PULSE SURVEY The Incentive Industry Trends 2014 August 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
20 th Annual Conference SCTM Benchmarking Survey John Harner Director of Travel Management Services, Indiana University Ian Thomas Partner, Academic Travel.
Advertisements

PULSE SURVEY The Incentive Industry Trends 2012 March 2012.
PULSE SURVEY The Incentive Industry Trends 2011 June 2011.
Client Compensation Realignment Project
PULSE SURVEY The Incentive Industry Trends 2012 September 2012.
Marketing Management Indicator 1.03 Employ marketing-information to develop a marketing plan.
1 Top 12 Incentive Trends of 2012: What they Mean For Your Business Motivation Show Session SM011 - Room W475b October 2012.
Northern Ireland Tourism Performance Overview January –March 2014.
1 ACI Annual Audit Committee Survey - Global M A R K E T I N G & C O M M U N I C A T I O N S R E S E A R C H Charles Garbowski Research February 21, 2006.
American Express Spending & Saving Tracker April 9, 2013 Wedding Spending Trends Prepared by:
© RPI In commercial confidence only Benchmarking Survey Overview of Results & Key Insights June 22, 2011 Presented By: Ian Citulsky, Carlson.
2013 Survey of California Home Buyers. Survey Methodology 1,400 telephone interviews conducted in March 2013 Respondents are home buyers who purchased.
Research Findings Aviation Safety Inspector Study February/March
1 EventView 2009: Global Bruce MacMillan President and Chief Executive Officer Meeting Professionals International Kerry Smith Founder and CEO Event Marketing.
Forecasting Availability and Overbooking
Objective 3.03 Employ Pricing Strategies to Determine Prices
Steamboat Springs Economic Summit 2010 The Changing Tourism Environment RRC Associates, an STR Company May 20, 2010.
2012 Survey of California Home Buyers. Survey Methodology 800 telephone interviews conducted in August 2012 Respondents are home buyers that purchased.
VIRTUAL BUSINESS RETAILING
1 Charles Garbowski Senior Director Research March 16, 2007 R E S E A R C H K P M G L L P ACI Second Annual Global Audit Committee Survey.
Leadership Pulse™ Total Rewards: Cash and Non-Cash Compensation Dr. Theresa M. Welbourne Preliminary Report November, 2007 the measure of your success.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
2010 Fox Cities Economic Outlook Survey. Survey Composition.
(ISC) Global Workforce Study U.S. Government Results May 7, 2013.
MARKETING THE INDUSTRY SEGMENTS 4.01 Explain the use of the marketing mix and promotional mix in the travel, tourism, and recreation industry.
Strategic Meetings Management Peter Moen Vice President, Carlson Meetings and Events.
1 Bill Maloney, CTC Executive Vice President & COO ASTA Travel Intermediaries: Are Consumers Still Willing to Pay?
1 Ohio Valley Business Travel Association Education Day Event, September 9, 2010 Millennium Hotel, Cincinnati, Ohio. Online Booking Tools Are you Keeping.
International Congress and Convention Association New Ways of Working: Getting Closer to Clients David Kliman, CMP, CMM 44 th ICCA Congress & Exhibition.
July 2012 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Clark County, Ohio.
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
1 EventView 2009: Life Sciences. 2 Overview EventView Background Status Key Performance Indicators Summary Trends Budget ROI Measurement Green Event-to-Experience.
3.10 Employ product-mix strategies to meet customer expectations Performance Indicator: Describe the nature of product bundling 3.00 Understand product/service.
Building Stronger Communities, Building Stronger Choruses Fundraising General Session.
1 Employer Participation in the Texas Workers’ Compensation System: 2006 Estimates Texas Department of Insurance Workers’ Compensation Research Group October.
What Sponsors Want 2007 What Sponsors Want 2007 Annual Business To Business Research -Data Summary-
3.08 Employ product-mix strategies to meet customer expectations
2008 Commercial GSO Demand Forecast
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
African Business Outlook Part of the Global Business Outlook A joint survey effort between Duke University, The South African Institute of Chartered Accountants.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 18, Page 2 July 18, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q2 Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas.
2007 Conference Pricing Study A look at IEEE Practices & Techniques for Effective Conference Pricing Presented by: William O’Connor Director of Marketing.
© 2007 Arkenford Ltd Hastings and 1066 Country Visitor Study Rye Destination Profile.
VI.PROPERTY PERCEPTIONSp. 46 Table of Contents I.METHODOLOGYp. 3 III.RESPONDENT PROFILEp. 8 IV.SPONSORSHIP SPENDING AND INVOLVEMENTp. 12 V.RESEARCH CONSIDERATIONSp.
ACE Marketing Research AAA Member Poll 2011 Spring Break Travel and Entertainment Auto Club of Southern California March 2011.
Brand USA: Market Intelligence China June 30, 2015.
CORPORATE INCENTIVE TRENDS A SURVEY & ANALYSIS Page 1 January 2013 Incentive Trends.
Employ marketing-information to develop a marketing plan.
How You can Recover Hidden Cash Flow from Your Supplier Base (Modify your title as appropriate for your audience) First Name Last Name Bold Month XX, 2015.
2012 International Fleet Barometer Local report UK.
 The purpose of the survey was to gather feedback from MMCAP Medical Supplies and Equipment contract users related to:  Experiences and satisfaction.
Parves Khan Andrew Gostelow 7 October 2009 Tourist Information provision A national economic impact review Tourism Management Institute National Conference.
May 9th, 2015 Market Research Describe the purpose of marketing research.
ACE Marketing Research AAA Member Poll regarding 2011 Holiday Shopping and Gas Prices Auto Club of Southern California October 2011.
Marketing & Brand Research AAA Member Poll 2011 Summer Travel and Entertainment Auto Club of Southern California May 2011.
Central Bank of Ireland/Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland: Survey of Property Professionals 2013Q1 Results: Circulated June 2013.
Event Disruptions and Mitigation Strategies
Results: Circulated August 2017
The One For Three Solution Making Retained Earnings Work For You Trying on the Solution [Trying on the solution is a tool for use with a client during.
The Incentive Industry Trends Outlook for 2009
btX Event October 22, :00 PM EDT, 11:00 AM PDT, 7:00 PM GMT
Correlation of Oil Prices and Airline Quality
B2B Strategies that Work
FORECASTING IN HOTELS STARTS WITH MAKING A BUDGET
The Power of Youth Travel
The One For Three Solution Making Retained Earnings Work For You Trying on the Solution [Trying on the solution is a tool for use with a client during.
Thursday, February 2nd Obj – Product Mix Strategies
3.08 Employ product-mix strategies to meet customer expectations
U.S. Lodging Industry Briefing and Forecast
Presentation transcript:

PULSE SURVEY The Incentive Industry Trends 2014 August 2014

Background and Survey Purpose Beginning in August 2008 it was decided that an appropriate topic for the 2008 Pulse Survey would be an incentive industry trends outlook for the upcoming years and with the continued economic conditions, also an appropriate topic for the trends outlook for Given that the Incentive Research Foundation (IRF) is charged with advancing the science of incentives, it surveyed industry professionals to obtain their opinions about the more salient trends affecting the industry during To this end, the IRF asked these professionals questions on trends with regard to incentive travel programs, merchandise non-cash programs, and budget changes forecast for In addition to the current topic on industry trends, the IRF tracks core issues of continuing interest to the industry: The extent to which company financial forecasts influence incentive programs; The effect of competitor reactions on company incentive programs; and Sensitivity to others’ perceptions of company incentive programs. 2

Research Methods Invitations to participate in this online survey were sent to 2687 incentive providers, suppliers to the industry and corporate incentive travel buyers. The 284 survey participants can be categorized 1 as follows… Corporate (i.e./ Buyer, Planner, Sales, HR) (20.4%) Supplier (i.e./ Hotel, Airline, DMC, Merchandise) (23.6%) Third Party (i.e./ Incentive Company, Travel Agency, Consultant) (49.3%) I am not involved in incentive programs (6.7%) Data collection was conducted July 21 st through August 6 th, This question, and survey, was significantly modified to present the respondents with specific/logical questions based upon their selection.

Highlights: Core Issues 4 Findings indicate that the trends continue to stabilize this period compared to the previous survey periods which indicated a strong positive upward trend for each of the core issues beginning in July 2009 – May The overall trends are nearing those reported in The positive trend continues with respect to the perceptions of the company’s financial forecast influences the design and implementation of our incentive program(s) compared and the previous three survey periods. The perception of internal (non- incentive) stakeholders influence on the design of incentive programs increased significantly compared with May These questions were asked only of Corporate participants. *Previously question was asked as; “Sensitive to perceptions of program extravagance to the extent that it would impact the type of company program awards and inclusions” (n=58)

Current Topic Industry Trends for 2014/ Incentive Travel Programs Merchandise Non-Cash Programs ROI – Budget Considerations

Perceived Impact of the Economy on Ability to Plan and Implement Incentive Travel Programs 6 Respondents in the current survey (Fall 2014) indicate they continue to be optimistic and consider the economy as having a more of a positive impact on their ability to plan and implement incentive travel programs. (All positive 66.7% August 2014 vs. 62% May 2014) Strongly negative 1% August 2014 vs. 0% May All negative impacts 15% November 2013 vs. 12% May In the coming year what impact will the economy have on your ability to plan and implement travel incentive programs? (N=210) Note: The response categories were modified in the May 2011 and the historical data was adjusted to reflect these changes.

Perceived Impact of the Economy on Ability to Plan and Implement Incentive Travel Programs By Category Comparing the perceived impact of the economy on the ability to plan and implement incentive programs by respondent category, we find:  The Supplier and Third Party segments are significantly more likely to perceive the impact of the economy to have a more “positive” impact than the Corporate segment.  Supplier 79.1% total positive  Third Party 65.9% total positive. 7

Perceived Impact of the Current Air Transportation Environment of Incentive Travel Programs 8 Most respondents (51%) have a negative perception of the current Air Transportation Environment and it’s impact on incentive travel plans. The percent of “negative” responses has remained increased 7% compared to May Significantly negative- 5% May 2014 vs. 5% August All negative perception- 44% May 2014 vs. 51% August What impact does the current air transportation environment have on your incentive travel program planning? (n=210)

Perceived Impact of the Current Air Transportation Environment of Incentive Travel Programs By Category Comparing the perceived impact of the current air transportation environment on travel programs by respondent category, we find:  The Supplier segment is significantly more likely to perceive the impact of the air transportation environment as more “positive” (39.6%) than the Corporate and Third Party segments.  The Third Party segment is significantly more likely to perceive the impact as “negative” (55.2%) than the Corporate and Supplier segments. 9

Techniques Used In Coming Year To The Air Transportation Portion Of Incentive Travel Programs, What Component? 45% anticipate that “Only tickets will be provided”, are to be included components of Incentive Travel Programs in the coming year. 43% indicate that “All costs for air transportation” will be provided. 24% indicate that “Non-air options” will be included. 7% indicate that seating upgrades will be included. 5% indicate that “Airline club passes” will be included In the coming year, do you anticipate any of the following changes will be made with regard to choices of incentive travel programs? Check all that apply. (n=265, multiple choice) 10

Techniques Used In Coming Year To The Air Transportation Portion Of Incentive Travel Programs, What Component? By Category Third Party respondents are more likely to use the following techniques than Corporate and Supplier segments:  Only tickets will be provided.  Airline club passes will be included. Corporate and Third Party segment respondents are more likely to use “Non-air options” techniques than Suppliers. 11

Trending of Techniques Used To The Air Transportation Portion Of Incentive Travel Programs The inclusion of “Only tickets will be provided” has increased significantly since 2013 and the inclusion of “All costs for air transportation related expenses” has increased slightly by 6% compared to May

Anticipated Changes In Coming Year With Regards To Incentive Travel Program Destinations Most of the respondents (46%) anticipate no change with respect to the program destinations for Incentive Travel Programs in the coming year. 15% anticipate a change from “Domestic to International”, and,10% indicate that they anticipate a change from “International to Domestic” with regards to the travel program destinations 12% “Will pick locations closer to “home” with regards to the travel program destinations. 13 In the coming year, do you anticipate any of the following changes will be made with regard to incentive travel program destinations? Check all that apply. (n=265 multiple selections)

Anticipated Changes In Coming Year With Regards To Incentive Travel Program Destinations By Category Most of the Corporate and Third Party segments anticipate no changes to program destinations. Third Party and Supplier segments anticipate more changes than the Corporate segment in the following:  Locations closer to home  From international to domestic  From domestic to international 14

Trending Anticipated Changes With Regards To Incentive Travel Program Destinations There has been a significant decrease in program destinations from “International to Domestic” since Compared with May 2014, all components are reporting similar results. 15

Anticipated Changes In Coming Year With Regards To Incentive Travel Accommodations 14% percent of respondents anticipate a change to “all inclusive” pricing options for the accommodations portion of Incentive Travel Programs in the coming year. 26% indicate “No Change” 9% indicate: Total number of days/nights will be reduced Total number of rooms increased On-site inclusions per participant increased 8% indicate that the “Total number of rooms” will be reduced. 16 In the coming year, what changes, if any, will be made with regard to accommodations for incentive travel programs? Check all that apply.(n=265, multiple response)

Anticipated Changes In Coming Year With Regards To Incentive Travel Accommodations By Category Most of the Corporate and Third Party segments anticipate no changes to program destinations. There is very little difference amongst the Corporate and 3 rd Party segments with regards to changes on the upcoming year to incentive travel accommodations. 17 Suppliers were not asked this question.

Trending Anticipated Changes With Regards To Incentive Travel Accommodations The “anticipated reduction” of both components with regards to hotel accommodations has declined compared to the previous survey periods. 18

Anticipated Changes In Coming Year With Regards To Sponsored Non-Meal Related Components Fifty-six percent (56%) of respondents anticipate No Change with regards to Sponsored Non-Meal Related Components for Incentive Travel Programs in the coming year. 19% indicate that Sponsored Non- Meal related components will be Moderately Reduced, and 24% indicated that Sponsored Non-Meal related components will be Moderately Increased. 19 With regard to the sponsored (paid by your company) non- meal related components such as airline tickets, transfers, gifts, etc for incentive travel programs, what changes will be made in the coming year? (n=167)

Anticipated Changes In Coming Year With Regards To Sponsored Non-Meal Related Components By Category Both Corporate and Third Party respondents anticipate a “moderate increase” for Sponsored Non-Meal related components. 20 Suppliers were not asked this question.

Anticipated Changes With The Involvement Of Procurement And Purchasing In Travel Incentive Programs Most of the respondents (52%) anticipate No Change with regards to involvement of procurement and purchasing for Incentive Travel Programs in the coming year, 44% agree that procurement involvement will increase by some degree in the coming year. 32% indicate that procurement and purchasing involvement will “Moderately Increase” in the coming year. 12% indicate that procurement and purchasing involvement will “Significantly Increase” in the coming year. 21 In the coming year, do you anticipate the involvement of procurement and purchasing with regard to your incentive programs to…(n=210)

Anticipated Changes With The Involvement Of Procurement And Purchasing In Travel Incentive Programs By Category Corporate respondents are more likely to anticipate the involvement of procurement and purchasing in travel incentive programs to “remain unchanged” when compared with Supplier and Third Party Respondents Supplier respondents are more likely to anticipate the involvement of procurement and purchasing in travel incentive programs to “significantly increase” when compared with the Corporate and Third Party segments. Third Party respondents are more likely to anticipate the involvement of procurement and purchasing in travel incentive programs to “moderately decrease” when compared with the Corporate and segment. 22

Anticipated Changes In Incentive Travel Program Budgets for This Year Forty-seven percent (47%) of the respondents anticipate budgets for Incentive Travel Programs to “Moderately Increase” this coming year. 15% indicate that budgets for Incentive Travel Programs will decrease by some degree in the coming year. 37% indicate that budgets for Incentive Travel Programs will remain unchanged this coming year. 23 In the coming year, do you anticipate budgets for incentive travel programs in general to… (n=210)

Anticipated Changes In Incentive Travel Program Budgets for This Year By Category Third Party and Supplier respondents anticipate travel incentive program budgets to “remain unchanged”, when compared with the Corporate segment. Corporate respondents anticipate that travel incentive program budgets will “slightly increase” when compared with Third Party respondents. 24

Trend Strategy For The Consideration Of Award Strategy Moving (Either Temporarily Or Permanently) From "Group Trips" To "Individual Travel Packages" The majority (81%) of the respondents anticipate no changes (either temporarily or permanently) from "group trips" to "individual travel packages" in the coming year. A combined 7% indicate that the consideration of award strategy moving (either temporarily or permanently) from "group trips" to "individual travel packages“ in coming year to decrease. 12% indicate that the consideration of award strategy moving (either temporarily or permanently) from "group trips" to "individual travel packages“ to increase in the coming year. 25 With regard to planning and implementing incentive travel award programs, do you anticipate the consideration of award strategy moving (either temporarily or permanently) from "group trips" to "individual travel packages" to…n=210)

Trend Strategy For The Consideration Of Award Strategy Moving From "Group Trips" To "Individual Travel Packages" By Category Supplier respondents indicate that the consideration of award strategy moving (either temporarily or permanently) from "group trips" to "individual travel packages“ to slightly decrease in the coming year when compared with the Corporate and Third Party segments. 26

Average Per Person Spend on Incentive Travel Programs Most (36%) of the respondents indicate the average spend per- person is $ $4000. A combined 62% indicate that the average spend per person is at least $3000. >1% indicate that the average spend per person is 0 - $ What is the average per-person spend on incentive travel programs (n=124)

Average Per Person Spend on Incentive Travel Programs By Category 3 rd Party respondents are more likely to indicate the average spend per-person on Incentive travel programs to be between $ $4000. A combined 72.8% report average spending at these levels. 28 Suppliers were not asked this question.

Geographic Region Chosen as “Destinations" for Incentive Travel Program(s). 47% of the respondents indicated that the Caribbean was their chosen region for Incentive Travel Destination programs. Top regional destinations include: North America (43%) Europe (34%) Central America (19%) South America (14%) ASIA (11%) 29 In the coming year, please indicate which geographic region you will choose as your "destinations" for your incentive travel program(s). (n=265)

Geographic Region Chosen as “Destinations" for Incentive Travel Program(s). By Category Third Party respondents are significantly more likely to choose the following destinations than Corporate respondents:  Europe  Caribbean  ASIA 30 Suppliers were not asked this question.

Perceived Impact of the Economy on Ability to Plan and Implement Merchandise Non-Cash Incentive Programs 31 In August 2014, respondents continue to anticipate the impact of the economy to have a “positive” effect on their ability to plan and implement merchandise non-cash incentive programs potentially indicating a positive trend in the coming year. Negative impact 8% in August 2014 vs. 11% in May No impact 43% in August 2014 vs. 42% in May Positive impact 48% in August 2014 vs. 48% in May Do you anticipate budgets for merchandise non-cash incentive programs in the coming year to…(n=141) Note: The response categories were modified in the May 2011 and the historical data was adjusted to reflect these changes.

Perceived Impact of the Economy on Ability to Plan and Implement Merchandise Non-Cash Incentive Programs By Category Comparing the perceived impact of the economy on the ability to plan and implement Merchandise Non-Cash incentive programs by respondent category, we find:  The Corporate and Third Party segments are significantly more likely to perceive the impact of the economy to have a more “positive” impact than the Third Party segment.  Corporate 48.6% total positive  Supplier 48.9% total positive. 32

Anticipated Changes This Year With Regards To Merchandise Non-cash Incentive Programs Award Selections 21% of the respondents anticipate “Included experience-related (SPA, event tickets, etc.)” in the coming year with regards to Non-Cash Incentive Program Award Selections 23% indicate “No change” to the merchandise non-cash incentive program this year. 19% indicated “Increased use of debit/prepaid gift cards”. 16% indicated “increased merchandise award value” and “Included individual travel as an option”. 15% “Added merchandise”. 33 With regard to merchandise non-cash incentive programs, what changes,, will be made this year with award selections? Select all that apply. (n=198)

Anticipated Changes This Year With Regards To Merchandise Non-cash Incentive Programs Award Selections By Category Third Party respondents are significantly more likely to anticipate the following changes to merchandise non-cash award selection than Corporate respondents:  Included experience-related (SPA, event tickets, etc.) as an option  Increased use of debit/prepaid gift cards  Included individual travel as an option  Added debit/prepaid gift cards  Increased merchandise award value 34 Suppliers were not asked this question.

Merchandise Types Used Within Reward and Recognition Programs Electronics (43%), Open Card (40%) and Jewelry/Watches (34%),are the most common merchandise used in Reward and Recognition Programs. Other popular merchandise types identified by the respondents are: Housewares (31%) Clothing/Apparel (31%) Golf Items (30%) Luggage (28%) 35 What types of merchandise are you using within your reward and recognition program? Select all that apply (n=198)

Merchandise Types Used Within Reward and Recognition Programs By Category Third Party respondents are significantly more likely to use all of the listed merchandise awards, except “Plaques/Trophies” when compared with the Corporate respondents. 36 Suppliers were not asked this question.

Use of Points Based System for Merchandise Non-Cash Incentive Programs A majority (74%) of the respondents indicate they use a points based system for their Merchandise Non- Cash Incentive program(s). 26% indicated they do not use a points based system. Compared with May 2014, slightly less respondents (4%) indicate the use of a “Points Based System” for Non-Cash incentive programs. Third Party respondents are significantly more likely to use a points based system than the Corporate and Supplier respondents. 37 Do you use a "points-based" system for your merchandise non-cash incentive program? (n=141)

Anticipated Changes In Non-Cash Incentive Program Budgets for This Year Forty-nine percent (49%) of the respondents anticipate budgets for Non-Cash Incentive Programs to “Remain unchanged” this coming year. 5% indicate that budgets for Non- Cash Incentive Programs will decrease by some degree in the coming year. 46% indicate that budgets for Non-Cash Incentive Programs will increase by some degree in the coming year. 38 Do you anticipate budgets for non-cash incentive programs in the coming year to...(n=141)

Anticipated Changes In Non-Cash Incentive Program Budgets for This Year By Category Comparing the anticipated changes in Non-Cash incentive program budgets by respondent category, we find no statistically significant differences. 39

Anticipated Changes Incentive Program Elements In general, respondents indicated that they anticipate most incentive program elements to remain the same in the coming year. The “Number of total qualifiers” is the element that has the highest reported increase in the coming year at 33%. The following elements received “Increased” ratings of greater than 20% for the coming year: Awards budget (26%) Third Party/Incentive Company Involvement (22%) 40 This year, do you anticipate the following incentive program elements will increase, decrease or remain the same? (n=252)

Average Per Person Spend on Merchandise or Gift Card Reward Programs Most (46%) of the respondents indicate the average spend per- person is $50 - $ % indicate that the average spend per person is $ or $ % indicate the average spend is $ What is the average per-person spend in your merchandise or gift card reward programs (n=94)

Average Per Person Spend on Incentive Travel Programs By Category 3 rd Party respondents are more likely to indicate the average spend per-person on Incentive travel programs to be between $100 - $200. Corporate respondents are more likely to indicate the average spen per-person to be between $50 - $ Suppliers were not asked this question.

General Issues Of Interest to the Industry 43 Budget Changes for Incentive Program Elements

Impact on Incentive Program As A Result Of The Current Economic Conditions 49% of the respondents anticipate no changes to the budget for Incentive Programs in the coming year as a result of the recent economic conditions. 19% indicate that budgets for Incentive Programs have increased as a result of the recent economic conditions. 17% indicate that that budgets for Incentive Programs have been reduced as a result of the recent economic conditions. 11% indicate no budget change, but reduced the component and added or increased a merchandise incentive program component. 4% indicated no budget change, but replaced the travel incentive. 44 As a result of the recent economic conditions, have you made a change to your upcoming incentive program, and if so have you… (n=198)

Use of Enhancement Tools/Techniques for Incentive Programs Slightly less than half of the respondents (46%) indicate they use Social Media tool/techniques to enhance their incentive program. 37% indicate the use of CSR components and Gaming techniques. 45 Are you using any of the following to enhance your programs? (Check all that apply) …(n=284)

Trending of Enhancement Tools/Techniques for Incentive Programs Most tools/techniques showed decreased use in the enhancement of incentive programs compared to May Integration with Sales Management Tools and Virtual Elements increased as enhancement tools when compared with May Are you using any of the following to enhance your programs? (Check all that apply) …(n=284)

General Perceptions of the Coming Year The majority of respondents (69%) perceive “The Economy” to be either Slightly or Extremely positive in the coming year. 47 As you look ahead to the coming year, what is your view of the following. (n=see chart) While the outlook on the Economy is generally “positive”, 15% of the respondents also indicate a “negative” perception of the economy in the coming year. In general, over 45% of the respondents perceive “Slightly Positive/Extremely Positive” views with respect to each of the areas measured.

Goals & Objectives used to Determine Incentive Payouts and Measurement of Success The majority (91.5%) indicated that goals/objectives are used to determine incentive payouts. Most respondents (57%) indicate that they use “Top Line Sales” to determine a programs’ success. Only 9% of the respondents indicated they have no method to determine a programs success. 48 Which of the following is used to determine a program’s success? : (n=260)

Primary Reason For Ending An Incentive/ Recognition Program Slightly more than a third of the respondents (35%) indicated that they have not ended a program. 23% indicated they lost executive support. 22% indicated there was no budget. 10% indicated lack of results. 49 What is the primary reason for ending an incentive/ recognition program? (n=250)

Frequency of Results Analysis and Program Design Element Changes Thirty percent (30%) of the respondents indicated that they analyze results and program design elements Annually during a programs duration. 4% indicated that they “never” analyze results and program design elements during a programs duration. 27% analyze results and program design elements “3-4 times” during a programs duration. 50 When running an incentive program, how often are results analyzed and program design elements are changed? (n=250)