Regulatory CMC BLA and NDA Submissions: Differences and Correlations from Regulatory and Scientific Perspectives – Drug Substance David G. Donne, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biopharmaceutical Quality
Advertisements

1 The management and technical evaluation requirements of chemical drug substances State Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation March.
2-4 ICH Quality Guidances: an overview
Finished Pharmaceutical Product Specifications
1 Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS,
Stability data required by WHO-PQP Mercy Acquaye.
Sultan Ghani WHO Prequalification Programme of Priority Essential Medicines, October 2010, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E. Experience of Pre-Qualification Program.
VALIDATION What is the new guidance?. What is a Compliance Policy Guide? Explain FDA policy on regulatory issues CGMP regulations and application commitments.
ICH Q11 – Definisjon av startmaterialer – Fleksibilitet og dokumentasjonskrav Andreas Sundgren LMI 17. april 2012.
Manufacturing Process
Impurities in New Drug Substances ICH Topic Q3A (R) – Revised Guidelines in Oct الشوائب في الأدوية الجديدة.
Batch Reworking and Reprocessing
Specifications Breakout Session I&II
Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs): The Big Picture of a Long-term Commitment Elizabeth Pollina Cormier,
Sultan Ghani WHO Prequalification Programme of Priority Essential Medicines, October 2010, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E. Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Master.
Determine impurity level in relevant batches1
Office of New Drug Chemistry, OPS, CDER, Food and Drug Administration Establishing Dissolution Specification Current CMC Practice Vibhakar Shah, Ph.D.
Slide 1 of 19D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept Training Workshop for Evaluators from National Medicines Regulatory Authorities in East African Community.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLS ACPS March 12-13, 2003 Stephen K. Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team Leader CDER/Office of New Drug Chemistry Co-Chair, Comparability.
Assessing Quality-by-Design A CMC Review Perspective
Regulatory requirements on Medicine Stability Guidelines relevant for Stability testing Sultan Ghani.
Structure of Dossier of Medicinal Product- Q part
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Sultan Ghani WHO Prequalification Programme of Priority Essential Medicines, October 2010, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E. Dossier Requirements for Generic Medicines.
QA Production Material and Analytical Methods BIT 230 Chapters 5 and 6 (Huxsoll)
Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research The Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Web Seminar Series presents:
Ensuring Product Quality in Gene Transfer Clinical Trials
DHHS/NIH/NIAID/DAIDS September 8, 2004 ADDRESSING THE INFORMATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF REGULATORY AGENCIES IN INTERNATIONAL VACCINE DEVELOPMENT STUART Z.
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 Scientific Considerations of Polymorphism in.
Quality by Design Application of Pharmaceutical QbD for Enhancement of the Solubility and Dissolution of a Class II BCS Drug using Polymeric Surfactants.
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
Virtual Drug Development in Southern California, A Pre-Clinical Focus in vitro tests to support IND submissions David Johnson, Ph.D. Director, DMPK MicroConstants,
A substance used in the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of a disease or as a component of a medication A substance used in the diagnosis, treatment,
Applications of Analytical Chemistry in Pharmaceuticals Corey M. Chong 10Mar10.
Risk Based CMC Review Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science October 22, 2003 Vilayat A. Sayeed, Ph.D. OGD, FDA.
Sultan Ghani WHO Prequalification Programme of Priority Essential Medicines, October 2010, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E. Dossier Requirements for Generic Medicines.
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Lynda Paleshnuik Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
1-7.The ICH Q8 “Minimal Approach” to Pharmaceutical Development
Stability of FPPs- Conducting, Bracketing, Matrixing Sultan Ghani.
CHALLENGES FACED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF BIOSIMILARS Dr.G.Hima Bindu MD; PG dip. diabetology Asst.Professor Dept. of Pharmacology Rajiv Gandhi Institute.
Predicting Physical Stability in Q1A(R) Chi-wan Chen, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Chemistry Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration.
HELM AG Module 3 Christa Clasen Ankara, 6./7. April 2006.
The New Drug Development Process (www. fda. gov/cder/handbook/develop
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Satish Mallya January 20-22, |1 | 2-3. Pharmaceutical Development Satish Mallya Quality Workshop, Copenhagen May 18-21, 2014 May 18-21,2014.
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
ERT 313 BIOSEPARATION ENGINEERING INTRODUCTION
Data, Meta-Data and Documents in Ginas,. Data and Documents Data related to substances should be organized across manufacturers, by manufacturer and even.
Dr. Pogány - Geneva 1/30 PREQUALIFICATION OF ANTIMALARIAL DRUG PRODUCTS János Pogány, pharmacist, Ph.D. Geneva, 03 May 2004
FDA PAT Sub-Committee of Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences June 12-13, 2002; Gaithersburg, MD Regulatory Challenges: Post-Approval PAT Applications.
Impurities in Drugs author: srikanth N
Structures and functions of biomolecules & applications Purin Charoensuksai, PhD Department of Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Silpakorn University.
David G. Donne, Ph.D. and Thomas J. DiFeo, Ph.D.
Manufacturing Process of Drug Product: Container closure system Compatibility Ratiya KUKHETPITAKWONG 27 April 2016.
New Light Path TM Services. slide 2 Light Path TM : streamlined custom material supply for discovery to early development n Leverage Lonza’s proven technology.
A substance used in the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of a disease or as a component of a medication recognized or defined by the U.S. Food, Drug,
In the name of God. Common Technical Document On Biotech.
DIA ERS SIAC IND CMC eCTD Submissions Part II – IND to NDA
Quality Control Biochemistry
Telephone : / 82 ID: com Website: www
BSB Biomanufacturing CHAPTER 5 Upstream Processes
נמטוציטים משושנת ים Eli. S Lec. No.2.
Northeast Biomanufacturing Center and Collaborative
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 953, 2009
The Lifecycle of Pharmaceutical products
Quality guidelines on impurities
Quality guidelines on impurities
Guideline for Elemental Impurities ICH Q3D(R)
Presentation transcript:

Regulatory CMC BLA and NDA Submissions: Differences and Correlations from Regulatory and Scientific Perspectives – Drug Substance David G. Donne, Ph.D. and Thomas J. DiFeo, Ph.D. Janssen Research & Development, LLC Welsh and McKean Roads Spring House, PA, USA

Janssen Research & Development A. NDA and BLA: CMC Basics NDA – New drug application –The NDA is the vehicle through which drug sponsors formally propose that the FDA approve a new pharmaceutical for sale and marketing in the U.S. (5-year data exclusivity for new chemical entities) –ANDA for generics (Waxman-Hatch Act, 1984) BLA – Biologic license application –The Biologics License Application (BLA) is a request for permission to introduce, or deliver for introduction, a biologic product into interstate commerce (12- year data exclusivity for biologics). –ABLA for biosimilars (BPCI Act, 2009) –Focus here will be on monoclonal antibodies Common CMC Requirements –Whether the methods used in manufacturing the drug and the controls used to maintain the drug's quality are adequate to assure the drug's identity, strength, quality, and purity. 2 Penicillin Monoclonal antibody

Janssen Research & Development B. NDA and BLA Comparison: a CTD M3 Overview 3 32S Drug substance –S11, S12, S13 –S21, S22, S23, S24, S25, S26 –S31, S32 –S41, S42, S42, S44, S45 –S5 –S6 –S71, S72, S73 32P Drug product –P1 –P21, P22, P23, P24, P25, P26 –P31, P32, P33, P34, P35 –P4 –P51, P52, P53, P54, P55, P56 –P6 –P7 –P81, P82, P83 32A Appendices –A1: Facilities and Equipment –A2: Adventitious Agents and Safety Evaluation Non-viral agents Viral agents –A3: Novel excipients 32R Regional –DP batch records –Comparability protocol and method validation package –Medical devices –DS batch records Green: Same; Yellow: similar; Red: Different

Janssen Research & Development C. NDA/BLA: Essentially Same Information – DS S11: Nomenclature –IUPAC/CAS name, INN/USAN, company code etc. S21: Manufacturers –Facilities involved in the manufacturing of the commercial API and establishment registration numbers S5: Reference standards –Detailed testing results of reference std/mat batch(es) S6: Container closure system –May need to consider container closure integrity for sterile API S72: Post-approval stability commitments –Regulatory commitments for post-approval stability monitoring studies 4 Green: Same Yellow: Similar Red: Different

Janssen Research & Development D. NDA/BLA: Essentially Similar Information S12/S13 Structure and Properties S12: Structures –Chemical structure, stereochemistry S13: Properties –Physical form, Melting point, Solubility –BCS class –Dissociation constant, –Partition coefficient –pKa –Hygroscopicity –Specific optical rotation, –Particle size –Polymorphism –Stereochemistry S12: Structures –primary structure (aa seq. + S-S bonds), CDR regions, glycosylation sites S13: Properties –Summary of bioactivity –Physicochemical properties (may just refer to S31) Primary structure Higher order structure Carbohydrate structure Microhetereogeneity NDABLA 5

Janssen Research & Development D. NDA/BLA: Essentially Similar Information S41 Specifications ID by UV/IR Appearance Assay Purity/Impurities by HPLC Optical rotation Residual moisture Heavy Metals Residual solvents Residue on ignition Particle size ID by DRID/Dot Blot Purity/Impurity by cSDS, SE-HPLC Size by SE-HPLC Charge by IEF/cIEF Bioactivity Protein concentration (Impurities (HCP, DNA, protein A)) Bioburden Endotoxins pH NDABLA 6

Janssen Research & Development D. NDA/BLA: Essentially Similar Information S42/S43 Analytical methods/validation ID tests (spectroscopy) Assay (chromatography) Organic impurities (chromatography) Inorganic impurities (specific tests) Residual solvents (chromatography) ID & bioactivity (product specific) Assay & characterization (electrophoresis + chromatography) Total protein (spectroscopy) Product impurities (electrophoresis + chromatography) Process impurities (rDNA, HCP, protein A) Microbiology (bioburden/endotoxins) NDA: USP Chapter 1 Chart 1BLA: USP Chapter 1 Chart 2 7

Janssen Research & Development D. NDA/BLA: Essentially Similar Information S44/S45 Batch analysis/Justification of specification S44: Batch analysis –GLP toxicology batches –Clinical batches –Validation batches –Registration stability batches –Impurity profile is key –Captures results for tests not in specs S45: Justification of specs –Based on all relevant batches –Consider impurity profile changes S44: Batch analysis –No toxicology batches –Clinical batches (current process) –Validation batches –Manufacturing process/scale is key –Captures results for tests not in specs S45: Justification of specs –Based on commercial process only and sometimes restricted to clinical experience –Consider comparability NDABLA 8

Janssen Research & Development D. NDA/BLA: Essentially Similar Information S7 Stability S71: Stability summary and conclusions –Covers final API only –Re-test based on extrapolation –Often without stat analysis S73: Stability data –3 registration stability batches at long-term, accelerated and stress conditions –Force degradation data (high/low pH, oxidation, light) –Stability data from process intermediates S71: Stability summary and conclusions –Covers final API and intermediate from end of upstream processes –Shelf-life based on extrapolation –Often with stat analysis S73: Stability data –Data from clinical and development batches –Data from process intermediate –No forced degradation data (usu. discussed in S31) NDABLA 9 The intermediate from end of upstream is the crude API equivalent.

Janssen Research & Development E. NDA/BLA: Essentially Different Information S22 Manufacturing process description Chemical synthesis process Chemical Synthesis/purification scheme (reaction scheme) Starting from chemical starting materials and reagents –Chemical reactions as major steps –Crystallization as preferred purification technique –Crude API can be obtained –Pure drug substance is final API Protein expression process Protein expression and purification flowchart Starting from cell banks and cell growth media –Cell growth and protein expression as major steps –Purification conditions should not denature the protein –Process intermediate from end of upstream processes equivalent to crude API –Drug substance presented as formulated bulk NDABLA 10 Ibuprofen

Janssen Research & Development E. NDA/BLA: Essentially Different Information S23 Control of materials Chemical starting material (SM) marks the beginning of GMP control and major of concern of HA’s SM often commercially available SM specifications and impurity carry-out will affect API quality –Impurities (esp. genotoxic) –Trace heavy metal carry-over Reagents (equivalent to media) –Many reagents are compendial Analytical methods for SM Cell substrate (cell line + gene constructs) developed in-house –Source, history and generation of cell substrate described in detail –Genetic stability of cell substrate critically important –Potential virus carry-over addressed elsewhere Cell banks (generation, storage, shipping and testing) as SM Growth media for cell growth –Minimize animal derived components –Many components are compendial Analytical methods for cell banks NDABLA 11

Janssen Research & Development E. NDA/BLA: Essentially Different Information S24 Control of critical steps/intermediates Criticality analysis –Synthesis: Fate of impurities (generation, elimination, reduction, and spiking experiments) Critical intermediates –Specifications –Process Selection and justification of in-process controls (IPC) – few IPCs Selection and justification of critical process parameters (CPP) – few CPPs –Selection of CQAs (qualitative aspect) Analytical methods/validation Selection and justification of in-process controls (IPC) –Critical intermediates Crude proteins captured from end of upstream processes –Process controls Selection and justification of in-process controls (IPC) – many IPCs Selection and justification of critical process parameters (CPP) – many CPPs Process monitoring tests (PMT) –Selection of CQAs Analytical methods/validation NDABLA 12

Janssen Research & Development E. NDA/BLA: Essentially Different Information S25 Process validation and/or evaluation Solid dosage forms –Validation commitment (data not required) Sterile API –Sterilization validations Filter studies Filter validation studies Aseptic process justification Process simulation test Container closure integrity testing Manufacturing Scale –Process Validation (detailed data required) –Critical Process Parameter Ranges –Process Evaluation Reduced Scale –Viral Clearance validation of viruses specific to the cell line used Manufacturing and Reduced Scales –Chromatography Resin Lifetime –Intermediate Hold –Reprocessing –Qualification of a Granular Form of Hybridoma Medium –Characterization of Cell Substrate and Process Consistency Analytical methods and validations NDABLA 13

Janssen Research & Development E. NDA/BLA: Essentially Different Information S26 Manufacturing process development Different chemical syntheses Changes to other aspects of processes –Scales –IPCs –Process parameters Manufacturing process changes –Upstream Cell line/media Scale/site –Downstream Process/scale/site Comparability studies –Biochemical & Biophysical Equivalence –Degradation Profile Comparison –Biological Assays –May also be place in P2 together with DP comparability NDABLA 14

Janssen Research & Development E. NDA/BLA: Essentially Different Information S31 Characterization Structure and other characteristics –Structure by EA, UV, IR, NMR, MS, XRD –Other properties (hygroscopicity, thermal properties) Polymorphism and form selection –Only one polymorph is selected for the formulation Focus is on the major form Structure –Primary structure –Carbohydrate structure –Higher order structure Microheterogeneity –Multiple forms are present in DS (mass, charge, glycosylation, term-L) –Consistency of DS/DP Biological function Impurities/degradants and degradation pathways NDA – physicochemical char.BLA – biophysicochemcal, biological char. 15 Multiple molecular variants are in the mAb drug substance.

Janssen Research & Development E. NDA/BLA: Essentially Different Information S32 Impurities Organic impurities –Specified/unspecified –Actual/potential –Synthesis/degradation Inorganic impurities Tox qualification of impurities –List tox studies and qual levels Genotoxicological concerns –DEREK screening –AMES/CA tests –If +, control below TTC Product related impurities –Equivalent to synthesis impurities in NDA Process related impurities –Equivalent to degradants in NDA High-level summary only. Detailed cross reference d to S31 Immunogenicity not a topic for CMC No specified levels set for individual impurities NDABLA 16

Janssen Research & Development F. NDA/BLA CMC Comparison: Conclusion 17