INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS UPDATE K-6, 9-12 Common Core State Standards Math Recommendation April 2, 2015
August/September all call for teacher participation 29 teachers across K-6, all sites represented Met with K-5 & 6 th grade team K-6 MATH PILOT PROCESS
During the initial meeting: Developed district lens: Demographic Data Achievement Data Determined non-negotiable for curriculum program Math content & alignment with CCSS standards Program Organization Assessment System Universal Access K-6 MATH PILOT/ADOPTION PROCESS
Programs Piloted: K-2 EveryDay Math th : Big Ideas 14/15 K-6 Math in Focus K-6 EnVision Not available for pilot: K-6 TPS Publishing 3-6 EveryDay Math 2016 Training provided for all programs Each teacher piloted 2 programs K-6 MATH PILOT PROCESS
March 10, 2015: K-5 March 11, 2015: 6 th grade Used CCSESA tool for analyzing programs Math content & alignment w/standards Program Organization Assessment Universal Access Teachers worked in pairs or trios Came together as a grade level Sticky dot consensus in grade levels Consensus conversation as a whole K-6 MATH PILOT PROCESS
TPS: Did not rate on any of the 4 elements Math in Focus: Kindergarten rated in 2 elements EnVision: Rated in all 4 elements for 3-6 th grade EveryDay Math 2016: Wasn’t available for pilot, materials not available for all students until Spring 16, not on CDE list 6 th Grade Big Ideas: Did not rate on any of 4 elements K-6 RECOMMENDATIONS
“Envision explained hard subjects in easy ways.” – Asher, 6 th grade “Envision made math so much better that is usually is” – Keane, 6 th “Envision: I selected this program because I find it really good that work in groups and the video helped me understand.” - Ana, 6 th “Envision: because it makes more sense to me.” – 6 th, unknown “Envision: because I learn more.” – Ben, 6th K-6 STUDENT VOICE
Consensus recommendation: EnVision Area of concern: Acceleration for high achieving students both in and out of AIM How concern is being addressed: EnVision specialist will meet with AIM teachers and other teachers to address concern and provide curriculum options Professional Growth K-6 RECOMMENDATION
September all call for teacher participation 7 teachers across 9-12 Programs Piloted: College Preparatory Mathematics Carnegie Math Vision Project Training provided for all programs, except MVP Each teacher piloted 2 programs 9-12 INTEGRATED MATH PILOT PROCESS
Math Vision Project: Only a supplemental program, not a complete program College Preparatory Math: Met all 4 elements Carnegie: Did not meet any of the 4 elements Big Ideas Int. Math I: not available for complete pilot, full program not available until late summer 9-12 RECOMMENDATION
DSHS - class of 62, 58 students voted for CPM Harper– majority of students didn’t like the Carnegie textbook. More positive comments for the CPM text. Carnegie: “very repetitive” “Okay, but not great.” “The math book was tedious.” CPM: “I like it because of how they word the problems.” “It’s really good.” 9-12 STUDENT VOICE
Consensus Recommendation: CPM Areas of Concerns: Parent/Student Support Parent Guide purchased to support parents/students Test Generator Being updated but will need to look at other options i.e. Illuminate, Kuta Substitute Ready Use parent guide for lesson, provide different plans for the substitute Struggling Student Support Pacing allows for more time on concepts Look at supplemental program for students that repeat course 9-12 RECOMMENDATION
Materials for programs have been available for review at District Office EnVision & College Preparatory Mathematics materials will be at each school library for continued public comment & review Comment form will be provided Communication will go out in school newsletters and district website updates Announcement in Enterprise Parent announcement COMMUNICATION
May 7, 2015 bring back to BOE for approval/adoption May 8-11 Order materials for June delivery Professional development scheduled for: June July August Ongoing throughout school year NEXT STEPS