Measuring Energy Linkages with the Hypothetical Extraction Method: An application to Spain Ana-Isabel Guerra Ana-Isabel Guerra Ferran Sancho Universitat.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTRA-INDUSTRY TRADE AND THE SCALE EFFECTS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION Elisa Riihimäki Statistics Finland, Business Structures September
Advertisements

Aims Competitive Industrial Base (Lisbon jobs and growth) Climate Change (greatest long-term challenge facing the human race) Right Mix/Balance – critical.
Federal Planning Bureau Economic analyses and forecasts METHODOLOGY OF EMISSIONS PROJECTIONS FOR BELGIUM (Third national communication, April 2002) METHODOLOGY.
Scottish Input-Output Tables
CARBON FOOTPRINT TOOL OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN EUROPE 01/04/2014 Xavier Gabarrell, Joan Rieradevall, Pere Llorach.
Introduction to Input-Output Based LCA. Admin Issues Friday Feb 16th? 1-2:30 confirmed HERE.
The impact of the rebound effect of first generation biofuel use in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions 17 th ICABR Conference, 19 June 2013 Edward Smeets,
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world Carbon Footprinting: Methodological Approaches, Challenges & Opportunities Simon Aumônier.
Environmental Sustainability in the Extractive Industry: The Case for Climate Change Mitigation Dr Uwem E. Ite.
IMPACT OF HIGH ENERGY COSTS: RESULTS FROM A GENERAL AND A PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL Francesco Gracceva Umberto Ciorba International Energy Workshop Kyoto,
OECD Model simulations for OECD’s Environmental Outlook: Methods and Results Presentation at the Fourth Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis Purdue.
Tax Exemption for Biofuels in Germany: Is Bio-Ethanol Really an Option for Climate Policy? Jan Michael Henke, Gernot Klepper, Norbert Schmitz International.
The crisis and energy consumption Irina Zabelina, Ekaterina Klevakina Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology, Siberian Branch of Russian.
1 WORKSHOP ON THE PREPARATION OF THE FOURTH NATIONAL COMMUNICATION FROM ANNEX I PARTIES Dublin, 30 September – 1 October 2004 National circumstances in.
UNFCCC Workshop, 9/ /1 2004, Dublin. September 30 – October 1, 2004, Dublin, Ireland Jiří Spitz ENVIROS, s. r. o. Czech Republic UNFCCC Workshop,
Green Economy Initiative Derek Eaton UNEP UNCEEA, June 2010.
The Economics of Marine Renewable Energy Peter McGregor Fraser of Allander Institute, Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde Second Forum on.
The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Changing Energy Prices on the Food Supply Chain in Northern Ireland Erin Smith Minihan
1 On the Effect of Greenhouse Gas Abatement in Japanese Economy: an Overlapping Generations Approach Shimasawa Manabu Akita University March 2006.
Energy balances in Sweden Per Anders Paulson Swedish Energy Agency.
ESPON Project TERRITORIAL TRENDS OF ENERGY SERVICES AND NETWORKS AND TERRITORIAL IMPACT OF EU ENERGY POLICY Álvaro Martins/Luís Centeno CEEETA Research.
Shale gas boom, trade, and environmental policies: Global economic and environmental analyses in a multidisciplinary modeling framework Farzad Taheripour,
Masaru Aoki (Japan Research Institute) Long-term, Multi-sectoral Model for Interaction on Economy and Environment of Japan International Workshop for Interactive.
APERC Workshop, Bali 16 November, 2009 Norihiro Okumura Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre APEC ENERGY DEMAND & SUPPLY OUTLOOK 4 th Edition ~ Case of.
TA Project: “Improving Emissions Control” Session 2 Scenarios for Emissions Management Dr Russell C Frost Project Team Leader.
IV-A 1 IV. Analytical extensions and policy issues.
Federal Planning Bureau Economic analyses and forecasts 1 An assessment of Belgian NRP macroeconomic objectives in a medium term framework Francis Bossier.
1 N.K. Tovey ( 杜伟贤 ) M.A, PhD, CEng, MICE, CEnv Н.К.Тови М.А., д-р технических наук Energy Science Director CRed Project HSBC Director of Low Carbon Innovation.
1 Macroeconomic Impacts of EU Climate Policy in AIECE November 5, 2008 Olavi Rantala - Paavo Suni The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © The industries on the previous table will be spilt up on three different types depending on the size.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © The economic impact of a limitation on production in a linear programming input-output model Wolfgang.
Efficiency Analysis of a Multisectoral Economic System Efficiency Analysis of a Multisectoral Economic System Mikulas Luptáčik University of Economics.
MAPS Chile Macroeconomic Modelling Results: MEMO II Model November 5th, 2014 EconLab III, Cape Town.
Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (ACS PROT – INN) Rome, th January.
Energy Management: 2014/2015 Energy Analysis: Input-Output Class # 5 Prof. Tânia Sousa
Energy Economics and Policy Spring 2012 Instructors: Chu Xiaodong, Zhang Wen :
Energy sector Special sector: –Depend on energy inputs (imported) –Strategic sector (linkages) –Non-competitive markets, high regulation Liberalization.
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 15 Energy Conservation.
Lecture Objectives: Finish with example modeling problems –Phase change thermal storage materials –Energy and airflow Interpret energy simulation results.
Mikuláš Luptáčik Martin Lábaj Department of Economic Policy University of Economics in Bratislava June 8, 2012 Bratislava Economic Meeting 2012.
© OECD/IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Worldwide Trends in Energy Use and Efficiency Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis ENERGY INDICATORS.
Section 3: Energy Use by Sector & Energy Conservation by Fuel Switching Dr. Congxiao Shang Room No.: 01 37P ENV-2D02 (2006):Energy Conservation – power.
The Canadian Approach To Compiling Emission Projections Marc Deslauriers Environment Canada Pollution Data Division Science and Technology Branch Projections.
THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL OUTSOURCING ON EMPLOYMENT: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM EU COUNTRIES Martin Falk and Yvonne Wolfmayr Austrian Institute of Economic.
“ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF REDUCED LOSS TRANSFORMERS: Experiences in Spain" 14 th May 2003 J.Frau Spain Session 5 – Block 1.2.
1 Dilemmas in energy consumption, international trade and employment: Analysing the impact of embodied energy in traded goods on employment China University.
© OECD/IEA 2015 Energy Efficiency Today: Mobilizing investment through Markets and Multiple Benefits Tyler Bryant International Energy Agency.
Session 2 Buildings and Measurements. Buildings Sector Accounts for About 40% of U.S. Energy, 72% of Electricity, 34% of Natural Gas, 38% of Carbon, 18%
AMOS Energy CGE Modelling Karen Turner Department of Economics and Fraser of Allander Institute University of Strathclyde ESRC Grant Ref: RES
CAFE Baseline dissemination workshop 27/09/2004 Dr. Leonidas Mantzos E3M-LAB/ICCS NTUA contact: Energy projections as input to the.
CES KULeuven The Pan EU NEEDS TIMES model: main results of scenario analysis The Pan EU NEEDS TIMES model: main results of scenario analysis SIXTH FRAMEWORK.
S T A T I S T I K A U S T R I A Energy Balances, Energy Accounts and the world beyond Wolfgang Bittermann 12th Meeting of the London City.
Policy questions to be addressed and structures of IMACLIM-CHINA Wang Yu Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy Tsinghua University 29 January 2015.
The Two-Country CGE for Malaysia and Indonesia for Energy Subsidy Removal Yanfei Li Energy Economist, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
Green Accounting. EU Policy Context Lisbon (economic and social) Gothenburg (environment) Climate change Sustainable transport Public health Resource.
THE JEVONS' PARADOX AND THE FAILURE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY POLICIES Jaume Freire González 6 th UPC International Seminar on Sustainable Technology Development.
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION BY MANUFACTURING SECTORS. THE SPANISH CASE Vicent ALCÁNTARA Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona Pablo DEL.
International Energy Workshop Venice, June Energy and CO 2 Efficiency in the European Manufacturing Sector: A Decomposition Analysis Dirk.
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
on CO2 Emission Across Industries
Asociación Española para la Economía Energética (AEEE)
Department of Economics
Gestão de Sistemas Energéticos 2015/2016
Gestão de Sistemas Energéticos 2016/2017
Fairtax Conference: “Options for an EU Tax as an EU Own Resource”
SEEA as a framework for assessing policy responses to climate change
1. Introduction Over the past decade, the tertiary industry (Service sector) has been the largest and the fastest growing sector in China The tertiary.
Frank Troch, Thierry Vanelslander, Christa Sys
Environmental input-output analysis at Statistics Netherlands
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SUPPLY
Presentation transcript:

Measuring Energy Linkages with the Hypothetical Extraction Method: An application to Spain Ana-Isabel Guerra Ana-Isabel Guerra Ferran Sancho Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Spain) (Spain)

Key points of this Analysis Goal: Stressing empirically the relevance of Energy Linkages for the effectiveness of energy efficiency policies Goal: Stressing empirically the relevance of Energy Linkages for the effectiveness of energy efficiency policies Relevant in the actual context: Energy Efficiency policies one of the main concerns of the EU Energy Policy Relevant in the actual context: Energy Efficiency policies one of the main concerns of the EU Energy Policy Methodology: within the Input-Output framework “Key sectors analysis” using the Hypothetical Extraction Method. (HEM thereafter) Methodology: within the Input-Output framework “Key sectors analysis” using the Hypothetical Extraction Method. (HEM thereafter) Novel Contribution to the existing literature: We have Generalised the HEM to measure Sectors’ “keyness” in terms of stronger Energy Linkages for Energy Efficiency policies. Novel Contribution to the existing literature: We have Generalised the HEM to measure Sectors’ “keyness” in terms of stronger Energy Linkages for Energy Efficiency policies. Data: SIOC-2004 for Spain and “Satellite” Environmental Data: SIOC-2004 for Spain and “Satellite” Environmental

I.I. Introduction: Why Energy Efficiency Policies are so relevant?  First Goal: Reduce negative externalities: Energy efficiency improvements seek reducing the link between Energy use, Economic activity and Environmental degradation. Energy efficiency improvements seek reducing the link between Energy use, Economic activity and Environmental degradation.  Derived Positive Effects: Income effects: Income effects: Efficiency improvements increase productivity and thus, favors economic growth. Efficiency improvements increase productivity and thus, favors economic growth. Trade Balance: Trade Balance: Production is less costly Increases competiveness Production is less costly Increases competiveness Less Energy inputs are needed Energy imports decreases Less Energy inputs are needed Energy imports decreases  Derived Negative Effects: Potential Energy Savings might be totally or partially lost due to the decline in the actual price of Energy (Rebound effects, Khazzoom (1980))

I.II. Introduction: What determines Energy Efficiency Policy effectiveness? Specific Characteristics of the sector receiving the energy efficiency policy inflow: Specific Characteristics of the sector receiving the energy efficiency policy inflow:  Degree of energy intensiveness: Transport, Manufacturing, Energy and Construction sectors.  However this energy intensiveness provides incomplete information for those economies in which there are markets’ interdependencies Tighter sectors’ interdependencies generate stronger economy-wide impacts and this is pertinent for economic policy effectiveness. (Hirschman, 1958) Tighter sectors’ interdependencies generate stronger economy-wide impacts and this is pertinent for economic policy effectiveness. (Hirschman, 1958) Then, Sectors’ role in the existing network of market interactions should be measured: Identification of “key sectors” Then, Sectors’ role in the existing network of market interactions should be measured: Identification of “key sectors”

I.III. Introduction: How to identify “key sectors”?  Input-output framework the most appropriate for this task: Sectors’ keyness identified using the information contained in the Leontief inverse because it reflects direct and indirect sectors’ linkages: forward and backward linkages Sectors’ keyness identified using the information contained in the Leontief inverse because it reflects direct and indirect sectors’ linkages: forward and backward linkages  Two approaches: Classical Multiplier Method: Sectors’ keyness is measured through out the effect of hypothetical positive demand shocks over output levels, i.e. output gains. Classical Multiplier Method: Sectors’ keyness is measured through out the effect of hypothetical positive demand shocks over output levels, i.e. output gains. Hypothetical Extraction Method: Sectors’ keyness is measured through out the negative effect of an hypothetical cessation of external sectors’ activities, i.e. output losses Hypothetical Extraction Method: Sectors’ keyness is measured through out the negative effect of an hypothetical cessation of external sectors’ activities, i.e. output losses

II.I. Our Approach: the HEM and energy efficiency policy effectiveness Goal (recalling): Identifying “key sectors” for a higher effectiveness in the design of energy efficiency policies. Goal (recalling): Identifying “key sectors” for a higher effectiveness in the design of energy efficiency policies. Among the two methodologies ( the Classical method and the HEM), the HEM appears to be the most appropriate tool in this case. Among the two methodologies ( the Classical method and the HEM), the HEM appears to be the most appropriate tool in this case. Why? Why? the HEM can be seen as an extreme case of energy efficiency policies, this is in fact the advantage of a linear model: “efficiency improvements are so high that energy external linkages completely disappeared”. the HEM can be seen as an extreme case of energy efficiency policies, this is in fact the advantage of a linear model: “efficiency improvements are so high that energy external linkages completely disappeared”.

II.II. Our Approach: About the HEM It is assumed that there are two blocks in the economy, E, -E. It is assumed that there are two blocks in the economy, E, -E. On Analysing the “keyness” of these blocks, A -E,E On Analysing the “keyness” of these blocks, A -E,E =A E,-E =0 Then: Then: For a constant f, compute the difference between (2) and (3), thus, evaluate changes in output levels. For a constant f, compute the difference between (2) and (3), thus, evaluate changes in output levels.

II.III. Our Approach: Data and Methodology Data: SIOC-2004 for Spain and “Satellite” Environmental Accounts Data: SIOC-2004 for Spain and “Satellite” Environmental Accounts The economy is partitioned into two large production blocks: Energy sectors and Non-Energy sectors The economy is partitioned into two large production blocks: Energy sectors and Non-Energy sectors When using the HEM two types of extractions are applied: When using the HEM two types of extractions are applied:  Sequential Extraction of Energy sectors and quantified sectors’ output losses (Energy and Non-Energy)  Sequential Extraction of Non-Energy sectors and quantified Energy sectors’ output losses

III.I. Methodology: First type of Extraction When energy sectors are sequentially extracted: When energy sectors are sequentially extracted:  Sectors’ Higher Output losses indicates higher energy efficiency sensitivity.  This information is helpful to identify the origin of the ‘perverse’ effects of energy efficiency gains: - Channels trough out the decline of the effective price of energy is transmitted generating “Rebound Effects” - Channels trough out the decline of the effective price of energy is transmitted generating “Rebound Effects” -Higher sensitivity in terms of quantities can be interpreted as a higher sensitivity in terms of energy input costs. However depending on elasticity of substitution values. -Higher sensitivity in terms of quantities can be interpreted as a higher sensitivity in terms of energy input costs. However depending on elasticity of substitution values.

III.II. Methodology: Second type of Extraction When Non-Energy sectors are sequentially extracted: When Non-Energy sectors are sequentially extracted:  Higher Output losses in Energy Sectors indicates a larger amount of energy inputs to fulfill they external market relationships (direct and indirect).  This measure turns out to be a more complete approximation to sectors’ energy intensity than the conventional energy input-output ratio.  Input-output ratio only controls for the direct energy input requirements

IV.I. Results: First type of Extraction Table I. Relative Output Losses for all sectors under the Hypothetical Extraction of Energy Sectors. Spanish I/O Data Production Units 2. Extraction of Anthracite, Coal, Lignite and Peat 3. Extraction of Crude and Natural Gas 5. Coke, Refinery and Nuclear fuel; 6. Production and distribution of electricity 7. Production and distribution of Gas 1.Primary Sector 0,01580,0070,1020,2630, Extraction of Anthracite, Coal, Lignite and Peat 98,592 0,0311,056 84,6610, Extraction of Crude, Natural Gas, Uranium and Thorium 0,16299,69776,77214,46819,74 4. Other Extractive Industries 0,0700,01420,3570,6260, Coke, Refinery and Nuclear fuels 0,1730,039855,27410,4250, Production and Distribution of Electricity 0,3710,0331,01371,9020, Production and Distribution of Gas 0,1340,0890,78230,26173,881

IV.I. Results: First type of Extraction Table II. Percentage Emission Losses by Air Pollutant under the Hypothetical Extraction of Energy Sectors. Spanish I/O Data Air Pollutant 2. Extraction of Anthracite, Coal, Lignite and Peat 3. Extraction of Crude & Natural Gas 5. Coke, Refinery & Nuclear fuel 6. Production and distribution of Electricity 7. Production and distribution of Gas SOx 0,6240,1626,24345,48110,047 NOx 0,3000,0863,09417,4695,261 NMVOC 0,0360,0160,587 0,9721,364 CH 4 2,7760,0490,4053,6520,360 CO 0,0940,0251,8833,0334,043 NH 3 0,0180,0070,1610,2740,133 CO 2 0,4630,1334,880 23,8986,850 SF 6 0,0500,0210,2620,7405,700 NO 2 0,0590,0170,5401,9120,804 PM10 1,0560,0552,539 10,8563,786 PFC 0,1570,0140,3260,9065,400 HFC 0,0960,0180,4420,4543,000 OVERALL REDUCTION IN EMISSION LEVELS OF AIR POLLUTANTS 0,4720,1304,79723,5516,753

IV.II. Results: Second type of Extraction Table III. Relative output losses of Energy Sectors under the Hypothetical Extraction of Non-Energy Sectors. Spanish I/O Data Production Units Energy Intensity Measures 2. Extraction of Anthracite, Coal, Lignite and Peat 3. Extraction of Crude & Natural Gas 5. Coke, Refinery &Nuclear fuel 6. Production and distribution of Electricity 7. Production and distribution of Gas Average impact Energy Sectors 10. Other Industrial Sectors & Recycling HEM 7,6592,3961,8404,3354,6034,166 I/O Ratio 0,0010,0000,0440,1761, Chemistry Industry, Rubber and Plastic Industry HEM 3,92010,9412,0725,3207,7017,990 I/O Ratio 0,0170,0160,5163,5061, Manufacturing Industries HEM 5,41013,15110,85922,02722,48214,785 I/O Ratio 0,0530,0020,8360,2391, Construction HEM 28,0266,9456,1248,5517,66311,461 I/O Ratio 0,0100,0370,5890,2030, Commercial & Transport Activities HEM 10,19521,39521,70317,26714,70917,053 I/O Ratio 0,0020,1350,0402,4281,462

IV.II. Results: Second type of Extraction Table IV. Percentage Emission Losses by Air Pollutant under the Hypothetical Extraction of Non-Energy Sectors. Spanish I/O Data Non-Energy Sector s Overall % reductions in emissions levels % Explained by Energy Sectors % Explained by Non- Energy Sectors 1. Primary Sector 5,4821,554, Other Extractive Industries 2,2850,3941, Water Sector 0,4530,1920, Food Beverage, Tobacco, Textile and Leather Products 9,3393,3715, Other Industrial Sectors & Recycling 5,0361,6573, Chemistry Industry, Rubber and Plastic Industry 5,6072,9162, Manufacturing Industries 20,5818,50912, Construction 10,0383,3836, Commercial & Transport Activities 15,4097,4887, Market Services 13,1246,8746, Market R & D 0,3600,2110, Not Market Servicies & Public administration 8,5775,3683,208

Conclusions: This analysis has performed a double simulation exercise using an adaptation of the HEM applied to energy and non-energy blocks with Spanish data: This analysis has performed a double simulation exercise using an adaptation of the HEM applied to energy and non-energy blocks with Spanish data: First type of extraction: Production and Distribution of Electricity turns to be a “key sector” for energy efficiency policies and for the possible “Rebound effects”. First type of extraction: Production and Distribution of Electricity turns to be a “key sector” for energy efficiency policies and for the possible “Rebound effects”. Second type of extraction: Should the indirect consumption of energy be controlled for, Commercial and Transport activities together with the Manufacturing industries turn out to be the more energy intensive. Second type of extraction: Should the indirect consumption of energy be controlled for, Commercial and Transport activities together with the Manufacturing industries turn out to be the more energy intensive. This novel reformulation of the HEM provides useful information for maximising economy-wide impacts of energy efficiency policies is concerned. This novel reformulation of the HEM provides useful information for maximising economy-wide impacts of energy efficiency policies is concerned.

Thanks for your attention