R EVIEWS AND F EEDBACK : R EVIEWING I NNOVATION P LANS THROUGH THE PROBLEM OF PRACTICE MODEL Joey Nichol NHDOE Joey Nichol, New Hampshire Department of.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.

Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools

INITIAL ACTION PLANNING PROCESS August 22, 2012 Andy Kelly, Assistant Superintendent, OSPI Bill Mason, Director of Operations, OSPI Office of Student and.

Schoolwide Programs (SWP) NCLB Regional Meetings April 2010.

Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.

An Introduction to the “new” NCDB …a webinar for the National Deaf-Blind TA Network November 13, 2013 November 15, 2013 Presented by:

Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.

Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education

Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health

Addressing the Needs of Students through School Improvement What’s New in North Carolina?

Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.

Presentation from the New Hampshire Department of Education Innovation Team March 17, 2015 FIFTH ANNUAL INDISTAR SUMMIT ROGERS, ARKANSAS MARCH 16-18, 2015.

Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.

Healthy North Carolina 2020 and EBS/EBI 101 Joanne Rinker MS, RD, CDE, LDN Center for Healthy North Carolina Director of Training and Technical Assistance.

The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.

CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

Leadership Development Presentation to the School Board Patrick Bryan Principal on Special Assignment April 19, 2011 ACHIEVEMENT + ALIGNMENT + SUSTAINABILITY.

Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.

Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.

Summer Non-effective School Districts district staff issue a plethora of uncoordinated and often contradictory directives while presiding over resource.

FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.

Restructuring Plan Overview. Process Advisory Committee – teacher representatives, administrators Advisory Committee – teacher representatives, administrators.

Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.

Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.

Staffing What training and resources do they need to work effectively with students? Are the right people doing the right work? How will you know that.

OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 Keys to Successful 21 st Century Educational Leadership Jazzar and Algozzine Chapter 8 Curriculum Considerations & Implementations.

Operated by RMC Research Corporation In Partnership with Education Development Center, Inc. The Education Alliance at Brown Learning Innovations at WestEd.

Persistently Low Achieving Schools Update September 14, 2010 Board of Education Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary.

David Abbott Director of Student Services Mary Barton CFN 204 SATIF November 21, 2011.

EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.

HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.

1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.

Standard 1 School Library Media Coordinators Demonstrate Leadership Staff development documentation Newsletters Conference documentation Websites School.

Council for the Advancement of Standards Student Leadership Programs September 14 th, 2012.

ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.

How the SEA Uses the Data from Indistar to Improve Implementation and Track Results  1:00-2:15.

Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.

GOT CHAMPIONS? WI Department of Public Instruction Indistar Conference March 2015 Aundrea Kerkenbush, MS Education Consultant, Title I Team Kristine Nadolski,

The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.

SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.

Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.

NCCE 2009 Administrator/IT Summit Strategy Session: Leadership.

The School Effectiveness Framework

State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.

Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.

Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.

Introduction to Strong Educator Support System.

1. Staffing 2. Expectations 3. Instructional Leadership.

The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.

UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.

East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.

Literacy and Numeracy Partnership Project Curriculum Partnerships LITERACY and NUMERACY PARTNERSHIP PROJECT Gavin Power – Consultant Principal, Literacy.

Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio

Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.

Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.

New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March

Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.

Louisiana State Personnel Development Grant Personnel Development Grant to improve outcomes for SWD Awarded to the LDOE in 2016.

Clarke County School District Accountability Report

Opportunities for Growth

Jordan Dueis Carol Bush

ENDS Report Priority #3 Create Spaces of Optimism

Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models

Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary

Summit Hill Elementary School

Presentation transcript:

R EVIEWS AND F EEDBACK : R EVIEWING I NNOVATION P LANS THROUGH THE PROBLEM OF PRACTICE MODEL Joey Nichol NHDOE Joey Nichol, New Hampshire Department of Education Joe Trunk, New England Comprehensive Center 1 3/17/16

It is not an event but a process! Implementation Science Explore-Plan-Launch-Sustain Reflection/Revision of Problems of Practice. Focus: Data Literacy 2nd Quarterly Meeting Launching 1st Quarterly Meeting Planning 2016 NH Educators’ Summer Summit Exploration 3rd Quarterly Meeting Expansion 4th Quarterly Meeting Sustain Problems of Practice Model of School Innovation ★

USED-Indistar-Swift Alignments USEDNH Indistar KeysSWIFT Domains Strong LeadershipPrincipal LeadershipAdministrative Leadership Effective Teachers and Leaders Educator EffectivenessAdministrative Leadership Redesign School Day, Week, Year Expanded Learning TimeInclusive Policy Structure and Practice Strengthen Instructional Program Use of Effective and Evidence-based Instructional Strategies Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Use Data to Inform InstructionLeadership Teams Meet and Use Data to Inform Decision Making Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Safe School EnvironmentSchool and Community Culture and ClimateIntegrated Education Framework Engage Families and Communities Parent Engagement in Leadership TeamsTrusting Family and Community Partnerships

Tri-annual Review Levels Does Not Meet Target on Rubric A NHDOE Team Revises Plan Collaboratively with a School Funding is Approved Approaching Target on Rubric Report Identifies what is needed to meet target. School Amends and Returns Plan Based on Clarifying Questions from Review Teams Funding is Approved Meets Target on Rubric Funding is Approved School Requests Learning Opportunities

5

6

How does New Hampshire’s process of reviewing plans and providing feedback differ from the process used in South Dakota? Purpose: similar: understanding of work being done in F/P schools; supports needed; provide feedback Participants: similar but NH does not have coaches Process: Data Analysis days for SD; Tri-annual reviews for NH Work day/Tri-annual review: review of the evidence; use of a rubric Work groups: similar but NH spreads their reviews over 3 days for each of the tri-annual reviews.

Double Blind review of the 41 plans in NH Strengths: transparency of the process; timely feedback; opportunities to work on the plan with guidance; focused support from the DOE; both maximize use of Indistar process. NH reports that a more serious approach is being taken to completing the Innovation plans by the schools. Challenges: also very similar: changing staff especially in critical positions; finding enough reviewers; interrater reliability.

Contact Information 9 Joey Nichol Educational Consultant SIG Coordinator New Hampshire Department of Education Joe Trunk Research Associate New England Comprehensive Center