Orland Park, IL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Boscombe Strategic Assessment 21 st July 2011.
Advertisements

Citizen Survey Results. Mecklenburg County Citizen Survey  Questions on full range of usage, customer satisfaction, needs, unmet needs, and priorities.
Survey Conducted May 6-8, Project Objectives & Results  A recently commissioned project of The Lew Edwards Group--with survey research.
Survey Results September Survey Information There is an error margin of ±3.6 on this survey. South Ogden City sent out 5,300 surveys and received.
BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey.
2 Presentation Overview Study Objectives Survey Design Trip Purpose and Trip Chaining Overview – Satisfaction with Roadways and Transportation in Communities.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
1 Community Assessment Chapter 13 28/4/2007 Ahmad Adeeb.
1. National Research Center, Inc.2 A turnkey citizen survey service offered by the INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL RESEARCH.
2008 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results May 29, 2009.
WalkSanDiego, created 1998 Move San Diego, created 2004 Merged Staff 18 Board Members $1,040,000 Annual Budget.
2012 Citizen Survey results Background Implementing Our Vision Action Chart Key Drivers Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time What’s Next?
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors Summer 2015 Ann S. Bisconti, PhD Bisconti Research, Inc.
1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.
Community Themes & Strengths Assessment Jason Porter San Antonio Metropolitan Health District.
RESEARCH AND TRAINING SPECIALISTS, INC Concord, North Carolina 2008 CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY Paul C. Friday, Ph.D. President
2014 National Citizen Survey Results Citizen Survey results Implementing Our Vision Background Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time Special.
Albemarle County 2004 Citizen Survey October 6, 2004.
CITY OF CLEARWATER Communications Survey Public Communications Department 2004.
 Health insurance is a significant part of the Vietnamese health care system.  The percentage of people who had health insurance in 2007 was 49% and.
Outdoor Spaces Equal Healthy Places Planning for Virginia’s Outdoors.
Danville Region Social Capital Survey Center for Survey Research A Unit of the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service University of Virginia Center.
Morrisville Chamber State of Wake County 1. Accolades Wake County has… 4 out of 18 of the Top Small Cities in N.C. Cities Journal #2 Morrisville.
CICOA Aging & In-Home Solutions July 2013 Results of the 2013 Survey.
Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303) The National Citizen Survey™ LOWER PROVIDENCE.
City of Sarasota 2008 National Citizen Survey Conducted by the National Research Center (NRC) for the City of Sarasota.
2009 Lane County Community Survey Demographic Breakdown.
September 2015 Town of the Blue Mountains Citizen Satisfaction Survey.
Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
Alachua County Community Survey Report. Report Outline Analysis of survey tool Description of population and sample Zip Code Response Rates Findings Other.
Survey conducted: November 6th, 8th – 10th,
Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.
Fayette County USA Expansion Opinion Survey Prepared for Cornett-IMS/Fayette Alliance The Matrix Group, Inc August 2006.
Region Forward Building Interdisciplinary Partnerships to Improve Public Safety.
Powered by Earswick Village Residents Questionnaire Key Findings October 2015.
Mayor’s Office of Neighborhood Development. Purpose and Need The Office of Neighborhood Development joins with neighborhoods throughout Wilmington that.
Waikato Regional Community Outcomes Taking the Pulse of Our Communities Presentation to SPN, 11 November 2010.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – FEBRUARY 23, National Citizen Survey Results.
Discussion Materials Prepared for City of Williamsburg, Virginia August 9, 2010 Refunding Opportunities Prepared By Davenport & Company LLC Member NYSE.
2012 Citizen Survey Results Presentation City of Twin Falls, Idaho.
City of Rocklin, California “State of the City” “Preparing Today for Tomorrow”
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – APRIL 12, Strategic Action Plan Evaluation Results.
The National Citizen Survey™ Orland Park, IL Summary of Findings May 7, 2012 ©2012 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc Valmont Road,
Redmond Police Functional Plan Update Council Study Session January 14, 2014.
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
Citizen Survey Hampton City Council July 8, 2009.
Budget Week Results Public Forum Data March 10, 2010.
Ashland, VA Key Findings January 6, 2015 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
2016 Community Engagement Survey Results Office of Councilmember Chris Seelbach June 2016 Community Budget Survey.
North Somerset Partnership Priorities & Opportunities 2 December 2015.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
The National Citizen Survey™ Ashland, VA Summary of Findings November 29, 2011 ©2011 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St.
1 City of Virginia Beach 2007 Citizens’ Survey Objective: To learn how residents feel about their community and the services provided by the City of Virginia.
Arapahoe County, CO 2017 Citizen Survey Prepared by: Andrea Rasizer
2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama
McKinney, TX Key Findings 2017
City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey
Tomahawk School District Community Survey Results
Summary of Findings January, 2009
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
Key Findings – Special Topics 2018
2014 National Citizen Survey Results
The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA
Summary of Findings May 26, 2009
Listening to the Voices Of Residents Can you really hear them?
Listening to the Voices Of Residents Can you really hear them?
Focused General Plan Update Status Report & Visioning Overview
Presentation transcript:

Orland Park, IL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA

Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities “Cities have the capability of providing something for everybody, only because, and only when, they are created by everybody.” “Cities have the capability of providing something for everybody, only because, and only when, they are created by everybody.”

About The NCS  Community Livability  Community Characteristics  Governance  Participation Communities are partnerships among... Residents Community- based organizations Govern- ment Private sector

Facets of Community Livability Safety Mobility Recreation and Wellness Economy Quality of Community Overall Natural Environment Built Environment Community Engagement Education and Enrichment

The NCS & Orland Park  Participant in The NCS since 2012  2012, 2014  Random sample of 1,600 households  514 returned surveys; 33% response rate  ±4% margin of error Expanded sample PresentationWeb Survey Geographic comparisons Demographic comparisons Custom benchmarks

National Benchmark Comparisons 6

2016 National Benchmark Comparisons 83 received similar ratings 83 received similar ratings 42 received higher ratings 42 received higher ratings

2016 Ratings Compared to received similar ratings 120 received similar ratings 7 received higher ratings 7 received higher ratings

Education and Enrichment Community Engagement Mobility Natural Environment Recreation and Wellness Built Environment Safety Economy Legend Higher than national benchmark Similar to national benchmark Lower than national benchmark Most important Key Focus Areas

Residents of Orland Park continue to enjoy a high quality of life Key Finding #1

Overall Quality of Life Ratings

Community Characteristics Higher than benchmark Place to raise children Overall image

Residents feel the economy is strong in Orland Park Key Finding #2

Economy in Orland Park 4 in 5 residents gave “excellent” or “good” ratings Economic development Orland Park as a place to visit Overall economic health Businesses and services Shopping opportunities Comparison to national benchmark: Higher Similar Lower

Safety is an important community feature, and residents feel positively about it Key Finding #3

Feelings of Safety 9 in 10 residents report  Overall feeling of Safety  Feeling safe in their neighborhood  Safe in commercial/downtown area

Safety Services At least 9 in 10: Police services At least 8 in 10: Crime prevention Emergency preparedness Comparison to national benchmark: Higher Similar Lower “excellent” or “good” Animal control

Orland Park residents appreciate built environment Key Finding #4

Built Environment At least 3 in 4 residents rate as “excellent” or “good” Comparison to national benchmark: Higher Similar Lower Housing Options New Development Overall Built Environment Public Places

Public trust in local government is relatively high in Orland Park Key Finding #5

Public Trust Between two-thirds and three-quarters residents rate as “excellent” or “good” Welcoming citizen involvement Value of services for taxes paid Comparison to national benchmark: Higher Similar Lower Overall direction Village is taking Acting in the best interest of Orland Park Confidence in Village government Being honest Treating all residents fairly

Special Topics

Investing in Open Lands The Village of Orland Park should continue to invest in Open Lands in addition to parks to ensure that acquired land is preserved for future generations:

Growth and Development of Community Please rate the job the Village of Orland Park does at being proactive and responsible for the continued growth and development of the community that results in improving quality of life for residents and businesses.

Priorities for Orland Park Please rate how important you think each of the following priorities should be to the Village of Orland Park over the next five years: TOP rated Make annual investments in municipal infrastructure Enhance and invest in community policing and public safety programs

Sources of Information Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of the following to be for obtaining information from the Village: -Local Media -Village Newsletter -Village Website -Phone (code red) -Local cable channel -Internet blogs Highest rated Lowest rated

Conclusions  Residents of Orland Park continue to enjoy a high quality of life  Orland Park’s economy is a strong community feature in the eyes of its residents  Safety helps make Orland Park a livable community  Orland Park Residents appreciate their built environment  Governance is given high ratings by residents

Moving Forward Citizen-centric Decision making Data-driven Decision making NCS Envision, Engage, Educate, Earmark, Enact, Evaluate

Questions?

Thank you! National Research Center, Inc Valmont Road Suite 300 Boulder, CO