PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS March 13, 2014 Wifi: EnglishWLan PW:BostonEnglish1821 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Advertisements

Performance Evaluation
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Natick Public Schools.
Defining and Supporting Effective Teaching through Educator Evaluation May 10, 2015.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
SMART Goals and Educator Plan Development
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
NAPS Educator Evaluation Spring 2014 Update. Agenda Evaluation Cycle Review Goal Expectations and Rubric Review SUMMATIVE Evaluation Requirements FORMATIVE.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Tuesday, July 30
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
EEF SESSION #3 MARCH 2013 Analyzing & Documenting Progress Toward Goals Please have a seat and fill out the reflection sheet (Do Now)
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
Working Portfolios For Non Classroom Teachers. Agenda Determine Working Portfolio rubric Understand the performance levels and scoring Brainstorm possible.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS FACILITATORS SESSION #2 JANUARY 2013 Unpacking Well-Structured Lessons.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Educator Performance Evaluation Office of Educator Effectiveness January 31, 2013.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Wednesday, July 31 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Next Steps Prepared by the MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice January 2012.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview August 4, 2015 and August 10, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 3 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Using the CAP Rubric Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 1: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, Oct 7 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, October 21 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
My Learning Plan Observation and Appraisal SYStem
Blackstone Innovation School Supervision and Evaluation SY September 10, 2013 Café nook 3:30-5:00.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, October 28 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Educator Plans Overview
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Formative Assessments and Observations on EDFS
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Documenting Your Work Through Artifacts November 2012
Improving student achievement through teacher observation and feedback
Unpacking Effective Instruction
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Evaluation Cycle At-A-Glance
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS March 13, 2014 Wifi: EnglishWLan PW:BostonEnglish1821 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness

Today’s Agenda Opening Writing Evaluations Putting it all Together Breakouts  Directed Growth & Improvement plans  Navigating the EDFS on the Training Site  Evaluations in the Central Office Closing

Introductions  Angela Rubenstein, Office of Human Capital  Chason Ishino, Office of Human Capital

Objectives of the training Objective 1: Evaluators will know how to implement the new system and how to get it done and done well technical piece of implementation evaluation best practices

Overall goals of the training Objective 2: Evaluators will leave with concrete, specific plans for implementation in their school, including how to: Use the evaluation system to further their school priorities Talk with teachers about the evaluation system

Overall goals of the training Objective 3: Evaluators will leave knowing the specific responsibilities of evaluators and teachers under the new evaluation system.

Implementation Stage of the Five-Step Cycle Self- Assessment Analysis, goal-setting, & plan development Implementation of the plan Formative Assessment /Evaluation Summative Evaluation

Today’s Agenda Opening Writing Evaluations Putting it all Together Breakouts  Directed Growth & Improvement plans  Navigating the EDFS on the Training Site  Evaluations in the Central Office Closing

Writing Evaluations The basics Evaluations on EDFS Examples

Every evaluation includes ratings on goals & standards Progress on Proficiency in OVERALL 2 Goals 4 Standards RATING Student Learning Professional Practice I. Curriculum, Planning and Assessment* II. Teaching All Students* III. Family & Community Engagement IV. Professional Culture Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory

What is a formative assessment? A mid-plan check-in  rating on progress towards each goal  rating on each standard A document that considers all evidence  observations to date  artifacts to date It may be used to change a plan  If there is a significant change in practice, however, this is not mandatory. The plan may continue until the summative.

What is a summative evaluation? A summary at the end of the plan  rating on progress towards each goal  rating on each standard A document that considers all evidence  the formative assessment  observations & artifacts since the formative  consistency or change in practice since the formative The overall rating determines the next plan * Information from the formative can be filtered into the summative

How ratings determine next educator plan

Not the “evaluation” of the past Evaluations are NOT write-ups of individual, formal observations.

Formative Assessment & Summative Evaluation Meetings  Upon request of educator or evaluator  Required for Summative if the overall rating is NI or Unsatisfactory  Recommended for all educators

Formative Assessment & Summative Evaluation Plan TypeEvaluation TypeDeadline Improvement or Directed (less than 1 year) Formative Assessment / Summative Evaluation dates established by evaluator 1-Year Self-Directed or Developing Formative AssessmentJanuary 13* 1-Year Self-Directed or Developing Summative EvaluationMay 15 2-Year Self-DirectedFormative EvaluationJune 1 (year 1) 2-Year Self-DirectedSummative EvaluationMay 15 (year 2)

Evaluations in EDFS

Formative Assessment Step 1 Step 2

Evaluations in EDFS

Evaluations in EDFS: Rating Goals

Evaluations in EDFS: Rating Standards

Evaluations in EDFS: Overall Rating

Evaluations in EDFS: Prescriptions Prescriptions for any standard in which an educator is rated NI or UNSAT.

Evaluations in EDFS: Comments Comments are optional for both the evaluator & the educator

Evaluations in EDFS: Ending Current Plan

Evaluations in EDFS: Release

Evaluations in EDFS: Sign-Off

Primary & Secondary Evaluators  Department managers assign primary & secondary evaluators  Each educator can only have 1 primary, multiple secondary  Primary evaluators approve goals/action steps, & create evaluations.  Secondary evaluators can view & comment on goals/action steps/evaluations.  All evaluators are able to upload artifacts & observations.

Evaluation Examples Read the example on pg.11 What do you notice about how evidence is used?

Rationales for Ratings Standard I. Curriculum, Planning, & Assessment Rating Exemplary, Proficient, Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory Rationale Claim/Connection to rubric: Evidence 1: Evidence 2: Evidence 3: Rationale: What claim can you make? What is the evidence to support it (artifacts, observations)?

Rationales for Ratings Standard I. Curriculum, Planning, & Assessment Rating Exemplary, Proficient, Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory Rationale Claim/Connection to rubric: Evidence 1: Evidence 2: Evidence 3: Rationale: What claim can you make? What is the evidence to support it (artifacts, observations)?

Reflect What are the implications of what we just discussed for your practice? For your school community?

Today’s Agenda Opening Writing Evaluations Putting it all Together Breakouts  Directed Growth & Improvement plans  Navigating the EDFS on the Training Site  Evaluations in the Central Office Closing

The Evaluation Cycle Self- Assessment Analysis, goal-setting, & plan development Implementation of the plan Formative Assessment/E valuation Summative Evaluation

Evaluation from start to finish  Establish school goals & priorities  Support teachers in setting goals & action steps Additional supports for Developing, Directed, & Improvement  Communicate expectations  Observe & provide feedback  Complete a formative based on all evidence  Continue to observe & provide feedback  Complete a summative based on all evidence

The Evaluation Cycle Plan out & schedule your points of contact: Use EDFS as a guide:

Planning the work at your school Mary’s document

Planning the work at your school Guiding Questions: What has your school done to support staff with the evaluation process? What additional supports do you think would be helpful? What are ways of structuring this support at the school? What timelines should guide the work? How can you and your team find the time to do this well?

Today’s Agenda Opening Writing Evaluations Putting it all Together Breakouts  Directed Growth & Improvement plans  Navigating the EDFS on the Training Site  Evaluations in the Central Office Closing

Directed Growth and Improvement plans Considerations: Choosing length Using a calendar to calculate dates of formative assessment and summative evaluation Writing goals from prescriptions Developing the Action Plan, including supports and timelines Collection of evidence Supports: “Did I” sheets and timelines

Timelines and Requirements

Working with teachers rated NI or U You can change the plan at the time of the formative assessment (though a formative assessment does not HAVE to change the plan).

Today’s Agenda Opening Writing Evaluations Putting it all Together Breakouts  Directed Growth & Improvement plans  Co-evaluators & teacher evaluators  Your own evaluation Closing

What progress have we made toward the objectives of the training? Objective 1: Evaluators will know how to implement the new system and how to get it done and done well technical piece of implementation evaluation best practices

What progress have we made toward the objectives of the training? Objective 2: Evaluators will leave with concrete, specific plans for implementation in their school, including how to: Use the evaluation system to further their school priorities Talk with teachers about the evaluation system

What progress have we made toward the objectives of the training? Objective 3: Evaluators will leave knowing the specific responsibilities of evaluators and teachers under the new evaluation system.

Resources, Support, Questions, and Feedback For more information, visit:  EDFS:  OEE website: questions, comments, and feedback to:  MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Evaluation (DESE) Evaluation Site: 

Contact us if you have questions NetworkEvaluation Support TeamBPS AEmily Qazilbasheqazilbash BKris Taylorktaylor CNicole Irelandnireland DAngela Rubensteinarubenstein EJared Joinerjjoiner FLeah Levinellevine2 High SchoolsChason Ishino & Theresa O’Neillcishino, toneill

Please complete the exit ticket, and stay in touch!