MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Community Councils Tuesday, March 23, 2010.
Advertisements

SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
MISSION: Working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT COMPLIANCE. Mark Schrader – FHWA –Law and Process Review Findings Bill Bicknell – USFWS –Field Review Examples Sheri Lares -
An Introduction to Comprehensive Conservation Planning for National Wildlife Refuges U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
South African National Policy Framework for Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality Broad Overview.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) Protecting and Conserving Fish and Wildlife Resources Ch. 4 Mod. 1 – HO#10.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Missouri River Flood Task Force (MRFTF) Concept Briefing
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by: Miss Syazwani Mahmad Puzi School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Anacostia Streetcar Phase 2 Environmental Assessment & Section 106 Evaluation: Community Workshop January 12, 2011.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Rob Adams Vice President, Landrum & Brown NEPA Essentials — Tools: E, B, Desk Reference,
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
I Larry Heil, FHWA October 15, 2003 Environmental Streamlining.
Perpetual Discord? Missouri River Conflict-Resolution Efforts John E. Thorson June 2015.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
National Marine Sanctuaries Permits and Consultations USGC Training – Oakland, CA June 4, 2014 Vicki Wedell National Coordinator for Permitting, Consultations.
Writing the IEE. EA Training Course 2 Writing the IEE IEE Preparation  Suggested steps in preparing an IEE are:  assembling relevant information resources.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
The Role of ICS and Management Prepared for: The Interagency Section 7 Streamlined Consultation Training Summit (February 18, 2004)
April 2006 Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process April 25, 2006
Mitigation and Impact management
Erv Gasser Natural Resource Specialist nps Baer Field Manager National Interagency BAER Team Leader - North team National Park Service, Seattle, Wa BAER.
1 Poseidon Resources (Channelside), LLC Carlsbad Desalination Project Marine Life Mitigation Plan (MLMP) Marine Life Mitigation Site Selection and Preliminary.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
BUILDING STRONG ® TELLING THE PLANNING STORY Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Section 2 Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
SPILL CONTROL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ANNUAL MEETING MARCH 20 & 21, 2014 Office of Marine Environmental Response Policy.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
TOWARDS A COMMON GOAL Coordinating actions under the Clean Water Act (FWPCA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Division of Federal Program Activities Sikes Act Coordination Activities Fish and Wildlife Service.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Information Presentation to YBFEPT July.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
Interagency Coordination in Long Range Transportation Planning
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Unit 6 NEPA.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
IS YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PREPARED
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act and the Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Presentation Objectives Requirements of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) pertaining to MRERP Cooperating Agencies Team (CAT). How the FWCA will be integrated into the MRERP process. How FWCA activities will be accomplished through the CAT.

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Procedural and permissive law. USFWS coordinates with the various State fish and wildlife agencies USFWS and State fish & wildlife agencies participate with USACE informally and formally in all stages of the planning process. Complements NEPA and MRERP planning processes. Objectives of consultation under FWCA complements MRERP purpose and need to conserve wildlife by: -Preventing loss and damage, and -Providing for development and improvement. FWCA Requirements

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Recommendations made by USFWS and appropriate State agencies under the FWCA shall: – be as specific as practicable – address wildlife conservation – describe impacts and mitigation needs – address opportunities to develop and enhance fish and wildlife The USACE must give full consideration to recommendations made under the FWCA. Final conservation measures are decided by the USACE. FWCA Recommendations

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Methods to convey recommendations: - Planning Aid during Meetings - Planning Aid Memorandum (PAM) - Planning Aid Letter (PAL) - Planning Aid Report (PAR) - Formal Section 2(b) Report FWCA Recommendations

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Provide Technical Assistance –Initial Service evaluation of the study and alternatives –Study needs Asking for information  More than one may be submitted  Does not constitute the final report of the DOI as required by Section 2(b) of the FWCA -Building blocks for 2(b) report FWCA Planning Aid

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision 2(b) Reports End of coordination for formal project planning Contains Service position Recommendations - timing Documents impacts - biology Historical document to monitor impacts and track and evaluate effectiveness of recommendations FWCA Overview

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision FWCA & MRERP Process A USFWS biologist will be taking notes during the CAT meetings to capture the feedback that is given to the USACE by State fish and wildlife agencies that may have relevance to FWCA activities. In the spirit of collaboration, the USFWS encourages agencies to engage and provided feedback during regular CAT meetings.

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision FWCA & MRERP Process Planning Aid Letters (PALs) will be prepared and submitted to the USACE on an as-needed basis. CAT products and meeting summaries are intended to serve the function of capturing the substantive recommendations that would normally be contained in a PAL. A draft FWCA 2(b) report will be published in draft form with the draft MRERP/EIS. A final FWCA report will be submitted to the USACE to accompany the final MRERP-EIS for approval.

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision Summary: Procedural and permissive law FWCA provides opportunity for active participation of USFWS and State fish and game agencies in project planning Fish and wildlife issues become part of decision making/public interest review process Complements NEPA (MRERP and the EIS) FWCA

Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and EIS One River ▪ One Vision QUESTIONS? Carol S. Hale, Fish and Wildlife Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service P.O. Box 710 Yankton, South Dakota Office: (402) Cell: (605)