Tanya Morret October 26, 2011.  Background and History  Intent of Chapter 16  Forms and Timelines  Resources  Question and Answer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The State Mandate: The State Board of Education shall, through its departments of education, determine eligibility criteria and assist school districts.
Advertisements

Category 2 Doesn’t Mean Second Class! Cathy Seward Oklahoma State Department of Education.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
Present Levels of Educational Performance PAGE Conference April 2011 Tanya Morret and Cheryl Everett PAGE 2011.
Third Grade AIG Nomination and Identification 101 OR: Everything you Wanted to Know about how Students are Identified but were Afraid to Ask.
SLO Process A process to document a measure of educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
G/T Identification Parent Orientation January, 2015.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
Effingham County Who is a Gifted Student? A student who demonstrates a high degree of intellectual and/or creative ability, exhibits an exceptionally.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
Laws and Regulations.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
Identification and Service Options for Gifted Students.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
School District of Haverford Township Elementary Gifted Program Inquiry June
Linda J. Deal Penn Manor School District
PAGE Conference April 14, 2011 Prepared by Cheryl Everett and Tanya Morret.
GATE/SAS Parent Meeting
GIEP January Writing GIEPs is a Balancing Act! Balancing… District Philosophy and State Regulations District Resources and Program Costs Free Appropriate.
Gifted Education in the Elementary Schools Swarthmore-Rutledge School E.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
Gifted and Talented Education Neil Cummins School Larkspur School District
Orientation to Special Education From Referral to Eligibility.
For today’s network meeting: Sign-up as a teacher (even though you are my student). If you already have an account, sign in and go to next step. On the.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
TAG Testing and Referral
Edward G. Rendell, Governor ▪ Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak, Secretary of Educationwww.pde.state.pa.us Chapter 16 1 Chapter 16 Overview with 2008 Updates March.
CHAPTER 16 Regulations Covering the Education of Gifted Students August 25,2009.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Gifted Identification Janice Estabrook, Lancaster-Lebanon IU 13.
GATE/SAS Gifted and Talented Education and School for Advanced Studies Cowan Avenue Elementary.
Gifted Liaison Meeting N  E  I  U  19. Writing GIEPs is a Balancing Act! Balancing… District Philosophy and State Mandates District Resources and.
Blending Gifted Education and School Reform Dr. Betsy Gustafson, Assistant Superintendent Special Education Leadership Academy July 2011.
Best Practices.  Demonstrate growth commensurate with aptitude during the school year ◦ Use local, state, and national standards to align and expand.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
PA Gifted Education Update Intermediate Unit 1 Gifted Teacher Consortium October 28, 2009.
Chapter 16 Highlights A presentation for Octorara School District March 30, 2010.
Five Areas of Giftedness In-Service Training. 704 KAR 3:285. A large part of the law is devoted to describing instructional strategies for educators to.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
The Who, What and When Basic Guide to Assessment and Identification.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Alone we can do so little, together we can do so much. Helen Keller.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
INFORMATION SESSION: GIFTED EDUCATION IN GVSD Great Valley School April 5,
BY: SHAIFALI RACHNA PURI. ACADEMIC RECORD (Marks in qualifying degrees) ACADEMIC RECORD (Marks in Higher Degrees ) ACADEMIC RECORD (Marks in entrance.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Response to Instruction and Intervention and how it could apply to High Achievers/Gifted Education Tanya Morret, Dr. Christine.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Chapter 16 Special Education for Gifted Students, Basic Education Circular, and Legal Decisions January 11 & 12, 2007.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Special Education Notes If the student cannot demonstrate learning or achievement, the student has not failed-WE have failed the student.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Understanding the IEP Process
DeSoto County Schools’ Intellectually Gifted Mission Statement
Chapter 16 Overview with 2008 Updates
Chapter 16 Special Education for Gifted Students
Linda J. Deal Penn Manor School District
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Identifying Gifted Potential in Underrepresented Populations
Parent Informational Meeting
TAG and the Law
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Tanya Morret October 26, 2011

 Background and History  Intent of Chapter 16  Forms and Timelines  Resources  Question and Answer

 Chapter 16 was passed in 2000  Revisions in 2004, 2008  Academic Model

General Intellectual Ability Specific Academic Ability Creative/ Productive Ability Psychosocial/ Leadership Ability Visual/ Performing Arts Ability

 (d) Each school district shall establish procedures to determine whether a student is mentally gifted. This term includes a person who has an IQ of 130 or higher or when multiple criteria as set forth in this chapter and in Department Guidelines indicate gifted ability. Determination of gifted ability will not be based on IQ score alone. Deficits in memory or processing speed, as indicated by testing, cannot be the sole basis upon which a student is determined to be ineligible for gifted special education. A person with an IQ score lower than 130 may be admitted to gifted programs when other educational criteria in the profile of the person strongly indicate gifted ability. Determination of mentally gifted must include an assessment by a certified school psychologist. § General.

–Achievement test scores – year or more above grade level –High Acquisition and retention rates (1-3 presentations for retention and application) –Demonstrated achievement, performance or expertise in one or more academic areas –Higher level thinking skills, academic creativity, leadership skills, academic interest areas, communication skills, foreign language aptitude or technology expertise –Documented evidence of intervening factors

 Background and History  Intent of Chapter 16

 Two Prong  Identified Gifted and…in need of Services  Pennsylvania does not have a statute of limitations on gifted  Once identified, parents can ask for a GIEP review at any time – even if a student has not received services  If more than one year, a Review of a students Records will occur through a re-evaluation process, but IQ testing will not be repeated

 GIEP is an Individualized Plan  Not a Program  Goals ◦ Annual ◦ Measureable ◦ Aligned to the Standards ◦ Strength Based

 “Discrepant Needs” ie. organization, study skills, social prompts  Talent, leadership, creativity goals and objectives – unless mutually agreed upon by the district  Content outside the scope of what is normally offered in the district curriculum – again, unless mutually agreed upon

 Twice exceptional, One set of paperwork  Special education teacher is the case manager  All forms, timelines, and procedures are according to Chapter 14 regulations

 Chapter 15 addresses needs based on a medical diagnosis: ADHD, Vision, Mental or Physical Illness, Physical Handicap  Cannot be combined into one document  Chapter 15 can be indicated by Support Services in the GIEP document

 Background and History  Intent of Chapter 16  Forms and Timelines

 Done by the district  Review of Multiple Measures  Parent Permission not Required  No Timelines on this part of the process

 Permission to Evaluate – Required Signature, starts Evaluation or Re-Evaluation process  “GWR”-Gifted Written Report – results of the evaluation process, if identified should guide initial GIEP  Invitation to Participate in the GIEP – District’s documentation that parents have been included/invited to meet and craft GIEP

 “GIEP” – Gifted Individualized Education Plan – Annual review of Present Levels, Goals, Objectives, Specially-Designed Instruction, and Support Services  “NORA”-Notice of Recommended Assignment- ”contract” between you and the district for agreement and promise of fulfillment of the GIEP  Procedural Safeguards – Outlines parents’ rights in this process and what to do if you do not agree with the recommendations made by the district

 Background and History  Intent of Chapter 16  Forms and Timelines  Resources

 Capital Area Intermediate Unit ◦ Tanya Morret, X8113, ◦  Dr. Shirley Curl – Director for Gifted Education ◦ ,  Pennsylvania Department of Education Website for Gifted  PAGE – Pennsylvania Association for Gifted Education  Parent Guide

 Background and History  Intent of Chapter 16  Forms and Timelines  Resources  Question and Answer