Pensions GOMB Response to Budgeting For Results Commission Pension Questions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Retirement System Board Consideration of Assumption Changes September 5, 2012.
Advertisements

Overview of Act 120 of 2010 A Look at PSERS Retirement Benefit Changes Presentation at: PASBO Annual Conference March 16, 2011.
1 Understanding Coronado’s CalPERS Rates. 2 Agenda  Basic Concepts  How Rates are Set  What causes rates to rise and fall?  Coronado Rates – historically.
Georgia Government Finance Officers Association October 1, 2013 How to Read an Actuarial Valuation Report: “It’s Not Just a Sleep Aid”
FCERA Board of Retirement and Fresno County Board of Supervisors Joint Meeting – April 30, 2009 Contribution Volatility and Asset Smoothing FCERA Board.
March 26, 2010 Althea A. Schwartz, FSA Consulting Actuary Milliman Inc. Managing DB Pension Plans in Stressful Times.
ORP Contribution Concepts IFS-Sponsored Presentation Denise Yunker, Benefits Director Human Resources Division, OUS
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
PASA PENSION BRIEFING Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Charles B. Zogby, Secretary of the Budgetwww.budget.state.pa.us Pennsylvania Pension System Reform March.
© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois direct:
Pension Funding Risks & Possible Method Changes Alan Milligan Chief Actuary.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
OPEN – C&HR – INFO 1-2 UM Retirement Plan Annual Valuation Board of Curators January 31, 2013.
FCERA April 2008 Interest Crediting FCERA Board Interest Crediting and Excess Earnings Policy Discussion Wednesday, April 16, 2008 Paul Angelo,
Fritzie Archuleta, ASA, MAAA, Senior Pension Actuary Actuarial Office.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review June 1, 2011.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review April 15, 2013.
Copyright © 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. GASB Statements 67 & 68 – Audit & Budget Committee Discount Rate and Allocation of Assets/Liabilities.
The Illinois Pension Problem What is Wrong with Illinois Pensions?
OPEN – C&HR – 1 June 13-14, 2013 OPEN – C&HR – 1 June 13-14, 2013 Board of Curators Compensation and Human Resources Committee June 13-14, 2013.
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
Report on State Actuarial Valuation Joint Hearing Assembly Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security Committee Senate Public Employment and Retirement.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Introduction to the Actuarial Valuation: Funding and Assumptions January 12, 2006 P.
1 Statewide Retirement Systems Funding Updates Presentation to the Legislative Commission on Pensions & Retirement Dave Bergstrom, MSRS Executive Director.
Vancouver Webcast Financial and Operational Review Accountable To You 4th Annual General Meeting October 15, 2005.
1 Interpreting Actuarial Information Fritzie Archuleta, ASA MAAA Senior Pension Actuary, CalPERS February 21, 2013.
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits Chapter 15 Robinson, Munter and Grant.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning Unit #6.
A Discussion Prepared for February 10, 2009 Presented By Glen Volk, FSA, MAAA Consulting Actuary.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
Public Act and its Effect on Illinois’ Teachers By Marc Ansay and Jill Kaner.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
CALPERS AND PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS City Council Workshop July 13, 2005.
NCCCMA Winter Seminar Michael Williamson Director, North Carolina Retirement Systems.
March 9, 2006www.psers.state.pa.us1 PSERS An Update on the State of the Fund, the Employer Contribution Rate and Pending Legislation.
Oregon Public Employees’ Benefit Board Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) July 1, 2006 Actuarial Valuation PEBB Board Meeting April 17, 2007.
© Center for Tax and Budget Accountability CENTER FOR TAX AND BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY 70 E. Lake Street Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois direct:
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Funding Public Pensions Seventh Annual Employee Benefits Symposium John Marshall Law School April 20, 2009 by Jon Forman Alfred P. Murrah Professor of.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
Commonwealth of Massachusetts OPEB Commission Meeting April 5, 2012.
Board Retreat – Oct 20, 2011 FCERA 2011 Retirement Board Retreat October 20, 2011 Paul Angelo, FSA Andy Yeung, ASA The Segal Company, San Francisco v2.
GASB 67 & 68 Disclosures Implementing and Auditing GASB’s New Pension Standards.
City of San Diego Retiree Medical Proposal City Council Presentation May 13, 2011.
BUDGET DAY PENSION BRIEFING Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Charles B. Zogby, Secretary of the Budgetwww.budget.state.pa.us Pennsylvania Pension System Reform.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
1 Accounting for OPEB Retiree Health Benefits Committee September 11, 2006.
Prepared by Aon Hewitt Retirement and Investment Consulting Presentation to Iowa School Districts Changes in Postemployment Benefit Accounting July 2015.
Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Results of the January 1, 2015 GASB 45 Valuation September 22, 2015 Linda L. Bournival, FSA Consulting Actuary KMS Actuaries,
Regional Transportation District Salaried Employees' Defined Benefit Pension Plan Presented by: Terry Bright January 13, 2015  Foster City, CA  Denver,
Copyright © 2015 GRS – All rights reserved. RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan January 13, 2015 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2014.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. MGFOA Annual Meeting 2016 OPEB and GASB 74/75 May 11, 2016 Daniel J. Rhodes, FSA, MAAA Vice.
Pension Funding Policy Public Pension Oversight Board May 23 rd,
New Member Mid-CareerNearRetirementAfterRetirement Municipal Pension Plan Operations and Financial Review December 31, 2002.
Actuarial Status Update of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth May 4, 2010 Presented by Doug Anderson, EA, ASA, MAAA Gallagher Benefit.
1 Foregone revenue & lost savings $ Impact on TRA Foregone revenue from 1% ER contribution increase$43.0 million Permanent foregone savings if delay COLA.
THE BASICS OF THE GASB OPEB CALCULATION PRESENTED BY: MARK VAN BUSKIRK, PHD, ASA, MAAA HOLMES MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 23,
TRS Funding and Pension Benefits
League of AZ Cities and Towns PSPRS Pension Task Force August 15, 2014
Who is Actually Paying the Bill? By Brad Heinrichs, FSA, EA, MAAA
Chief Deputy County Executive
RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan February 9, 2016 Pension Fund Status
California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)
Texas’ Retired Employees Obligations: Case Study – City of Houston
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
City of Houston Retired Employees Obligations
Senate E-12 Finance March 19, 2018
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
Oklahoma County Employees Retirement System
Presentation transcript:

Pensions GOMB Response to Budgeting For Results Commission Pension Questions

Overview Schedule of Funding Progress Components of UAAL 2011 UAAL contribution by retirement system Employee contributions to pensions

Schedule of Funding Progress (1)

Schedule of Funding Progress The funded ratio is worse today than it was prior to the $7.3 billion contribution from the 2003 pension bond issuance. The 2011 unfunded accrued liability is virtually the same if measured on a market basis or actuarial basis (5 year smoothing). – 43.4 percent compared to 43.3 percent. The 2011 unfunded actuarial liability as a percentage of payroll is 1.84 times what it was in 2002.

C OMPONENTS OF C HANGE IN U NFUNDED L IABILITY

The largest contributor to the increase in the unfunded liability is employer contributions less than the normal cost plus interest. Investment returns less than assumed is the second largest contribution to the increase in unfunded liabilities.

INDIVIDUAL PENSION SYSTEM DATA UPDATE – 2011 (1) System Salary Increases/ (Decreases) Investment Returns (Higher)/Lower Than Assumed Employer Contributions Higher/(Lower) than Normal Cost Plus Interest (2) Benefit Increases Changes In Actuarial Assumptions Other Factors (3) Total Change in Unfunded Liability From Previous Year TRS (545.6) 1, , ,675.9 SURS (172.3) (24.9) ,414.9 SERS (116.5) ,887.2 GARS (0.1) 49.7 JRS (17.7) TOTAL (847.3) 2, , , ,166.1 Data compiled from the annual actuarial valuations of the Retirement Systems as of June 30, Table may not add due to rounding. (1) In millions (2) To determine whether employer contributions represent an increase or decrease in UAAL, such contributions are measured against contributions based on the Normal Cost plus interest. If employer contributions exceed Normal Cost plus interest, the UAAL will decrease. In employer contributions are less than Normal Cost plus interest, the UAAL will increase. (3)Other factors include, but are not limited to, higher or lower incidences of retirement, disability, in-service mortality, retiree mortality or termination than assumed.

INDIVIDUAL PENSION SYSTEM DATA UPDATE Despite a contribution of $4.3 billion (which is higher than the statutorily required contribution of $4.156 billion) in 2011 the unfunded actuarial liability (UAAL) increased $7.166 billion. Two factors contribute the Employer Contributions Higher/(Lower) than Normal Cost Plus Interest increase in UAAL – The difference between the actual contribution and the required contribution per GASB 25. – Interest (investment) income loss due to prior contributions not being made. Investment returns were less than assumed due to asset smoothing. Smaller than expected salary increases offset some negative pressures

Pensions System Income 2011 How much do employees contribute? SERSTRSSURSGARSJRSTotal Employee Contributions $254,201$909,755$260,177$2,006$16,725$1,442,687 State and Employer Contributions $1,127,887$2,326,029$773,595$11,444$62,694$4,301,648 Investment Income $1,930,208$7,234,539$2,801,109$10,271$105,258$12,081,386 Total$3,312,297$10,470,145$3,834,881$23,720$184,678$17,825,721 Data compiled from the annual actuarial valuations of the Retirement Systems as of June 30, Table may not add due to rounding. ($ in Thousands) SURS self managed plan not included.

2011 Pension Contributions as a Percentage of Pension Income SERSTRSSURSGARSJRSTotal Employee Contributions 7.67%8.69%6.78%8.46%9.06%8.09% State and Employer Contributions 34.05%22.22%20.17%48.25%33.95%24.13% Investment Income58.27%69.10%73.04%43.30%57.00%67.78%

2011 Pension Contributions as a Percentage of Pension Income State and employer contributions were three times the size of employee contributions in Benefits and refunds in FY11 were $7.668bn. The difference between investment income and benefits and refunds paid is the new net assets on a market basis (not actuarial). In 2011, market basis funding ratios improved slightly because the change in net assets exceeded the change in actuarial accrued liabilities (AAL). – $10.157bn increase in net assets compared with $7.668 increase in AAL.