/07 Rachel Winters (Team Lead) Aziatun Burhan Tsutomu Hasegawa Shunsuke Hirayama Matt Mueller Masao Shimada Shelby.
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
Universal Law of Gravity. Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation Between every two objects there is an attractive force, the magnitude of which is directly.
Effect of Structure Flexibility on Attitude Dynamics of Modernizated Microsatellite.
Dynamics and Control of Space Vehicles
DINO PDR 23 October 2015 DINO Systems Team Jeff Parker Anthony Lowrey.
1 Krzysztof Pennar Moshe Zilversmit Jon Winkler John Pignetti Ariane Mortazavi Takeshi Fuchiwaki Josh Fromm Structures Team Fall 2004 Final Report.
1 Structure (STR) Subsystem Overview Jonah White – STR Co-Lead.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Support structure for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
Paul Butler Lauriston Girls’ School.  The FUNcube-1 satellite was designed and built by members of the volunteer amateur satellite organisations AMSAT-UK.
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
STARCAL Satellite Intro Prepared By: Cordell Grant Date: December 6, 2012.
CubeSat Design for Solar Sail Testing Platform Phillip HempelPaul Mears Daniel ParcherTaffy Tingley December 5, 2001The University of Texas at Austin.
ADCS Review – Attitude Determination Prof. Der-Ming Ma, Ph.D. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Tamkang University.
A conical pendulum is formed by a mass of 100 g (0.1 kg) moving in a circle as shown. The string makes an angle of 30 o. 1.Draw the free body force diagram.
1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory JPL Flight Team Adam Nikolic Josh Ruggiero Bob Hoffman Dusty Terrill.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase Alternative Design Comparison [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
Team SSCSC Critical Design Review Nick Brennan, Kier Fortier, Tom Johnson, Shannon Martin, Dylan Stewart, and Adam Wright October 05, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev.
1 Weekly Summary Weekly Summary Formation Flight AEM4332 Spring Semester March 7,2007 Masao SHIMADA.
Chapter 9a - Systems of Particles
HokieSat Introduction
AAE450 Spring 2009 Kelly Leffel 2/5/09 Structures and Thermal Lunar Descent Phase Kelly Leffel Structures and Thermal 1.
CubeSat Design for Solar Sail Testing Applications Phillip HempelPaul Mears Daniel ParcherTaffy Tingley October 11, 2001The University of Texas at Austin.
PTAR Presentation Jonathan DeLaRosa, Jessica Nelson, Ivan Morin, JJ Rodenburg, & Tim Stelly Team Cronus.
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
AAE 450 – Spacecraft Design 1 Attitude Determination Methods Brienne Bogenberger January 18, 2004 Dynamics & Control Group Lead, Attitude Determination.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Lander Volume and Mass 10kg, 100g, Arbitrary March 12, 2009 Lunar Descent Phase Group [Ryan Nelson] [STRC] 1.
Mini Autonomous Flying Vehicle CASDE is part of the National effort to develop a Micro Air Vehicle. CASDE has chosen a Mini Vehicle, in the short term,
1 Asteroid Sample Return AEM 4332 FDR 5/7/2008 Becky Wacker Carla Bodensteiner Ashley Chipman John Edquist Paul Krueger Jessica Lattimer Nick Meinhardt.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lander Sizing and Launch Vibrations Feb. 12, 2009 Earth Launch/Lunar Descent Phase Group 1 [Ryan Nelson] [STRC]
Utah State University - University of Washington - Virginia Tech.
Overview 3 2 Introduction Design Analysis Fabrication Testing
Structures and Thermal Locomotion Phase
Team Solkraft Conceptual Design Review
Lunar Descent Trajectory
SPECS 2004 Various ADCS Sizing
Ideal Operating Time for Minimized Power System
By: Josh Lukasak Attitude Group Lead Lunar Descent Phase Manager
System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure
Structures March 13, 2004.
Communications Rover Penetrators Parabolic Dish Reflector
Critical Design Review
Presentation transcript:

Eric Weber (1/14)1 Configuration and Structural Design Eric Weber Tasks –Preliminary hardware research –Preliminary transmission research –Materials Research –Solid Modeling –Satellite Configuration –Kept Mass Budget Total Hours: 75

Eric Weber (2/14)2 Configuration and Structural Design Design Requirements –University Nanosat Must be less than 50x60x60 cm Must be less massive than 50 kg –Mission specific Must withstand mission of 24 hours

Eric Weber (3/14)3 Configuration and Structural Design Derived Requirements and Goals –Center of mass to be within 1.5 cm of geometric center (ADC) –Camera and Star Tracker looking at 90º angle from each other (ADC) –4 Thrusters (ADC/Orbit) Thrust line on the same plane Through center of mass At 90 º angles from the camera

Eric Weber (4/14)4 Configuration and Structural Design Derived Requirements and Goals (cont.) –Solar cell panels on all faces except camera face (Power) –Attempt to keep components away from satellite walls (Thermal)

Eric Weber (5/14)5 Configuration and Structural Design Must be less than 50x60x60 cm 50 cm

Eric Weber (6/14)6 Configuration and Structural Design PieceDimensions (cm)Mass (g)Volume(cm^3) Thruster x41.5D x N2 Tank12.0D x Camera15.0 x 15.0 x Lens16.0D x Battery x215.0 x 7.0 x Electronics Controller30.0 x 30.0 x CPU9.6 x 9.1 x Star Tracker5.4 x 5.4 x Reaction Wheel11.8 x 11.8 x Gyro9.9 x 11.7 x GPS Comp x214.0 x 8.9 x GPS antennas x23.8 x 2.9 x Solar Cell Panels x548.0 x 48.0 x Aluminum Panel48.0 x 48.0 x Satellite Structure50.0 x 50.0 x Mass of Hardware44.0kg Extra Parts (conservative estimate)5kg Total49.0kg

Eric Weber (7/14)7 Configuration and Structural Design Must withstand mission of 24 hours –Short satellite mission time –Satellite is to be carried up with shuttle Greatest force < 50 N –Material Selection Aluminum 6061 T6 –Availability –Cheap –Adequate

Eric Weber (8/14)8 Configuration and Structural Design Center of mass calculation SolidWorks can calculate these numbers –Iterative process to find an adequate center of mass Center of mass location offset from geometric center –X = 0.29 cm –Y = 0.15 cm –Z = 0.01 cm

Eric Weber (9/14)9 Configuration and Structural Design

Eric Weber (10/14)10 Configuration and Structural Design Camera and Star Tracker looking at 90º angles from each other 4 Thrusters facing each other with thrust line through the center of mass at 90 º angles from the camera Thrusters

Eric Weber (11/14)11 Configuration and Structural Design Solar cell panels on all sides except camera side

Eric Weber (12/14)12 Configuration and Structural Design Attempt to keep components away from satellite walls (Thermal)

Eric Weber (13/14)13 Configuration and Structural Design All requirements and goals were met Must be less than 50x60x60 cm Must be less massive than 50 kg Must withstand mission of 24 hours Center of mass is to be within 1.5 cm of geometric center Camera and Star Tracker looking at 90º angle from each other 4 Thrusters facing each other with thrust line through the center of mass at 90 º angles from the camera Solar cell panels on all sides except camera side Attempt to keep components away from satellite walls

Eric Weber (14/14)14 Configuration and Structural Design Recommendations for Future Work –Thin out aluminum frame and supports For lower mass –Model small parts For more accurate model