Progress Report on SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Simulation Code Farrokh Najmabadi, Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting April 8-10, 2003 Sandia National Laboratory,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Solution of Benchmark Problems for CO 2 Storage Min Jin, Gillian Pickup and Eric Mackay Heriot-Watt University Institute of Petroleum Engineering.

Advertisements

Neural Network Control of a Hypersonic Inlet Joint University Program Meeting April 05, 2001 Nilesh V. Kulkarni Advisors Prof. Minh Q. Phan Dartmouth College.

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF A THERMAL PLASMA FLOW CONFINED BY MAGNETIC MIRROR IN A CYLINDRICAL REACTOR Authors: Gabriel Torrente Julio Puerta Norberto Labrador.

Progress Report on SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Simulation Code Farrokh Najmabadi and Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting February 5-6, 2004 Georgia Institute of.

Collaborative Comparison of High-Energy-Density Physics Codes LA-UR Bruce Fryxell Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Dept. of Atmospheric,

Numerical Uncertainty Assessment Reference: P.J. Roache, Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering, Hermosa Press, Albuquerque.

Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update - Spot Size Model Changes* ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002 * This work.

April 6-7, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber 1 Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi, Z. Dragojlovic,

Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.

Solar Turbulence Friedrich Busse Dali Georgobiani Nagi Mansour Mark Miesch Aake Nordlund Mike Rogers Robert Stein Alan Wray.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley C.S. Debonnel 1,2, S.S. Yu 2, P.F. Peterson 1 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department.

Steady Aeroelastic Computations to Predict the Flying Shape of Sails Sriram Antony Jameson Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Stanford University First.

EFFECTS OF CHAMBER GEOMETRY AND GAS PROPERTIES ON HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California.

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,

Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark Tillack (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein (ANL) Laser-IFE Program Workshop February 6-7, 2001.

HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS WITH DIFFERENT PROTECTIVE GASES AND PRE-IGNITION CONDITIONS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of.

IFE Chambers: Modeling and Experiments at UCSD Farrokh Najmabadi 5 th US-Japan Workshop on Laser IFE March 21-23, 2005 General Atomics, San Diego Electronic.

Prediction of Fluid Dynamics in The Inertial Confinement Fusion Chamber by Godunov Solver With Adaptive Grid Refinement Zoran Dragojlovic, Farrokh Najmabadi,

Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.

October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.

Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.

Progress Report on Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark S. Tillack, John Pulsifer, Zoran Dragovlovic (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein.

Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.

Highlights of ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi VLT Conference Call April 18, 2001 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:

The Effect of Sub-surface Fields on the Dynamic Evolution of a Model Corona Goals :  To predict the onset of a CME based upon reliable measurements of.

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Update on IFE Aerosol Analysis J.P. Sharpe INEEL Fusion Safety Program.

Numerical Analysis of the Bypass Valve in a Loop Heat Pipe Michel Speetjens, Camilo Rindt, Joy Klinkenberg Laboratory for Energy Technology, Dept. Mechanical.

April 9-10, 2003 HAPL Program Meeting, SNL, Albuquerque, N.M. 1 Lowering Target Initial Temperature to Enhance Target Survival Presented by A.R. Raffray.

Plasma Dynamics Group Aerospace & Energetics Research Program Boundary Conditions for MHD Resistive MHD equations in weakly conservative form (balance.

1 CFD Analysis Process. 2 1.Formulate the Flow Problem 2.Model the Geometry 3.Model the Flow (Computational) Domain 4.Generate the Grid 5.Specify the.

Heat Transfer Rates Conduction: Fourier’s Law

Modeling the Internal Flow of a Droplet Craig Ferguson.

Progress in Chamber Simulation Experiments At UCSD Laser Facility Farrokh Najmabadi Kevin Sequoia, Sophia Chen HAPL Meeting September 24-25, 2003 University.

Viscous Stress Terms for the RELAP5-3D Momentum Equations Adam Kraus and George Mesina RELAP5 International Users Seminar 2010 September 20-23,

© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.

A Novel Wave-Propagation Approach For Fully Conservative Eulerian Multi-Material Simulation K. Nordin-Bates Lab. for Scientific Computing, Cavendish Lab.,

Basics of molecular dynamics. Equations of motion for MD simulations The classical MD simulations boil down to numerically integrating Newton’s equations.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review January 14-15, 2003, FNAL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Center for Data Intensive.

High Performance Computing on the GRID Infrastructure of COMETA S. Orlando 1,2, G. Peres 3,1,2, F. Reale 3,1,2, F. Bocchino 1,2, G.G. Sacco 2, M. Miceli.

Progress in Chamber Simulation Experiments At UCSD Laser Facility Farrokh Najmabadi and Kevin Sequoia HAPL Meeting February 5-6, 2004 Georgia Institute.

Progress in UCSD Chamber Simulation Experiments – Initial Results from Fast Thermometer Farrokh Najmabadi Sophia Chen, Andres Gaeris, John Pulsifer HAPL.

Progress Report on SPARTAN Simulation of IFE Chamber Dynamics Farrokh Najmabadi and Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting March 3-4, 2005 Naval Research Laboratory.

Recent Results from Dragonfire Armor Simulation Experiments Farrokh Najmabadi, Lane Carlson, John Pulsifer UC San Diego HAPL Meeting, Naval Research Laboratory.

DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.

July 11, 2003 HAPL e-meeting. 1 Armor Design & Modeling Progress A. René Raffray UCSD HAPL e-meeting July 11, 2003 (1)Provide Parameters for Chamber “System”

TEMPLATE DESIGN © A high-order accurate and monotonic advection scheme is used as a local interpolator to redistribute.

SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Code Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California in San Diego HAPL Meeting, June 20-21, 2005, Lawrence Livermore.

Realtime Robotic Radiation Oncology Brian Murphy 4 th Electronic & Computer Engineering.

Governing Equations Conservation of Mass Conservation of Momentum Velocity Stress tensor Force Pressure Surface normal Computation Flowsheet Grid values.

Temperature Response and Ion Deposition in the 1 mm Tungsten Armor Layer for the 10.5 m HAPL Target Chamber T.A. Heltemes, D.R. Boris and M. Fatenejad,

Aerospace Engineering N. C. State University Air Terminal Wake Vortex Simulation D. Scott McRae, Hassan A. Hassan N.C. State University 4 September 2003.

LCSE – NCSA Partnership Accomplishments, FY01 Paul R. Woodward Laboratory for Computational Science & Engineering University of Minnesota October 17, 2001.

SUMMARY OF 4th IPTA TRANSPORT AND ITB PHYSICS TG MEETING St. Petersburg, Russia, April 8-11, 2003 Presented by E.J. Doyle for the TG Note: this summary.

QAS Design of the DEMO Reactor

1 Computational Modeling in Support of the Magnetic Intervention Concept D. V. Rose,* T. C. Genoni, R. E. Clark, D. R. Welch, and T. P. Hughes Voss Scientific,

1 Rayleigh-Taylor Instability Collaborators: Vasily Zhakhovskii, M. Horikoshi, K. Nishihara, Sergei Anisimov.

September 28, 2000 Improved Simultaneous Data Reconciliation, Bias Detection and Identification Using Mixed Integer Optimization Methods Presented by:

Development of an Atmospheric Climate Model with Self-Adapting Grid and Physics Joyce E. Penner 1, Michael Herzog 2, Christiane Jablonowski 3, Bram van.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.

1 Recent Progress on QPS D. A. Spong, D.J. Strickler, J. F. Lyon, M. J. Cole, B. E. Nelson, A. S. Ware, D. E. Williamson Improved coil design (see recent.

Ion Mitigation for Laser IFE Optics Ryan Abbott, Jeff Latkowski, Rob Schmitt HAPL Program Workshop Atlanta, Georgia, February 5, 2004 This work was performed.

56 th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics. October 27-31, New Orleans, LA Using the single reservoir model [3], shown on right, to:

NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.

Liquid Walls Town Meeting May 5, 2003, Livermore, CA Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.

Modeling of Z-Ablation I. E. Golovkin, R. R. Peterson, D. A. Haynes University of Wisconsin-Madison G. Rochau Sandia National Laboratories Presented at.

Simulation of the Interaction Between Two Counterflowing Rarefied Jets

Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling

The application of an atmospheric boundary layer to evaluate truck aerodynamics in CFD “A solution for a real-world engineering problem” Ir. Niek van.

Analysis of Technical and Programmatic Tradeoffs with Systems Code

Presentation transcript:

Progress Report on SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Simulation Code Farrokh Najmabadi, Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting April 8-10, 2003 Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM Electronic copy: UCSD IFE Web Site:

Since the Last HAPL Meeting, Chamber Simulation Research Was Focused on Two Fronts  SPARTAN E-meeting was held on Feb. 25: To develop a high level of confidence in SPARTAN code in the IFE community; To discuss plans for code physics upgrades.  Publication of SPARTAN code development in J. of Computational Physics: To further enhance confidence in SPARTAN code. To underline that HAPL-funded programs are high-quality research and contribute significantly to generals science and engineering.  Required further work on embedded boundary algorithm ad Dirichlet boundary conditions.  SPARTAN E-meeting was held on Feb. 25: To develop a high level of confidence in SPARTAN code in the IFE community; To discuss plans for code physics upgrades.  Publication of SPARTAN code development in J. of Computational Physics: To further enhance confidence in SPARTAN code. To underline that HAPL-funded programs are high-quality research and contribute significantly to generals science and engineering.  Required further work on embedded boundary algorithm ad Dirichlet boundary conditions.

Progress in Refining Numerical Algorithms Has Continued  We modified the embedded boundary algorithm from fully conservative to globally conservative (current state-of-the-art in the field) by re-distribution of errors into neighboring cells.  We implemented the solution to Riemann problem along the normal to the wall in order to estimate the pressure at the wall (as opposed to extrapolation from the surrounding fluid cells).  We developed a second order estimation of the energy flux at the wall (Dirichlet boundary condition).  We implemented Sutherland law for estimation of viscosity and thermal conductivity.  We obtained ionization levels of Xenon gas from Don Haynes to account for background plasma thermal conductivity, viscosity, and radiation.  Defined a set of test cases for publication.  We modified the embedded boundary algorithm from fully conservative to globally conservative (current state-of-the-art in the field) by re-distribution of errors into neighboring cells.  We implemented the solution to Riemann problem along the normal to the wall in order to estimate the pressure at the wall (as opposed to extrapolation from the surrounding fluid cells).  We developed a second order estimation of the energy flux at the wall (Dirichlet boundary condition).  We implemented Sutherland law for estimation of viscosity and thermal conductivity.  We obtained ionization levels of Xenon gas from Don Haynes to account for background plasma thermal conductivity, viscosity, and radiation.  Defined a set of test cases for publication.

SPARTAN E-Meeting Was Successful  Participants suggested “0 th order” tests: “Null test” and “Small Perturbation Test” to demonstrate gross stability: Both tests were ran and were successful. Detailed analysis of “Small Perturbation Test” showed that the projections of the normal flux to the wall in x and y directions were not calculated accurately and were fixed.  Participants discussed and endorsed our research plan for the coming year.  Participants suggested “0 th order” tests: “Null test” and “Small Perturbation Test” to demonstrate gross stability: Both tests were ran and were successful. Detailed analysis of “Small Perturbation Test” showed that the projections of the normal flux to the wall in x and y directions were not calculated accurately and were fixed.  Participants discussed and endorsed our research plan for the coming year.  Convergence Analysis of test cases for J. of Computational Physics paper identified problems with the embedded boundary algorithm. In collaborations with Mark Day of LBL, we are implementing some of the latest techniques to resolve this problem. We have made good progress and estimate closure this month.  Convergence Analysis of test cases for J. of Computational Physics paper identified problems with the embedded boundary algorithm. In collaborations with Mark Day of LBL, we are implementing some of the latest techniques to resolve this problem. We have made good progress and estimate closure this month.

SPARTAN Research Plan for the Coming Year  Incorporate cylindrical symmetry.  Implement and test contributions of viscosity, thermal conductivity, and radiation from background plasma.  Implement multi-species capability.  Implement of Equation of State.  Parametric investigation of chamber dynamics with different gas, gas pressure, target yield, chamber size, beam ports, etc..  At SPARTAN E-Meeting, we discussed implementation of SPARTAN on parallel processors. We agreed to shelf this unless SPARTAN run times become substantially long.  Incorporate cylindrical symmetry.  Implement and test contributions of viscosity, thermal conductivity, and radiation from background plasma.  Implement multi-species capability.  Implement of Equation of State.  Parametric investigation of chamber dynamics with different gas, gas pressure, target yield, chamber size, beam ports, etc..  At SPARTAN E-Meeting, we discussed implementation of SPARTAN on parallel processors. We agreed to shelf this unless SPARTAN run times become substantially long.