WWW.TRANSPORTATION.ORG AASHTO Comprehensive Committees Review (CCR) Status Update – April 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CEFPI Southeast Region Strategic Planning September 2011 Focus Groups Update – Sept
Advertisements

Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
What is the Lane Livability Consortium? Participating Agencies  City of Eugene  City of Springfield  Lane County  Lane Transit.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
2  A nonprofit, nonpartisan association  Represents highway and transportation departments in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
1 ITRC Mission ITRC is A state-led coalition working together with industry and stakeholders to achieve regulatory acceptance of environmental technologies.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
IT Governance and Management
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
LOCAL LEVEL ALIGNMENT UNDER WIOA Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education for NTI Conference November 12, 2014.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
The topics addressed in this briefing include:
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Overview and Status Executive Order “Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity”
Economic Development and the Skills Shortage in British Columbia Skills Challenge 2020.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Missouri River Flood Task Force (MRFTF) Concept Briefing
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Minnesota Department of Transportation Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Minnesota Department of Transportation TRB International.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Idaho Statewide Interoperability Executive Council.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
National Preparedness All Hazards Consortium Corey Gruber Assistant Deputy Administrator, National Preparedness National Preparedness.
APPROVED JULY 2014 GACAG Overview APPROVED JULY 2014 Role of GACAG GACAG Overview Priorities and position statements GACAG Priorities GACAG's.
Governance & Leadership Structure Influence Build Connect.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
Certification & Training Assessment Group History & Current Activity North Central Region Pesticide Education & Certification Workshop June 2002.
2011 ITRC Spring Membership Meeting Minneapolis, Minnesota April 6, 2011.
SCOHTS STRATEGIC PLAN Goal 5 – Workforce Development.
BEFORE TRAILS AFTER TRAILS 75 total miles 50 connected miles 250 mile vision.
IntelliDrive SM Strategic Plan 2009 Ted Trepanier SSOM – SCOTE Manchester The IntelliDrive SM logo is a service mark of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
Engaging Freight and Supply Chain Representatives in Public Sector Projects.
Community Resilience Planning in Coastal North Carolina Sixth Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012 Linda B. Rimer Ph.D. 10/20/20151 U.S.
MAP-21 Implementation and Reauthorization May 6, 2013 Providence, Rhode Island.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
AASHTO Achieving Excellence in Transportation September 20, 2006 Safety Background.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
OIT Reorganization August 27, Today’s Agenda Principles of Reorganization Survey Feedback Organization Chart Leadership Team Structure Items to.
How to make our National Committee even more successful – UK perspective and experience World Road Association (UK), WRA UK National Committee meeting.
AASHTO-FHWA Freight Partnership II Survey and Meeting: FHWA Perspective Tony Furst, FHWA-Office of Freight Management & Operations April 18, 2007.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
Pre-Decisional Involvement
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
A Strategic Plan for Pavement Engineering NCHRP 20-7(223) AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements Dan Dawood, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
East Hudson Regional Trail Council August 10, 2015.
Incorporating Connected/Automated Vehicles into the Transportation Planning Process November, 2015 Max Azizi US DOT.
NSDI Future Directions Governance Report Presentation to the FGDC Steering Committee June 23, 2005.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.
Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act Regional and Local Area Designation and Redesignation Local Workforce Investment Board Listening Session February.
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
SCOH Strategic Plan Subcommittee on Design July 20, 2009 P RESENTED B Y S HOBNA V ARMA 1 S TAR I SIS C ORPORATION.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
SWE Long-Range Strategic Plan Goals Version: April 2010 Updated: February 2011 Alyse Stofer, President Elect November 2011.
The NH Climate Action Plan and the need for Adaptation Sherry Godlewski NH Department of Environmental Services
Overview of SCOH Strategic Plan AASHTO Subcommittee on Design 2010 Annual Meeting Rick Land, Vice Chair AASHTO Highway Subcommittee on Design and Chief.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
TSMO Program Plan Development
Research Program Strategic Plan
New AASHTO Knowledge Management Committee
2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Update on AASHTO Committee Restructuring
Strategic Boards Toolkit
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

AASHTO Comprehensive Committees Review (CCR) Status Update – April 2016

CCR Status Update Topics Genesis & Background  AASHTO Strategic Plan & Identified Opportunities  CCR Membership & Objectives  Existing Structure & Operation  Guiding the Committee Review Work Proposed Restructuring Scenario  Procedural Changes  Key Changes  New Topical Committees  Overall Objectives Outreach and Way Forward

AASHTO Strategic Plan New Strategic Goals: Provide value to members Provide innovative technical and professional services and products Be a leader in national transportation policy development Communicate the value of transportation

CCR Identified Restructuring Opportunities Responsiveness to state-identified priorities Committee structure streamlining & simplification Expediting committee decision-making Increasing multi-modal communication and collaboration Addressing cross-functional issues Organizational nimbleness and responsiveness to quickly-developing matters Appropriate engagement on emerging issues

CCR Committee Membership Paul Trombino – Director, Iowa DOT, Co-Chair Carlos Braceros – Director, Utah DOT, Co-Chair Grant Levi – Director, North Dakota DOT Tim Henkel – Assistant Commissioner, Minnesota DOT Paul Degges – Chief Engineer, Tennessee DOT Gregory Slater – Planning and Programming Director, Maryland (SHA) DOT Paul Worley – Rail Division Director, North Carolina DOT Former Members:  Mike Hancock (KY), Del McOmie (WY)

CCR Objectives 1.Better address State DOT priorities 2.Streamline/simplify the structure 3.Expedite committee decision-making 4.Increase multi-modal communications and collaborations 5.Effectively handle cross-cutting issues 6.Increase nimbleness and responsiveness 7.Better address gap and emerging issues 8.Use available state DOT expertise 9.Enhance state DOT engagement in AASHTO

Guiding the Committee Review Work Provide committees with more clarity on their role and their responsibilities within the organization; Focus committees on national issues prioritized at the Board of Directors level; Reduce inconsistencies in the operation and oversight of the committees by providing guidance from the top while allowing flexibility within the committees to accomplish their objectives; Increase communication and collaboration between committees to ensure stronger decision-making and improve coordination of cross-cutting and emerging issues, including the following:  Technology – including impacts of disruptive technologies, automated and connected vehicles and their connection to operations and infrastructure, wireless and other communications technologies, use of drones and other new technologies in traditional work  Administration – including workforce development, succession planning, recruitment and retention; training; knowledge management  Multi-modal Considerations – including coordination of freight issues in rail, trucking, and water; technical aspects common to multiple modes (such as pavements); recognition of AASHTO’s role in non-highway modes  Environment – including impacts of extreme weather on transportation systems; agency activities that impact the environment, sustainability, livability; influencing regulations and policy  Performance – including data management and integration, performance measurement, knowledge management  Safety and Security – including traveler and worker safety, analysis methods, disaster response and protection  Economics – including analysis methods; consideration in planning, design, and funding  Outside Input – including the role of the private sector and other organizations in AASHTO’s work

Proposed Restructuring Scenario

Proposed Restructuring Scenario: Key Changes Strategic Steering Committee (Board) Transportation Roundtable Modal Councils: five plus two new councils  Freight Council  Active Transportation Council Special Committee on Communications Coordinating & Managing Committees  Program & Project Delivery CC  Transportation Systems CC  Agency Administration MC

Proposed Restructuring Scenario: New Topical Committees SpC on Data Management and Analytics Infrastructure Resilience  Merger of SCOTSEM & Resilience part of RSTS Performance, Risk, and Asset Management  Merger of SCOPM & SCOAM  Add new function: Risk Management Knowledge Management

Proposed Restructuring Scenario - Procedural Changes Better defining the roles and responsibilities of the committees. Establish committee work plans and annual activity reports. Improving direction from parent committees to subgroups on priorities. Establishing “steering committees” within committees for nimbleness. Encouraging groups to operate virtually. Establishing Communities of Practice for disciplines /topical committees. Establishing ad-hoc, short-term task forces to address specific matters. Appointing steering committee liaisons for cross-cutting issues. Requiring technical service programs to report to committee(s). Requiring chairs/vice-chairs be members of the supervising group. Formalizing the role of the Associate Members on some committees. Private sector limited participation on applicable AASHTO committees.

Proposed Restructuring Scenario: Outcomes 1.Organizational Structure: provides an organizational structure that ensures committees can operate efficiently and be nimble, adaptable and forward looking. 2.Committee Priorities: Prioritize the activities and resources required to support and conduct committee activities, while representing the diverse views of member states. 3.Cross Committee Interactions: Provide for increased communication between committees if, and as needed.

CCR Seeking Input- Way Forward Currently - Collecting Scenario Feedback: Board of Directors & Committee Members Regional & Committee Meetings Early Fall 2016: Steering Committee Deliberations November 2016: Recommendations to Board of Directors 2017 and Beyond: Implementation Plan with All Committee Member Participating to Align Charters

Outreach at Regional & Committee Meetings

Critical Role of AASHTO Committees and Volunteers

Questions & Comments CCR Website: Follow Up Questions: King W. Gee Director, Engineering and Technical Services Thank You