Detection of photoeletrons from the EFW probes A Fazakerley et al.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cluster Reveals Properties of Cold Plasma Flow May 15, 2009 Erik Engwall.
Advertisements

RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Interplay Between Electronic and Nuclear Motion in the Photodouble Ionization of H 2 T J Reddish, J Colgan, P Bolognesi, L Avaldi, M Gisselbrecht, M Lavollée,
3.2 More about photo electricity The easiest electrons to eject are on the metals surface And will have maximum kinetic energy Other electrons need more.
Sputtering at Europa History and Outlook Tim Cassidy, with help from Fran Bagenal, Ben Teolis, Chris Paranicas.
MAX PLANCK PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT © John Parkinson.
Introduction Secondary electron secondary electron detector The electron beam interaction with near surface specimen atoms will make a signal which results.
№4. Soap film Create a soap film in a circular wire loop. The soap film deforms when a charged body is placed next to it. Investigate how the shape of.
TEST GRAINS AS A NOVEL DIAGNOSTIC TOOL B.W. James, A.A. Samarian and W. Tsang School of Physics, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia
Comparing the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction at Mercury and Saturn A. Masters Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration.
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Electrically pumped terahertz SASER device using a weakly coupled AlAs/GaAs.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 11: Diagnostics / heating.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP Abstract Measurements of the radial equilibrium potential profiles have been successfully obtained with a Heavy Ion Beam Probe.
STREAMER DYNAMICS IN A MEDIA CONTAINING DUST PARTICLES* Natalia Yu. Babaeva and Mark J. Kushner Iowa State University Department of Electrical and Computer.
Schottky Enabled Photoemission & Dark Current Measurements John Power, Eric Wisniewski, Wei Gai Argonne Wakefield Accelerator Group Argonne National Laboratory.
Outline (HIBP) diagnostics in the MST-RFP Relationship of equilibrium potential measurements with plasma parameters Simulation with a finite-sized beam.
Quantum Physics and Nuclear Physics
ESS 265Electric Fields 1 Electric Field Measurements Types of electric field measurements Double Probe Measurements –Theory –Measurements in the ionosphere.
Magnetism Magnetic materials have the ability to attract or repel other types of magnetic materials. But not all materials are magnetic.
Physics.
Concentrated Generator Regions in the Auroral Magnetosphere as Derived from Conjugated Cluster and FAST Data M. Hamrin (1),O. Marghitu (2, 3), B.Klecker.
The exposure of the Moon to the Earth’s plasmasheet Mike Hapgood STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP E ~ 0 V/m in Locked Discharges Average potential ~ 580 V  ~ V less than in standard rotating plasmas Drop in potential.
Cluster photoemission Aug 24, 2011.
30.5 Magnetic flux  30. Fig 30-CO, p.927
110/29/2015 Physics Lecture 4  Electrostatics Electric flux and Gauss’s law Electrical energy potential difference and electric potential potential energy.
Jarred Alexander Young October 2,  Langmuir Probe testing  Probes completed and setting up for electron temperature scanning  Power Supply 
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
Experimental and Numerical studies on Bulk Micromegas SINP group in RD51 Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, West.
Magnetism. What makes a magnet? Some materials align their unpaired electrons so they spin all in the same direction. These electrons form microscopic.
Physics 106 Lesson #21 Magnetism: Motors and Generators Dr. Andrew Tomasch 2405 Randall Lab
Scott Thaller Van Allen Probes EFW meeting University of Minnesota June 10-12, 2014.
Simple Approach to Salvaging THEMIS ESA Moments Prior to Boom Deployment Vladimir Kondratovich David G. Sibeck.
A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.
1 Hybrid Simulations of the Callisto - Magnetosphere Interaction Stas Barabash and Mats Holmström Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden.
Field enhancement coefficient  determination methods: dark current and Schottky enabled photo-emissions Wei Gai ANL CERN RF Breakdown Meeting May 6, 2010.
IMPACT Laboratory investigations of electrostatic dust lofting on comet and asteroid (airless bodies) surfaces Xu Wang Joseph Schwan, Hsiang-Wen Hsu, Mihály.
Lab. Results. Differential Photoelectric Charging and Super-charging near the Lunar Terminator UV Radiation Differential photoelectric charging near the.
Cluster 911 Plasmoid Substorm Sept 11, 2002 DOY 254 Onset at 1600 UT Shock at Cluster 16:23 Plasmoid 16: :40 UT.
PLASMA DIAGNOSTIC BY ELECTRIC PROBE NITIN MINOCHA M.Tech. N.S.T., Delhi University 1.
Hot He + events in the inner magnetosphere observed by Cluster 1 Yamauchi, et al. (2014), JGR, doi: /2013JA Inner magnetosphere: Majority.
Simulation of the new PS EC detector: implementation and results A. Romano, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo LIU-PS Student Day 20 April 2015.
PLASMA DENSITIES FROM SPACECRAFT POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS CALIBRATED BY THE ASPOC, EDI, CIS, PEACE AND WHISPER EXPERIMENTS ON CLUSTER Arne Pedersen and Bjørn.
Update on the interpretation of spacecraft potential during active control Klaus Torkar IWF/OAW, Graz, Austria MSSL, October 26 th, 2006 acknowledging.
Status_Penetrating_Radiation Flag Branislav Mihaljčić, A Fazakerley 1.
3D modelling of the plasma environment of particle-emitting space probes - Modélisation 3D de l’environnement plasmique des sondes spatiales émettant des.
Analytic modelling of Rosetta spacecraft potential measurements based on SPIS simulations Master thesis by: Christian Hånberg Swedish Institute of Space.
Atom-interferometry constraints on dark energy Philipp Haslinger Müller group University of California Berkeley.
Reconstructing the spacecraft potential of Cluster when in active control and other issues Maria Andriopoulou Klaus Torkar Rumi Nakamura Space Research.
Ionization Injection E. Öz Max Planck Institute Für Physik.
MSSL * I. Rozum, A.N. Fazakerley, A.D. Lahiff, H. Bacai and C. Anekallu PEACE Calibration Status 8 th Cross Calibration Workshop, Kinsale, Ireland, 28.
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module Peter Kluit, Jan Timmermans Prepared 16 May 2016.
3D modelling of the plasma environment of particle-emitting space probes - Modélisation 3D de l’environnement plasmique des sondes spatiales émettant des.
Possible long-term trend in the relationship between the ASPOC ion current and spacecraft potential measurements Klaus Torkar IWF/OAW, Graz, Austria and.
SPES Target Group Data…… INFN-CISAS-CNR collaboration The Ablation Ion Source for refractory metal ion beams A preliminary design.
10 th CAA Cross-calibration meeting, 2nd – 4th November 2009, Paris N. Doss, A. Fazakerley, B. Mihaljčić and I. Rozum UCL Department of Space and Climate.
20 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop MPS, Göttingen, Germany Oct Ways of Measuring DC Electric Field: Who Does it Correctly?
Last Time Electric field of a hollow sphere
3D modelling of the plasma environment of particle-emitting space probes - Modélisation 3D de l’environnement plasmique des sondes spatiales émettant.
Solar Wind Core Electrons
Meteoroids 2016, ESTEC, Noordwijk, the Netherlands, June 6-10, 2016
General Physics (PHY 2140) Lecture 4 Electrostatics
Background for JGO: Rosetta dual Langmuir probes (LAP)
First 10 months (Feb 2007-Dec 2007)
Diagnosis of a High Harmonic Beam Using
DOE Plasma Science Center Control of Plasma Kinetics
Kevin J. Genestreti, R. B. Torbert, I. Dors, R. E. Denton, A. Le, T. K
Pulse Profile Decomposition: Geometry and Beam Patterns of EXO and 4U
Simple Stretch “Flips” the Sign of Charge Carriers
Presentation transcript:

Detection of photoeletrons from the EFW probes A Fazakerley et al

Photoemission from EFW Photoemission from Cluster Effect of varying bias current Effect of varying guard potential

Probe: 8 cm diameter sphere; attached by thin (0.3 mm tbc) radius wire Trying to achieve effective isolation of the probe Preamplifier Puck: 8 cm diameter disc, 3 cm long, biased to Vprobe+ 1V Idea is to “limit the photoelectrons from the puck coming to the probe” Guard: biased to Vprobe- 6V Idea is to “limit the influence of probe photoelectrons on the spacecraft side of the guard” Wire booms at spacecraft potential thin (1.1 mm tbc) radius Probe-probe distance = 88m Photoemission from EFW EFW Probe photoemission: e-folding energy 1.5 eV based on lab tests Details: Cully et al. 2007, Pedersen et al. 2008

Photoemission from EFW Details: Pedersen et al 2008

(situation with Sun at large +ve x; y = 0) Photoemission from EFW Cully et al. JGR 2007 Vsc = 25 V; Vp + 20 V (case of large Debye lengths – lobes, plasmasheet) Many probe electrons will be attracted to the wire booms and the spacecraft body Probe system

Detection of probe photoemission EDI PEA HEEA PEA LEEA ASPOC EFW HEEA LEEA Spacecraft photoelectrons probe photoelectrons or cold ambient plasma electrons? Note LEEA apparently shows more asymmetry in the eV electrons

PEACE Observations A test was carried out in which the bias current to the probes was changed, turning their photoemission on and off. EFW bias current is periodically perturbed in the second part of this interval There is clear control of the high flux “beam” near the potential. (Note, this was not done for C4, bottom panel) C1 C2 C3 C4 Detection of probe photoemission

EFW: bias voltage 10 V EFW: bias current -100 nA There is clear control of the high flux “beam” near the potential. With a strong –ve bias current, the probe emits all its photoelectrons, some of which are then detected by PEACE. Apparently no significant fluxes of cold ambient plasma – would be expected at similar energies before and after the bias current was set to -100 nA Plot of EFW bias current /voltage history here Detection of probe photoemission

Now EDI produces a strong electron beam current on C1 and C3 and drives Vsc ~100s V EFW cannot provide enough bias current for to make the probes –ve w.r.t. the plasma when Vsc > 100 V, and the probes are positive and emitting much lower fluxes EFW: bias voltage 10 V EFW: bias current -100 nA Detection of probe photoemission Are we seeing cold ambient plasma electrons when bias voltage is at 10 V? It would be good to see if the EFW wake technique reveals anything at this time

Vguard +20V Same for Vguard > 2V Vsc ~ V Limited evidence of probe electrons Role of the Guard Potential

Vguard +2V Vsc ~ V Increasing evidence of probe electrons

Role of the Guard Potential Vguard +0V Vsc ~ V Strong evidence of probe electrons; significant spin asymmetry

Role of the Guard Potential Vguard -2V Vsc ~ V Strong evidence of probe electrons; significant spin asymmetry

Role of the Guard Potential Vguard -6V (standard setting) Vsc ~ V Moderate flux of probe electrons; significant spin asymmetry in LEEA but more symmetric in HEEA... (reason tbc)

Role of the Guard Potential Vguard -10V Vsc ~ 50 V Moderate evidence of probe electrons; significant spin asymmetry in LEEA and some in HEEA...

Role of the Guard Potential Vguard -20V Vsc ~ V Moderate evidence of probe electrons; significant spin asymmetry in LEEA and some in HEEA...

Summary Clear demonstration of detection by PEACE of EFW probe electrons reaching the spacecraft body – will contribute to the electric current balance that controls the spacecraft electrostatic potential Demonstration of the limits of EFW control of probe emission in rarefied plasma plus strong EDI current Demonstration of effect of varying the “guard” potential; – No probe electron flux for strong positive V_g – Quite asymmetric probe electron flux to spacecraft for small positive V_g (leads to spin phase dependent potential tbc) – More symmetric probe electron flux for V_g = -6V (value preferred by EFW to assist making good E field measurements; presumably because get spin independent Vsc) – Potential varies as current balance alters – (could be understood in more detail using future spacecraft-plasma interaction simulations)