Protocols for Critique & Revision

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core Standards (What this means in computer class)
Advertisements

Analyzing Student Work
WELCOME to WELCOME to Implementation Training for: The Revised Ontario Curriculum for Canadian and World Studies Grades 9 and 10.
PBL Sara Hallermann PBL National Faculty Buck Institute for Education
PBL PRINCIPAL PRIMER: BCIC JOANNE KEIM PBL COORDINATOR, TRAINER AND COACH OCTOBER 2014.
Project-Based Learning
Module 2A: Unit 2: Lesson 9 Analyzing the Model Essay: Studying Argument (Chapter 27 Plus Synthesis of Scenes in Previous Chapters)
Classroom Discussions
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
Project-Based Learning Sally Stuart GT Specialist.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Pre-Conference Workshop – June 2007 BUILDING A NATIONAL TEAM: Theatre Education Assessment Models Robert A. Southworth, Jr., Ed.D. TCG Assessment Models.
Module 2A: Unit 2: Lesson 10 Writing an Argument Essay: Evaluating the Model and Crafting a Claim (Chapter 28, Including Synthesis of Scenes in Previous.
PBL PRINCIPAL PRIMER JOANNE KEIM PBL COORDINATOR, TRAINER & COACH DENISE PAWLEWICZ PBL TRAINER & COACH.
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. Criteria to use when selecting personal responses and journal.
Project Based Learning PD Our Driving Question How can we plan effective projects for our students?
Wednesday, November 30, Name the network 2. Literacy Frame 3. Bliink2 Draft Smart Goal 4. Curriculum Embedded Critical Thinking  Deconstructing.
Facilitating Meaningful Feedback Utilizing Multiple Methods of Direct Instruction to Prepare Students for Successful Peer Review.
+ Reading Groups for Johnston’s Opening Minds BSWP 2012 Invitational Summer Institute, Days #1 and #2.
District 3 Magnet Curriculum Writing Institute 2012 PROJECT-BASED LEARNING: A GUIDE FOR BEGINNERS.
ATL’s in the Personal Project
Leading Innovation 2011: Sanding the Edges - Tuning a Lesson STRUCTURED LESSON REVIEW BEGIN.
Writing a Thesis for a Literary Analysis Grade 11 English.
Good Morning! Let’s start with some science!. What’s our goal here? Provide an example of a science lesson with literacy and dialogue strategies integrated.
In-Class Interventions Sherrard Lewis I3/COMPASS Proj. Dir. Feb. 13, 2012.
August 19, The current situation Fall 2008 – incoming college students needing writing remediation: 36.7% of incoming students in 2 year institutions.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
Project-Based Learning (PBL) Vivene Robinson.
Module 2A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Writing and Argument Essay: Peer Critique with Rubric (Chapters 29-31, Including Synthesis of Scenes in Previous Chapters)
Presentation 1 Roles for Discussing Student Work There are four roles for discussing student work: Presenting Teacher Participant Recorder Facilitator.
MIGHTY WRITERS A LEARNING PROCESS BY KRISTINA KAZANJIAN.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
College of Public Health and Human Sciences Communicating About Public Health Policy Presenter: Craig Mossbaek Date: August 22, 2013 Public Health Policy.
Good Morning Curriculum Boot Campers March 6, 2012.
TRAVAILS AND TRIUMPHS ALONG OUR JOURNEY: CRAFTING INTEGRATED PBL UNITS WITH COMMON CORE STANDARDS Presented by Collegiate American School, Middle School.
Project Based Learning: Challenges & Opportunities John R. Mascazine, Ph.D. Ohio Dominican University Science Education Council of Ohio January 25 – 26,
What Community College Students Need to Know About Writing at the University Professor Irene L. Clark California State University, Northridge.
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
“The Lady or the Tiger” Discussion Levels of Questioning Take Notes!!
PBL for the 21 st century. Begin with the end in mind Knowledge of science, history, literature, languages, etc. Time management Strong work ethic Respectful.
Experience Protocols Tools that provide framework for discussions By Claire Dean.
Writing Workshop Feedback Protocol Let’s improve our writing!
WELCOME! 1. PICK UP YOUR BENCHMARK FROM THE ROUND TABLE. 2. OPEN THE “TEEN ISSUES” ARTICLES YOU RESEARCHED YESTERDAY. 3. YOU HAVE 10 MINUTES TO CONTINUE.
By: Adriana Hernandez. Parts to the Writer’s Workshop Mini Lesson (5-10 min) Work Time/Conferencing (15-20 min) Share Time (5 min)
1 Participating in Learning Community to: Present and Give Feedback on QUALITY EVIDENCE required to complete Professional Certification Washington State.
September 25, 2015 Senior English. Photo Essays Gallery Walk Review and Reflection Four Corners ‘Jobs and Majors’ Individual questions – grades, assignments,
1 Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 9 Conversations with Educators March 17, 2016.
Inquiry Road Map A Guidance System for 21 st Century Learning By Mary Ratzer.
Units of Study :Training for Substitutes Writing Writing Writing Writing,, Writing Writing Writing Writing.
Reading and Reflection Protocols
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Media Analysis.
Project-Based Learning
Learning and Teaching –
Project-Based Learning
Understanding by Design
BR: 5/15/17 Summarize your group’s Tangible Product(s). Did you include photos (while you made it, from beginning, middle, end, etc.), as well as a biography.
Week 3 – day 1 Tuesday, January 30, 2018
Socratic Conversation
Tuning Protocol Critique Groups.
Leading PBL: Managing PBL
BR: T1D18 Describe the issue that you are addressing in your political cartoon. Why did you choose it? How are you making your point(s)? I’ll be giving.
Fishbowl Discussion Directions:
Group Talk Feedback – A focus on the individual
BR: 3/22/17 What aspects of your amendment does your presentation cover well? What parts might need some help? You have 20 minutes to work on your PSA.
Expeditionary Learning Grade 8 Module 1 Unit 2 Case Study:
Unit 2/ lesson 10 End-of-unit 2 Assessment
Project Based Learning
Sharing Homework and Unpacking Learning Targets (7 minutes)
Seminar Four Quality Academic feedback: oral and written
Presentation transcript:

Protocols for Critique & Revision Use with students and with teacher peers to receive critical feedback for improvement Change the time and criteria as needed Other resource protocols http://www.nsrfharmony.org/free-resources/protocols https://www.engageny.org/search-site/protocols?solrsort=score%20desc

DRIVING QUESTION CHARRETTE PROTOCOL PRESENTER Presentation: Presenter explains their project idea and DQ; Presenter asks a specific question to frame the feedback e.g. “What can I make better about..?” “How can I improve…?” Thought Partner listens. 2 minutes THOUGHT PARTNER Partner gives suggestions providing helpful, specific, and kind feedback: “I Like…”: Audience shares what they liked about the project (8 Essential Elements) and the DQ “I Wonder…”: Audience shares concerns (Authentic, Leads to In-Depth Inquiry, Student-Friendly) Presenter Listens. PRESENTER AND THOUGHT PARTNER Open Discussion Presenter and Thought Partner have a dialogue about the suggestions/ feedback. TOTAL TIME 6 minutes

EVIDENCE-BASED CLAIM CHARRETTE PROTOCOL PRESENTER & THOUGHT PARTNER Presentation: Presenter presents his or her claim and evidence to support the claim Presenter explains why he or she chose this claim and the supporting evidence Presenter asks a specific question to frame the feedback “What can I make better about..?” “How can I improve…?” Thought Partner listens. 4 minutes THOUGHT PARTNER Feedback: Partner gives suggestions providing helpful, specific, and kind feedback: “I Like…”: Audience shares what he or she likes about the claim and evidence “I Wonder…”: Audience shares concerns about the claim: too broad, already stated or obvious, does not state a position clearly or not at all, or is stated as an opinion but not as a basis for an argument (etc.) “I Wonder…”: Audience shares concerns about the evidence: is not concrete or explicit, does not support the claim, Presenter listens. 4 minutes PRESENTER & THOUGHT PARTNER Open Discussion: Presenter and Thought Partner have a dialogue about the suggestions/ feedback. Both Presenter and Thought Partner speaks. 2 minutes TOTAL TIME 10 minutes

PBL PROJECT GALLERY WALK PROTOCOL TIME Directions Provide feedback on the following areas: Significant Content—Is the content relevant to students’ lives? Are there real-world connections that put learning in context to what matters to students? Driving Question—Is the DQ engaging, open-ended, and aligned to significant content? Will it drive in-depth student inquiry? Is it relevant to students? Group and Individual Products—Are the designated products authentic and relate to the Driving Question? Do both group and individual products support student learning of the significant content? Do the products add value to the community or to the lives of others in some way? Public Audience—Is the public audience authentic? Is the group project appropriate for the audience? 2 min Gallery Walk & Feedback Silently record feedback on sticky notes offering one or more of the following: “Praise” —Tell why you like it, why it is a strength “Question” —Ask questions about pieces of the plan that are unclear “Polish” —Provide suggestions for improvement Make sure the feedback is helpful, specific, and kind. 20 min Reflection Think deeply about your project using the feedback you received from your peers. How can you improve the authenticity of your project so that student learning is meaningful and relevant? 8 min TOTAL 30 min

STUDENT PROJECT GALLERY WALK PROTOCOL TIME Set-Up and Directions Hang poster or arrange projects for the gallery walk Distribute sticky notes Assign roles (give students specific elements of the project to critique) Give directions 5 min Gallery Walk & Feedback Silently record feedback on sticky notes specific “I likes” and I wonders.” Give one “I like” and one “I wonder” for each project. Make sure the feedback is helpful, specific, and kind. 20 min Reflection Think deeply about your project using the feedback you received from your peers. TOTAL 30 min

CRITICAL FRIENDS PROTOCOL PRESENTER Presentation Presenter explains their project; Audience Listens. 4 min EVERYONE Clarification Audience asks short clarifying questions; Presenter responds. 2 min AUDIENCE “I Like or appreciate…” Audience shares what they liked (Best Practices); Presenter listens. “I Wonder or am curious if you thought about…” Audience shares concerns (Needs Development); “I Have…” Audience shares ideas & resources for the project. 3 min Reflection Group reflects on useful feedback; Audience listens. TOTAL TIME 15 min

CRITICAL FRIENDS PROTOCOL PRESENTER Presentation Presenter explains their project; Audience Listens. 4 min EVERYONE Clarification Audience asks short clarifying questions; Presenter responds. 2 min AUDIENCE “I Like or appreciate…” Audience shares what they liked (Best Practices); Presenter listens. “I Wonder or am curious if you thought about…” Audience shares concerns (Needs Development); Reflection Group reflects on useful feedback; Audience listens. “I Have an idea or a resource…” Audience shares ideas & resources for the project. 3 min TOTAL TIME 15 min