Mission Erie 1 BOCES commits to those we serve students, staff and communities by understanding, anticipating and responding to their needs. Administrative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
DPS Educator Effectiveness: Stakeholder Engagement Lessons Learned February 6, 2013.
EngageNY.org Identifying CCSS-Aligned Instruction Recognizing Effective Instructional Practices.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Differentiated Supervision
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Successful Practices Network Annual Professional Performance Review and CTE Carol Ann Zygo, Field Team Associate of Central And Northern.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Broome-Tioga BOCES Network Team… the ENTIRE team! (Pat Walsh, Barb Phillips, Jennifer Dove)
Lead Evaluator Training
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition Forrest W. Parkay Chapter 13 Becoming a Professional Teacher Parkay ISBN: © 2013, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education,
Teacher Lead Evaluator Training Module 3 Presenters: Dr. Regina Cohn Dr. Robert Greenberg January 2013.
Day 8. Agenda Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability Growth-Producing Feedback.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Regents Reform Agenda Update as of November 2012 C-A Teachers' Resource Center-- J. Robinson, director 1 A special thank you to Jill Robinson, Director.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Ongoing Training Day 4. Agenda Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and.
August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review SLOs: Lessons Learned A Look at Some Evidence Planning School Visits Supporting Principals Closure.
WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Inter- Rater Reliability and the Co-Teaching Classroom STEVE GRASER & JESSIE KARCHES.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Technical Support Webinar May 8, 2012 Presented by: Broome-Tioga BOCES RTTT Network Team.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Day 4. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) – A Teacher Tool for Implementing the CCSS AGENDA October 4 th and 5 th 2012 Outcomes: Self- reflections on how the.
NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Overview of Network Team Plan.  Deliverable Metrics are being finalized  Assessment of Network Team Deliverables ◦ Principals ◦ Teachers ◦ District.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Office of Special Education
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Implementing Race to the Top
Assessment and Units of Study
Presentation transcript:

Mission Erie 1 BOCES commits to those we serve students, staff and communities by understanding, anticipating and responding to their needs. Administrative Leadership Service NYSED Requirements Outlined in (b) All evaluators must be appropriately trained, but only lead evaluators need to be certified to conduct evaluations. Districts will be required to provide appropriate training and certify their lead evaluators. State developed evaluator training will be provided to Network Teams (for teacher evaluation). The Erie 1 BOCES Network team will be able to “turn-key” the training to participating school districts. Districts may choose to take advantage of this training program or they may develop or contract for their own training and evaluator certification programs. Website:

Year 1 – 3: Compliance Focus: APPR Guidance and Regulation: Distribution of information Inter-Rater Reliability (Videos) SLO development Teacher Standards and Evaluation Resources: SED and NTI

Year Promising Practices in Principal Evaluation Inter Rater Reliability: Teacher Evaluation Lessons Learned from SLOs Bridging the CCLS and Evaluation The Role of Data in RttT New Administrator Training

Year APPR Updates and Inter-Rater Reliability Inter Rater Reliability: Teacher Evaluation Analyzing & Improving the SLO Process Metrics & Instructional Implications Experiencing the Tri-State Rubric, Evidence Collection Tool & Shifts in ELA New Administrator Training Data Driven Instruction SWDs and ELLS

Year APPR Evaluator Workshop Data Analysis and APPR Special Expo: Stem for Evaluators NYSED Accountability Data and Inter Rater Reliability in the Co- Taught Classroom Data Analysis and Inter Rater Reliability with ELLs New Administrator Training

Evaluating Best Practice and Research Focus: Educational Research and Best practice in classrooms providing Growth producing and Evidence based feedback around best practice and instruction. Presentations included E1B District initiatives modeling engagement strategies (Kagan, Adaptive Schools, Differentiated Instruction, Collaborative Teaching, EDI) Resources: Educational Research, Field Texts and Structures, and SED

Year Brad Geise's presentation Student Engagement Managing Classrooms Communicating with Students Questioning and Discussion Blueprint for Special Education and Multiple Pathways New Administrator Training

Why? InfluenceEffect SizeSource of Influence Feedback1.13Teacher Instructional quality 1.00 Teacher Direct instruction.82 Teacher Remediation/feedback.65Teacher Student's disposition to learn.61 Student Class environment.56 Teacher Challenge of Goals.52Teacher Questioning.41Teacher

The Series Student Engagement : Neural Fatigue, Interrelated Neural Systems, (Danielson 3C) Managing Classrooms : Disruptions, behavior management, setting limits, (Danielson 2 and 3A) Communicating with Students : Expectations, directions, written/oral language, (Danielson 3A) Questioning and Discussion : Level of questions, wait time, discussion, (Danielson 3B) Special Education and Pathways: Blueprint, Multiple Pathways (Danielson 1 b-d, 4b,c)

Collaborative Feedback

Question: Based on your knowledge of Athenian Democracy would implementing a direct democracy in our local government improve our quality of life?

Provide Feedback around the scenario/question on the table- you may suggest an alternative Pass card clockwise Underline or highlight the words that are most important to you Pass clockwise and repeat with next card until returned to author Using the underlined words create a new question based on the feedback that your table provided and write it on the index card on your table