Breakout Groups Goal Format Demo Pitch. Overview Monday – 3-6p Breakouts Tuesday – 9-12p Pitches (10 min, 10 discussion) – 2-6p breakouts Wednesday –

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Improve program impact by increasing use of evidence-based practices Relevance Increase program relevance and diversity of constituents served.
Advertisements

Mission The mission of Kappa Omicron Nu is empowered leaders in scholarship, research, and leadership. This mission will enable the organization and chapters.
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
4 th Meeting of the EC International Dialogue on Bioethics Copenhagen, June 19 th, 2012 Large research and medical databases in clinical and research multi-centred.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Documenting & Assessing Community- Engaged Scholarship (CES) A Workshop for Promotion & Tenure Committees Sarena Seifer Community-Campus Partnerships for.
Community Resources Assessment Training 1-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 1-3.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Assignment Options Writing to learn and/or writing to communicate School-based audience, other audience Exploratory/Formal Low stakes/ High stakes Group/individual.
Open Science Framework: Supporting the research worflow Brian Nosek University of Virginia.
Options for Evaluating Research: Inputs, Outputs, Outcomes Michele Garfinkel Manager, Science Policy Programme ICSTI ITOC Workshop 19 January 2015, Berlin.
GeoData 2011 Workshop Data Life Cycle Break Out #3 Wednesday, 2 March 2011 Moderator: Mohan Ramamurthy, Unidata.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Sara Bowman Center for Open Science Open Science Framework: Facilitating Transparency and Reproducibility.
Issues and Strategies for Faculty Development Michelle Robinson DMD, MA Director of Informatics Marquette University School of Dentistry.
5. How to Amass Evidence (Evaluation) of Change and its Effects? How does assessment drive transformative change in the classroom, at the department level,
Educate Alabama & Professional Learning Plan
PYs 4 and 5 Objectives for Education, Outreach and Training and External Relations Scott Lathrop
“Putting the pieces together – as a community” December, 2014.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
ASSOCIATION OF STATE PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITIONISTS.
8th Sakai Conference4-7 December 2007 Newport Beach Teaching and Learning Community Gathering Let’s talk Teaching with Sakai.
Students Becoming Scientists in the World: Integrating Research and Education for Sustainable Development Dr. James P. Collins Directorate for the Biological.
Instructional Coaching Columbia High School February 17, 2011 JoAnn Moore, Facilitator 10 minutes.
Leading Change. THE ROLE OF POLICY IN CHANGE Leading Change – The Role of Policy Drift to Quantitative Compliance- Behavior will focus on whatever is.
Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE) Conference and Expo 2011 David L. Lawrence Convention Center/ 316 October.
Building An Academic Career
A Framework for Building an Early Learning System in Walla Walla October 16, 2008.
Open Access in Russia (a view from inside Russian Academy of Sciences) Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, principal researcher euroCRIS, Board member.
From membership to leadership: advancing women in trade unions Working groups ETUC workshop, Berlin 28 October 2010.
Data Access and Research Transparency in Political Science Journals John Ishiyama Professor of Political Science & Editor in Chief American Political Science.
EDUCATE ALABAMA & PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PLAN Oak Mountain High School
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Selecting Evidence Based Practices Oregon’s initial attempts to derive a process Implementation Conversations 11/10.
Adult Learning Principles
Open Science Framework Jeffrey Spies University of Virginia.
 Monday 8:00-9:15 Music (415)  9:30-12:15 Language Arts  Tuesday 9:30-12:15 Language Arts  Wednesday 8:00-9:15 Music (415)  9:30-12:15 Science/S.S.
Documentation and Assessment of Scholarship in Extension and Engagement: A National Perspective Amy Driscoll Associate Senior Scholar Carnegie Foundation.
Brian Nosek University of Virginia -- Center for Open Science -- Improving Openness.
Scientific Utopia: Improving Openness and Reproducibility Brian Nosek University of Virginia Center for Open Science.
Practical Steps for Increasing Openness and Reproducibility Courtney Soderberg Statistical and Methodological Consultant Center for Open Science.
Towards a Regional Communication and Information Network for the West and Central African Research and Education Network (WACREN) Presented at the WACREN.
1 Open Discovery Space Overview Argiris Tzikopoulos, Ellinogermaniki Agogi Open Discovery Space [CIP-ICT-PSP ][elearning] A socially-powered and.
Webinar on increasing openness and reproducibility April Clyburne-Sherin Reproducible Research Evangelist
Practical Steps for Increasing Openness and Reproducibility Courtney Soderberg Statistical and Methodological Consultant Center for Open Science.
Brian Nosek University of Virginia -- Center for Open Science -- Improving Openness.
David Mellor, PhD Project Manager at Improving Openness and Reproducibility of Scientific Research.
What does diversity mean for open science? Sanjay Srivastava.
Sara Bowman Center for Open Science | Promoting, Supporting, and Incentivizing Openness in Scientific Research.
Development & Implementation Awayday. Groups Wedgwood CliffMoorcroft Trevor Pull (Facilitator)Barry Gregory (Facilitator)Anna Armstrong (Facilitator)
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
Brian Nosek University of Virginia -- Center for Open Science -- Improving Openness.
Assistive Technology Professional Development Overview – SED 579.
Sara Bowman Center for Open Science | Promoting, Supporting, and Incentivizing Openness in Scientific Research.
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
What is Open Science and How do I do it?
What is Open Science and How do I do it?
Shifting the research culture toward openness and reproducibility
Center for Open Science: Practical Steps for Increasing Openness
Achieving Open Science
Data Sharing Now and in the Future
Transparency increases the credibility and relevance of research
Scaling the Open Science Framework: National Data Service Dashboard, Cloud Storage Add-ons, and Sharing Science Data on the Decentralized Web Natalie K.

PresQT - Preservation Quality Tool
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
What, why and best practices in open research
Identifying Your Scope of Competence in Autism Treatment
How many codes of research conduct do we need?
Presentation transcript:

Breakout Groups Goal Format Demo Pitch

Overview Monday – 3-6p Breakouts Tuesday – 9-12p Pitches (10 min, 10 discussion) – 2-6p breakouts Wednesday – 8:30-11:30a Pitches (10 min, 10 discussion) – 3-? Open collaboration

Goals Define problem, solution Propose projects to advance solution – Practical – Actionable with existing resources – Build on existing efforts Implement

Approach Pick a group Document work via OSF for others to follow Breakouts can split, consolidate, disband Updates to Simine/Brian or Prepare pitches to whole group

Format Monday – Defining problem and scope – Assessment of existing and proposed solutions Tuesday – Pitch to whole meeting (10/10) – Revision Wednesday – Revised pitch to whole meeting (10/10) – Implementation

Success Define aspirational goal Break down problem into practical, incremental, cumulative steps Avoid redundancy 80/20 rule

Design Principles DON’T Anchor at desired end Rely on “do the right thing” Be parochial on “my field” Append to the workflow DO Start where community is Incorporate incentives Look for general principles Integrate with existing workflows

Signals: Making Behaviors Visible Promotes Adoption

% Articles reporting that data was available 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Demo Tuesday Pitch

Aspirational Goal Make transparency the default for content underlying published research Concrete Goal Get 90% of Psychology journals to adopt TOP Guidelines (score = 8+)

Why journal guidelines/policies? Publication is key part of research lifecycle Journal policies affect all published research now and future SIPS community can facilitate adoption

Why TOP Guidelines? TOP exists Modular: 8 standards Low barrier: 3 levels (disclose, require, verify) Discipline agnostic Anticipates exceptions Established: Committee, COS supported, 538 journal/60 org signatories

TOP Guidelines 1.Data citation 2.Design transparency 3.Research materials transparency 4.Data transparency 5.Analytic methods (code) transparency 6.Preregistration of studies 7.Preregistration of analysis plans 8.Replication

SIPS Strategy 1.Needs at least 5-10 people & bit help from many 2.Define population of journals 3.Gather contact information for decision-makers 4.Gather info on prior engagement 5.Define engagement method for each journal, society, publisher 6.Implement strategy to – move journal from 0 to signatory – move journal from signatory to adopter – move journal from adopter to implementation

Spin-off project Transparency scorecard for journals and funders to nudge action Proposal:

BUS STOP 6p, 7p, 8p, 9p, 10p COS OMNI MARRIOTT

1.Improving teaching and training (including undergrad, grad, and re-training). Moderators = Victoria Savalei and Courtney Soderberg / Breakout room: Large conference room at COS 2.What journals and societies can do. Moderators = Dan Simons and Bobbie Spellman / Breakout room: Marriott conference room 3.Meta-science, interventions, and evaluations. Moderators = Tal Yarkoni and Joe Simmons / Breakout room: Alberto at COS 4.Making replication mainstream. Moderator = Rich Lucas / Breakout room: Aperi at COS 5.Improving hiring and promotion - and what job candidates can do. Moderators = Sanjay Srivastava and David Funder / Breakout room: Lobby at Marriott 6.Broadening the model of science - recognizing different types of contributions. Moderator = Katie Corker / Breakout room: Lobby at Marriott 7.Improving research in individual labs. Moderators = Lorne Campbell and Mike Frank / Breakout room: Bukas at COS 8.Developing norms for data sharing. Moderators = Michelle Meyer and Jake Westfall / Breakout room: Furan at COS 9.Growing the tent: Promoting fruitful dialogue with those unfamiliar with or skeptical of open science. Moderators = Scott Lilienfeld and Alexa Tullett / Breakout room: Lobby at Marriott