Socratic Smackdown Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading the Socratic Seminar
Advertisements

The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with right answers.
Professional Growth and
Effective use of protocols: Don't waste my time Bethann M. McCain Educational Consultant, CIU #10.
Reflection: TOPIC: Are people naturally “good” or are they forced to be “good” by social rules and legal institutions? INTRODUCE EVIDENCE: Why do you believe.
Critical Thinking Course Introduction and Lesson 1
Welcome Introduction Parking lot Etc.
Professional Growth and
Collaborative Conversations Doug Fisher, PhD San Diego State University.
Socratic Seminars. The Goal of Socratic Seminars Fosters active learning  Participants explore and evaluate a text Ideas Issues Values To learn more.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
Develop an Action Plan and Plan to Assess Progress Dec. 12, 2006.
EngageNY.org Session 4: Living a Lesson Part 2 Elementary.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Literature Circles.
Math AP Meeting January 20, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
Unit 2: Socratic Seminar
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
The difference between learning goals and activities
Performance Development at The Cathedral of the Incarnation A Supervisor’s Guide.
Presentation Five Using Descriptive, Analytical, and Reflective Writing to Analyze Practice.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
An Introduction.  To Build 21 st Century Survival Skills  Achieve a deeper understanding about the ideas and values in a text.
Thoughtful Classroom Research-Based Strategies Task Rotations.
ATL’s in the Personal Project
Reflection: TOPIC: Are people naturally “good” or are they forced to be “good” by social rules and legal institutions? INTRODUCE EVIDENCE: Why do you believe.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
What is Shared Inquiry? Shared Inquiry is a method of learning in which students actively search for answers to questions raised by a text. This search.
Socratic Seminar. What is it? In the seminar, participants discuss issues related to a particular text. It is a group conversation that allows participants.
Fishbowl Discussions 7 th Grade Language Arts. “My Mother’s Food” Look back at your questions. How do you know they are “good” questions? Look back at.
Please get your journal and performance assessment book
SARAH DOERR DISTRICT LITERACY COACH SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MENOMONEE FALLS Extending Student Thinking Through Readers’ (and Writers’) Workshop.
To improve student learning using FLIP cameras during a volleyball unit in both Standard 1 and 2.  Standard 1 - Demonstrates competency in motor skills.
Bell Ringer: Write your own original example of each of the following: anecdote, dichotomy, imagery, and conceit. 1.
Meeting Norms and Expectations Be punctual and prepared Support each other by actively listening and staying engaged Stay on topic according to what is.
Literacy Team September Introductions and Roles Literacy Coach Roles Providing and demonstrating a variety of new literacy strategies monthly “Test.
Socratic Seminar. What is a Socratic Seminar? In a Socratic Seminar participants seek deeper understanding of complex ideas through thoughtful dialogue.
 Florida Standards Assessment: Q & A with the State Literacy Department January Zone Meeting.
Formative Assessment and Feedback to Improve Writing CONVENING III, SECTION I.
Inquiry Road Map A Guidance System for 21 st Century Learning By Mary Ratzer.
Socratic Seminar Waiver Day Purdy and Snellgrove January 11, 2016.
Socratic Seminar A Model for Civil Discussion. What is a Socratic Seminar? Teacher observes; students lead Students come prepared with notes and questions.
Socratic Seminar Fishbowl.
Roles, Rules, and Relationships
thinking is not driven by answers but by questions
Chuan Yuan Anderson (Palos Verdes Peninsula High School)
Collaborative Conversations
Be ready to check 90 seconds after the bell.
Building and Assessing Oral Proficiency in the English Classroom
The Shared Inquiry Model
What is Shared Inquiry? Shared Inquiry is a method of learning in which students actively search for answers to questions raised by a text. This search.
Debate Unit 1 Standards Comprehension and Collaboration
Socratic Conversation
Socratic Seminar This PowerPoint is meant to be used with either teachers or students schoolwide to assist in implementing Socratic Seminar. It is written.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Introduction to Socratic Seminars
Warm-Up: Take a ¼ sheet from the tan bin.
Warm-Up: Take a ¼ sheet from the tan bin.
Socratic Seminars.
Copy the following list of words and write their definitions: Obstruct
Fishbowl Discussion Directions:
D Self-Perception The way a person sees him/herself.
Copy the following list of words and write their definitions: Obstruct
D Impartial Neutral, fair, on neither side.
Strategy Points Description NAME: Agree +1
Assessment Day Strategy
Class Components ►Monday/Tuesday
Socratic seminar Session #2.
Presentation transcript:

Socratic Smackdown Introduction

Socratic Seminar Introduction

Learning Goal Students will be able to: Prepare for discussions Use a variety of discussion skills Ask and answer deep questions Build on and refute others’ ideas Game Goal : Earn points and advance your individual, team, and/or class score by using different discussion strategies during a Socratic Smackdown

Learning Goal Students will be able to: Prepare for discussions Use a variety of discussion skills Ask and answer deep questions Build on and refute others’ ideas Game Goal : Earn points and advance your individual, team, and/or class score by using different discussion strategies during a Socratic Smackdown

RULES Teams of 4 to 6 students will be given a topic, text, or issue that will be the focus of the Socratic Smackdown, as well as a question set. Students will prepare answers to the questions prior to the Socratic Smackdown. 2 The teacher will reveal which discussion skill strategies will be part of the game. The point value of the different strategies will also be shared. MATERIALS -Copies of text/topic for game -Question set -Copies of Coach Card, Instant Replay Card, and Scorecard All-class scoreboard (if needed)

RULES Teams of 4 to 6 students will be given a topic, text, or issue that will be the focus of the Socratic Seminar, as well as a question set. Students will prepare answers to the questions prior to the Socratic Seminar. 2 The teacher will reveal which discussion skill strategies will be part of the game. The point value of the different strategies will also be shared. MATERIALS -Copies of text/topic for game -Question set -Copies of Coach Card, Instant Replay Card, and Scorecard All-class scoreboard (if needed)

When it is time for the Smackdown, the class will set up chairs in a fishbowl arrangement. A fishbowl is when there is an inner circle of 4 to 6 chairs—dependent on the size of the student discussion team— within a larger circle of chairs. RULES #3

When it is time for the Seminar, the class will set up chairs in a fishbowl arrangement. A fishbowl is when there is an inner circle of 4 to 6 chairs—dependent on the size of the student discussion team—within a larger circle of chairs. RULES #3

One student from each team will be asked to go inside the Socratic Smackdown Ring to have a 6- minute discussion, or Smackdown, based on the topic, text, or issue given earlier. During the Smackdown, they will earn points for using discussion skills. They can also lose points if they disrupt the discussion. RULES #4

Using the Socratic Smackdown Scorecard, a number of students (from 2 to the entire class) will track points during the 6-minute Smackdown. The first time the class plays the game the teacher can track points to model scoring. RULES #5

Using the Socratic Seminar Scorecard, a number of students (from 2 to the entire class) will track points during the 6-minute Seminar. The first time the class plays the game the teacher can track points to model scoring. RULES #5

Students who aren’t scoring will complete the Coach Card during the Seminar. If all students are scoring they will then complete the Coach Card after the Seminar. RULES #6

Students who aren’t scoring will complete the Coach Card during the Smackdown. If all students are scoring they will then complete the Coach Card after the Smackdown. RULES #6

When 6 minutes is up, the teacher or a student will collect the Scorecards, determine the average score for each student in the discussion team, and then sum up the average scores to figure out the team score. . RULES #7

After the Smackdown, the students in the ring will complete the Instant Replay Card. RULES #8

After the Socratic Seminar, the students in the ring will complete the Instant Replay Card. RULES #8

After individual and team scores are revealed, the class will have a brief discussion time to share thoughts from their Coach Cards. RULES #9

The teacher can use this rubric to assess students’ progress toward reaching Common Core standards by circling different aspects of strategies based on what you observe during a Smackdown. Students use the rubric to self- assess their progress toward reaching Core standards COMMON CORE RUBRIC

The teacher can use this rubric to assess students’ progress toward reaching Common Core standards by circling different aspects of strategies based on what you observe during a Seminar. Students use the rubric to self- assess their progress toward reaching Core standards COMMON CORE RUBRIC

Uses textual evidence correctly more than 5 times during conversation EXCELLENT √+ Comes prepared with required materials completed with additional annotations or notes Uses textual evidence correctly more than 5 times during conversation Analyzes textual evidence by comparing multiple pieces of evidence and synthesizing for meaning CCR SL.8.1a Come to discussions prepared, having read or researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas under discussion.

EXCELLENT √+ Uses new and long-term discussion strategies expertly Never distracts or interrupts Leads team toward goals with verbal cues and reflects on progress CCR SL.8.1b Follow rules for collegial discussions and decision-making, track progress toward specific goals and deadlines, and define individual roles as needed.

EXCELLENT √+ Asks 3 or more analytical and evaluative questions that prompt discussion Answers others’ questions always using evidence Synthesizes the ideas of others and asks questions related to others ideas CCR SL.8.1c Pose questions that connect the ideas of several speakers and respond to others’ questions and comments with relevant evidence, observations, and ideas.

Agrees with and deepens the ideas of others EXCELLENT √+ Agrees with and deepens the ideas of others Refutes the ideas of others by playing devil’s advocate Refers to earlier evidence and statements frequently CCR 8.1d Acknowledge new information expressed by others, and, when warranted, qualify or justify their own views in light of the evidence presented.

COMMON CORE RUBRIC Use this rubric to assess students’ progress toward reaching Common Core standards by circling different aspects of strategies based on what you observe during a Smackdown. Students use the rubric to self-assess their progress toward reaching Core standards

TEACHER CHECKLIST Symbols to Use - / — APPROACHING √ MEETS √ + EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Students observing the Socratic Smackdown will write down glows (strengths) and grows (areas of growth) based on what they observe during a Smackdown. A teacher can ask students to share ideas to the class as a reflection. COACH CARD

Students observing the Socratic Seminar will write down glows (strengths) and grows (areas of growth) based on what they observe during a Smackdown. A teacher can ask students to share ideas to the class as a reflection. COACH CARD

SOCRATIC SMACKDOWN COACH CARD

SOCRATIC SEMINAR COACH CARD

SOCRATIC SEMINAR COACH CARD 1 What is one thing your team did particularly well during this Smackdown? Give specific examples. 2 What is one thing your team could improve on for the next Smackdown? How did this problem hinder your discussion? How can the problem be solved? 3 What was the most interesting thing your team discussed and why? SOCRATIC SEMINAR COACH CARD

SOCRATIC SMACKDOWN COACH CARD 1 What is one thing your team did particularly well during this Seminar? Give specific examples. 2 What is one thing your team could improve on for the next Seminar? How did this problem hinder your discussion? How can the problem be solved? 3 What was the most interesting thing your team discussed and why? SOCRATIC SMACKDOWN COACH CARD

The teacher will collect these Reflections as part of an assessment. Students in the Socratic Smackdown will answer Reflection Questions to reflect on their strengths and areas of growth. The teacher will collect these Reflections as part of an assessment. INSTANT REPLAY CARD

The teacher will collect these Reflections as part of an assessment. Students in the Socratic Seminar will answer Reflection Questions to reflect on their strengths and areas of growth. The teacher will collect these Reflections as part of an assessment. INSTANT REPLAY CARD