Agenda 3-05-2013 Leads work – Track Status Admin / Upcoming / Next Steps – RFP Document review – Vendor Question Review – GL Preparation – Orals – Harris.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISeries Skip Upgrade External Sales Presentation September,2005.
Advertisements

Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
MIGRATION MIGR-09. How to Run Your Next Implementation... Don't Let It Run You! Patricia Johnson Senior Systems Consultant Strategic Systems Group, Inc.
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
1 Meeting On The Management Of Statistical Information Systems (MSIS), Oslo, May 18-20, 2009 Shri Narayanan, Economic Systems, TGS Jola Stefanska, STA.
A A A N C N U I N F O R M A T I O N T E C H N O L O G Y : IT OPERATIONS 1 Problem Management Jim Heronime, Manager, ITSM Program Tanya Friehauf-Dungca,
Accelerate BI Presented by: Stephen Goldsmith RapidApp BI Methodology  Agile Project Management, Quality Assurance, Knowledge Transfer  Plan Business.
ECM RFP 101 Presented by: Carol Mitchell C.M. Mitchell Consulting.
MTS Delivery Development © 2009 IBM Corporation EMEA GLOBAL Total Microcode Support (GTMS)
Chapter 5 IT Processes Presented by Dr. Mohamed Sammouda.
SE 555 Software Requirements & Specification Requirements Management.
Managing the Information Technology Resource Jerry N. Luftman
Secure System Administration & Certification DITSCAP Manual (Chapter 6) Phase 4 Post Accreditation Stephen I. Khan Ted Chapman University of Tulsa Department.
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups
10.5 Report Performance The process of collecting and distributing performance information, including status reports, progress measurements and forecasts.
4 4 By: A. Shukr, M. Alnouri. Many new project managers have trouble looking at the “big picture” and want to focus on too many details. Project managers.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
EMEA Media Center The Work In Progress Deck. Agenda 10/11/12 Worksession planning  Intro’s and Michael’s role  Media Center Updates  Review overall.
S/W Project Management
Copyright Course Technology 1999
Condor Technology Solutions, Inc. Grace RFTS Application Extension Phase.
Roles and Responsibilities
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
Agenda Teams Responsibilities Timeline Homework and next steps.
 Copyright 2001 Perot Systems Europe. All rights reserved Architecture Model Introduction Tim Taylor.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
MyFloridaMarketPlace Roundtable January 21, :00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. MyFloridaMarketPlace.
CORE Executive Board March 31, 2010 Next CEB April 28, 2010.
Save a Tree: Use an eForm Automating IT Change Request Management Processes (Concurrency IT Department)
Centro de Estudos e Sistemas Avançados do Recife PMBOK - Chapter 4 Project Integration Management.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
Agenda News Process and Admin – Follow-up items – Upcoming Schedule (M, F, T, TH, T=GL) – GL Timeline – June 25 th RFP Track – Vendor Scoring.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike.
National Information Exchange Model Update for the Global Advisory Committee Spring 2008 Meeting April 10, 2008 NIEM Technical Architecture Committee (NTAC)
Agenda Thanks! Schedule and Coordination Objectives Review Timeline Homework and next steps – Scope Team’s Work (Discussions) – Stakeholder Management.
Agenda Team, Headlines and Housekeeping – P1 has been accepted! – Key milestones/detailed activities – Updated checkpoints Project Roundtable.
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
February 5, 2009 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Texas Nodal Program Implementation: Program Update Trip Doggett.
Health eDecisions Use Case 2: CDS Guidance Service Strawman of Core Concepts Use Case 2 1.
Query Health Distributed Population Queries Implementation Group Meeting October 11, 2011.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
Thursday, 17 Jan Day 4 9:00-9:15a.25 hrs Overview of the day 9:15-10:45a 1.5 hrsMichael/Andy/Adam Recap and Prioritization of Functional / Workflow Implications.
Project management Topic 7 Controls. What is a control? Decision making activities – Planning – Monitor progress – Compare achievement with plan – Detect.
Thursday, 17 Jan Day 4 9:00-9:15a.25 hrs Overview of the day 9:15-10:45a 1.5 hrsMichael/Andy/Adam Recap and Prioritization of Functional / Workflow Implications.
MediaCentre Planning Workshop Wednesday January 16 th, 2013.
ITPD ISSUE MANAGEMENT PROCESS SEPTEMBER 5, 2008
Project Management Project Integration Management Minder Chen, Ph.D. CSU Channel Islands
Worldwide Protein Data Bank wwPDB Common D&A Project Full Project Team Meeting Rutgers March 16-19, 2010.
DATA MANAGEMENT CONTENT ORGANIZATION AND MEDIA IDENTIFICATION John Doe Executive Vice President Digital Division.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
ESSRT In-Process Review September 10, Agenda 1.Work Completed Till Date 2.Scope of future activities and deliverables 2.
Agenda Team, Headlines and Housekeeping – TechOps Backfills – Rob Patton – Eric – Speaking of Spain Agenda for the week of 17 th (10min) Kickoff Presentation.
EMEA Media Center Inception Funding 12/17/2012. Problem Statement, Objective and Scope Problem Statement –SPE spends too much on outside vendors to process.
© 2003 Six Sigma Academy0 The Roles of Six Sigma Champion Workshop.
Agenda 1. Key Activities, Accomplishments and Status 2. Meeting Notes and Action Items.
Agenda Thanks! Schedule and Coordination Objectives Review Timeline Homework and next steps – Scope Team’s Work (Discussions) – Stakeholder Management.
6/6/ SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLE OVERVIEW Professor Ron Kenett Tel Aviv University School of Engineering.
Ron Johnson, CFA Litman/Gregory Asset Management.
Team Meeting 1 To Dos Review Agenda for the 17 th Agenda for Next Week (round 1) Change Management Scope, Projects and Tracks and Timelines Review of Roles.
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, Project Review Overview Facilitative approach that actively engages a number of key project staff and senior IS&T.
Data Architecture World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Implementation Strategy July 2002
CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
Employee engagement Delivery guide
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Agenda Leads work – Track Status Admin / Upcoming / Next Steps – RFP Document review – Vendor Question Review – GL Preparation – Orals – Harris Trip / Budapest / Spain – YSI Changes After RFP / Before GL – Big areas of focus

Timeline Today

APPENDIX

Team Leads Responsibilities Pick your working team to help you resolve your questions (should be between 4-8 participants in each team depending on topic). I recommend a cross functional team. – Consolidated request of resources and funnel through Mark) Assess the open scope questions assigned to you (final version to be sent out tomorrow – drafts are in the YSI folders). – Determine if they have been appropriately assigned to you. If not, send the question back to Michael Pusateri and myself with the suggestion of the person who should own the question. – Consolidate any questions (preserve cross reference ID) Scan any “during” questions assigned to you and validate that we can safely defer their consideration until after we kick-off the project. Move any to “before” if necessary. Prioritize the open questions in term of: – “Before” Issues that can impact the RFP selection (first) in order of priority / impact – “Before” Issues to be resolved for GL in order if priority / impact – Analysis - Determine the approach for resolution required to scope the project for vendor selection and for Greenlighting. (defer any portion of the open question to the project if it is not necessary to resolve the project scope ) Schedule your work sessions Identify your “shared” questions and reach out that team lead and agree what will be done by each group Determine the timeline needed to resolve your high important issues Work the questions as determined by your approach. (Suggest involving others outside of your core team to gather data points) Save your team’s work in the YSI folders under > /Scope Resolution / [Your folder] Report back in our weekly coordination meetings Drive the questions to resolution Responsibilities Procedure Check-in Focus Responsibilities Procedure Check-in Focus

Team Updates VOD/Non-Linear Spencer Stephens - Christopher Taylor Content Identifiers & Relationships & Inventory Management & Metadata (Kelly Harkness) Program Acquisition and Rights Management (Iverson/Caz) Integration - Vision/BMS, Business Systems changes, Finance (Allsop) System Architecture (Ryan Kido) Infrastructure Requirements (Glen Marzan) Technical Specifications & Client Profiles (Adam Moore) MAM Requirements: Overall and Distributed Ingest, 3rd Party Integration (Adam Moore) Workflows & Prioritization of Tasks (Andy Bolding) Security (Adam/Jaspal) Reporting (Chris) Operations - Support & Maintenance (Gleeson) Implementation Approach & Scope Management (Bob) Progress Issues Next Steps Progress Issues Next Steps

Focus on RFP Question Spain and Budapest Give Vendors a Heads-up on Non-Linear Next Tuesday

Scope Team Charters Scope TeamCharterBefore RFPBefore GL VOD/Non- Linear Issues concerning the process of preparing content for use by non- linear business partners Integration –Issues involving how various software systems interact with each other Determine scope of VOD/OTT requirements and hand off to other teams Determine Options for meeting requirements Determine what requirements need to be given to Vendors Delineate between VOD/OTT Determine what is in scope or out of scope for project Proposal for how requirements are met by SPT WorkflowsIssues centering on the detailed process of how assets flow through the preparation process and specific steps within MediaCentre Refine list of workflows addressed by MediaCenter Identify any new in scope workflows for vendors Define high level requirements for vendors Give new requirements to other team (MAM/Content ID/Operations / etc) Refined list of all workflows to be handled by MediaCenter PROJECT Give new requirements to other team (MAM/Content ID/Operations etc) Define high level requirements required for final estimates MAM Requirements Issues detailing the specific operation of the asset management system, both in terms of functionality and process Refined list of MAM Requirements for Vendors List of requirements out of scope Give any other team any implications to the requirements Complete list of inscope requirements verified by vendors List of post project enhancments List of work arounds Give any other team any implications to the requirements (ie Operations)

Scope Team Charters Scope TeamCharterBefore RFPBefore GL System Architecture Issues involving the high level technical design of the MediaCentre and how it interconnects with other Sony systems Reference architecture for Vendors Identification of requirements requiring Vendor bids List of all functional services that are to be a part of the MediaCenter PROJECT List of all functional services that are on the roadmap (including out of scope) InfrastructureIssues regarding the network and hardware systems, sizing requirements, connectivity, and other detailed design concerns Verification of the infrastructure requirements INSIDE the core MediaCentre architecture for the vendors (including verified sizing) Specification of all infrastructure requirements inside and outside of the MediaCentre with verified assumptions Tech SpecsIssues involving the technical specifications of assets received, distributed, and used by the MediaCentre Identification of any standards that will need to be implemented by the vendors enough that the vendors can bid List of all of the standards that will be included in the scope of the PROJECT – enough that the project can estimate and deliver

Scope Team Charters Scope TeamCharterBefore RFPBefore GL Content ID/Metadata Issues that involve the way assets are indentified, how that data is exchanged and stored, and how master data flows Content ID and Metadata approach at a high level to guide vendors (worst case) Refinement of approach (high level model) enough to enable proper scoping of the PROJECT Refinement of the key metadata to be used to enable key workflows What is required scope of the PROJECT and what can be done later Program Acq./Rights Issues concerning content usage rights, methods of tracking usage, and the process of making systems aware of new content Identification of any requirements that would affect vendors Identification of any requirements or dependencies to BMS systems and workflows IntegrationIssues involving how various software systems interact with each other. Identification of any inbound our outbound data interchanges requirements with the core MediaCentre software Content ID implications shared with Content ID team List of specific interfaces to be build by the MediaCenter with an estimate ReportingIssues regarding the requirements for reporting, status updates, and metrics List of any reports expected to be produced by vendor apps High level reporting requirements Reporting architecture and approach required for estimation

Scope Team Charters Scope TeamCharterBefore RFPBefore GL Implementation /Scope Issues about whether a specific function or need is included within the MediaCentre project. Also defines program set-up Any scope or sizing decisions that would impact the assumptions or scope of the other work teams Structure of team Finalized scope, budget and schedule OperationsIssues involving how people and departments are responsible for parts of the overall workflow Any scope or sizing decisions that would impact the assumptions or scope of the other work teams Any manual or automation decisions General design of the “run” team that addresses incope workflows and support requirements Any workspace decisions Resolution of any HR impacts to overall operations SecurityIssues involved in preventing unauthorized use of or access to the MediaCentre and content distributed by the media Center List of security requirements for the vendors List of security requirements for all parties