So, what exactly is the Opportunity School District? 1.The Opportunity School District (OSD) is a proposed state level bureaucracy that will be created.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Advertisements

AVID Elective Overview
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
2014 Election Ballot Mill Levy Override #3A For the Elizabeth School District Explained.
Idaho Tiered Teacher Licensure May 13, Vision for Tiered Teacher Licensure Attract and retain great teachers in Idaho Identify struggling teachers.
Detroit Public Schools FY 2005 Adopted Budget June 30, 2004.
2016 Charter Review Commission Discussion Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 6, 2015.
IE 2 and CHARTER SYSTEMS Accountability Comparison Sources of Information Governor’s Office of Student Achievement website Georgia Department of Education.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Forsyth County Schools Overview of the Proposed IE 2 Partnership Contract.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
No Time to Lose The Imperatives to Educate A New Majority: Low Income Students in Georgia “One by one their seats were emptied…Here the circle has been.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Context setting, assessment scenarios, and communications.
Los Angeles Unified School District Edgar Zazueta, Chief of Staff-External Affairs Valley Schools Task Force 1/29/14 Los Angeles Unified School District.
Inspiring the Next Generation of Innovators: Students, Parents and Educators Speak Up about Science Education National Report Release NECC – July 1, 2008.
Recommendations Overview Student Success Task Force.
A Survey of Voter Attitudes in Douglas County, Colorado #12459 May 25-26, 2010.
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
Education Reform in New Orleans Public Schools “In the nearly 5 years since Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans a fundamentally different public education.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Charles Pack Jr. WorkKeys and KeyTrain Help Make The Academy of Careers and Technology A West Virginia Exemplary School.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Voting and Elections Who can vote? Anyone over the age of 18, a resident of the state and a US citizen. People who have been convicted of serious crimes.
State Charter Schools Commission of Georgia SCSC Academic Accountability Update State Charter School Performance
Title I Annual Meeting State of School Address
Education Governance structure—traditionally a local affair Usually elected school board decides policy for school district State board of Ed is appointed.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Sandusky City Schools’ Transformation Sub-Committee “The Future of School Facilities” Briefing Document for Community Forum.
Group 6 Michael Berg, Scott Gravitt, Joy Singleton, Gina Smeeton, Amy Wagner.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Edit the text with your own short phrases. To change the sample image, select the picture and delete it. Now click the Pictures icon in the placeholder.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) February.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Policies: Orchestrating the Common Core Mathematics Classroom Ilene W. Straus, Vice President California State.
Opportunity School District Georgia PTA’s Position.
Miller County School System STRATEGIC WAIVERS SCHOOL SYSTEM (IE2) FY17-23.
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) & Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) School Board Meeting, March 20,
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM Haymon-Morris Middle School NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
Crafting a Quality Grant Proposal March, 2016 ACCELERATED COLLEGE CREDIT GRANT.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Legislative Update April 16, FY Budget  Budget in Senate Finance Subcommittee (3/15/13) Budget passed full House on 3/15/13 Base Student.
Opportunity School District Georgia PTA’s Position.
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
FHSD Proposition Howell Information.
Recapture: Purchasing Attendance Credits vs. Detachment
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AUGUST 24, 2017 REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH.
2007 Article VII # ELFA 8 Education, Labor, and Family Assistance
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK JULY 24, 2017 UPDATE REGARDING THE CALIFORNIA VOTER PARTICIPATION RIGHTS ACT (CVPRA) AND THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S.
So, what exactly is the Opportunity School District?
Wirral SEN/D Picture.
Ch. 11 (textbook) Voting & Elections.
Keep Georgia Schools Local Campaign
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
“Accessing College Through Comprehensive Early Outreach, State Partnerships, and Simplification Act”
Roles and Responsibilities
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Voting & Elections Chapter 9.
CCRPI Overview and FAQs
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Presentation transcript:

So, what exactly is the Opportunity School District? 1.The Opportunity School District (OSD) is a proposed state level bureaucracy that will be created to take over schools that have scored “60” or below on Georgia’s College and Career Readiness Index (CCRPI) for three consecutive years. 2.This new state level bureaucracy is an idea taken from other areas of the country like Katrina devastated New Orleans. 3.The OSD is a state takeover plan that would grant special powers to a new superintendent answering directly and only to the governor. 4.Although a new state-wide level authority, this new OSD superintendent is not required to or expected to work in concert with the current elected State Superintendent of Schools. 5.The OSD will be enacted and legitimized by an amendment of the Georgia State Constitution. 6.This constitutional amendment will be voted on by the public as a referendum that will appear on the ballot when the country goes to the polls to vote in the coming general elections, the first Tuesday of November.

When would the Opportunity School District start the “take over” of local schools? 1.Schools will be added to the list for takeover by the OSD as early as Jan. 1, Once selected, a school will remain under the supervision of the OSD for a minimum of five consecutive years. 3.If a school earns a rating above 60 on the CCRPI for three consecutive years, it will be released from the OSD. 4.The maximum term a school will remain under the supervision of the OSD is 10 years.

Why should the OSD be important to me and my community? 1.Without any consultation with the local community, the new OSD superintendent is empowered to:  Close down any school,  Reorganize staff, fire and replace teachers and principals at will,  Transfer any school to the State Charter Schools Commission, or  Direct local school boards to make changes at an OSD schools via private contract. 2.The entire local community of parents, educators, and other stakeholders are will lose their voice in local school affairs. 3.The historic and long appreciated demonstration of trust and access of the entire local community of parents, educators, and other stakeholders to its locally-elected school boards will lose purpose and value. 4.The OSD will reduce all the social factors, personal circumstance, challenge, discovery and adjustments relevant to each child and that child’s entire school community to a simple “failing” number. A

Why should the OSD be important to me and my community? 1.There is no data supported evidence that the OSD will be successful. 2.Data used to justify the empowerment of the OSD are inconsistent and have not been adequately tested by time. 3.Data show that student progress – despite from particularly under-resourced lower starting points – for OSD selected schools has been more significant than the progress of other usually higher performing schools in Georgia. 4.The CCRPI, the measurement used to determine OSD eligibility, has changed several times since its implementation. 5.The OSD plan lacks transparency and does not address why students and schools are struggling. B

Why should the OSD be important to me and my community? 1.The OSD legitimizes a history of ignoring what local communities of parents, educators, and other stakeholders have long petitioned for to help them close gaps in the tailored process of developing the potential of each child. 2.The Office of School Improvement and School Turnaround at the GaDOE already provides the lowest performing schools with special funding and support. Instead of creating more bureaucratic duplication, local communities should be supported in influencing how such special funding can be better targeted for measurable outcomes. 3.In the November 2016 election, the language of the referendum to allow for the OSD constitutional amendment is crafted in a way that will surely confused voters to vote against all of the above stated points highlighting their own local liberties and interests: C  Shall the Constitution of Georgia be amended to allow the state to intervene in chronically failing public schools in order to improve student performance?

How will funding the OSD affect me or my local community? 1.The OSD gives the state control over local assets – actual local tax dollars and local facilities. 2.Local communities continue to retain liability for local schools while the state seizes control of the assets of the schools. 3.The facilities of selected schools that are transferred to the supervision of the OSD will then be controlled by the OSD. 4.Acquired assets such as textbooks, technology, media resources, instructional equipment, and all other resources will all be controlled by the OSD at the discretion of the OSD superintendent. 5.The OSD will be empowered to contract out any maintenance and repair of school buildings, but the local board and the local community will continue to be responsible for extensive repairs and capitol expenses, even if such conceivable major expenses result from poor maintenance and repair. $

What can I do to prepare my community for the OSD takeover attempt? 1.Each community of parents, educators, and stakeholders concerned about the OSD takeover should use the coming months to educate all of the local community about the OSD and initiate and facilitate thorough discussions. 2.Teachers and school leaders should use CCRPI data to demonstrate upward progress at the local level and encourage open and honest community discussion about resources needed to assist struggling students. 3.We all should explain to our communities how utilizing only the CCRPI Single Score is an incomplete method to address struggling schools. A

What can I do to prepare my community for the OSD takeover attempt? 1.We should explore ways to clearly illustrate that schools identified as potential candidates for the Opportunity Schools District generally have lower overall scores than others in the state.  As measured by the CCRPI, these schools are also showing greater progress and growth and are moving their students in a positive direction 2.We should persistently spread the valid point that OSD-eligible schools are almost entirely comprised of poor, minority students.  Over 90% of students in the OSD schools are participating in the free and reduced lunch program  Disproportionately, almost 95% of the students of OSD targeted schools are either black or Hispanic  In contrast, the High Achieving schools have under a third of their students in the free and reduced lunch program and only about a quarter of their students are black or Hispanic  Both of these facts are reflective of national trends in what impacts student achievement B