ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY 2013-14 March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core Standards (What this means in computer class)
Advertisements

The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
JUSD Common Core Priority Standards for ELA. SEE THE “BIG PICTURE” FIRST.
Access Point One: Purpose and Modeling Access Point Two: Close and Scaffolded Reading Instruction Access Point Three: Collaborative Conversations Access.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
EngageNY.org Living a Lesson Part 2 Secondary Session 4, November 2013 NTI.
EQuIP Rubric and Quality Review Curriculum Council September 26, 2014.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
MULTILINGUAL & MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Science Content Leadership Network July 17, 2014.
ELA Common Core State Standards Job Alike #8 Assessment.
Facilitators: Teresa Roe English Language Arts Division Manager, TDS Latahshia Coleman English Language Arts Instructional Facilitator, TDS Session Outcomes.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
Adapted from: PARCC Model Content Frameworks English Language Arts/Literacy October 2011.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Two: November 2, 5, 6, 7, 2013.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Summer 2012 Day 2, Session 1 Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts “Transitioning to the Common Core State Standards by Making Strategic.
Grade 3-5 ELA Common Core Ambassadors August 13-17, 2012 Albany, NY.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Puget Sound ESD December
Revisiting LDC, Day 2 Elementary Bowling Green, Kentucky – Reach Associates November 15,
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Understanding the Standards We Teach – English Language Arts.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session One: September 4-7, 2013.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Bremerton School District ACT System. OVERVIEW OF THE INTER ACT IVE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MODEL.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice CCSS Regional Conference June
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Welcome! March 2013 ELA Network
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Module 1: Read and Know the Standard.
Welcome Arts Teachers October 19, 2011 Professional Development.
Chapters 8 & 9 Planning for Continuous Performance-Based Assessment 8 & 9 Planning for Continuous Performance-Based Assessment C H A P T E R S.
Instructional Leadership Planning Common Assessments.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
ELA VERTICAL ALIGNMENT Common Core Transition Training SY May 6, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC)
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
Information for the Presenter Suggested Schedule: 8:00-8:30 Frame and Overview 8:30-9:00 Smarter Balanced Assessments 9:00-10:00 A Closer Look at Items.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
ELA Cohort Common Core Transition Training August 21, 2013 Professional Development Center (PDC)
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Elementary
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Secondary
SUHSD ELA/ELD CCSS Transition
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Presentation transcript:

ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth Hernandez, Gina Vattuone

Welcome NORMS: 1.Participate equally. 2.Postpone judgment and tolerate ambiguity. 3.Advocate for what is best for our students. 4.Accept critical questions. 5.Reach agreement with consensus.

Daily Learning Target (DLT) By the end of today’s cohort training, I will be able to gain assessment literacy and describe measurable outcomes expected of my students by the end of the semester as evidenced by annotated assessment drafts and completed evaluation criteria.

PD Essential Question How do challenging tasks affect teacher expectations, instructional practices, and student learning?

How did we get here? O Cohort 1: 2 sample PTs O Cohort 2: PT frame and PT O Cohort 3: Collaboration to create PT and Final Exam O Cohort members: Continuing collaboration to revise PTs and Final Exam

Why? O New standards emphasize the integration of all four strands—Reading, Writing, Speaking & Listening, and Language O New standards ask students to engage with complex texts and to synthesize information in support of controlling ideas or claims

Our work today O Session 1: O Review the PT and provide feedback for the final product O Implement Structured Student Interaction O Session 2: O Review the Final Exam and provide feedback for the final product O Session 3: O Read Chapter 3 of the CCSS ELA Framework

Performance Task Parameters O Is aligned to Semester 2 EQs O Addresses both content and literacy outcomes O Includes texts with possible annotation directions O Has internal coherence: all parts are related O Includes CR tasks based on texts O Includes time for collaboration O Requires synthesis in written format O Includes scoring guide/rubric

Structured Student Interactions (SSI) provide for opportunities to verbally process/rehearse before producing an outcome access prior knowledge or allow for processing new information select SSI activity based on students’ needs √ enhance ability to garner meaning from text √ elicit/refine responses to the texts contain clearly communicated and consistently followed protocols √ think time √ language response expectations √ developmentally appropriate and cognitively demanding task √ conservative time limits

Time to interact with PT Independent Work: (20-25 minutes as needed) O Read:Teacher Directions & Student PT (Part 1) O Complete: Chart 1 O Annotate for revision: focus on content Table/Group Work: (30-35 minutes as needed) O Use 3-Step Interview to complete Chart 2

Feedback O Discuss: Annotations O Complete: Performance Task Evaluation Guide O Submit: One master copy of PT revision & evaluation form per table

Closing Session 1 O What are some highlights? O What are some areas for growth? O Please prepare all PT papers to be collected

15 Minutes

PD Essential Question What role does the teacher play in implementing the Common Core standards, within and beyond the classroom?

Our work today O Session 1: O Review the PT and provide feedback for the final product O Review Structured Student Interaction O Session 2: O Review the Final Exam and provide feedback for the final product O Session 3: O Read Chapter 3 of the CCSS ELA Framework

Final Exam Parameters O Is aligned to semester’s EQs O Addresses both content and literacy outcomes O Must include selected responses and possibly other item types O Should engage students for minutes O Includes key/rubric(s) O Should generate data stored in DD for future reference

Rigor Relevance Framework Hess’ Cognitive Rigor Matrix

Final Exam Review and Feedback Independent Work: (30 minutes as needed) O Read and Answer 11 th  Questions th  Questions O Annotate for revision: focus on content Table/Group Work: (30 minutes as needed) O Discuss & Complete: Final Exam Evaluation Guide O Provide: 1 annotated copy of Final Exam and 1 Final Exam Evaluation Guide

Closing Session 2 O What are some highlights? O What are some areas for growth?

1-hour LUNCH BREAK

PD Essential Question How is ELA embedded in a larger context? How can we explore depth of understanding?

Our work today O Session 1: O Review the PT and provide feedback for the final product O Review Structured Student Interaction O Session 2: O Review the Final Exam and provide feedback for the final product O Session 3: O Read Chapter 3 of the CCSS ELA Framework

Daily Learning Target (DLT) By the end of today’s cohort training, I will be able to gain an understanding of the “Key Themes and Practices for ELA/ELD Instruction” (framework draft) as evidenced by annotating the text, engaging in a collaborative activity, and completing recommended student outcomes-evidence form.

Key Themes and Practices for ELA/ELD Instruction

How will the information in Ch. 3 of the ELA/ELD Framework impact your teaching practices in the upcoming year?

Closing Session 3 O Revisit DLT O Revisit PD Essential Question: How is ELA embedded in a larger context? How can we explore depth of understanding? O NCR

Closure and Next Steps… (via NCR) 1. Summary 2. Reflection 3. Needs/Requests 4. Action Plan:

For Title II compliance, please type the link below and complete the electronic feedback form.