EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 EUROnu Introduction and Objectives Neutrino oscillations: much interest since 1 st paper in 1998 - extension required to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EuroNu CERN February 5, 2008 Marco Zito Super-Beam work package Marco Zito Dapnia-Saclay On behalf of the SB w2 team EuroNu 5/2/2008 Thanks to M. Dracos.
Advertisements

NuSTORM March 2013 CERN Welcome and introduction.
EURO EURO 1)Welcome 2)Status of negotiations and GA 3) “ of Consortium Agreement 4) “ of website, mailing lists, logo, etc 5)Management Structure 6)Bodies.
Scoping Study Proposal: Physics Section Introduced by: Paul Harrison University of Warwick.
Accelerator based Neutrino program around the world 1. Europe: Neutrino platform at CERN ESS second maximum? 2. Japan: T2K and HyperK status 3. USA: LBNF.
14 mars 2007M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study1 Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design Study in FP7.
ISS-4 22 August IRVINE Alain Blondel NEUtrino DETectors N-EU-DET 4-years working plan for Neutrino Detector R&D to take place in ~ objectives.
Alain Blondel CHIPP Neutrino meeting NEUCHATEL June 2004.
25/10/2007M. Dracos1 EURO The European Design Study for a high intensity neutrino oscillation facility (Rob Edgecock, Mats Lindroos, Marcos Dracos)
Neutrino physics: experiments and infrastructure Anselmo Cervera Villanueva Université de Genève Orsay, 31/01/06.
Neutrino-CH 19 October 2006 Alain Blondel HARP and K2K 1. The K2K experiments 2. beam related uncertainties 3. HARP and results 4. K2K and results 5. conclusions.
Costing Workshop Summary Chris Rogers, RAL, 30 Mar 2010 Establish a common framework for costing of neutrino facilities Compare Beta Beam, Super beam and.
Scoping study p-ECFA Alain Blondel ISS-detectors Introduction: working group plans, organization and aims of the meeting.
WP5: Detector Performance and Cost EuroNu Launch Meeting 5 February 2008 Coordinator: Paul Soler, University of Glasgow Deputy: Anselmo Cervera Villanueva,
The meeting in Paris: The agenda has been built and optimized.
Introduction to EC Framework Programme 7 Rob Edgecock CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction to Framework Programmes “ “ FP7 Neutrino LOI Mapping.
ISS After One Year Peter Dornan Imperial College London.
Alain Blondel CHIPP Neutrino meeting NEUCHATEL June 2004 Aims of the meeting At least four universities in Switzerland do research in Neutrino Physics.
EURO EURO 1)Welcome 2)Status of negotiations and GA 3) “ of Consortium Agreement 4) “ of website, mailing lists, logo, etc 5)Management Structure 6)Bodies.
European design study on Neutrinofacilities - Euronu within FP7.
EURO EURO A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe Proposal submitted 2 nd May 2007 “Approved” ~ beginning August 07  highest mark ever.
ESS based neutrino Super Beam for CP Violation discovery Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg 1 20 August 2013M. Dracos.
Anselmo Cervera Villanueva IFIC (Universidad de Valencia & CSIC) EURODET meeting 7 December 2007 Neutrino Networking activities.
WP5: Detector Performance and Cost EuroNu Meeting CERN, 26 March 2009 Paul Soler Coordinator: Paul Soler, University of Glasgow Deputy: Anselmo Cervera.
Road Map of Future Neutrino Physics A personal view Ken Peach Round Table discussion at the 6 th NuFACT Workshop Osaka, Japan 26 th July – 1 st August.
Alain Blondel NUFACT11 1 August Rhone route Shopping route Historic route count >> 30 minutes ! Boarding on ship Henri-Dunant at 19:15 CANT BE LATE.
Alain Blondel. AIDA-Neutrino meeting AIDA Neutrino detector studies 1. News from the neutrino scene 2. Beam requirements for AIDA 3. Discuss.
CARE Steering Committee and Dissemination Board R. Aleksan CARE Steering Committee Paris, April 11, Introduction.
R.G. 7/09/20101 Options for neutrinos. R.G. 7/09/20102 Conventional beam from the SPS (1/3) Neutrinos using the SPS Nominal CNGS 732 km baseline from.
WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies Introduction Introduction View from Europe - RE View from Europe - RE “ “ Japan- Yoshi Kuno “ “ Japan- Yoshi Kuno “ “ US-
A new underground laboratory at Frejus Jacques Bouchez CEA-SACLAY NNN05-Aussois April 7, 2005 Historical overview Latest developments Outlook.
The ISS Peter Dornan Imperial College London. 16 March 2006P Dornan - MUTAC `atmospheric’`solar’ `cross/reactor’ Oscillation defined by 3 mixing.
Activities and news Last meeting: 2015 CERN budget allocations as expected, now distributed on accounts Annual report done, and MTP (Medium Term Plan)
J. Bouchez CEA/DAPNIA CHIPP Neuchâtel June 21, 2004 A NEW UNDERGROUND LABORATORY AT FREJUS Motivations and prospects.
John Womersley Welcome Director of Particle Physics, CCLRC International Scoping Study Meeting, RAL April 2006.
Physics and Performance Evaluation Group NuFact 07 Okayama University, Japan August 6, 2007 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg for the executive committee:
ESS based neutrino Super Beam for CP Violation discovery Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg 1 10 September 2013M. Dracos.
Alain Blondel -- After the ISS -- What did ISS achieve? 1. Established a « baseline » for the accelerator study 2. Rejuvenated simulation and study of.
EUROnu WP5 Detector Costing EuroNu Annual General Meeting, Strasbourg 3 June 2010 Paul Soler.
NUFACT’06 Summary of working group 1 Neutrino Oscillations Experiments Mark Messier Indiana University August 30, 2006.
Detector possibilities: scintillator based detectors EUCARD 1 st Annual Meeting, RAL, 13 April 2010 Paul Soler.
CERN, 15/03/05EURISOL - Beta Beam Task1 EURISOL and the Beta-Beam Task Status and Planning Michael Benedikt Mats Lindroos AB-Department, CERN.
Status and Plans for EUROnu FP7 Design Study Status and Plans for EUROnu FP7 Design Study EUROnu = A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe.
Elena Wildner, CERN Rob Edgecock, STFC/RAL THE EUROnu PROJECT: “A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility In Europe”
1 Neutrino detector test beam requirements 0. Disclaimer 1. News from the neutrino scene 2. Beam requirements for AIDA and others.
EURO EURO A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe History Aims Structure Some admin Rest of the meeting.
EURO EURO A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe Introduction Aims Structure Tasks Link to other activities Future dates.
A CCELERATOR S ESSIONS S UMMARY D AVE W ARK, I LIAS E FTHYMIOPOULOS Neutrino Strategy Workshop CERN, October 3, 2009 Outline  Show highlights from the.
MIND Systematic Errors EuroNu Meeting, RAL 18 January 2010 Paul Soler.
Proposal Preparation. Documents for June PAC  Full Proposal  Starting point is LOI + updates in EOI  Project Definition Report  Cost estimate  Excel-based.
Neutrinos from Stored Muons STORM physics with a μ storage ring.
Workshop summary Outline  Workshop’s aims  Highlights from the presentations (my selection!)  Costing Exercise – What we learnt  Summary - Roadmap.
K. Long, 25 June, 2016 IDR: structure and overall timeline: Slides are to introduce discussion of how we prepare IDR. Propose to revise slides as we discuss.
Near Detector Tasks EuroNu Meeting, CERN 26 March 2009 Paul Soler.
K. Long, R. Roser, 23 July 2014 Report from the Neutrino Summit.
CARESG, 11Apr2006V. Palladino Report on BENE Activities Beams for European Neutrino Experiments (BENE) subtitle: A Network aiming at a consensual road.
Goals of the consultation meetings From the ToR, the goals of the meeting in the first year should be: communicate that the panel exists; collect input.
Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Université de Strasbourg
Conclusions and thanks
Final Discussion THE EUROPEAN STRATEGY FOR FUTURE NEUTRINO PHYSICS
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
nuSTORM at Fermilab D Adey
Alain Blondel 11 October 2010 GDR NEU2012 summary
EUROnu: Management Aspects
Elena Wildner, CERN EUROnu meeting Paris June
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
Neutrino Oscillation Physics with a Neutrino Factory
XVth International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Betabeams and Superbeams LAGUNA-LBNO Many thanks to D. Duchesneau, F. Di Lodovico, T. Patzak, A. Rubbia.
A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe
A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe
Presentation transcript:

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 EUROnu Introduction and Objectives Neutrino oscillations: much interest since 1 st paper in extension required to SM - possible explanation of matter-antimatter asymm. - contribution to dark matter - may bring explanation of hierarchy problem - etc Many projects World-wide to make new measurements Much theoretical interest In Europe:CNGS T2K Double Chooz etc Despite these, full picture looks to require new facilities conventional Super-Beams Neutrino Factory Beta Beam

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 EUROnu Introduction and Objectives Much interest in Europe in these facilities Possible to host both accelerators and detectors: Accelerators: CERN & RAL Detectors: many places – see LAGUNA DS! Prior to EUROnu: work undertaken largely independently EUROnu created to: - bring together groups working on facilities - undertake crucial R&D on accelerators - compare performance, “cost”, safety and risk in same framework - report results to CERN Council + elsewhere Aim is that all of EUROnu (+ others) continue to next step

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 EUROnu Introduction and Objectives Work package No Work package titleType of activity Lead participant No Person- months Start month End month 1Management and Knowledge Dissemination MGT Super-BeamRTD Neutrino FactoryRTD Beta BeamRTD Detector Performance RTD Physics ReachRTD TOTAL1407

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 WP2: Super-Beam Conventional Super-Beam: - similar to existing beams - but higher beam power and bigger detectors Particular focus in EUROnu: CERN to Frejus

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 WP2: Super-Beam Coordination: CEA C EA & CNRS STFC CNRS STFC & CUT CEA

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 WP3: Neutrino Factory Detector 1: ~7000km Detector 2: ~4000km

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 WP3: Neutrino Factory Work being done in close collaboration with International Design Study for a Neutrino Factory STFC Warwick STFC, CERN, Imperial, UOXF.DL, Warwick Coordination: Imperial STFC, Imperial STFC, CERN, Imperial

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 WP4: Beta Beam Studied in EURISOL FP6 DS Looked at 6He and 18Ne – but couldn’t make enough Ne EUROnu: 8Li and 8B; increase 18Ne production Plus bunching, capture, acceleration and decay ring

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 WP4: Beta Beam Coordination: CERN CERN INFN, UCL CNRS CEA, CERN

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 WP5: Detectors Study only performance and cost of baseline detectors Includes both near and far detectors Neutrino Factory: Magnetised Iron Neutrino Detector iron (3 cm) + scintillators (2cm) beam 15 m B=1 T kT m Coordination: Glasgow Glasgow, CSIC

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 WP5: Detectors Super-Beam and baseline Beta Beam: Water Cherenkov, in particular MEMPHYS Paris 7 EuroNu, RAL, 19 January m 60m MEMPHYS 440 kt

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 WP5: Detectors Near detectors: - measure flux and beam composition - measure cross-sections - measure charm background - do physics Glasgow, UniSofia

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 WP6: Physics Reach Brings together information from other work packages Treats it independently and consistently Physics performance Optimisation Systematic uncertainties Physics comparison CSIC, UDUR, INFN, MPG Coordination: CSIC CSIC, UDUR, INFN, MPG CSIC, INFN, MPG CSIC, CERN, UDUR, INFN

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Associates CountryAssociate CanadaTRIUMF FranceGANIL GermanyAachen GSI IndiaINO IsraelWeizmann PortugalLisbon RussiaIAP, Novgorad JINR, Dubna SwitzerlandGeneva UKBrunel USAArgonne Brookhaven FNAL Virginia Tech Muon Collaboration Have not signed GA. Not required to deliver EUROnu obligations. Interested in and contributing knowledge and work to the project. Some funds to allow attendance at EUROnu meeting.

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Costing Requirement is to do relative cost estimate of facilities Best accuracy within resources available Costing panel has been created Work so far: - existing CERN costing tool being used - use existing costs where possible - common WBS - WBS for WP2-5 quite advanced Workshop in May: - finalise WBS - start entering information in costing tool. Costing done in common way to improve relative error

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Safety and Risk Safety assessment: - no point in designing facility if can’t build it! Main safety issues of facilities identified Only time to look at large structures, e.g. target stations Implication of safety on cost and/or performance assessed Safety panel created - safety workshop in June Technical risk – will come out of R&D At the end of EUROnu: - some hardware R&D projects not finished - new hardware R&D identified by DS - some performance unknown Result to be entered in risk register - implications on cost and/or performance included

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Objectives ObjectiveDelivery date Define facility comparison criteria18 Undertake interim facility performance for Project Review 36 Produce a reference design of each facility42 Undertake a physics and cost comparison46 Write a design report for each facility and publish outcome 48

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Criteria Physics performance – sensitivity to - θ 13 - sign of Δm δ CP - unless θ 13 measured, will be done in ranges of θ 13 Relative cost Safety and implications on cost and/or performance Technical risk and implications on cost and/or performance In principle, figure-of-merit based on these possible Unlikely to be helpful!

EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Conclusions EUROnu has brought together EU and world groups working on next generation of neutrino facilities - CERN to Frejus Super-Beam - Neutrino Factory - CERN based Beta Beam Focus on crucial R&D for each Aim is to do a comparison Report results to policy making bodies in Europe and World Help to determine next steps for neutrino physics Work is progressing well All objectives will be met by end of project