EVS GTR – TF3 Presentation on EVSTF-07-12e "JRC proposal for a 60 minutes observation time for electrolyte leakage – post-crash" V. Ruiz, N. Lebedeva,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EV Safety GTR Task Force Group #2 – Low Electric Energy #5 EVS GTR Status Briefing May 13, 2014.
Advertisements

Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage Last update- 12/05/
Draft Deliberative Document1 of 15 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Safety Research to Support Rulemaking/GTR Objectives September 2008 SGS
TF8 – OICA considerations for the draft annex for heavy vehicles.
ISO Current status of development
Michael Scharfenstein FAC October LCLS Environment, Safety & Health Michael Scharfenstein ES&H Coordinator.
TIWANA WALTON MENTOR: SHARON MONICA JONES High Level Aviation Safety Risk Assessment.
Proposal for Management of gas emitted from REESS May, 2014 U.S. DOT Head Quarter 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DG JASIC 1.
Progress report of TFG 7 “Fire resistance test” June 5, 2015 Korea Transportation Safty Authority (TS) Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute (KATRI)
Hydrogen Fueled Vehicle Global Technical Regulation (GTR) Subgroup Safety (SGS) Nha Nguyen 49 th GRSP Session May Informal document GRSP (49th.
GEOSAF-Meeting F. Boissier, S. Voinis, S. Barlow Operational Safety- IGSC Expert Group on Operational Safety (EG-OS) DMR/DIR/ May 2014, Vienna.
Research Activities of HFCV Rule-making in Korea Sept. 24 ~ 26, th HFCV-SGS Meeting Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Korea Transportation.
Pipeline Qra Seminar Title slide Title slide.
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
General Safety Regulation ACEA discussion paper Renzo Cicilloni Director Safety Paris, June 2009 AEBS/LDWS
Transposition of GTR No.13 “Hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles” into UN Regulation - Explanatory material - 20/September/2013 The European Commission and.
Title: Australia’s Proposal for the Development of Pole Side Impact GTR Presenter’s Name: Allan Jonas Economy: Australia 33rd APEC Transportation Working.
June SURVEY OF EUROPEAN DIRECTIVES European directives are based on the new approach in order to provide free movement of goods in the single market.
Implementation of Global Satellite Navigation System (GLONASS) for In-Vehicle Emergency Call Systems: Status and Further Development Presented by the Russian.
1 18 March 2010AGNA meeting EASAC update Yves Morier.
Volker Rothe, OICA October 23, 2012 Draft Global Technical Regulation Electric Vehicle Safety Outline of the OICA proposal.
Draft Proposal ECE-R 100 protection against electric shock
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage Last update- 11/11/ EVS-06-19e.
TF8 work report for 9 th EVS-GTR conference Changchun.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation EVS Draft-GTR – Questions Relating to Venting/Gas Emissions N. Lebedeva, A. Kriston, V. Ruiz,
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage Last update- 01/06/
TF5 – Status report on thermal propagation EVS-GTR 9 th IWG meeting Changchun, China 2015/9/17.
Pipelines study – final report European Commission, DG Environment Industrial Emissions, Air quality & Noise Unit 1.
THE MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND TRADE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Dr. B.V.Kisulenko, V.A. Burmistrov 162-th meeting of WP March 2014, PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENTS.
Progress report about RESS activities Gerd Kellermann, Germany Informal document GRSP (50th GRSP, 6–9 December 2011, agenda item 15)
ISO Current status of development ​ ​ ISO development process ​1​1.
1 ISO/PC 283/N 197 ISO Current status of development November 2015.
1 Warning requirement for the management system of the REESS May, 2014 U.S. DOT Head Quarter 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DG JASIC.
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage Last update- 19/03/
NFPA ELECTRIC VEHICLE SAFETY FOR EMERGENCY RESPONDERS Module V : Emergency Operations Module V : Emergency Operations 5-1.
Progress report of GRSG informal group on Accident Emergency Call System (AECS) Transmitted by the Chair of AECS IWG Informal document GRSG
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage Last update- 14/09/
PROTECTIVE ACTIONS AND REENTRY. Protective Actions Promptly and effectively implemented or recommended for implementation to minimize the consequences.
December 2015 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Transmitted by the expert from JapanGRSP Rev.1 (58th GRSP, 8-11 December 2015,
European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee Developing an European Interior Headform Test Procedure T. Langner on behalf of EEVC WG 13 19th International.
Rechargeable Energy Storage systems (REESS) requirements Gerd Kellermann, Germany Informal document GRSP (51 st GRSP, May 2012,
GTR-EVS TF-6 SOC – OICA Discussion Paper Jan 21 st, OICA Discussion Paper for TF-Mtg1 EVSTF-06-32e.
Progress report of TFG 7 “Fire resistance test” Mar. 3rd, 2016 Korea Transportation Safty Authority (TS) Korea Automobile Testing & Research Institute.
CPNZ Basic Training 009 – Emergency Services. Generally when the term ‘Emergency Services’ is used, people usually think of Police Fire Ambulance Each.
OICA TF8 drafting annex Mar. **, 2016 TF8 OICA pilot 1 EVSTF-08-25e.
Task Force 1: Protection against Water February 29th , 2016.
TF#4 – Mechanical Integrity Approved Japanese proposal for addition of vehicle mechanical protection structure into mechanical integrity requirement. EVS-11-17e.
OICA input on TF1 discussions for GTR-EVS
Electric Vehicles Safety Global Technical Regulation Phase 1
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
Working Party on Noise (GRB) General information and WP.29 highlights
10th EVS-gtr IWG Progress Report TF6 - SOC 2nd March
Electric Vehicles Safety Global Technical Regulation
Co-Sponsors: China, Japan, EU and US 59th Session GRSP May 9-13, 2016
Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)
GTR EVS ‘Thermal propagation testing’ JRC Work Plan
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
New UN Regulation on electric vehicles of category L
Risk Assessment in Construction
Informal document GRE Rev.1
IS-907 – Active Shooter: What You Can Do
Observation period requirement
Highlights of the 177th WP.29 session and
8th all TF F2F Meetings EVS Washington DC
Submitted by the expert
TF1 Meeting content Open issues of EVS 10th meeting
Alternative Approach to UN R13 Type-IIA for Battery Electric Vehicles
Presentation transcript:

EVS GTR – TF3 Presentation on EVSTF-07-12e "JRC proposal for a 60 minutes observation time for electrolyte leakage – post-crash" V. Ruiz, N. Lebedeva, A. Pfrang, L. Brett 29 February 2016

Time Update: clarification and additional data AreaCrash-CallCall-ArrivalArrival-Accommodation Extraction Total Japan*, average actual time / min 138'up to 36' 20 (more than 8 % of cases > 46) 41 If more than 1 occupant to rescue: 36 up to 57 Germany**, target time / min 5-8 to 17 (depending on Bundesland) USA***, actual time / minRural: 45% cases > 10 12% cases > 20 Urban: 15% cases > 10 * Y.Sukegawa, M.Sekino, "Analysis of rescue operations of injured vehicle occupants by fire fighters", paper# , presented at the 22 nd Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference (ESV-22), Washington DC, June ** *** NCHRP synthesis 451 Report Transportation Research Board 2 Update on EVSTF-04-13e.pdf: TF-3 Electrolyte leakage JRC 11MAR2014

Time Black – existing text of the GTR draft Green – input from JRC Text for I "Statement of technical rationale and justification ", 4.5. "Rationale for REESS requirements" 7. These criteria are established with assumption that the vehicle user is supposed to stop using the vehicle until certain repair/maintenance is conducted once subject to the event. In this case, any additional risk to the occupants and the surrounding people should be mitigated at a reasonable level. The requirements of electrolyte leakage ( ) and REESS retention ( ) are based on the existing requirements of UN Regulations Nos. 12, 94 and 95 as well as UN Regulation No Within minutes after the impact, there shall be no electrolyte leakage into the passenger compartment. This time period is considered as sufficient to ensure the evacuation of the occupants. 3 EVSTF-07-12e Rationale for 60 minutes observation time electrolyte leakage – post-crash 18/02/2016

Time Electrolyte leakage can occur as the result of mechanical damage to REESS, e.g. in a vehicle crash. Electrolyte leakage can lead to a potential hazardous situation that can cause human harm from contact with electrolyte and/or electrolyte residue. Risk of human harm is mitigated by adopting a requirement on electrolyte leakage in the tests addressing REESS safety post-crash and stipulating 60 minutes observation time. The observation time for electrolyte leakage in the vehicle crash test is 60 minutes which is related to the time needed for occupants to be rescued from a crashed vehicle. Recent and historical data show that the average time that elapses from the moment of crash to the moment when the occupants of a crashed vehicle are removed from a crash scene, i.e. the duration of potential exposure to leaked electrolyte, often approaches 60 minutes [1-4]. Similarly, the data shows that time needed from site arrival to rescue of the occupant from the vehicle was 20 minutes on average and the average exceeded 30 minutes when there were two or more persons to be rescued [1]. 4 EVSTF-04-13e.pdf: TF-3 Electrolyte leakage JRC 11MAR2014

Time Recommendations on the duration of the observation time may be reconsidered in the future with any mandatory implementation and an effective operation of in- vehicle communication systems (e.g. e-call requirements to be implemented in the EU from 2018 onwards) [5]. In this case the required observation time during the in-vehicle test may be reduced, provided that the vehicle is equipped with an in- vehicle communication system and the accompanying infrastructure supporting an effective communication is ensured across the entire territory of a contracting party. The observation time for electrolyte leakage in the REESS-based mechanical integrity ( ) and mechanical shock ( ) tests is 60 minutes. _______________________________________________ 1. Y. Sukegawa, M. Sekino, "Analysis of rescue operations of injured vehicle occupants by fire fighters", paper# , presented at the 22nd Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference (ESV-22), Washington DC, June H. Johannsen, G. Muller, C. Pastor, R-D. Erbe, H-G. Schlosser, "Influence of new car body design on emergency rescue", paper presented at the 4th International Conference on ESAR "Expert Symposium on Accident Research", Hannover, September 2010; 3. L.E. Shields, "Emergency Response Time in Motor Vehicle Crashes: Literature and Resource Search", report prepared for Motor Vehicle Fire Research Institute, January eeip-adac-accident-research-01-oct-2009/file EVSTF-04-13e.pdf: TF-3 Electrolyte leakage JRC 11MAR2014