Agenda VA’s Transformation Continues

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strategic Management & Planning
Advertisements

Life Science Services and Solutions
Alignment of COBIT to Botswana IT Audit Methodology
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
Overview of Priorities and Activities: Shared Services Canada Presentation to the Information Technology Infrastructure Roundtable June 17, 2013 Liseanne.
Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.
Delivering Digital Services Information Management Theme Presented By: Deborah Cowell, FAA, AIT Date:August 27, 2014.
National Health Policy Forum William Winkenwerder, Jr., M.D. Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) January 28, 2004.
SEM Planning Model.
Enterprise Architecture. 2 Agenda What is Enterprise Architecture (EA)? Roles in EA? Why is EA Important? Tangible Benefits from EA? What Do We Need to.
Connecting People With Information DoD Net-Centric Services Strategy Frank Petroski October 31, 2006.
Contractor Assurance Discussion Forrestal Building Washington, D.C. December 14, 2011.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
IT Governance and Management
EIM – Strategy to Pragmatic Delivery
1 July 23, 2002 Strategic Technology Plan Briefing to LOT Committee.
Moving from money well accounted for to money well spent UK Information Technology Summit May 2005 Helen McDonald A/Chief Information Officer Treasury.
From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )
Investment Management Concepts Portfolio Management | Segment Architecture March 25, 2009 Adrienne Walker and Kshemendra Paul
Series 2: Project Management Advanced Project Management for Behavioral Health Electronic Health Records (EHRs) 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten.
Global IT Planning & Analysis
Welcome to the OSDBU Showcase Department Of Veteran Affairs Freddie Graham Veteran Relationship Management (VRM) April 19,
A Security Training Program through Transformational Leadership and Practical Approaches Tanetta N. Isler Federal Information Systems Security Educators’
Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information TechnologyAPEX | 1 Copyright © 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved. Architecture Concept UG D- DOC UG D-
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Information Technology Strategy & 5 Year Plan.
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
1 DoD-VA Partnership Status 22 February DoD/VA Partnership DoD/VA Mission, Vision, Authority DoD/VA Council Structure Joint Strategic Plan Current.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Why is BCL Needed? BCL addresses long-standing challenges that have impacted the delivery of business capabilities The DepSecDef directed increasing the.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
How to do Successful Project Management in a Competitive Industry
CSI - Introduction General Understanding. What is ITSM and what is its Value? ITSM is a set of specialized organizational capabilities for providing value.
DRAFT – For Discussion Only HHSC IT Governance Executive Briefing Materials DRAFT April 2013.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Copyright © The OWASP Foundation Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the OWASP License. The OWASP.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
The Value Driven Approach
Deputy Director, Integrated Requirements-Design
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
DOE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Information Security IBK3IBV01 College 3 Paul J. Cornelisse.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Government and Industry IT: one vision, one community Vice Chairs April Meeting Agenda Welcome and Introductions GAPs welcome meeting with ACT Board (John.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Smart Choice Pre-Select Phase Transition September 2002.
Business Transformation Project December 18, 2015 Rachel Mercer, Project Director.
VA’s Continuing Transformation Greg Giddens, Executive Director Enterprise Program Management Office June 19, 2013.
Driving Value from IT Services using ITIL and COBIT 5 July 24, 2013 Gary Hardy ITWinners.
GSA IT Strategic Plan 2009 – 2011 August 2007 US General Services Administration 1.
Geospatial Line of Business FGDC Steering Committee Meeting October 23, 2006.
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Opportunities in DoD Business Transformation May 4, 2006.
Beyond the BACoE: Developing Business Analysis Maturity.
© 2010 IBM Corporation STRATEGIC ADVISORY COUNCIL MARCH 2011 Enterprise Architecture - Advisory Discussion – Greg Dietzel Vice President, Client Unit Director,
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
Michael J. Novak ASQ Section 0511 Meeting, February 8, 2017
EITS Planning & Decision Support
IT Governance at the SCO
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Alignment of COBIT to Botswana IT Audit Methodology
Scotland’s Digital Health and Care Strategy
MAZARS’ CONSULTING PRACTICE Helping your Business Venture Further
CYBERSECURITY IS A Business Issue
IEEE Architecture Council Overview
Data Governance Chief Data officer Carlos rivero.
Presentation transcript:

VA’s Continuing Transformation Greg Giddens, Executive Director Enterprise Program Management Office November 6, 2013

Agenda VA’s Transformation Continues Planning, Programming, Budgeting, Execution Enhancing Integration Across Programs A New Look at “Requirements” Acquisition Program Management Framework (APMF) Integration Steering Committee Customer Data Integration 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO

Integration Integration Integration 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO

PPBE In the Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) process, the first two P’s drive the identification of capability gaps and initial analysis of alternatives. FY14-20 Strategic Plan drafted OOP: Implementation Plan Review Underway VA has just completed its first PPBE Programming phase, culminating in a Future Year Veterans Program approved by the Secretary. End to End Requirements Management (E2ERM) Methodology will be in place to inform the FY17 PPBE cycle 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO

President’s Budget/ Enacted Budget The PPBE framework enables the definition, prioritization, selection, and budgeting of requirements that close capability gaps Leadership Decisions Leadership Decisions Planning Programming Budgeting Execution Traceability to source of capability need Strategic Needs Develop Requirements Alternative Solutions Resource Investment Decisions President’s Budget/ Enacted Budget Define Capability Gaps Verified need, validated requirement, programmed activity, budgeted program APMF Strategic needs and investment decisions inform “Verify” phase… Scope Cost (ROM) Estimated Timeline Concept Design 4 10/31/2013 4

APMF Provides a Common Framework to Plan and Manage Critical VA Programs 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO

A New Look at “Requirements” E2ERM methodology is a series of processes and practices that complements the PPBE and APMF frameworks and facilitates the identification of strategic capability gaps and defines requirements to fill the gap. Well-developed requirements inform investment decision making processes, drive well-formed programs, identifies integration touch points, and result in the right solutions. 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO

E2ERM Methodology complements the PPBE process PLANNING Planning establishes the strategic priorities and capabilities required to achieve the VA mission and strategy PROGRAMMING Programming applies resources to programs that provide the capabilities required to achieve the VA strategic priorities EXECUTION Execution executes the enacted budget and operational plans and measures how well we are achieving the VA’s mission BUDGETING Budgeting develops the VA’s President’s Budget and operational plans and provides justification for the approved programs System Requirements Strategic Capabilities Unconstrained Requirements Acquisition Program Requirements Project Contract Business Capabilities Constrained Requirements Non-Acquisition Program Requirements Need Align planning Strengthening Requirements through End-to-End Traceability Solution 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO

Integration Integration Integration 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO

Enhancing Integration Across Programs Data Governance Council Integration Steering Committee Enterprise Architecture Council Department-Wide Data Stewardship Converging authoritative data sources Identify Enterprise Integration Opportunities Task, monitor and control execution of enterprise integration initiatives Create and manage the Enterprise Architecture Use the Enterprise Architecture to support executive decision-making 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO

The Veteran Data Management Challenge Current Environment: VA suffers from a proliferation of systems and a lack of authoritative, common customer data across VBA, VHA, NCA, BVA, and Staff Offices. This situation prevents: Easy sharing of data enterprise wide Comprehensive understanding of a Veteran’s circumstances, needs, benefits, and services Timely delivery of benefits and services in a contextually appropriate manner Cost-effective and efficient maintenance of VA’s systems Delivery of integrated business process results to management, policy-makers, and customers Challenge: How do we ensure that VA processes and systems support an integrated, authoritative view of our customers and their needs in order to ensure the most efficient and effective delivery of benefits and services possible across the Veteran lifecycle? Cursory examination of VA systems and databases reveals: 16+ sources for name 15+ sources for SSN 14+ sources for birthday 13+ sources for mailing address 10+ sources for military separation 9+ sources for gender

Initial Vision and Long-Term Evolution CDI Vision: VA maintains authoritative common data on each Client that is securely shared across the enterprise for proactive, seamless delivery of benefits and services with reduced burden to the Veteran, their Family, and VA. With enterprise-wide, Veteran-centric common customer data management, VA will have: Authoritative common customer data where and when it is needed Authoritative common customer data domains and source(s) Processes and practices to manage authoritative common customer data Governance to support use of common customer data management processes and practices Long term: Lessons learned with common customer data will be applicable to ALL VA data. Military Service History Identity Demographic & Socio-Economic Contact All customer data = common, shared, and data that belongs to the LOBs Common Core Data – all 3 Admins Common Shared Data – 1 Admin VA EA: if updatable by >1 Admin, it is “common”. Integrate and align business processes to capture data once, share enterprise wide, use for a lifetime

CDI Guiding Principle Common data is a VA enterprise asset. Common data is “owned” by VA, though the “management” of common data may be delegated. VA policy, culture, and decision processes will strongly support this principle. Trusted authoritative common data shall be visible, accessible, and understandable to all authorized users, both internal and external. All VA business processes will access common data solely through the use of trusted authoritative sources ensuring data quality, interoperability, and reuse. CDI supports VA’s goal to streamline the Veteran’s interaction with VA. Having single authoritative sources for basic Veteran data (identity, demographic /socio-economic, contact info, military service history) will allow both the VA and Veterans to focus on business process and service delivery – not on whether they have the right address.

Peek Into the Future at VA Enterprise thinking and enterprise behavior that is operationalized by: Mature Requirements Development and Management that feeds and traces back to strategic planning, programming, budgeting, and execution Integrated execution of funding across programs that adhere to world class program management standards and practices Authoritative common Client data that is securely shared across the enterprise 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO

What’s at the end of the rainbow? It’s not…. 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO

What’s at the end of the rainbow? Integration 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO

Questions? 10/31/2013 OPP ePMO