“What is Enlightenment?” Immanuel Kant Michel Foucault.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Subject-Matter of Ethics
Advertisements

Being and Time A Brief Summary.
Robert Bernasconi, “ Krimskrams: Hegel and the Current Controversy about the Beginnings of Philosophy ” A Presentation for PHIL 317 by John Doe.
German Philosophy: Kant and Hegel
Categorical Imperative Universal Maxim Respect of Persons
Kant’s Ethical Theory.
LECTURE. ‘An Oak Tree’ Michael Craig-Martin Jacques Derrida Gilles Deleuze.
ARISTOTLE: Background
Newton and psychology Thanks to Newton, scientists and philosophers know that the world is controlled by absolute natural laws, so the inconsistencies.
Repression and Confession Power and the Productivity of Language.
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
Liberal Humanism And the Liberal Humanist Subject.
Postmodernism. According to Sarup, poststructuralists like Foucault, Derrida, and Lyotard are postmodernists There are similarities between poststructuralist.
Education and Physical Education During the Reformation KPE 260 – Fall, 2000 Dr. D. Frankl.
“What is Enlightenment?” Philosophy 157 G. J. Mattey ©2002.
Michel Foucault A Brief Overview. His Work His writings have had an enormous impact on other scholarly work: Foucault's influence extends across the humanities.
Critical Theory and Postmodernism Approaches to OS (Alvesson and Deetz 2006) Presented by Alejandra Marin Organizational Theory Seminar.
Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals Immanuel Kant Enriquez | Lee | Lim | Montano | Rombaoa.
HUMAN NATURE AND MODERN PHILOSOPHY DESCARTES PHILOSOPHY 224.
Philosophical Concerns in Critical Psychology Critical Psychology is rooted in different social critiques to industrial capitalism (Marx, 1844) and the.
Philosophy 224 Person As Passion: Kierkegaard and Nietzsche.
Why a third Critique? Seminar “Kant: Critique of the Power of Judgment” University of Iceland Session 1 18/9/2007 Text: Preface Claus Beisbart.
What is philosophy? * The Life of Reason *“A reasoned pursuit of fundamental truths.” Concerned with problems whose solution depend not on facts but ways.
Epistemology Revision
Descartes’ First Meditation
Immanuel Kant Critique of Pure Reason. Historical Context Kant lived during the age of enlightenment The spirit of enlightenment (Aufklaerung): 1. Universalism:
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
“What is Enlightenment?” Immanuel Kant Michel Foucault.
HZB301 Philosophy Room 158 Mr. Baker.
Descartes & Rationalism
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
Chapter 3: Knowledge Kant’s Revolution Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
Michel Foucault - The Culture of the Self, First Lecture, Part 1 of 7
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
American Transcendentalism Backgrounds for Walden.
The Sheriff’s Dilemma How to structure your answer.
 existence precedes essence  in order to make a table, the artisan must first have a conception of the table  not so with human beings; we come into.
Evidently the Cosmological argument as proposed by Aquinas is open to both interpretation and criticism. The Cosmological argument demands an explanation.
Epistemology ► Area of Philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge ► Philosophy of Knowledge.
The Turn to the Science The problem with substance dualism is that, given what we know about how the world works, it is hard to take it seriously as a.
Husserlian Phenomenology Dr. James A. Snyder Postmodern Philosophy.
Evidential Challenge: Kierkegaard and Adams
11/26/2015 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Kant III Charles Manekin.
After today’s lesson I will be able to: Explain Kant’s theory on moral ethics Explain the term ‘categorical imperative’ Understand the phrase 'Duty and.
Critical Theory and Philosophy “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it” Marx, Theses on.
KANT ON THE SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
L ECTURE 15: C ERTAINTY. T ODAY ’ S L ECTURE In Today’s Lecture we will: 1.Review Hume’s radical empiricism and its consequences 2.Outline and investigate.
Consciousness of Self Self-Consciousness and Self-Constitution.
COGITO ERGO SUM.
An analysis of Kant’s argument against the Cartesian skeptic in his ‘Refutation of Idealism” Note: Audio links to youtube are found on my blog at matthewnevius.wordpress.com.
Kant and Kantian Ethics: Is it possible for “reason” to supply the absolute principles of morality?
Philosophy 224 Kant and Humans and Morality. Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant ( ) was one of the most important philosophers of the modern era. His.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
KANT ON THE POSSIBILITY OF METAPHYSICS Text source: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, introduction.
What is Postmodernism? A complicated term A set of ideas emerged as an area of academic study since the mid-1980s It is hard to define it is a concept.
Chapter 7: Ethics Morality and Practical Reason: Kant
Stuart Hall Who Needs ‘Identity’?.
Michel Foucault, Critique and Ethics
MNU Five Other Ethical Systems Dr. Judy Martin Session 7 – February 18, 2014.
WEEK FIVE: CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHY 19 TH & 20 TH Century Philosophy & Existentialism.
Lecture 1/Term 3: Postmodernity/Postmodernism Dr Claudia Stein.
Introductory Class. Course code/course title GST 113 LOGIC, PHILOSOPHY AND HUMAN EXISTENCE.
Lecture 9: Enlightenment: What is Enlightenment?.
What is Philosophy? The Course- GST 118 requires that we refresh our memories with the idea of philosophy as an academic discipline since the history and.
Philosophy and History of Mathematics
Kant and Kantian Ethics:
Kant’s Categorical Imperative - revision
EXAM WEEK DATES THE FINAL EXAM IS 12 NOON, THURS 9th
What is Postmodernism? A complicated term
Presentation transcript:

“What is Enlightenment?” Immanuel Kant Michel Foucault

Michel Foucault, French philosopher ( ) Often characterized as a postmodernist and a poststructuralist, although his position is complex and he rejected both of these categorizations.

What characterizes ‘postmodern’ approaches: Suspicion/critique of all ‘grand narratives’ Critique of universalism / universal claims Critique of all truth claims / all transcendental claims to truth The subject as an effect of structure, of power relations and knowledge-practices The subject as produced through discourses and the operations of power

Foucault, “What is Enlightenment”: “I have been seeking [...] to emphasize the extent to which a type of philosophical interrogation – one that simultaneously problematizes man's relation to the present, man's historical mode of being, and the constitution of the self as an autonomous subject – is rooted in the Enlightenment.”

“Cogito ergo sum” / “I think, therefore I am” – proposed by René Descartes in his Discourse on Method

What does it mean to be modern? Britain in the 1800s Shanghai: Pudong skyline, from the Bund

Foucault on Kant: The hypothesis I should like to propose is that this little text is located in a sense at the crossroads of critical reflection and reflection on history. It is a reflection by Kant on the contemporary status of his own enterprise. No doubt it is not the first time that a philosopher has given his reasons for undertaking his work at a particular moment. But it seems to me that it is the first time that a philosopher has connected in this way, closely and from the inside, the significance of his work with respect to knowledge, a reflection on history and a particular analysis of the specific moment at which he is writing and because of which he is writing. It is in the reflection on “today” as difference in history and as motive for a particular philosophical task that the novelty of this text appears to me to lie (Foucault, p. 38)

Jürgen Habermas : Kant is the first philosopher to 'take aim like an archer at the heart of a present that is concentrated in the significance of the contemporary moment, and thereby to inaugurate the philosophical discourse of modernity'.

ParticularUniversal Königsberg, Prussia, 1784Humanity in general

“Foucault expounds what he takes to be the crucial and unresolved tension within Kant's philosophical project. This results from Kant's commitment to a notion of critique that, on the one hand, takes rise in response to certain highly specific historical conditions, while on the other hand claiming to transcend those conditions through an exercise of the human faculties — of understanding, reason, and judgment — deduced a priori as a matter of timeless, self-evident truth.” “On Foucault's reading, this latter must be seen as a form of residual anthropomorphism, a humanist or subject- centered philosophy that fails to take the point of its own best insights as regards the radically contingent or historically situated character of all such truth-claims.” Christopher Norris, “Kant According to Foucault”

Foucault: “But if the Kantian question was that of knowing what limits knowledge has to renounce transgressing, it seems to me that the critical question today has to be turned back into a positive one: in what is given to us as universal, necessary, obligatory, what place is occupied by whatever is singular, contingent and the product of arbitrary constraints? The point in brief is to transform the critique conducted in the form of necessary limitation into a practical critique that takes the form of a possible transgression. This entails an obvious consequence: that criticism is no longer going to be practiced in the search for formal structures with universal value, but rather as a historical investigation into the events that have led us to constitute ourselves and to recognize ourselves as subjects of what we are doing, thinking, saying.”

“this criticism is not transcendental, and its goal is not that of making a metaphysics possible [;] [...] it will not seek to identify the universal structures of all knowledge or of all possible moral action, but will seek to treat the instances of discourse that articulate what we think, say, and do as so many historical events [...], it will separate out, from the contingency that has made us what we are, the possibility of no longer being, doing, or thinking what we are, do, or think.”

Foucault and permanent critique: “the principle of a critique and a permanent creation of ourselves in our autonomy: that is a principle that is at the heart of the historical consciousness that the Enlightenment has of itself.”

Foucault on modernity I wonder whether we may not envisage modernity rather as an attitude than as a period of history. And by “attitude,” I mean a mode of relating to contemporary reality; a voluntary choice made by certain people; in the end, a way of thinking and feeling; a way, too, of acting and behaving that at one and the same time marks a relation of belonging and presents itself as a task. A bit, no doubt, like what the Greeks called an ethos. And consequently, rather than seeking to distinguish the “modern era” from the “premodern” or “postmodern,” I think it would be more useful to try to find out how the attitude of modernity, ever since its formation, has found itself struggling with attitudes of “countermodernity” (p. 38). Modernity is often characterized in terms of consciousness of the discontinuity of time: a break with tradition, a feeling of novelty, of vertigo in the face of the passing moment (p. 39) Modernity is the attitude that makes it possible to grasp the “heroic” aspect of the present moment. Modernity is not a phenomenon of sensitivity to the fleeting present; it is the will to “heroize” the present’ (p. 40).

Foucault on critique as a “historico-practical test of the limits that we may go beyond”: “the following objection would be entirely legitimate: if we limit ourselves to this type of always partial and local inquiry or test, do we not run the risk of letting ourselves be determined by more general structures of which we may well not be conscious, and over which we may have not control?”