Water Connection Charges: A Tool for Encouraging Water-Efficient Growth Amelia Nuding Senior Water Resources Analyst.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2004 St. Johns River Water Management District Florida Water Star SM A Program of the St. Johns River Water Management District.
Advertisements

Cities and Green Growth OECD Green Cities Programme
From Governance to Management: Opportunities and Challenges John Janmaat University of British Columbia Okanagan Campus.
Discussion Topics Overview of Water Rates in California Legal Framework of Water Rates Water Consumption Patterns Empirical Data – City of Fresno The.
Current Legal Developments on Ratemaking - A Primer on Budget-based Water Rate Structures 1 Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager, Eastern.
8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia.
PROPOSAL TO ADJUST CURRENT WATER RATES Goal: Address frequently expressed concerns of citizens  Simplicity  Understandability  Fairness  Liability.
Regional Water Service Development Cost Charges Update October 2014 Bryan Shoji, P.Eng. General Manager, Infrastructure Services.
1 City of Sonoma Water Conservation Program Update June 2007.
Water Conservation Tools for Municipal Systems: Overview of Costs and Water Savings Damian C. Adams Assistant Professor Department of Agricultural Economics.
2010 Draft Municipal Budget
Copyright Rehmann Robson Pennfield Charter Township Water and Sewer Utilities Rate Study.
Water Demand Modeling Emanuele Massetti FEEM and CMCC Prepared for the Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of Adaptation 2 nd Regional Training.
Regulatory Best Practices for Small Water Companies May 6, 2009 John Hoy Chief Regulatory Officer May 6, 2009 John Hoy Chief Regulatory Officer.
City of Santa Fe Impact Fees Program Reed Liming Planning Division Director 2005 National Impact Fee Roundtable Conference October 5–7, 2005 Embassy Suites.
February 29,  Convergence  Reduced Cost  Increased Revenue  Productive vs. New Revenues  A “Plan”  Land Use / Finance / Services.
Incentivizing sustainable urban form Fresh Outlooks Foundation Building SustainABLE Communities Conference November 27, 2013 David Thompson Policy Director,
Coachella Valley Water District Dave Koller Conservation Manager.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
Financing “Greenfield” Developments An Overview of Financing Options for a combined Water System Presentation to NARUC Water Committee July 2007 By Keith.
Promoting Energy Efficiency In Buildings in Developing countries.
Pathways to Lasting Solutions “The Longest Yard” Water Budget Rate Structures & The City of Boulder, Colorado January 25, 2007 © 2006 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing Water Banking Pollution.
Municipal and Industrial Conservation and Water Reuse Workgroup Elizabeth Lovsted Sr. Civil Engineer Urban Water Institute Annual Water Policy Conference.
2013 UPDATE Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Water Demand Forecast Update Rob Lindsay Water Resources Manager Spokane County Utilities Spokane River.
Catherine Elvert City of Palo Alto Utilities Communications Manager.
Staying Afloat with Water Revenues Balancing the ebb and flow of revenue stability with conservation Mayors Water Council December 3, 2009 Sandra Ralston.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Smart Metering East Coast, Raleigh NC Revenue Protection Practices Ken Sharratt Principal, Sharratt Water Management Ltd. Toronto, ON, Canada.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
Presentation to the Sustainable Prosperity Conference
Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff.
LADWP WATER CONSERVATION IEPR Workshop August
1 Cost Recovery in Jordan March 2009 Eng. Kamal Zoubi Former CEO / Jordan Water Company.
PROPOSAL TO ADJUST CURRENT WATER RATES Goal: Address frequently expressed concerns of citizens  Simplicity  Understandability  Fairness  Liability.
Demand Response. What is Demand Response? In an electricity grid, electricity consumption and production must balance at all times Demand response in.
Land Use Planning Impacts on Water Demand. Land Use vs Water Demand  At water supply meetings hear frustrations with municipal use: Too much grass Bad.
EEI Energy Efficiency Initiative Eric Ackerman ( Senior Manager, Regulatory Policy April 23, 2007.
Overview of Conservation Options in the Colorado River Basin Water Supply & Demand Study WEAN-CRB Webinar January 9, 2013.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
Orange County Landscaping and Water Conservation Ordinance Presented to: Orange County Board of County Commissioners June 23, 2009.
Innovations in Water-Efficient Landscaping and Indoor Water-Use Jacob Atalla, KB Home 1) Efficiency as a resource – quantifying the savings that new homes.
State Demography Office Colorado Department of Local Affairs Growing Forward Population Trends in Archuleta County.
Cash for Grass Rebate Program The Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) is providing rebates to qualifying residents and commercial properties for converting.
CITY OF BEND | ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN AN URBAN AREA JIM LONG, AFFORDABLE HOUSING MANAGER HOUSING LAND ADVOCATES 2015 CONFERENCE, NOVEMBER 6, 2015.
2010 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting NASUCA 2010 Mid-Year Conference Presented by: Lee Smith Senior Economist and Managing Consultant Presented to: June ,
Conservation Cal Water’s Approach with the California Public Utilities Commission Darin Duncan, Bear Gulch District Manager Low-Income Oversight Board.
Eugene Water & Electric Board Jill Hoyenga, Water Management Services Supervisor.
MWELO Update -CII ??? April Snow Survey-No Snow.
ALACHUA COUNTY Energy Conservation Strategies Commission Residential Subcommittee Report to ECSC Committee January 3, 2008.
Making More Water Available by Using Less & Desalting the Sea Sections 5.8 & 5.9.
What are they and how are they calculated? May 2015.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Drought Response – Implementing the New Landscape Requirements Elizabeth Lovsted, PE Sr. Civil Engineer.
New Customer Contributions for the Water Sector: Workshop 4 August 2004.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Proposed Revisions to the Administrative Code Elizabeth Lovsted, PE Sr. Civil Engineer July 8, 2015.
Proposed Draft Financial Plan April 10, 2017
Re-examining the Lawn: Water Conservation In Colorado Springs
Untapped Potential: Water Conservation as a Source of Additional Water Supply Bozeman, Montana March 3, 2017.
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
Planning Commission Impact fees Planning Commission
SEWER SERVICE FEE RATE STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE
Fire Protection Impact Fee
Water & Sewer Rate Study Presented by: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager
Matthew S. Dickens Resource Conservation Manager
Matthew S. Dickens Resource Conservation Manager
Drought Planning Through Integrated Rate Design
Urban Water Use Efficiency Policy-2016 and Beyond
Paul D. Jones II, P.E., General Manager August 25, 2016
Rate Design Matters… A Lot
Presentation transcript:

Water Connection Charges: A Tool for Encouraging Water-Efficient Growth Amelia Nuding Senior Water Resources Analyst

Water Connection Charges (aka “impact fee”)  A one-time fee charged to new developments (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional) to cover:  The cost of physically connecting to the water system  The capital costs (past and/or future) for “capacity charges”: Acquiring water Water infrastructure Water treatment plants

Big Picture Context: Growing Urban Areas

The impact of new developments on a water system is not always uniform Variable factors include: lot size, square footage of home, irrigation area, plant type, and fixture types

Research Method  840 communities in NC & GA  60 communities in AZ, CO & UT (20 in each state)  Price for SFR charges  Factors considered in connection charge design: meter size, lot size, house size, outdoor area etc.

Connection Charges in Western Communitie s  Researched Single Family charges in 60 communities: 20 each in AZ, CO, UT  Selection criteria included a diversity of population sizes, population growth rates, geographic locations, and water sources

Uniform vs. Variable Connection Charges in Single Family Homes Uniform – Meter only, or other flat fee for SFR Variable – Other factors considered, including location

Multiple Factors used in Western Communities

Case Studies in Colorado

Case Study Highlights : Fountain, CO Single Family Residential Connection Charges:  Smaller lots pay smaller fees  Smaller turf areas also result in smaller fees  Landscape templates help increase adoption of conservation incentive

Case Study Highlights : Westminster, CO 1.The water resources fee is proportionate to each ICI customer’s projected annual water use (restaurants, schools, warehouses etc.) Graphic courtesy of Westminster Average Water Use By Category

Case Study Highlights : Westminster, CO 2. Lower connection charges are assessed for Water Efficient Landscapes

Case Study Highlights: Aurora, CO Lot Size (Sq. Ft.) Proposed Fees 1-2 Bath Use3-4 Bath Use5+ Bath Use - $5,509$8,901$15,426 5,000 $10,213$13,605$20,130 6,000 $11,154$14,546$21,071 7,000 $12,095$15,487$22,011 8,000 $13,036$16,428$22,952 9,000 $13,977$17,369$23,893 10,000 $14,917$18,309$24,834 15,000 $19,621$23,014$29,538 20,000 $24,326$27,718$34,242 50,000 $52,550$55,942$62, ,000 $99,591$102,983$109,507 Pre 2014: SFR Uniform Fee of $24,460 Slide Courtesy of P. Van Ry Median lot size is 7,500 sq ft. ~90% under 11,000 sq ft. + $1,000 Credit if the front yard uses xeriscape!

But wait, there’s more! Irrigation Fee: $200,000 $0!

Concluding Thoughts  The impacts of new homes or businesses on a water system is not necessarily uniform. Therefore a uniform fee structure may be unfair to some customers.  Variable water factors that capture indoor and outdoor demand are sending more precise pricing signals to new developers & builders.  Consider mechanisms to ensure the longevity of water savings.  Successful “multi-factor” water connection charges relied on good data and inviting stakeholders (customers, developers, builders) into the design process

Thank you! Questions? Amelia Nuding Download report at: /water-connection-charges/