Comparative advantage Why countries trade. Absolute advantage A country has an absolute advantage when it can produce more goods and services than other.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Economics Issues Lecture 2 Why do we trade? Some parts of this lecture are drawn from material in Chapter 23.1 of Sloman (2009). For the remainder.
Advertisements

Comparative advantage as a basis for exchange 1. Production possibility frontier 1. Production possibility frontier –Choices & opportunity costs 2. Specialisation.
Welcome to Econ 414 International Economics Study Guide Week Two Ending Sunday, September 9 (Note: You must go over these slides and complete every task.
Theory of Theory of comparative advantage David Ricardo.
Interdependence and the Gains from Trade
 Comparative vs. Absolute Advantage Students will be able to understand the difference between absolute and comparative advantage (in theory and graphically),
Office Hours: Monday 3:00-4:00 – LUMS C85
The Classical World of David Ricardo and Comparative Advantage
Interdependence Every day you rely on many people from around the world, most of whom you do not know, to provide you with the goods and services you enjoy.
Interdependence and The Gains From Trade
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND POLICY;  Charles van Marrewijk, 2006; 1 2 countries; A and B Comparative advantage (technology differences)
Interdependence and the Gains from Trade PRINCIPLE #5: Trade Can Make Everyone Better Off!
Prof. John M. Abowd and Jennifer P. Wissink, Cornell University 1 Micro Production Possibility Frontier.
2 2 International Trade and Comparative Advantage No nation was ever ruined by trade. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN International Trade and Comparative Advantage No.
Of Microeconomics 3. The Production Possibilities Frontier and Gains From Trade* Akos Lada July 22nd 2014 * Slide content principally sourced from N.
Notebook # 26- Economics 17-1 Absolute & Comparative Advantage.
Definitions Absolute Advantage:This condition exists when one nation has the ability to produce a good more efficiently than another nation. Comparative.
Absolute and Comparative Advantage A2 Economics
The “internationalization” or “globalization” of the U. S
International Issues.
PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS Professor Karen Leppel Widener University Q P S D.
Production Possibilities Curve/Frontier -. Rum Crystal 1 million 100, ,000 30,000 A B 0 C 80,000 40, ,000 Ireland Puerto Rico A B C Crystal.
International Economics International Trade Theory A One-Factor Economy – The Ricardian Model February 15, 2007.
International Trade. Scenario 1  You are starting a bakery with a partner  It takes you 1 hour to make 80 muffins and 1 hour to make 20 cookies  Your.
Gains from Trade and Division of Labor Interdependence versus Subsistence J.F. O’Connor.
Principles of Microeconomics & Principles of Macroeconomics: Ch. 3 First Canadian Edition Interdependence and Trade Economics studies how society produces.
Absolute Advantage When it is possible for one country to produce more goods and services than other countries with the same level of inputs (lower cost/unit)
Comparative Advantage and the Gains from Trade. Outline I. Assumptions II. Absolute Advantage A. Definition B. Example III. Comparative Advantage A. Definition.
Specialization & Comparative Advantage Comparative Advantage.
Why Do Nations Trade? Understanding Specialization.
0 Our First Model: The Circular-Flow Diagram  A way to organize the economic transactions/decisions of 2 decision-makers: Households Firms (businesses)
Examination of the foreign exchange market, the establishment of exchange rates, and how the balance of payments account is affected. The main reasons.
Gains From Trade Antu Panini Murshid. 11/16/2015 Antu Panini Murshid--Principles of Macroeconomics2 Today’s Agenda Gains from specialization and trade.
Comparative advantageslide 1 The Gains from Trade Why do people specialize in the production of a few goods or services and then trade? Why don't people.
20 Prepared by: Fernando Quijano and Yvonn Quijano © 2004 Prentice Hall Business PublishingPrinciples of Economics, 7/eKarl Case, Ray Fair International.
Chapter 3 Interdependence and the Gains from Trade.
1 Comparative Advantage, Exchange Rates, and Globalization Application: Comparative Advantage United StatesSaudi Arabia % of resources devoted to.
The Classical World of David Ricardo and Comparative Advantage Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Competition & Stock Challenge Wrap-Up. Today, our goal is to learn about: Rationalization Competitive Advantage Absolute Advantage Opportunity Cost Comparative.
International Trade Trade between China and Italy ◦ China  makes everything cheaper, faster, better  why trade with Italy? Continuing growth of international.
U.S. PPF for Cars and T-Shirts Cars T-Shirts U.S has 50,000 Hours of Labor with which it can produce either cars.
The importance of international trade. Why trade?  1. Sell off unwanted surpluses.
hair gel from Cleveland, OH
International Trade 1. Why Nations Trade  Believe products received worth more than what they give up  Increases variety of goods available  Sometimes.
Defined: International trade is the exchange of capital, goods, and services across international borders or territories. Important: When we say countries.
AP Macroeconomics Comparative Advantage FRQ B #1; 2008 #3.
Trade Analysis Analyzing Trade Problems using a 4-step process.
SESSION 14: ABSOLUTE ADVANTAGE & COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE Talking Points Absolute Advantage & Comparative Advantage 1. Trade increases the value society receives.
1 Welcome to EC 382: International Economics By: Dr. Jacqueline Khorassani Week Two.
Lecture Notes: Econ 203 Introductory Microeconomics Lecture/Chapter 3: Interdependence/gains from trade M. Cary Leahey Manhattan College Fall 2012.
Comparative Advantage & PPF Corn Wheat Because the PPF gradients are different, these two countries have different opportunity costs between Corn.
Dolan, Microeconomics 4e, Ch. 15 Survey of Economics Edwin G. Dolan and Kevin C. Klein Best Value Textbooks 4 th edition Chapter 15 Global Trade and Trade.
International Trade. Trade-Offs  Sacrificing one good or service to produce or purchase another.  Opportunity Cost – Value of the next best alternative.
International Trade. Clip of the Day  Imports – Bringing goods in  Exports – Sending goods out.
Economic growth Economic growth can be defined as an increase in actual or potential GDP Using AD/AS analysis, draw an increase in actual GDP (hint,
You owe me work! Josh Alex Ryan China teenager article Q’s You all owe me notes on WTO P476 – 478 notes: What is the WTO? What are the 2 main functions?
Copyright © 2004 South-Western/Thomson Learning 3 Interdependence and the Gains from Trade.
ROLL CALL Would you rather have a Coke or Pepsi?.
The importance of international trade
DO NOW Why do people and countries trade as opposed to just making everything themselves?
Specialisation and trade and pattern of trade
International Monetary Systems
The importance of international trade
The Causes of Economic Growth
EOC: Where do you need to be to pass?
Trade Analysis Analyzing Trade Problems using a 4-step process
Unit 1: Basic Economic Concepts
International Trade By Ben Quick.
Comparative Advantage FRQ B #1; 2008 #3
Absolute v. Comparative Advantage
Presentation transcript:

Comparative advantage Why countries trade

Absolute advantage A country has an absolute advantage when it can produce more goods and services than other countries with the same level of inputs (lower cost/unit) Germany might be able to produce more cars than the UK with the same inputs and more financial services as well If in the very exceptional case Germany is exactly equally more efficient at both (twice in this case) then trade is not beneficial

Comparative advantage Comparative advantage exists when one country can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than another For example, assume the UK can produce more cars and financial services (FS) than Spain, and so has an absolute advantage in both In this example the UK’s PPF shows it can produce 120 FS if all resources are devoted to FS, or 50 cars, whilst for Spain it is 40 and 40 The UK is comparatively better at producing FS because its opportunity cost is lower, whilst Spain has a comparative advantage in cars. See right Each country can be better off by specialising in the product for which is has a comparative advantage, and then trading Spain is willing to produce an extra car as long as it can trade this car for at least 1 unit of FS UK is willing to produce an extra unit of FS and trade this as long as it receives at least 5/12 of a car Let’s say the trade is based on 2:3, so 2 cars are traded for 3 units of FS Financial ServicesCars UK12050 Spain40 Total16090 Opportunity cost For the UK to gain 1 unit of FS it gives up 5/12 of a car For Spain to gain 1 unit of FS it gives up 1 car For the UK to gain 1 car it gives up 2.4 units of FS For Spain to gain 1 car it gives up 1 unit of FS

Comparative advantage If we assume the starting point is that both countries devote equal resources to each product, then output is as shown in the top table If Spain then devotes all its resources to cars, and the UK devotes say 80% to FS and 20% to cars then total output is as shown in the second table Output of FS rises from 80 to 96, whilst output of cars rises from 45 to 50 How can each country be better off? Before specialising, Spain consumed 20 cars and 20 units of FS It now produces 40 cars and 0 FS so let’s assume Spain trades 20 cars at an exchange rate of 2:3 This means Spain gains 30 units of FS and is better off. Same number of cars but 10 more FS The UK consumed 60 FS and 25 cars before specialisation It now produces 96 units of FS and 10 cars, and as above buys 20 cars for 30 units of FS The UK now consumes 30 cars (10 produced and 20 bought) and 66 units of FS, so 5 more cars and and 6 more units of FS Pre trade chooseFSCars UK6025 Spain20 Total8045 Specialise UK9610 Spain040 Total9650 Opportunity cost For the UK to gain 1 unit of FS it gives up 5/12 of a car For Spain to gain 1 unit of FS it gives up 1 car For the UK to gain 1 car it gives up 2.4 units of FS For Spain to gain 1 car it gives up 1 unit of FS Specialisation and trade is worthwhile if the trade takes place at an exchange rate between FS and cars of between 2.4:1 and 1:1

Comparative advantage and trading Trading makes sense because of different opportunity costs We can look at what happens with a combined PPF The point highlighted is where both countries are completely specialised

Another example WheatCorn Country A510 Country B42 Opportunity Costs: For country A to gain 1 unit of wheat, they would give up 2 units of corn. For country B to gain 1 unit of wheat, they would give up ½ unit of corn. For country A to gain 1 unit of corn, they would give up ½ unit of wheat For country B to gain 1 unit of corn, they would give up 2 units of wheat Therefore country A should produce corn and country B should produce wheat What exchange rate is possible

Other example TextilesCars China155 Japan14 Opportunity cost in China of 1 unit of textile is 1/3 car Opportunity cost in Japan of 1 unit of textile is 4 cars Opportunity cost in China of 1 car is 3 units of textile Opportunity cost in Japan of 1 car is 1/4 unit of textiles Therefore China should produce textiles and Japan cars What could the exchange rate be?