2006.10.29 –11.03 Hawaii Multi bunch acceleration on LUCX system Ⅰ. LUCX project Ⅱ. Simulation results for Compton scattering Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adnan Doyuran a, Joel England a, Chan Joshi b, Pietro Musumeci a, James Rosenzweig a, Sergei Tochitsky b, Gil Travish a, Oliver Williams a a UCLA/Particle.
Advertisements

CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Stephen Benson U.S. Particle Accelerator School January 17, 2011 The FEL as a Diagnostic* * This work was supported by U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC05-84-ER40150,
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Demonstration of the Beam loading compensation (Preparation status for ILC beam loading compensation experiments at ATF injector in this September) (PoP.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
Design on Target and Moderator of X- band Compact Electron Linac Neutron Source for Short Pulsed Neutrons Kazuhiro Tagi.
Outline 1.ERL facility for gamma-ray production [A. Valloni] 2.ERL facility - Tracking Simulations [D. Pellegrini] 3.SC magnet quench tests [V. Chetvertkova]
Laser Notcher Pulse Energy Requirements & Demonstration Experiment David Johnson, Todd Johnson, Vic Scarpine.
Room temperature RF Part 2.1: Strong beam-cavity coupling (beam loading) 30/10/2010 A.Grudiev 5 th IASLC, Villars-sur-Ollon, CH.
7.8GHz Dielectric Loaded High Power Generation And Extraction F. Gao, M. E. Conde, W. Gai, C. Jing, R. Konecny, W. Liu, J. G. Power, T. Wong and Z. Yusof.
New Electron Beam Test Facility EBTF at Daresbury Laboratory B.L. Militsyn on behalf of the ASTeC team Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Science.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Transverse Profiling of an Intense FEL X-Ray Beam Using a Probe Electron Beam Patrick Krejcik SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
After Posipol In my opinion we are still too much dispersed. We have to re compact our community if we want to succeed in presenting a Compton version.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
Compact X-ray & Emittance Measurement by Laser Compton Scattering Zhi Zhao Jan. 31, 2014.
Beam Loading experiment at KEK ATF ( Multi-train acceleration at KEK-ATF Injector ) KEK Masafumi Fukuda and Junji Urakawa LCWS /10/052 train acceleration.
–10.06 Milan Italy LUCX system and dark current (1) LUCX project (2) Phase Ⅰ and results (3) Phase Ⅱ and dark current Liu shengguang and LUCX.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
Transverse Gradient Undulator and its applications to Plasma-Accelerator Based FELs Zhirong Huang (SLAC) Introduction TGU concept, theory, technology Soft.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Laser-Undulator Compact X-ray source (LUCX) POSIPOL2006 Workshop at CERN 1/23 Experimental Plan of X-ray Generation using Optical Resonator using Optical.
Page 1 Polarized Electron Sources for Linear Colliders October, 2010 A. Brachmann, J. C. Sheppard, F. Zhou SLAC SLAC October 18-22, 2010.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
1 Junji Urakawa (KEK, Japan) at PosiPol2012, Under development of Quantum Beam Technology Program(QBTP) supported by MEXT from to
AFAD 2014 Synchrotron Status of Compact X-ray Source at LUCX Kazuyuki Sakaue Waseda University Laser Undulator Compact X-ray source.
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
GDE FRANCE Why High brillance gun is good for the ERL scheme? And SC GUN? Alessandro Variola For the L.A.L. Orsay group.
X-band Based FEL proposal
ELI PHOTOINJECTOR PARAMETERS: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND SIMULATIONS C. RONSIVALLE.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
CEPC APDR Study Zhenchao LIU
NC Accelerator Structures
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
MIT Compact X-ray Source
Pol. positron generation scheme for ILC
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
Compton effect and ThomX What possible future?
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Some CEPC SRF considerations
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
CEPC Injector positron source
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Evgenij Kot XFEL beam dynamics meeting,
小型X線源の性能確認実験計画 高輝度・RF電子銃研究会 広島大学 高エネルギー加速器研究機構 浦川順治
Presentation transcript:

–11.03 Hawaii Multi bunch acceleration on LUCX system Ⅰ. LUCX project Ⅱ. Simulation results for Compton scattering Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation Ⅴ. Results and summary Liu shengguang Masafumi Fukuda, Koichiro Hirano, Junji Urakawa

–11.03 Hawaii LUCX ( Laser Undulator Compact X ray source) is for generation x-ray photon by inverse Compton scattering. X-ray is for medical application ----K-edge digital subtraction angiography. In this application, 33KeV X ray photons are required. Collision angle between electron beams and the laser beams is 20 degree. The detector size is 4cm×4cm, 2m away from the collision point. Acceptance angle of the detector is 10mrad. Ⅰ. LUCX project (1)

–11.03 Hawaii Ⅰ. LUCX project (2)

–11.03 Hawaii Electron beamLaser pulse Energy43MeV1064nm (1.17eV) Intensity2nC/bunch (5nC/bunch) 1.25*10^10electron/bunch 17µJ/pulse 9.1*10^13photon/pulse Width (FWHM)10ps Bunch number100bunches/train 2.8ns spacing Beam sizeσ x =64um σ y =32um σ= 100um Repetition rate12.5Hz About 45% X ray photon number can be reserved by the detector : /bunch /train /sec Ⅰ. LUCX project (3)

–11.03 Hawaii Ⅱ. Simulation results for Compton scattering (1)

–11.03 Hawaii Because of the energy spread of electron beam, the peak position at the high energy edge decrease a little. If we want to shift the peak at 33keV, we should increase the energy of electron beam a little X-ray spectrum Ⅱ. Simulation results for Compton scattering (2)

–11.03 Hawaii Electron beam emittance affects the distribution structure of X-ray. But to the number of X ray on the detector, emittance is not much important. Emittance on Compton scattering Ⅱ. Simulation results for Compton scattering (3)

–11.03 Hawaii Comparing with the effect on the X ray number, the electron bunch length is much important than the beam emittance Bunch length on Compton scattering Ⅱ. Simulation results for Compton scattering (4)

–11.03 Hawaii Resonant Frequency MHz β 0.60 Filling Time 0.55 µs Qo 7900 R/Q 464 TTR MΩ Efull/Ehalf 0.77 RF Driving Frequency MHz RF Pulse Repetition rate 12.5 Hz Operation frequency 2856MHz Phase shift/cell 2/3π Electric-field distribution Constant gradient Structure length 3m Number of cells 84 cells + 2 coupler cells Quality factor 13,000 Shunt impedance 60M Attenuation parameter 0.57 Group velocity – c Filling time 0.83us Gun parameters Acc tube parameters Gun cavity and Accelerator tube Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(1)

–11.03 Hawaii Energy gain and beam loading Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(2)

–11.03 Hawaii Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(3)

–11.03 Hawaii C alculation result t0=0.916us V=4.72MeV/c Experiment result t0=0.908us V=4.65MeV/c Compensation on gun Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(4)

–11.03 Hawaii We can see that t is different, Δt is different. When a bunch inject into the structure, the RF power has been propagated in the structure for t time. And then the bunch spends Δt to catch up with the head of RF power. In fact, the catching up process is the acceleration process for the bunch. For the bunch that inject into the structure at moment t, the acceleration length is – c Energy gain calculation Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(5)

–11.03 Hawaii If the RF pulse is long and flat pulse, energy gain of electron bunch is linear to Δt, to c Δt. Energy gain Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(6)

–11.03 Hawaii In the theory of Traveling-Wave-Type RF-Pulse Compressor, Traveling wave type compressor Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(7)

–11.03 Hawaii For a slope RF pulse, of course, the propagation behavior is the same as the flat pulse. we can cut the pulse into n parts by time step dt. It is assumed that at t=0, the head of RF pulse begin to enter the structure. At time mdt (<filling time tf), a bunch enter the structure and begin acceleration. We can calculate the acceleration length dL for m parts. Average field gradient E of every part multiply its acceleration length during a dt step and sum up. The value is the energy gain for the bunch that enter the structure at time t, then normalize it. dt  dL Energy gain for slope RF pulse Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(8)

–11.03 Hawaii Traveling wave structure Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(9)

–11.03 Hawaii To a short RF pulse (width<tf), for example 500ns pulse. if the injection time of electron bunch is more than 500ns and less than 830ns, even through the whole RF pulse is in the structure, but the energy gain decrease a lot. This is another kind of attenuation of RF power in the process of propagation. Energy gain Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(10)

–11.03 Hawaii 600ns case for example Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(11)

–11.03 Hawaii calculation Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(12)

–11.03 Hawaii Good compensation results at the exit of accelerator tube are always as the plot show: Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(13)

–11.03 Hawaii Step 1 set parameter a to a suitable value (0.2<a<0.4) Step 2 solve the equation 1, then a formulas between p and t1 can be gotten— p1(t1) Step 3 solve the equation 2, then another formulas between p and t1 can be gotten---p2(t1) Step 4 solve p1(t1) and p2(t1), we can get the value p and t1 Step 5 using the value of p and t1 to check the energy at the exit of gun and Acc Step 6 to compare the calculation results for different parameter a. Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(14)

–11.03 Hawaii 600ns a=0.3, P=136.3MW, t0=0.2867us ACC: Max=43.5MeV ΔE=0.7MeV Gun: Min=3.70MeV ΔE=1.8MeV Case1 Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(15)

–11.03 Hawaii 600ns a=0.4, P=106.25MW, t0=0.286us ACC: Max=43.5MeV ΔE=0.7MeV Gun: Min=3.05MeV ΔE=1.4MeV Case2 Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(16)

–11.03 Hawaii 1000ns a=0.3, P=99.8MW, t0=0.2856us ACC: Max=43.5MeV ΔE=0.7MeV Gun: Min=3.17MeV ΔE=1.52MeV Case3 Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(17)

–11.03 Hawaii 1000ns a=0.4, P=77.5MW, t0=0.2846us ACC: Max=43.5MeV ΔE=0.7MeV Gun: Min=2.58MeV ΔE=1.18MeV Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading and compensation(18) Case4

–11.03 Hawaii 500ns600ns1000ns RF power p (MW) Injection time (us) Parameter a0.4 Energy difference at ACC exit0.68MeV0.7MeV Energy difference at Gun exit1.4MeV Mini =3.05MeV 1.18MeV Mini =2.58MeV Ⅴ. Results and summary (1)Calculation the energy gain for multi electron bunches in the constant gradient structure, considering the propagation behavior of short (<filling time) slope RF pulse. Find a method to search for the RF power and injection time for the good compensation of the beam loading. (2)For high charge multi bunch acceleration as LUCX case, beam loading effect and effective compensation mostly take place in the ACC tube. For different length RF pulse cases, injection time is always at 0.28us~2.9us. (3)Two better compensation cases is showed in the follow table

–11.03 Hawaii End

–11.03 Hawaii t0ZΔzEt(Et0+Et1)/2E*dzE*dz/

–11.03 Hawaii