Monitored PDPs, Directed PDPs, Discretionary Assistance Plans, Mandatory Improvement Plans What are they? When do I use them? How do I write them?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
We will lead the nation in improving student achievement. CLASS Keys SM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement Spring 2010 Teacher and.
Advertisements

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Teacher Performance Assessment System The Processes.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
North Carolina Educator Effectiveness System Training Script.
North Carolina Educator Effectiveness System Training Script.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information. Primary Evaluators All teachers will be assigned one Administrator to be the Primary Evaluator. The primary evaluator.
Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,
Project Control Techniques
Human Resources Dr. Walter Jackson, III Assistant Superintendent
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Teacher PDP for the School Year
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
ADEPT Framework
Writing Two ‘Online’ LEA Perspectives Craven County Schools Mike Tart, ELA/Writing Learning Systems Coach Cindy Manning, LEA Test Coordinator.
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
Portfolio based assessment - options for the new CGEA.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
2016 EDUCATOR & EVALUATION SYSTEM AND OASYS UPDATES.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information.  The primary evaluator will assign the final rating  The primary evaluator will take the lead on any Performance.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Beaufort County Schools April 19, 2012.
Maximizing RANDA Reports for Directors and Principals Erin Brophy-Lindo Educator Effectiveness Director HR 2015.
NCEES Train the Trainer September 25, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
BASELINE EDGE DOVER SHERBORN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SEPTEMBER 2013.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 Instructional Collaboration Day II January 3, 2014.
2012 MEGA eCIP PPT PART 2. Part IV Part V: Federal Requirements.
Teacher’s PDP for the School Year October, 2012.
Andy Wilson – Team Manager HR Education (School Teacher Appraisal) (England) Regulations 2012 A briefing for Heads and Governors.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
Teacher Keys Evaluation Systems Student Surveys Principals Supporting Principal Survey Preparation Ms. Collingsworth, Dr. Thomas, and Mr. Benedict.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Employee discipline and management
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Low-Performing Schools Evaluation Requirements
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
KDE School Assurances Due October 24, 2018
Teacher Evaluation Process
Local Option Plan for Analysis of Student Work (ASW)
CLASS KeysTM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Monitored PDPs, Directed PDPs, Discretionary Assistance Plans, Mandatory Improvement Plans What are they? When do I use them? How do I write them?

PURPOSE Assisting teachers to proficiency Remain in this mindset

Monitored PDP When to use? – Teacher rated developing on one or more standards (not elements) on summary evaluation – Not recommended for dismissal, demotion, or non- renewal Who develops? – Teacher and principal develop together – PDP will pre-populate with areas from summative Select top 2 items that will result in most improvement in shortest amount of time

Monitored PDPs contd. When developed? – Start of year based on previous year summative – Conference with teacher and principal – Takes more time than Individual or Directed to write/develop When does it start? – Beginning of year for one school year – Why then? – One school year to reach proficiency

Directed PDPs When to use? – Teacher rated “not demonstrated” on any standard (not element) on summative – Teacher rated “developing” on one or more standards for two consecutive years (does not have to be the same standard) – Not recommended for dismissal, demotion, or non-renewal Who develops? – Principal

Directed PDPs contd. When developed? – Start of year based on previous year summative – Conference with teacher and principal – Principal gives to teacher and reviews When does it start? – Beginning of year for one year – Why then? – One school year or less to reach proficiency (as determined by LEA)

Discretionary Assistance Plans When to use? – During school year as issues arise in relation to performance – Documented evidence on evaluation/observation or other records – Teacher not recommended for dismissal, demotion, or non-renewal Who develops? – Principal (may include teacher)

Discretionary Assistance Plan contd. When is it developed? – As needed during school year – Based on evaluation or observation When does it start? – As needed during school year – Time/dates set by principal but should be at least 60 instructional days – Specific time/date set to reach proficiency LOCAL OPTION ADOPTED BY CCS BOE

Mandatory Improvement Plans When to use? – Teacher rated below proficiency – Not recommended for dismissal, demotion or non-renewal immediately – Monitored or Directed PDP will/have not addressed the issue satisfactorily (determined by superintendent) Who develops? – Principal and HR

Mandatory Improvement Plans When developed? – When monitored and/or directed do not prove successful – When sudden need to document serious issues during school year that could lead to dismissal, non-renewal When does it start? – May be during school year (usually) – Determined by principal and HR

Mandatory Improvement Plans Length? – No less than 60 instructional days – (No less than 90 if low performing school) Qualified Observer – List on HR website in teacher evaluation toolbox KEY – Must be working with HR closely on a Mandatory – Serves as “final” step for possible dismissal, non- renewal

This and That Monitored takes time – allow for this in scheduling conferences All written on areas below proficient ALL prepopulated PDPs will show all elements below proficient – Teachers should put the standard and element being addressed in the first box to clarify – If proficient on the standard, do not have to work on prepopulated elements Mandatory Imp Plan takes priority over PDP

Keys to Success Progression of efforts – Informal (oral) – Written – Plan (Monitored, Directed, Discretionary) – Mandatory Improvement Plan Documentation, documentation, documentation,..... – Very specific and factual – Very detailed

Practice and Application Sample Monitored PDP Sample Directed PDP Sample Discretionary Assistance Plan

McRel Processes x.com/home/ncval/demo/ x.com/home/ncval/demo/ Log in to McRel – User ID: principaldemo24 – Password: – Cody, Eder What year teacher (teacher status on summary rating) What kind of plan is he on? How do you know?

Writing Plans for In McRel – Begin with any Directed PDPs – Move to drafts of Monitored PDPs Discretionary – Templates on HR website – Teacher evaluation toolbox Mandatory – Template located in the toolbox