1. 6/27/2016 2 VD-HCBS Status Map Operational VD-HCBS Programs States 27 and the District of Columbia VISNs17 out of 21 VAMCs47 out of 154 Aging & Disability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAPP Process & Outcome Evaluation
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
ADRC Implementation Funding Work Group July 2, 2012.
Julie Larsen LCSW VD-HCBS Program Coordinator SLC VAMC.
Employment in a Medicaid Environment: State Agencies’ Strategic Investment in System Improvements to Increase Employment Outcomes APSE June 2012 Rie Kennedy-Lizotte.
Creating a Blueprint for NCCF Affiliate Success. Why is this work necessary? To achieve greater impact in our local communities and together achieve greater.
Reaching Rural Veterans A Partnership Model to Connect Rural Veterans with Aging and Disability Resource Centers for Options Counseling.
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
May 5, 2015 Strategies for Evaluation Data Collection Eric Graig, Ph.D.
MAKING A CASE FOR EXPANDING SHARED LIVING IN PENNSYLVANIA.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Version 1 | Internal Use Only© Ipsos MORI 1 Version 1| Internal Use Only Sheffield CCG CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Karol Swartzlander & Ed Ahern California Health and Human Services Agency LTSS Advisory Committee March 7, 2014.
Results from 2014 NHSRU-KTEP Environmental Scan Prepared for Policy to Practice – Investing in Your Workforce September 15, 2014 Prepared by the Nursing.
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
Affordable Care Act Aging Network Opportunities Judy Baker Regional Director Health and Human Services October 18, 2010.
What is an ADRC? A ging and D isability R esource C onnection serve as a single point of entry into the long-term supports and services system for older.
UPDATE NOVEMBER 10, 2011 Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration.
Stephanie Hull MGA Conference Chief, Long Term Services and Supports June 7, 2012 Maryland Department of Aging.
DELAWARE HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES Division of State Service Centers Office of Volunteerism The Corporation for National and Community Service.
Balancing Incentive Program and Community First Choice Eric Saber Health Policy Analyst Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Spectrum of Self-Directed Care Maryland, Medicaid Office of Health Services John S. Wilson April 5, 2012 Community First Choice.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning and programming Planning and prioritizing Part 1 Strengthening Statistics Produced.
ASSURANCES, FRAMEWORKS, DOMAINS… OH MY! Everything You Always Wanted to Know About QM Strategies But Were Afraid to Ask.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
Terence Ng MA, Charlene Harrington, PhD Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences University of California, San Francisco 3333 California Street, Suite.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee October 22, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
New Community Opportunities Center at ILRU 0 New Community Opportunities Center at ILRU Presents… New Community Opportunities from the Affordable Care.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
1 FY04 ORS Performance Management Manage Information Technology Team Members: Charlie Jones, Ben Ashtiani, Denny Bermudez, La'Tanya Burton, Ron Edwards,
Measuring and reporting outcomes for BTOP grants: the UW iSchool approach Samantha Becker Research Project Manager U.S. IMPACT Study 1UW iSchool evaluation.
HEALTH CARE AND HUMAN SERVICES POLICY, RESEARCH, AND CONSULTING - WITH REAL-WORLD PERSPECTIVE. Administration on Aging’s Community Living Program: Experiences.
Presented by: Utah Department of Human Services Utah Department of Workforce Services.
AGING & INDEPENDENCE SERVICES San Diego’s Veterans Services At any Age.
VerdierView Graph # 1 OVERVIEW Problems With State-Level Estimates in National Surveys of the Uninsured Statistically Enhancing the Current Population.
Mark Leeds Director of Long Term Care and Community Support Services April 26, 2012 Maryland Medicaid Advisory Committee: Balancing Incentive Program.
Teacher Survey Highlights R&E/LWW May2014.
Sustainability Planning Framework and Process Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 ©
Division of Aging Services State Plan on Aging Georgia Department of Human Services Presenter: Jean O’Callaghan Deputy Director Division of Aging Services.
ATP Meeting September 18, Overview Key components of the 2016 Plan Public Participation Plan Discussion.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING, WASHINGTON DC PHONE | FAX | WEB
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING, WASHINGTON DC PHONE | FAX | WEB
Veterans Directed Home and Community-Based Services Flow Chart February 2009.
January 2012 AoA’s Draft National OC Standards Revision #2.
Veteran Directed Home and Community Based Services: Getting Started AoA & VA Grantee Conference Sandra Barrett National Resource Center for Participant-
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING, WASHINGTON DC PHONE | FAX | WEB
Maryland Access Points and Money Follows the Person Lorraine Nawara Office of Health Services Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING, WASHINGTON DC PHONE | FAX | WEB
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Creating a Consumer Direction Program for an Area Agency on Aging Creating a Consumer Direction Program for an Area Agency on Aging The National Association.
Orientation Serving Mecklenburg County. Welcome Orientation to CRC …an innovative network that will help you better connect with and serve consumers July.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING, WASHINGTON DC PHONE | FAX | WEB
Group Health’s experience September 24, 2015| Kathryn Ramos Implementing CDSME in an integrated health care system.
Care Transitions Intensive. 2 Agenda Open Session (8:00 – 10:30) AoA Introduction/Overview Cross Cultural Strategies for Strengthening the Relationship.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING, WASHINGTON DC PHONE | FAX | WEB
Area Agency on Aging of Central Texas H. Richard McGhee, AAA Director Thomas Wilson, AAA VD-HCBS Consultant Jim Reed, CTCOG Executive Director.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
HEALTH CARE AND HUMAN SERVICES POLICY, RESEARCH, AND CONSULTING - WITH REAL-WORLD PERSPECTIVE. Administration for Community Living (ACL) and Veterans Health.
Governance: No Wrong Door State of Connecticut. “ ” Governance determines who has power, who makes decisions, how other players make their voice heard.
ADRC in Maryland Maryland Department of Aging Evaluator: Stephanie M. Lyon, Ph.D. Center for Health Program Development and Management University of Maryland,
Upcoming Changes in Dane County system
Upcoming Changes in Dane County System
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Administration for Community Living ACL Resources to Grantees
Presentation transcript:

1

6/27/ VD-HCBS Status Map Operational VD-HCBS Programs States 27 and the District of Columbia VISNs17 out of 21 VAMCs47 out of 154 Aging & Disability Network Sites (SUAs, AAAs, ADRCs) 104

6/27/ VA Update Commitment to future growth and expansion Issuing policy guidance to enhance VD-HCBS Operations Focus on sustainability planning with VAMCs

6/27/ VHA/ACL VDHCBS Sustainability VHA and ACL are focused on assisting VAMCs and A&D Network develop sustainable VD-HCBS Programs 1. Part A 1:1 Sustainability & Expansion Calls 1. Initial and 6-month Follow-up Calls 2. Completion of VD-HCBS Sustainability & Expansion Templates 3. Achieving statewide access and census of 35 Veterans per VAMC 2. VD-HCBS Sustainability Guide (NRCPDS) 3. VD-HCBS Ticker Report

6/27/ VD-HCBS Sustainability What is VD-HCBS Sustainability? 1. Environmental 2. Social 3. Economic Sustainability EnvironmentalSocialEconomic BearableViable Equitable

6/27/ What are the Challenges to VD- HCBS Sustainability Environmental Challenges ► Pressure to reduce non-VA care spending ► Focus on priority issues and dealing with crises at hand ► Competing against other service lines ► Concerns with self-direction? Social Challenges ► Veterans not fully-aware of what it means to self-direct their own care Economic Challenges ► VD-HCBS requires a larger investment in HCBS ► NH/HCBS Rebalancing is a transformational shift ► Veterans may have other forms of coverage

6/27/ Overview of the VA LTSS The Department of Veterans Affairs has made a commitment over the past ten years to expand access to community LTSS for Veterans needing a nursing home level of care The Administration for Community Living (ACL) works collaboratively with the VA to offer Veterans-Directed Home and Community Based Services (VD-HCBS) The VD-HCBS program enables Veterans to remain at home, maintain their independence, participate in their communities and have choice and control over their services and supports

6/27/ Veterans Directed Home and Community Based Services The VD-HCBS program started in 2008 VD-HCBS provides an alternative to traditional non-institutional VA services VD-HCBS offers a consumer-directed and individualized budget model of services and supports 47 VAMCs partner with 104 State Units on Aging (SUAs), Aging and Disability Resource Centers (ADRCs), and Area Agencies on Aging (AAA) Over 1,600 Vet erans have been served by VD-HCBS

6/27/ Determining efficacy and effectiveness VD-HCBS programs continue to grow with new sites being added in several states ► California, Utah and Idaho have new VD-HCBS Programs in 2014 ► Colorado, Utah, North Carolina, Missouri and Oklahoma are all developing VD-HCBS The VA provides two years of funding and then the VAMC assumes the financial responsibility for continuation of the program VAMCs must demonstrate the efficacy and effectiveness of this program to sustain and expand VD-HCBS enrollment and add new sites of operation within their service areas One strategy to demonstrate success and cost-effectiveness of VD- HCBS is to use a Veteran’s experience survey to determine satisfaction, quality and increase or maintaining of independence

6/27/ The Analysis of the Veterans Experience Surveys

6/27/ Methodology Requests were sent to all VD-HCBS sites to determine which sites used a Veteran’s Experience Survey Questions were asked about the type of survey and the administration of the survey including frequency, process of collecting responses, and use of survey results In total, the Lewin Project Team collected 22 survey tools, some of which were used by multiple sites in a state Surveys questions were cross-walked to identify similar questions and overall themes which were organized into domain categories

6/27/ Methodology (Cont)

6/27/ Findings

6/27/ Veterans’ satisfaction Overall 89% of Veterans responded positively to each question asked in the surveys Veterans experience high level of satisfaction regarding choice and control. Of 70 respondents*, 52% strongly agree and 48% agree they are able to choose who provides their care Veterans strongly agree or agree (99%) that caregivers do things the way they want them done (79 respondents) Veterans strongly agree or agree (91%) that they control how they spend their VD-HCBS budget (53 respondents) *Please note that the number of Veteran respondents change s because not every site asks each question

6/27/ Veterans’ Independence Veterans report that the VD-HCBS program is highly successful in maintaining independence while improving the quality of the Veteran’s life Of 237 respondents, 210 (or 89%) reported it was certain, very likely, or somewhat likely they would enter a nursing facility without these services Of 231 respondents, 95 % reported that VD-HCBS helps them a lot Of 159 respondents, 157 (or 99%) reported that VD-HCBS improves the way they live 100% respondents either strongly agree or agree that VD-HCBS has helped them to stay as independent as possible

6/27/ Veterans’ Choice & Control Other areas of satisfaction with choice and control ► 98% of respondents report they are satisfied with the care was provided to them ► 100% of respondents report they receive services in the place they most desire ► 99% of respondents report having enough choice over the services and products they use ► 96% of respondents report they have support to engage in the activities that are important to them

6/27/ Domain Definitions The report includes the findings for the five domain areas: DomainMeasure Services and supportsmeasures overall program satisfaction, satisfaction with counselors/brokers, the quality of written materials, assistance to be an employer, and the quality and amount of care and services Caregiversmeasures satisfaction with the choice, responsiveness and quality of caregivers and the Veteran’s role as an employer Interests and Activitiesmeasures satisfaction with the Veteran’s ability to engage in activities of their choosing and remaining active in the community Independencemeasures the program’s ability to support the Veteran to maintain independence and improve how the Veterans live their lives Personal relationships, Autonomy and Privacy measure satisfaction with maintaining information about the Veteran confidentially and if the Veteran feels safe and secure in the home

6/27/ Summary of surveys The majority of sites insert use a mail survey Most sites conduct an annual survey but some report conducting semi- annual surveys Veteran census in VD-HCBS programs varies resulting in a range of responses per site The response rate varied from 56%-100% with an average of 81% Designated representatives can complete the surveys The most common reasons sites administer surveys are to determine satisfaction and for program improvement

6/27/ Results The results of the Veteran Experience Surveys analyzed indicate: ► The program is meeting its goals ► The program provides high levels of satisfaction with services and supports ► The program is fulfilling the program goals of the VA and ACL to assist Veterans to achieve improved health outcomes and meaningful community lives that afford them choice, control and independence

6/27/ Recommendations for National Surveys

6/27/ Overview The Lewin Team recommends two core standardized surveys are recommended: one at the three month post-enrollment point, and the second on an annual basis The two recommended surveys use questions from the existing surveys with the addition of specific questions to enhance the breadth and depth of the content. Surveys can be made available to all VD-HCBS sites with recommended scales and the methodology to conduct the survey The use of standardized surveys will encourage sites that currently do not administer a survey to do so and will assist the VA and ACL to evaluate the overall program on a national level in a standardized reliable way

6/27/ The three month post-enrollment survey Administer a survey to all Veterans three months after initial enrollment Survey is administered using an in-person interview by someone not directly serving the Veteran Survey data would be used to determine if services and supports are in place for the Veteran, determine their satisfaction and for program improvement The recommended survey includes 22 questions about services and supports; caregivers; and independence The survey uses a consistent scale: strongly agree, agree, neither agree or disagree, disagree or strongly disagree

6/27/ The annual satisfaction survey Administer the survey on an annual basis to all Veterans enrolled in the VD-HCBS program Survey is administered via USPS mail Survey data would be used to determine overall satisfaction and for program improvement The survey includes 22 questions about services and supports; caregivers; and independence The survey uses a consistent scale: strongly agree, agree, neither agree or disagree, disagree, or strongly disagree

6/27/ Comparison of the surveys In-person interview Primary Purpose: immediate program and quality improvement Questions focus on process and procedures and the program’s responsiveness Mail survey Primary Purpose: satisfaction Questions focus on the Veteran’s level of satisfaction and the program’s responsiveness Three Month Post EnrollmentAnnual Satisfaction

6/27/ Other Resources on VD-HCBS Sustainability NRCPDS Sustainability Guide ► VD-HCBS Sustainability Studies: available at ADRC-TAE site under VD-HCBS Resources ( ► Boston, MA ► Chillicothe, OH ► Milwuakee, WI Past VD-HCBS Educational Webinars ( Today’s slide deck and additional resources will be posted to the ADRC-TAE site ACL/VHA is scheduling the next VD-HCBS Educational Webinar for the Fall 2014