DRE ESSENTIAL TRAINING GRADUATION RATES At-risk and NCLB SDPBC January 17, 2012 Marc Baron – Chief, Performance Accountability Mark Howard – Director,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Track Performance Division of Performance Accountability.
Achievement of Hmong Students in Saint Paul Public Schools Hmong Youth Educational Services Banquet – June 2006 Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Florida Department of Education Value-added Model (VAM) FY2012 Using Student Growth in Teacher and School Based Administrator Evaluations.
FTE & Student Reporting GRADUATION RATE ESSENTIAL TRAINING PJ D’Aoust, Director or px
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Algebra Accountability and Acceleration Students and Schools Middle Schools May 2012.
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
Changes and Impacts A & S May  Accountability History  Accountability Changes and Impact  Discussion 2.
DRE ESSENTIAL TRAINING GRADUATION RATES SDPBC January 9, 2012.
Archived Information. MPR Associates 1 Effective Performance Measurement Systems  Define valid and reliable measures of student performance  Use appropriate.
Embargoed until 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 17, 2004 School Report Card Data 2002–2003.
New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
How Does Secondary Education in Louisiana Stack up? Presented by Dr. Bobby Franklin January 31, 2005.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) – Initial Designation.
DRE Agenda Student Learning Growth – Teacher VAM – School Growth PYG Area Scorecards. PYG, and other Performance Indicators.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Top-performing urban school district in Florida State Assessment & Accountability.
Florida Department of Education Value-added Model (VAM) FY2012 Using Student Growth in Teacher and School Based Administrator Evaluations.
NOVEMBER 12, 2013 Math Department Team Leaders’ Meeting.
Data Driven: Using District Comparisons Capital Region ESD October 22, 2014 Tim Stensager, Director of Data Governance Division of Assessment and Student.
Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.
Our Learning Benchmarks Broward County Public Schools Presented by: Laurel E. Thompson.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
DRE Raising Expectations for Florida’s Students FCAT 2.0 and Algebra I End of Course Levels Revised Recommendation by Florida’s Education Commissioner.
Western Heights Public Schools February 15, 2013 A District’s Implementation of Cohort-Based Accountability: Tracking Academic Performance and Non-Academic.
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
A & S December 14, 2010 DRE Graduation Rates High School Grades.
Overview “School Grading Rule” 6A Proposed CS/SB 1522 ESEA Waiver CAO March 2012.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Accountability Update School Grade Changes Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Accountability and Testing March 14, 2012.
DRE Developing Achievement Levels for FCAT 2.0 and Algebra 1 A & S October 11, 2011.
ESSENTIAL TRAINING COLLEGE READINESS SDPBC January 17, 2012 Marc Baron – Chief, Performance Accountability Mark Howard – Director, Research, Evaluation.
Graduation Rate: A Process; A Product New Hanover County Schools September 2012.
Florida Department of Education’s Florida Department of Education’s Teacher Evaluation System Student Learning Growth.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
1 Proposed Changes to School Grades for and Beyond.
Accountability and School Grades FY 16 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting March 17, 2016 Everglades Preparatory Academy.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Accountability and School Grades FY 17 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting August 24, 2016 Pew Center.
Cohort Study of Arts Participation and Academic Performance.
Mark Howard, Chief Performance Accountability
Legislative Requirement 2013
2016 Annual Dropout and Cohort Graduation Rates
The U.S. Higher Education Landscape: Equity Lens Applied
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Discipline Identification and Reporting
Hickory Public Schools Accountability Update - Math
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Cohort Study of Arts Participation and Academic Performance
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Essential Skills Update Oregon State Board of Education March 8, 2012
Cohort: Essential Skills Update
AEIS & AYP Board Templates
Presentation transcript:

DRE ESSENTIAL TRAINING GRADUATION RATES At-risk and NCLB SDPBC January 17, 2012 Marc Baron – Chief, Performance Accountability Mark Howard – Director, Research, Evaluation and Assessment

DRE Data FDOE has not yet provided the FINAL data file used to calculate Graduation Rates Therefore, SDPBC had to use a preliminary file for the data found in the sorting applications Values may be slightly different than what was reported for Graduation Rate

DRE Guiding Questions Compared to standard Compared to self Compared to others

DRE Support DRE Website – PowerPoint – Link to Sorting Apps Profiles Listings

DRE How Can Schools Sort and Compare? 1.School Profiles of NGA Grad Rate (Compare to self) 1.Wcodes (Graduation Codes) 2.Groups by 1.All or At-risk 2.Graduation Codes 2.School Listings of NGA Grad Rate (Compare to others) 1.Schools by 1.Group 2.All or At-risk 3.Graduation Codes Compared to standard Compared to self Compared to others

DRE How Can Schools View Their Profile: By Wcode? Any High School

DRE How Can Schools View Their Profile: By Group and By Wcode? Any High School

DRE How Can Schools Sort and Compare?

DRE FY11 SDPBC NGA Graduation Rate: Disaggregated by Group

DRE FY11-FY10 SDPBC NGA Graduation Rate: Disaggregated by Group

DRE FY11-FY10 Percentage Difference for Selected Graduation Codes: District ELL Nonattend Unknown Std. Dip. Std. Dip. Credit Assessment Concordant Deficient Deficient

DRE SCHOOL A

DRE FY11 School A NGA Graduation Rate: Disaggregated by Group

DRE SchoolFY11 PercentFY10-FY11 Diff School 100.0%0.3% School 99.7%0.0% School 94.6%-2.0% School 93.9%-0.1% School 93.9%-0.2% School 93.0%-0.7% School 92.2%-2.4% School 90.4%-2.7% School 88.2%1.7% School 87.5%-3.1% School 87.4%-1.1% School 86.9%-1.3% School 85.8%-2.3% School A 81.8%1.4% School 80.7%-5.9% School 80.7%-1.8% School 78.2%-4.6% School 77.8% School 76.6%-7.5% School 76.1%-9.6% School 75.9%-5.6% School 73.0%-9.0% FY11 NGA Graduation Rates

DRE FY11-FY10 School A NGA Graduation Rate: Disaggregated by Group

DRE School A FY10 Cohort Cnt FY10 CntFY10 % FY11 Cohort Cnt FY11 CntFY11 % Count Diff Percent Diff D-W % %-9-1.6% D-W % %-2-0.3% D-W % %50.7% G-W % %629.4% G-W % %10.1% G-W %.00.0%-2-0.3% G-WFT % % % G-WFW % %10.1% N-W % % % N-W % %00.0% N-W % %-2-0.3% N-W8A % %183.0% N-WGA %.00.0%-0.1% D G N D-W15 D-W22 G-W06 G-WFT N-W01 N-W8A

DRE FY11-FY10 Percentage Difference for Selected Graduation Codes: School A Haitian Nonattend Unknown Std. Dip. Std. Dip. Credit Assessment Concordant Deficient Deficient

DRE Graduation Rate for At-risk Students At-risk students are those who scored at Level 2 or below on both the FCAT reading and FCAT math tests in grade 8. Source: FDOE

DRE Who Makes Up The FY11 SDPBC At-risk Student Graduation Cohort? ELL HISP ESE FRL ELL HAITIAN BLACK HISPANIC WHITE MULTI ASIAN AM IND 17% of Graduation Cohort

DRE FY11 SDPBC NGA At-risk Graduation Rate: Disaggregated by Group

DRE SchoolFY11 PercentFY10-FY11 Diff School100.0%0.0% School84.6%1.7% School83.6%0.1% School83.5%-5.4% School81.6%-0.2% School81.6%-1.9% School78.6%-3.6% School77.6%-6.1% School77.3%0.9% School75.8%-5.3% School A74.5%0.8% School73.3%-8.4% School70.8%-10.3% School67.2%-5.0% School65.0%-15.8% School65.0%-5.7% School63.9%-13.7% School63.1%-16.8% School62.3%-13.0% School61.7%-13.7% School61.2%-15.3% School60.0%-8.9% FY11 NGA At-risk Graduation Rates

DRE FY11-FY10 SDPBC NGA At-risk Graduation Rate: Disaggregated by Group

DRE FY11-FY10 Percentage Difference for Selected Graduation Codes: District At-Risk ELL Hispanic Nonattend Unknown Std. Dip. Std. Dip. Credit Assessment Concordant Deficient Deficient

DRE SCHOOL A

DRE Who Makes Up The FY11 School A At-risk Student Graduation Cohort? ELL HISP ESE FRL ELL HAITIAN BLACK HISPANIC WHITE MULTI ASIAN AM IND 24% of Graduation Cohort

DRE FY11 School A NGA At-risk Graduation Rate: Disaggregated by Group

DRE FY11-FY10 School A NGA At-risk Graduation Rate: Disaggregated by Group

DRE FY11-FY10 Percentage Difference for Selected Graduation Codes: School A At-risk White Nonattend Unknown Std. Dip. Std. Dip. Credit Assessment Concordant Deficient Deficient

DRE How Can Schools Sort and Compare?

DRE SchoolFY11 PercentFY10-FY11 Diff School 70.0%-3.0% School 64.1%3.4% School 63.2%-14.1% School 63.0%-0.7% School 61.1%-2.5% School 58.3%8.3% School 56.7%-8.0% School 55.2%3.2% School 52.6%6.9% School 51.7%-11.5% School A 50.0%-2.0% School 48.0%-33.8% School 44.4%-3.2% School 34.6%-6.8% School 33.3% FY11 NGA At-risk White W06 Rates

DRE SchoolFY11 PercentFY10-FY11 Diff School 89.7%8.0% School 88.9%1.0% School 88.9%-2.0% School 80.0%-1.1% School 79.5%-5.8% School 78.9%-2.9% School 75.9%-6.1% School 73.3%-12.0% School 72.2%-4.0% School 68.4%-0.2% School 68.0%-22.9% School 66.7%8.3% School 65.4%-10.2% School A63.6%-20.4% School 41.7% FY11 NGA At-risk White Graduation Rates

DRE Guiding Questions Summary Guiding QuestionsGraduation RateAt-Risk Rate Standard No Groups at 100%3 of 8 Groups greater than 75% Self 6 of 9 Groups increased Haitian largest decrease WFT largest decrease 4 of 8 Groups increased White largest decrease WFT largest decrease Others Middle of High Schools W06 among the top of High Schools Middle of High Schools W06 among the top of High Schools

Questions?