C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) Thermal Analysis Christine Cottingham LM/GSFC 545 Hume Peabody GSFC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) Qalification/Functional Testing Bob Goeke January 3-4, 2008.
Advertisements

GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Section Mechanical Systems Radiator and X-LAT Assy1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Thermal Modeling and Model Correlation of the LORRI Telescope
MPSRThermal- 1 UCB, Oct 26, 2006 THEMIS MISSION PRE-SHIP REVIEW Thermal Christopher Smith University of California - Berkeley.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) MISSION ASSURANCE Brian Klatt January 3-4, 2008.
FASTRAC Thermal Model Analysis By Millan Diaz-Aguado.
STEREO IMPACT SEP Critical Design Review 2002-Nov-20 TvR IMPACT/SEP Thermal Design John Hawk, GSFC (301)
9 March 2004 GIFTS Blackbody Subsystem Critical Design Review Blackbody Controller 9 March 2004 Scott Ellington
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Telescope Mechanical Design Albert Lin The Aerospace Corporation Mechanical Engineer (310)
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) R. Foster January 3-4, 2008.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) MISSION ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES Brian Klatt September 10-11,
THEMIS Instrument PDR 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 IDPU Mechanical / Thermal Preliminary Design Review Heath Bersch University of California - Berkeley.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct. 2, I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist WBS
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE BRIAN KLATT MISSION ASSURANCE MANAGER.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation 6/27/06 Telescope Mechanical Design1 Albert Lin The Aerospace Corporation (310)
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 Presenter1 Thermal Control R.Eby Impact Boom Stowed and Deployed SWEA STE Magnetometer Bob.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) Installation Procedures/Orbiter Level Test Procedures Robert Goeke.
FM1 Instrument Suite Pre-Ship Review (PSR)Thermal-1UCB, September 21, 2005 THEMIS FM1 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) THERMAL Chris Smith University.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Mechanical Design CRaTER and the Electronics Assembly Matthew Smith Mechanical Engineer (617)
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Environmental Test Planing Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2008.
Sept. 2008EFW INST+SOC PDR IDPU Chassis Mechanical Design and Development Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL
LAT TVAC Test Delta-PDR1 GLAST LAT Project25 May 2005 LAT Environmental Test Planning and Design Delta-Preliminary Design Review 25 May 2005 LAT T-Vac.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Project and Independent Review Activity R. Foster September.
GLAST LAT Project September 15, 2006: Pre-Shipment Review Presentation 8 of 12 Thermal Vacuum Test 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Pre-Shipment Review.
GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Peer Design Review, Mar 17-18, 2003 P. Prat CNRS/IN2P3-LLR Ecole Polytechnique GLAST Large Area Telescope Calorimeter Subsystem Gamma-ray.
F1, F3, F4, F5 PER 1 UCB, June 23, 2006 THEMIS MISSION PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Thermal Christopher Smith Thermal Engineer University of California - Berkeley.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation June 27, 2005Larry Kepko - Data ProcessingPage 1 CRaTER Characterization Data Products & Production.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Spacecraft I&T Mike Golightly September 10-11, 2008.
109-IDPU-Chassis-Donakowski 1 30 Sep – 01 Oct 2009DRAFT RBSP EFW ICDR 109-IDPU-Chassis-Donakowski IDPU Chassis Mechanical Design and Development Bill Donakowski.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Thermal Analysis Huade Tan 6/27/05.
LAT Design Integration and Analysis1 GLAST LAT Project24 May 2005 LAT Monthly Status Review 24 May 2005 Design Integration and Analysis LAT Monthly Status.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 535 IDPU Chassis Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 Thermal Design Christopher Smith RBSP Thermal Engineer Space.
Spacecraft Level Testing and Verification Part 3 1.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CDR v1 Telescope Mechanical Design Albert Lin The Aerospace Corporation Mechanical Engineer (310)
GLAST LAT Project May 25, 2006: Pre-Environmental Test Review Presentation 11 of 12 Thermal Vacuum Test 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Pre-Shipment Review.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation 27 June 2005 Digital Engineering Digital Sub-System Bob Goeke.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Environmental Test Planing Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2007.
Rose Navarro HMI Lead Thermal Engineer
FIELDS MEP Thermal Vacuum Cycling iPER
FIELDS MEP & V5 Pre-Ship Review Thermal Summary
Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016
FIELDS V1234 Thermal Vacuum & Balance Tests iPER Draft
General overview Place : Institue of Space Astrophysic (IAS, Orsay)
FIELDS MEP & V5 Pre-Ship Review Thermal Summary
Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL
CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Engineering Requirements/Design Updates Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2007.
SPP FIELDS V1234 Thermal PSR
Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Capitalization style for Presentation Title is “Title Case”
FIELDS SCM Thermal iPER
LAT Requirements Verification in TVAC
University of California, Berkeley
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Precision Oven Thermal Design
CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Spacecraft Interfaces Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2007.
CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) Instrument Configuration Bob Goeke
Thermal Vacuum Test: Plans and Procedures
Systems Engineering Bob Goeke.
Thermal Control Subsystem
Integration and Test Organization Chart
CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Completed Verification Results Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2007.
CRATER MODEL ASSUMPTIONS
High Performance MLI for Cryogenic Hardware
CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Engineering Requirements/Design Updates Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2008.
JOSH STAMPS ROBIN HEGEDUS
CRaTER Thermal Analysis
LAT Thermal Systems Analysis
THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) Thermal Analysis Christine Cottingham LM/GSFC 545 Hume Peabody GSFC 545 January 3-4, 2008

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Overview Pre-test Analysis Balance Test Setup / Flight Environment versus Test Setup Balance Test Temperatures Balance Testing versus Temperature Cycling Testing Thermal Model Correlation Forward Plan / Work To Be Done Conclusions

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Pre Test Analysis Hume Peabody of NASA GSFC made Thermal Desktop Model in Test Configuration Made pre-test predictions Verified mounting plate heater was adequate CRaTER / TV chamber model CRaTER model with top removed CRaTER model

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Balance Test Setup CRaTER was mounted to a ½” thick aluminum plate in the shape of the flight mounting surface –The radiator side of the mounting plate was black anodize and it looked at the bottom of the chamber shroud 12 Thermocouples were installed on the external surfaces of the instrument and mounting surface Flight like blankets were installed on the instrument (3mil Kapton facing out) –Apertures had 1 layer GBK –Flight blankets will have GBK outer layer (Kapton has same emissivity as GBK) Chamber temperature was run at ambient temperatures for hot case and LN2 temperatures for cold and survival cases –In cold and survival the heaters on the mounting plate held the plate at -30°C and -40°C respectively –Telescope hot case environmental radiation sinks were 21°C verses flight effective radiation sinks of -1°C for –Z and 23°C for +Z

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Balance Test Setup

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Balance Test Temperatures (°C)

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Balance Test Temperatures (°C) vs Thermal Cycle Temperatures Issue: Does the TV cycle bound the ICD temperature limits by at least 10°C? Yes for Hot Case: The hot balance interface temperature ran ~4°C warmer than flight temperature limits due to test setup Pretty Close for Cold Case: The cold TV cycle telescope temperature was 7°C colder than flight temperatures and all other temperatures were 10°C or better Orbiter flight predicts have about 10°C margin to limits for CRaTER interface A waiver will be written against this one temperature and should have no trouble being approved because of the low risk involved

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Balance Test Temperatures

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Balance Test Temperatures

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Thermal Model Correlation

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Thermal Model Correlation Original thermal model vs test temperature was up to 4°C different After correlation most points are within 2°C and two hot case points to within 3°C Two things were changed to the thermal model to correlate it to test data –MLI effective emissivity was changed from 0.03 to 0.01 –Conductance from the feet to the mounting surface was reduced by 50% Need to verify PRT temperature in cold balance case –Doesn’t match near by flight telemetry –Flight telemetry was a little noisy

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Forward Plan / Work to be Done Include in the model where and how power changes in the instrument as the voltage changes –27.0 VDC = > 6.4 watts –31.0 VDC = > 6.6 watts –35.0 VDC = > 6.9 watts Model in the important components on the boards –To ensure limits are met –To make the flight telemetry predictable Develop reduced thermal model Publish Thermal Acceptance Package (joint MIT/GSFC task)

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Conclusions Thermal RFAs have been submitted for closure A waiver will be written for the TV cycle telescope temperature margin to limits Thermal model has been correlated (both GSFC and MIT) Work to be done is understood The thermal performance of CRaTER is understood and is acceptable

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation