1 User-Focused Engagement and Service Development Interactive Panel Discussion on Science Engagement TNC16 June 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Janet Spoonamore, PhD UNCLASSIFIED / FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Mathematics Careers: Army Research Laboratory – Army Research Office.
Advertisements

Public Safety Communications Research Program A joint program between NIST’s Communications Technology Laboratory & NTIA’s Institute for Telecommunication.
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
April 2009 OSG Grid School - RDU 1 Open Science Grid John McGee – Renaissance Computing Institute University of North Carolina, Chapel.
Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council.
The LOGIIC Consortium Zachary Tudor, CISSP, CISM, CCP Program Director SRI International.
APNIC Secretariat Paul Wilson Director General. APNIC Planning Process 2 Member Survey Operational Plan Membership EC Secretariat Strategy / Activity.
Board on Career Development: Strategic Planning David E. Lee Chair Board on Career Development 25 February 2013.
Partnerships in Promoting Innovation and Managing Risk Scientific and Financial Innovation in AIDS Vaccines International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Labeeb.
Higher Education and the Workplace - supporting employer engagement in engineering and physical science David Hellier Head of Sector Engagement.
Internet 2 Corporate Value Proposition Stuart Kippelman (J&J) Jeff Lemmer (Ford) December 12, 2005.
The “R” in R&E Networks GPN Survey and Observations Quilt Member Meeting Boston Ma. Sept Claude Garelik and Myron Lowe.
Bridging the Gaps: The Exeter Science Exchange Dr Helen Butler Project Manager 1 st July 2011.
Effective User Services for High Performance Computing A White Paper by the TeraGrid Science Advisory Board May 2009.
Looking Ahead - The Next Generation of Security Solutions.
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE Computational Literacy NPACI Site Visit July 22, 1999 Gregory A. Moses EOT Thrust Leader.
Call to Community: Building Connections that Make a Difference for Students with Disabilities CA Community Meeting April 28, 2008.
PATHWAYS BETWEEN K-12, HIGHER EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT: PATTERNS FROM OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE DATA Dr. Josh Hawley and Dr. Lisa Neilson The Ohio State University.
Open Science Grid For CI-Days Elizabeth City State University Jan-2008 John McGee – OSG Engagement Manager Manager, Cyberinfrastructure.
From Strategy to Implementation: Implications for NREN Product Management. TNC 2005 Ann Harding HEAnet NOC Manager.
CBCAP Pre-Bid Conference Ken Bopp Bill Holcomb Jamie Myers January 22, 2010.
Internet2 Health Sciences Mary Kratz Internet2 Health Science Manager March Spring Member Meeting International Session.
Presents: Information for participants: Your microphone will be muted for the formal presentation. If your audio portion the presentation is not working,
Enabling and supporting practitioners to engage with research One Local Authority’s progress towards developing a culture of research and evidence- informed.
Finding Partners, Creating Impact Rusty Low Poles Together Workshop NOAA Boulder, CO July 20-22, 2005.
Cyberinfrastructure What is it? Russ Hobby Internet2 Joint Techs, 18 July 2007.
The Condo of Condos Panel discussion Internet Annual Meeting Arlington, VA 4/22/13 1.
Establishing National Technology Development and Transfer Systems
Cyberinfrastructure: Many Things to Many People Russ Hobby Program Manager Internet2.
Internet2 and Cyberinfrastructure Russ Hobby Program Manager,
6 February 2004 Internet2 Priorities 2004 Internet2 Industry Strategy Council Douglas Van Houweling.
Government and Industry IT: one vision, one community Vice Chairs April Meeting Agenda Welcome and Introductions GAPs welcome meeting with ACT Board (John.
What’s Happening at Internet2 Renee Woodten Frost Associate Director Middleware and Security 8 March 2005.
IAB Involvement in ERCs: Assessing and Strengthening the Role.
Slide 1 Regional Network Collaborations Marla Meehl, UCAR/FRGP CC*IIE Collaborative Research: CC*IIE Region: Rocky Mountain Cyberinfrastructure Mentoring.
WHAT SURF DOES FOR RESEARCH SURF’s Science Engagement TNC15 June 18, 2015 Sylvia Kuijpers (SURFnet)
Communications and Government Affairs. Overview Funding Outlook and Congressional Update – Norm Peterson (ANL) – Scott Sudduth (UC) Accelerators for the.
1 Enabling Smart Cities/Campuses to Serve the Internet of People Florence Hudson Senior Vice President & Chief Innovation Officer Internet2 TNC16 June.
Motivation for science engagement-Jakob Tendel, DFN Collecting user feedback - Lauren Rotman, ESnet Florence Hudson, Internet2 Identifying priorities-
Scrum BUT Research Adapting Agile principles in a research environment Gary Morgan Chief Science and Technology Office March 16, 2009 PNNL-SA
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
The E-Mentoring Network for Women in Engineering and Science MentorNet: The E-Mentoring Network for Women in Engineering and Science.
CINO PROGRAM ADVISORY GROUP MEETING Ed Aractingi, Assistant Vice President for IT/Deputy Chief Information Officer, Marshall University Mark Cather, Chief.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
LH Business change team
Collaborative Innovation Communities: Bringing the Best Together
Supporting the NRP with a Lean CI Staff
CIOs Reach Across the Aisle to Enable Collaborative Research Innovation Curt Hillegas, Princeton University • Clare van den Blink, Pace University • Alan.
Science engagement: identifying priorities
The NSRC cultivates collaboration among a community of peers to build and improve a global Internet that benefits all parties. We facilitate the growth.
2017 National Geospatial Preparedness Summit
SURFnet, Community Manager Research
Exploring the not-so-fundamental Life Sciences Research fundamentals
Loren Bell Linnea Sallack, MPH, RD Altarum Institute
Research Development Office
Internet2: Integrated Innovation
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Connecting the Dots Kate Petersen ESnet Science Engagement
SUMPs SUMPs-Up - Overall goals and dimension of the project
Investment in Energy Workforce
Topics Introduction to Research Development
School of Education Opportunity for Discovery, Learning & Engagement
IEEE Foundation: The Road Ahead
IPv6 For IoT Mahyar Tajdini, DUT, Dec 2016.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Steve Denniss Technical Director. Steve Denniss Technical Director.
Corporate Program Update
Connecting the dots Kate Petersen ESnet Science Engagement
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Science of Food Educator Expo
Presentation transcript:

1 User-Focused Engagement and Service Development Interactive Panel Discussion on Science Engagement TNC16 June 2016

2 Panelists Florence Hudson, Internet2 - Moderator Eli Dart, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Sylvia Kuijpers, SURFnet David Salmon, Jisc Jakob Tendel, DFN-Verein

3 Topics for Panel Discussion Funding and collaborations Partnerships Technical evaluations and services Lessons Learned Reaching the Researchers Barriers to Success Next steps

4 Questions/Answers and Next Steps Discuss where are the gaps, how can we begin to address these gaps (together)?

5 Funding and collaborations –Have you had success working on Science Engagement with your funding agencies? What works? –How do you fund initiatives, with agencies, members, collaborators (industry, standards organizations such as IEEE or others)? Partnerships –What are common barriers to the adoption of advanced services? How have you had success in overcoming those barriers or working around them? –How does the underlying sociology of the science collaboration affect their ability to use networks and other cyberinfrastructure? –How do we better enable science/research to leverage our high speed networks for improved or accelerated science outcomes? –Is there any pattern to successes? If so, what features are common to success? –How do we work with the local support staff at the universities to reach out to researchers?

6 Technical evaluations and services –How do we ensure security of data flows while ensuring the data flows are not affected? (David Salmon’s point) –Do you have any examples of how cyberinfrastructure practitioners or science/network engineers (what is the best term?) work best to better enable science leverage of our high speed networks for accelerated science outcomes? Lessons learned –What have you learned from engagement with researchers, scientists, senior leadership, or others that is most applicable to new relationships? –Getting scientists working with computing and networking people at the beginning of a project is critical - How do we bring this about?

7 Reaching the researchers –How do we find the researchers and scientists to enable their leverage of HPC and HPN together? –Is it one-on-one or is it more scalable? How? –What are some of the Mechanisms and modes of researcher outreach that we are trying or know work, at least in one area, and may be transferable across NRENs. Barriers to success –What are the barriers to success in science and researcher engagement? –Where are we stuck? –What obstacles do we have to overcome?