A 3D Global MHD Simulation of the Solar Wind/Earth’s Magnetosphere Interaction Dr. Mehmet Sarp Yalim & Prof. Dr. Stefaan Poedts Centre for mathematical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.
Advertisements

Particle acceleration in a turbulent electric field produced by 3D reconnection Marco Onofri University of Thessaloniki.
Fast Magnetic Reconnection B. Pang U. Pen E. Vishniac.
Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.
Algorithm Development for the Full Two-Fluid Plasma System
4/18 6:08 UT 4/17 6:09 UT Average polar cap flux North cap South cap… South cap South enter (need to modify search so we are here) South exit SAA Kress,
February 2001GAMM, Zuerich, Switzerland1 Overcompressive shocks in 3D MHD bow shock flows H. De Sterck Centre for Plasma Astrophysics, K.U.Leuven, Belgium.
Non-magnetic Planets Yingjuan Ma, Andrew Nagy, Gabor Toth, Igor Sololov, KC Hansen, Darren DeZeeuw, Dalal Najib, Chuanfei Dong, Steve Bougher SWMF User.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
The role of solar wind energy flux for transpolar arc luminosity A.Kullen 1, J. A. Cumnock 2,3, and T. Karlsson 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics,
Boundaries, shocks and discontinuities
Magnetohydrodynamic waves
Competing X-lines During Magnetic Reconnection. OUTLINE o What is magnetic reconnection? o Why should we study it? o Ideal MHD vs. Resistive MHD o Basic.
Generation of Solar Energetic Particles (SEP) During May 2, 1998 Eruptive Event Igor V. Sokolov, Ilia I. Roussev, Tamas I. Gombosi (University of Michigan)
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.
Location of Magnetopause Reconnection S M Petrinec 1, S A Fuselier 1, K J Trattner 1, and J Berchem 2 1 Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Palo.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
3D multi-fluid model Erika Harnett University of Washington.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Boundaries, shocks, and discontinuities. How discontinuities form Often due to “wave steepening” Example in ordinary fluid: –V s 2 = dP/d  m –P/  
R. Oran csem.engin.umich.edu SHINE 09 May 2005 Campaign Event: Introducing Turbulence Rona Oran Igor V. Sokolov Richard Frazin Ward Manchester Tamas I.
The Magnetopause Back in 1930 Chapman and Ferraro foresaw that a planetary magnetic field could provide an effective obstacle to the solar-wind plasma.
An Atmospheric Vortex as the Driver of Saturn’s Electromagnetic Periodicities: 1. Global Simulations Xianzhe Jia 1, Margaret Kivelson 1,2, and, Tamas Gombosi.
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Euler Equations Andrey Andreyev Advisor: James Baeder Mid.
The Solar Wind.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Heliosphere: The Solar Wind March 01, 2012.
Global Simulation of Interaction of the Solar Wind with the Earth's Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Tatsuki Ogino Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory.
The figure shows that the minimum area which can occur in a given isentropic duct flow is the sonic, or critical throat area. Choking For γ=1.4, this reduces.
CLUSTER AT THE EARTH’S BOW SHOCK André Balogh Imperial College, London or how Cluster saw this important boundary of the the Earth’s space environment.
Earth’s Magnetosphere NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
07/11/2007ESSW4, Brussels1 Coupling between magnetospheric and auroral ionospheric scales during space weather events M. ECHIM (1,2), M. ROTH(1) and J.
E.E. Antonova1,2, I.P. Kirpichev2,1, Yu.I. Yermolaev2
Analyzing the Large-Scale Curvature of Interplanetary Shocks Marissa Vogt Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Justin Kasper May 24, 2006.
Gas-kineitc MHD Numerical Scheme and Its Applications to Solar Magneto-convection Tian Chunlin Beijing 2010.Dec.3.
A Non-iterative Hyperbolic, First-order Conservation Law Approach to Divergence-free Solutions to Maxwell’s Equations Richard J. Thompson 1 and Trevor.
Space Weather in Earth’s magnetosphere MODELS  DATA  TOOLS  SYSTEMS  SERVICES  INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Space Weather Researc h Center Masha Kuznetsova.
A shock is a discontinuity separating two different regimes in a continuous media. –Shocks form when velocities exceed the signal speed in the medium.
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Fluid Theory: Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Fall, 2009 Copyright © The Heliosphere: Solar Wind Oct. 08, 2009.
1 The Solar Wind - Magnetosphere Coupling Function and Nowcasting of Geomagnetic Activity Leif Svalgaard Stanford University AMS-93, Austin, Jan
Particle precipitation has been intensely studied by ionospheric and magnetospheric physicists. As particles bounce along the earth's magnetic fields they.
Thermospheric density variations due to space weather Tiera Laitinen, Juho Iipponen, Ilja Honkonen, Max van de Kamp, Ari Viljanen, Pekka Janhunen Finnish.
1 Fluid Theory: Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). 2 3.
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
GEM Student Tutorial: GGCM Modeling (MHD Backbone)
Challenges The topological status of the magnetosphere: open or closed? Driver(s) of ionospheric sunward flow Source(s) of NBZ currents Key problem: are.
Paul Song Center for Atmospheric Research
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
Solar Wind and CMEs with the Space Weather Modeling Framework
The Magnetopause Back in 1930 Chapman and Ferraro foresaw that a planetary magnetic field could provide an effective obstacle to the solar-wind plasma.
Two Simulation Codes: BATSRUS and Global GCM
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS
Fluid Theory: Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
The Bow Shock and Magnetosheath
Principles of Global Modeling
ESS 261 Topics in magnetospheric physics Space weather forecast models ____ the prediction of solar wind speed April 23, 2008.
Prof. dr. A. Achterberg, Astronomical Dept
Fluid Theory: Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
Non linear evolution of 3D magnetic reconnection in slab geometry
Added-Value Users of ACE Real Time Solar Wind (RTSW) Data
Presentation transcript:

A 3D Global MHD Simulation of the Solar Wind/Earth’s Magnetosphere Interaction Dr. Mehmet Sarp Yalim & Prof. Dr. Stefaan Poedts Centre for mathematical Plasma-Astrophysics (CmPA) 9 th European Space Weather Week - 9:40 am

OUTLINE Solar Wind/Earth’s Magnetosphere Interaction Overview of the COOLFluiD Framework Overview of the Global MHD Model Solver Results April 2000 Magnetic Storm Simulation - Search for the Presence of a Complex Planetary Bow Shock Structure Conclusion

SOLAR WIND/EARTH’S MAGNETOSPHERE INTERACTION Earth’s magnetic field is essentially a dipole; It constantly interacts with interplanetary magnetic field (IMF); In case of southward IMF (i.e. negative B z )(see the image), space weather effects increase; During geomagnetic storms, southward IMF occurs for long durations.

THE COOLFluiD FRAMEWORK Component-based environment for multi-disciplinary research (von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics et al.) Multiple 3D parallel solvers for unstructured grids Time Steppers: Runge Kutta-n, 1- & 3-point Backward Euler, Crank Nicholson, Limited Space Discretizations: FV, FE, RD, DG, Spectral FV/FD Linear System Solvers: PETSc, Trilinos, Pardiso, FlexMG, SAMG Multiple physical models Compressible & incompressible flows Aerothermodynamics (thermo-chemical equilibrium / non-equilibrium) Ideal MHD, Inductively coupled plasma (ICP), Maxwell Aeroacoustics, LES, turbulence  Parallel infrastructure for HPC where scalability is tested up to 1024 CPUs.

GLOBAL MHD SOLVER Ideal MHD equations Cell-center upwind Finite Volume schemes Total variation diminishing Implicit time stepping B 0 +B 1 splitting divB=0 constraint satisfaction (hyperbolic divergence cleaning, 8-wave)

SIMULATION DOMAIN GSM coordinate system (x-axis points at the Sun, xz-plane contains the dipole (B 0 ) axis where a fixed tilt angle of 11.94°is applied.) Solar wind plasma parameters from ACE L1) (ρ, v, B 1, p) Outlet (simple extrapolation of parameters) Inner boundary 2.5R E ) (Powell et al. 1999, Gombosi et al. 2002) ρ is fixed to 56 AMU/cm 3 ; v is 0; (B 1 ) n is 0 and (B 1 ) t is extrapolated; T is fixed to K. z x y

RESULTS 6-7 April 2000 Magnetic Storm Simulation Search for the Presence of a Complex Planetary Bow Shock Structure

6-7 APRIL 2000 MAGNETIC STORM Second largest storm in 2000 after the Bastille Day storm Proton number density movie Proton speed movie Proton pressure movie B z movie B z movie Magnetic field lines movie Magnetic field lines movie

DST INDEX Dst index gives a large-scale average of how much current is running through the inner magnetosphere. Different ways of calculation are possible. We adopt taking the average of B z over a spherical surface near the Earth boundary (e.g. 3R E ). The lowest Dst peak is not predicted correctly since we have not implemented a sophisticated ionosphere model for the inner boundary condition or we have not coupled our model with the inner magnetosphere and ionospheric electrodynamics models yet.

A NUMERICAL MAGNETIC STORM INDEX We present a numerical magnetic storm index based on the average of the magnitude of the perturbation field, B 1, in our simulation domain downstream of the planetary bow shock.

SEARCH FOR A COMPLEX PLANETARY BOW SHOCK STRUCTURE DURING THE 6-7 APRIL 2000 MAGNETIC STORM

NON-DIMENSIONAL PARAMETERS Magnetic beta (i.e. ratio of hydrodynamic to magnetic pressures): Mach number (e.g. in the shock normal direction):

MAGNETICALLY DOMINATED REGIME (1) Hans De Sterck, PhD Thesis, CmPA, KU Leuven, 1999 An upstream plasma flow (e.g. incoming solar wind) is said to be magnetically dominated when the following conditions are met: which results in a complex dimpled planetary bow shock topology involving different types of intermediate and switch-on/off shocks.

MAGNETICALLY DOMINATED REGIME (2) Hans De Sterck, PhD Thesis, CmPA, KU Leuven, 1999

ON THE EXISTENCE OF COMPLEX PLANETARY BOW SHOCK STRUCTURE DURING A MAGNETIC STORM According to (De Sterck, PhD Thesis, 1999), a complex planetary bow shock structure is preferably to occur when: - (in particular for low beta solar wind parameters); - is large in the solar wind; - on the quasi-parallel side of the magnetosheath and not too far from the plane containing the incoming solar wind magnetic field; and - the solar wind parameters remain in the magnetically dominated regime for a sufficiently long time.

MAGNETICALLY DOMINATED REGIME DURING 6-7 APRIL 2000 MAGNETIC STORM (1)

ANALYSIS OF THE SELECTED PARAMETER REGIME (1) After ~42 minutes from the measurement taken by ACE, the related magnetically dominated solar wind plasma is thought to arrive at the vicinity of Earth’s bow shock. Density contours with magnetic field lines are shown together with cuts for analysis.

ANALYSIS OF THE SELECTED PARAMETER REGIME (2) Along the bow shock while going from left to right, M A and M s values across the shock decrease from above to below 1 which is an indication of the presence of complex bow shock structure. Middle line Right line Left line

CONCLUSION Easy-to-configure Global MHD solver for a storm; Possibility of real-time storm simulation; Possibility of coupling with different physical models; Introducing a numerical magnetic storm index; Presence of a complex bow shock structure during the 6-7 April 2000 magnetic storm.