Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK J-PARC Upgrade Plan for Future and Beyond T2K.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 J-PARC and T2K 1.Accelerator construction status and commissioning 2.Accelerator upgrade plan in first 5 years 3.Experiments with slow extracted beam.
Advertisements

J. Strait Fermilab October 21, 2005 The Neutrino Detector of the Future: A Massive Liquid Argon TPC.
ISIS Accelerator Division
Current Status of Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda,
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Development of new power supplies for J-PARC MR upgrade Yoshi Kurimoto (KEK) for J-PARC accelerator group.
Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
J-PARC upgrade T. Nakadaira (KEK / J-PARC). Outline J-PARC overview & on-going program Motivation of future experiment in J-PARC Overview of future experiment.
1 T2K Beam Operation Summary (earthquake recovery and beamline survey) NBI 2012 T. Ishii (KEK) for the T2K beam group.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda, H. Sako, H. Suzuki,
1 Status and Plans at J-PARC Linac Kazuo Hasegawa J-PARC Center/Japan Atomic Energy Agency Collaboration meeting between CERN and J-PARC December 18, 2013,
Q&A on T2K construction of beam line near detectors budget collaboration (contribution from each) T2KK.
Related poster [1] TPAG022: Slow Wave Electrode Structures for the ESS 2.5 MeV Chopper – Michael A. Clarke-Gayther Status Funding bids have been prepared.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Future upgrade of the neutrino beam-line for multi-MW beam 5 th Hyper-Kamiokande open Vancouver July Yuichi Oyama (KEK) (for T2K neutrino.
KEK Plans for J-PARC Particle Physics at J-PARC CERN-KEK Committee March 29, 2010 at KEK Koichiro Nishikawa Institute for Particle and Nuclear Studies,
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
Development of the beam loss monitor for beam halo measurement in the J-PARC RCS Masahiro Yoshimoto *, Hiroyuki Harada, Shinidhi Kato, Kota Okabe, Michikazu.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
Contents Overview of 150 MeV FFAG Accelerator
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
STATUS OF BNL SUPER NEUTRINO BEAM PRORAM W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NBI2003, KEK November 7-11, 2003.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Proton FFAG Accelerator R&D at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
29 September 2006M.Sakuda NuFact06 Asian Regional Outlook (Japan) -by Y.Kuno (Osaka) (1) SuperBeam (T2K) (2) J-PARC current upgrade plan (3) T2HK or T2KK.
J-PARC Accelerator and Beam Simulations Sep. 7th, SAD2006 Masahito Tomizawa J-PARC Main Ring G., KEK Outline of J-PARC Accelerator Characteristics of High.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
THE DESIGN OF THE AGS-BASED PROTON DRIVER FOR NEUTRINO FACTORY W.T. WENG, BNL FFAG WORKSHOP JULY 7-11, 2003 KEK, JAPAN.
LINAC4 and the Upgrade of the LHC Injector Complex R. Garoby 26 February, 2013.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
1 NICA Project Report of The Group I S.L.Bogomolov, A.V.Butenko, A.V.Efremov, E.D.Donets, I.N.Meshkov, V.A.Mikhailov, A.O.Sidorin, A.V.Smirnov, Round Table.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
COMET Task Force 16/Oct/2008 J-PARC PAC meeting Satoshi MIHARA.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Aug Project X ICD2 Briefing.
After Protons from RCS 1 st DeeMe Collaboration Meeting Dec. 10, 2012 Kazami Yamamoto J-PARC Center Accelerator Division.
Presenter : Yang Wu McMaster University Work conducted at IHEP.
A. FaccoEURISOL DS Task 7GANIL, 30 Nov 2005 EURISOL DS 2° Meeting Task 7 - Primary Accelerator GANIL, November 30, 2005 Summary of the Task 7 status New.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
J-PARC Site Visit Summary – 03/09 S. Childress (Accelerator, T2K Primary) J. Hylen (T2K Target Hall, Decay, Absorber & Near Detector)
Irradiated T2K Ti alloy materials test plans
High power beam operation at J-PARC: status and future
Takashi Kobayashi IPNS, KEK
Injection and Extraction in the J-PARC RCS
BE/RF-IS Contribution to LIU C. Rossi and M. Paoluzzi
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
Development of new power supplies for J-PARC MR upgrade
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Presentation transcript:

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK J-PARC Upgrade Plan for Future and Beyond T2K J-PARC Upgrade Plan for Future and Beyond T2K T.Ishida Neutrino Experimental Facility Group J-PARC / KEK [CONTENTS] 1. Introduction 2. Status of Accelerator Operation* 3. J-PARC Upgrade Plan* 4. Summary 1 * By courtesy of T. Koseki (J-PARC)

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK 1. Introduction 2

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK T2K: The 1 st experiment with J-PARC facility Discovery of   e oscillation ( e appearance) Precision measurement of  disappearance Open possibility to explore CPV in lepton sector 3

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK T2K e Appearance Result [data until Jun.2012] 11 candidate events are observed with 3.01x10 20 pot N exp =3.22±0.43(sin 2 2 13 =0) 10.71±1.10 ( =0.1) Probability=0.08%(3.2) 4 The 1 st e event after EQ (Mar.2012) Evidence of e appearance

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Next Step of T2K Systematic error reaches already as small as 10% owing to near detector. We can achieve 5 significance with ~8x10 20 pot. It is within our reach before shutdown in summer, Near Detector Observation (MeV)

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK 6 J-PARC P32 (LAr TPC R&D), arXiv: Kamioka Fid. Mass 560kt, L=295km OA=2.5deg Okinoshima 100kt, L=658km OA=0.78deg LoI: The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment Submitted Sep.2011 [arXiv: v1], Current: T2K J-PARC ~0.75MW + 50kt 295km 2.5° Future LBL plans using J-PARC

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK  → e probability Required Run-Time To discover CPV: 10 years x 750kW WC: 3yr x 750kW () + 7yr (bar) LiqAr: 10yr x 750kW () 7 Normal hierarchy Neutrino Anti-neutrino 295km 658km First max GeV Second max. 0.4GeV

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Expected e CC candidates (HK LOI) To go to CPV discovery, intensity upgrade of J-PARC is the key sin 2 2θ 13 =0.1 stat. error only ν e candidates diff. from δ=0 case δ=0 δ=1/2π δ=π δ=3/2π δ=0 δ=1/2π δ=π δ=3/2π δ=1/2π δ=π δ=3/2π δ=1/2π δ=π δ=3/2π 0.75MW×3yrs0.75MW×7yrs ~4,000 signal ~2,000 signal

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK 2. Status of Accelerator Operation 9

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Hadron Experimental Hall Main Ring A round = 1,568m Materials and Life Science Facility ( MLF) 3GeV RCS A round=348m LINAC(330m) Neutrino Beam 3NBT 3-50BT Transmutation Experimental Facility Near Neutrino Detectors FY01~08 Construction Nov. 2006~ LINAC Oct. 2007~ RCS May 2008~ MLF/MR Dec. 2008~ Jan Hadron Apr Neutrino Neutrino Target Station January 2008 January 2008 J-PARC Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex Joint project btw. KEK & JAEA 10

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Beam delivery from RCS to MLF Beam power [kW] Availability [%] Accumulated beam power [MWh] Accumulated beam power (New target) [MWh] Beam Power [kW] Availability [%] Accumulated Beam Power [MWh] Stable operation of 275 kW successfully demonstrated 11 Design Intensity:1MW Design Intensity:1MW

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Delivered POT to Neutrino Facility (MR Fast Extraction) After earthquake, beam operation resumed in the same year, and physics run resumed within one year. Stable operation at ~190kW achieved, 1x10 14 ppp (1.26x10 13 x8b) is the world record of extracted protons per pulse for synchrotrons. 12 Delivered # of Protons Protons Per Pulse 1.43x10 20 pot until Mar.11,’ x10 20 pot Jun.9’12 1x10 14 ppp 6 bunches Rep=3.52s  50kW 8 bunches 3.2s  145kW 8 bunches 2.92  2.56s  ~190kW Physics Run resumed on Mar.8, 2012 Beam resumed on Dec.24,2011 [w/o horn operation] Dec.24,25, 2011 Jan 20-25, 2012 Run-1Run-2Run-3

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK High power operation in FX mode ( March 5 to June 9, 2012) Delivered beam power is limited by beam loss at the injection / collimator section. Ring collimator upgrade was being taken place during 2012 summer shutdown. The capacity is now enlarged to 2kW. 1ms average 10 µs average 200kW 100kW 1000W 400W 600W MR Power [kW] Beam loss [W] Mar.5 Jun.9 450W Capacity of Collimator 13

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK 3. J-PARC Upgrade Plan 14

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK 30mA 181MeV 50mA 400MeV LINAC Upgrade New accelerating structure, ACS, will be installed to increase the extracted beam energy from 181MeV to 400MeV New accelerating structure, ACS, will be installed to increase the extracted beam energy from 181MeV to 400MeV Front-end part (IS+RFQ) will be replaced to increase peak current from 30mA to 50m These installations are scheduled in 2013 shutdown Repetition: 25Hz, Pulse width: 0.5ms RF antenna colab.w SNS ACS, Annular Coupled Structure linac 15

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Power upgrade for Linac & RCS Power [MW] JFY Original power upgrade plan of RCS to MLF Linac 400MeV Ion source, RFQ RCS 400MeV Inj. Realignm ent Fabrication, Offline test R&D, Fabrication, Offline test Installation, Beam test User operation, Power increase R&D, Fabrication, Offline test Budget for the Linac and the RCS upgrade is mostly secured. Revised plan We revise the power-up curve after the earthquake: shifted 6 months.

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK For Higher Beam Power in MR Fast Extraction Number of particles in one pulse is limited by the beam loss due to the space charge effect ~450kW is estimated upper limit with current apparatus To achieve higher beam power : 1. Higher beam energy than 30 GeV (Original plan) 2. Higher repetition rate than 0.4 Hz 17 Np=2.2 x ppp Beam power: 435 kW at 30 GeV / 0.4 Hz Beam loss ~ 1.3 kW Acceleration Injection Time (s) Survival ratio Tracking simulation of the MR fast extraction with space charge effect

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Magnet Saturation in the 50 GeV operation The saturation effect deteriorates the field quality of the main magnets Total magnet power consumption for 50GeV operation is x4 times larger than that for 30GeV. Considering the situation after the earthquake, the high electric cost is fatal disadvantage for the higher beam energy option. 18 Ratio of B-field for dipole magnets Ratio of total magnet power consumption Y(mm) ~30GeV 40GeV 50GeV 40GeV 30GeV P 50GeV = 2P 40GeV = 4P 30GeV

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK For 1 Hz Operation 19 PS Building #3 PS Building #1 PS Building #2 FX/RF section Injection/collimator section (4) Upgrade of ring collimator section 2kW  3.5kW (1)Replacement of the magnet power supplies All the main magnet power supplies will be replaced with newly developed high rep./low ripple PS. A new PS building to be constructed. New PS Building (3) Upgrade of injection and extraction devices (2) Replacement of the rf cavities New magnetic core material, which has x2 times higher impedance than present one, is developed. 80cm T=2.5cm60kg Condenser bank For energy recovery SX section

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK The Medium-Term Plan of the MR-FX until 2017 We adopt the high repetition rate scheme to achieve the design beam intensity, 750 kW. Rep. rate will be increased from ~ 0.4 Hz to ~1 Hz by replacing magnet PS’s and RF cavities A new budget is needed for replacing MR main magnets. 20 JFY LINAC upgrade FX power [kW] Cycle time of main magnet PS New magnet PS for high rep s 2.56 s2.4 s1.3 s Present RF system New high gradient rf system Install. #7,8Install. #9 Ring collimators Additional shields Add.collimators and shields (2kW) Add.collimators (3.5kW) Injection system FX system New injection kicker R&D Manufacture installation/test R&D Kicker PS improvement 、 Septum 2 manufacture /test LF septum, PS for HF septa manufacture /test Manufacture installation/test

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Project Review by MEXT 21 On March~May 2012, progress of the J-PARC project in the recent 5 years was evaluated by a review committee at Monka-Syo, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science & Technology in Japan (MEXT). An evaluation report was issued. The 5-year medium term plan (2013~2017) was endorsed by the review committee. For MR, scenarios for Multi-MW output beam power for neutrino experiment, are being discussed One of feasible schemes: Introduce 8 GeV emittance damping ring betw. RCS and MR The detailed scheme for the future MW proton driver is to be discussed in the next five years, to submit budget proposal to the government in 2018 or later.

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Doubled Rep.rate: Impact to Neutrino Facility ? Thermal shock will be reduced for equipments which are exposed to beam directly (Target, beam window, profile monitor, beam dump…) Cf. T2K Target: ΔT = 750kW, Safety factor = ~3.5 for original design  For doubled rep.rate option, ΔT = 100K/spill, Safety Factor= ~7 (?)  T.Nakadaira’s talk. Heat load for equipments will stay same. Cf. T2K Target: 750kW Fatigue of horns will become more severe. Update of power supplies Reconfiguration of bus-bar & strip line layout  T.Sekiguchi’s talk 22

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK 4. Summary T2K achieved 3.2  significance for  e appearance signal using 3x10 20 POT. 11 candidate events. Need more statistics. We can achieve 5 significance with ~8x10 20 pot. It is within our reach before shutdown in summer, To going to precision  13 measurements and further CPV discovery, upgrade of J-PARC acc. is quite essential. Upgrade of J-PARC accelerators To increase #p/bunch Increase MR collimator capability (2012 Summer; done) Upto 450W  2KW loss LINAC frontend upgrade (2013 Summer) Ion source, RFQ : 30mA  50mA LINAC energy upgrade to 400MeV (2013 summer) To realize MR 750kW operation, doubled rep.rate option is chosen. Need to replace all magnet power supplies in ~5yrs Need higher gradient RF core. The mid-term plan is endorsed by the committee at MEXT. 23

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Backups 24

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Expected Contours Normal mass hierarchy (known)  Good sensitivity for CPV 7.5MW ・ years 5% systematics on signal, ν μ BG, ν e BG, ν/ν True points Reactor  13 exps.(1σ)

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK 2% all syst σ true δ (π) High Sensitivity to CPV w/ <~5% sys. error 5% all syst 10% all syst 26 CPV Discovery Sensitivity 7.5MWyear sin 2 2θ 13 =0.1 normal MH 74% region of δ covered at 3σ w/ 5% sys. error (w/ Mass Hierarchy known)

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK On going R&Ds (1) - Power supply for main magnets- - A small scale prototype model is manufactured and testing in 2011/ A real scale prototype for one of the quadrupole families will be manufactured and tested in 2012 and Technical review committee meeting for the power supply R&D will be held in October 2 nd, High rep rate (~1 Hz): Energy recovery using condenser bank -Small current deviation: Current feedback, voltage feed-forward, NPC chopper..

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK On going R&Ds (2) - MA (Magnetic Alloy) loaded rf cavity with higher shunt impedance - A type of MA cores, FT3L (made by Hitachi metals), which is processed by annealing with magnetic field, shows higher impedance than FT3M, the present core used in J-PARC synchrotrons. We have manufactured the real size core of FT3L for the rf cavity of the MR in the J-PARC site in collaboration with Hitachi metals. The FT3L core has the impedance approximately twice of the FT3M. FT3M: annealing w/o magnetic field FT3L: annealing w/ magnetic field The first manufactured real size FT3L core Diameter 80 cm, thickness 2.5 cm, weight 60 kg. Six FT3L cores are used at one gap of the cavity tank in the #9 cavity, which is installed in the 2012 summer shutdown. Frequency [MHz] µQf

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK 3.0 GeV Inj: Ave Inj loss 3.2% (2.4 kW Inj loss for MR 750 kW) 3.2 GeV Inj: Ave Inj loss 1.5% (1.2 kW Inj loss for MR 750 kW ) Simulation of beam survival in the injection period of the MR for the RCS 1MW eq. beam (4e13 ppb) Injection energy and beam loss in the MR 3.4 GeV 3.6 GeV 6.0 GeV Beam survival ratio is drastically increased by higher beam momentum. Time [s] Survival ratio

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK Beta & Dispersion for 1-superperiod  x,y (m)  x,y (m) H & V s (m) Design of the 8-GeV BR : Lattice & parameters 8-GeV BR INJ+COLL RF CAVs EXT 3-GeV RCS8-GeV BR Circumference m m Super-periodicity34 Injection energy400 MeV3 GeV Extraction energy3 GeV8 GeV Repetition25 Hz Ramping patternSinusoidal Transition energy9 GeV15 GeV Harmonic number24 Number of bunches22 Momentum acceptance ±1% Ring acceptance486  mm mrad 189  mm mrad Collimator aperture324  mm mrad   mm mrad Parameters of the RCS and 8 GeV BR

Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK